logo
Why the US opened its doors to Chinese students, and why Trump is closing them

Why the US opened its doors to Chinese students, and why Trump is closing them

Boston Globe31-05-2025
That era of academic exchange between China and the United States, beginning in the 1970s under President Carter as a form of soft power diplomacy, now stands in sharp contrast to the Trump administration's recent stance toward the country.
The administration announced this week that it would
Get Starting Point
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
Those policies promise to reduce the number of students from China coming to the United States, who have been a fixture on American university campuses for decades. In 2024, there were roughly 277,000 students.
Advertisement
The Trump administration