‘Utterly ridiculous': Liberal Senator Jacinta Price rejects comparison between One Nation and Greens preferences
The Albanese government has come under fire this week for preferencing the Greens in almost all its lower house seats.
However. news One Nation made a last-minute change to its how to vote cards in order to preference the Coalition in at least ten marginal seats provided Labor with the opportunity to equate the preference deals.
Speaking to Sky News Australia's Chris Kenny, Senator Price said the comparison was 'utterly ridiculous'.
'The Greens are absolute radicals. One Nation aren't radical like the Greens,' the Northern Territory Senator said.
'I mean, the antisemitism that we have seen increase in our country and the division that we've seen increase in our country is ridiculous.
'The Greens are a very dangerous party who are anti-Australian, let's face it. One nation is not anti-Australian.'
To back up her argument, the shadow Indigenous Australians minister pointed to the fact Pauline Hanson's party had supported the Coalition's push to audit the billions spent on Indigenous programs and their calls for a Royal Commission into sexual abuse in Indigenous communities.
In comparison, she described the Greens' approach to Indigenous policy as 'completely out of touch'.
'It's the reason why Lydia Thorpe left the Greens, because she understood the fact that they weren't interested in listening to Indigenous voices. They have their own agenda - I mean, it's quite infantilising,' Senator Price said.
'The Greens that we have in the Territory who talk a big talk about treaty and culture and all those things, but they are aligned with outfits like the Environmental Defenders Office, who exploit Aboriginal people and make up fake Indigenous dreaming stories for their own agendas – to block projects.
'This is what the Greens are all about, thinking that they know what's best for Aboriginal people when they're completely out of touch."
Senator Price also claimed a former Greens staffer, now working for an organisation combatting gender-based violence, had been gaslighting Indigenous women by attempting to deny a link between traditional culture and violence against women.
'It was a former Greens staffer, who now works for Our Watch, who tells journalists how to report on domestic violence and Indigenous Affairs and tries to gaslight us to suggest that violence is not part of traditional culture,' she said.
'We've got traditional cultural payback going on in places like the Northern Territory and those of us who've had the lived experience know that violence is accepted in traditional culture.
"So the Greens are dangerous. They're interested in their agenda – which is a radical agenda.
'They're not interested in supporting Indigenous Australians to get off welfare dependency and (become) economically independent and stand on their own two feet.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Perth Now
an hour ago
- Perth Now
Kids blocked from YouTube as social media ban expands
Australian children will be barred from accessing YouTube after the government confirmed the video-sharing website will fall under its social media ban. The website was initially spared from the ban for under-16s as part of an exemption for health and education services. But advice from eSafety commissioner Julie Inman Grant has encouraged the government to change its tune. YouTube will join other platforms such as Snapchat, Facebook, Instagram and TikTok which were included under the ban when legislation passed parliament in late 2024. Anthony Albanese maintained barring children from such platforms would prevent social harms when the ban comes into effect in December. "There is no doubt that Australian kids are being negatively impacted by online platforms so I'm calling time on it," the prime minister said. "Social media is doing social harm to our children, and I want Australian parents to know that we have their backs." The video-sharing platform's inclusion has been foreshadowed since the online safety watchdog in June cited research that found children were exposed to harmful content on YouTube more than any other platform. YouTube's parent company Google has threatened to sue the federal government on the grounds the ban restricts the implied constitutional freedom of political communication. But Ms Inman Grant in June said the new proposal would only prevent those under 16 from having an account, not from accessing content. Educators can continue to use school-approved educational YouTube content through their own accounts. Under the legislation, age-restricted social media platforms will face fines of up to $49.5 million if they fail to prevent people younger than 16 from creating accounts. The move was celebrated by the government and coalition but there are reservations about whether it will work and the impact it could have on marginalised children, particularly those in rural or regional Australia who use the internet to seek community. Preliminary findings released by a federal government-commissioned trial in June found there was no guarantee technologies aimed at blocking young kids from social media would always work. While there were a plethora of approaches that would work in different ways, the age assurance technology trial's early findings revealed there was no single, ubiquitous answer that would fit every use case. Communications Minister Anika Wells acknowledged there was no "one perfect solution" but said the rules would still offer kids reprieve from the "persuasive and pervasive" pull of social media. The age assurance technology trial's final report will be published later in 2025.

ABC News
6 hours ago
- ABC News
YouTube to be included in social media ban for under 16s after exemption reversed
Children and teenagers will be barred from logging in to YouTube under the incoming social media ban for under 16s after the government reversed its plan to grant the video sharing site an exemption. Rules of how the ban will operate are set to be presented to parliament on Wednesday, including details of the types of platforms that will not be captured, such as those primarily concerned with gaming, messaging, health and education. It comes days after Google, the parent company of YouTube, threatened legal action if the government scrapped its previously flagged exemption on the basis of the platform's educational uses. Over the weekend, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said a decision on whether YouTube would be included was yet to be made — despite the draft rules naming the platform as exempt — and that the government would not be influenced by threats from social media companies. "Our government is making it clear — we stand on the side of families," Mr Albanese said in a statement on Tuesday. "Social media has a social responsibility and there is no doubt that Australian kids are being negatively impacted by online platforms, so I'm calling time on it." YouTube differs from other popular social media sites in that it doesn't require users to have an account to access most features and young people will still be able to use the site in a logged-out state after the world-leading laws come into force in December. But including YouTube in the list of social media platforms covered by the ban — which already includes apps like TikTok and Instagram — means under 16s won't be able to access age-restricted content on the video-sharing site. Former communications minister Michelle Rowland initially flagged that YouTube was likely to be exempt from the laws in November last year. But the proposed carve out was thrown into question last month when eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant — who is tasked with implementing the laws — wrote to new Communications Minister Anika Wells formally recommending it be scrapped. She cited eSafety research that found young people used YouTube more than any other social media platform and it was where they were most likely to experience harm online. "When we asked where they were experiencing harm and the kinds of harms they were experiencing, the most prevalent place where young Australians experienced harm was on YouTube — almost 37 per cent," Dr Inman Grant said. "This ranges from misogynistic content to hateful material, to violent fighting videos, online challenges, disordered eating, suicidal ideation." She also argued that YouTube had the characteristics of a platform that should fall under the ban and cautioned against naming specific platforms for carve outs. The platform's competitors had separately campaigned against its exclusion, accusing the government of making a "sweetheart deal" in private submissions. YouTube has previously argued that it is a video streaming platform, rather than a social media site, and therefore should not be captured by the ban, citing evidence that it is widely used in classrooms and by parents. Under the new laws, which are due to come into force on December 10, social media companies will face fines of up to almost $50 million for failing to take "reasonable steps" to bar under 16s from their platforms. "There is no one perfect solution when it comes to keeping young Australians safer online — but the social media minimum age will make a significantly positive difference to their wellbeing," Communications Minister Anika Wells said in a statement. "There's a place for social media, but there's not a place for predatory algorithms targeting children."

Sydney Morning Herald
6 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
YouTube Kids to escape social media ban for children under 16
YouTube Kids will escape the federal government's teen social media ban that could serve as a model for other sites to keep offering their products, and ads, to children under the age of 16. The main YouTube platform will join Instagram, Facebook, TikTok, X and Snapchat in being caught by the ban, which is set to come into effect on December 10, after the government backflipped on its earlier plan to exclude Google's video streaming site. The government is expected to table rules in parliament on Wednesday to set which online services will be captured by the laws that were enacted with bipartisan support last year in an effort to protect children from online bullying and body image issues. Sites that are primarily intended for education, messaging, health or online gaming will be exempt. YouTube's inclusion in the ban sets the government up for a possible fight after the platform's owner, Google, sent a letter to Communications Minister Anika Wells threatening to sue if it was not given an exemption. Loading Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said restricting YouTube from use by children under 16 meant his government stood on the side of Australian families. 'Social media has a social responsibility and there is no doubt that Australian kids are being negatively impacted by online platforms, so I'm calling time on it,' he said in a statement. 'Social media is doing social harm to our children, and I want Australian parents to know that we have their backs.'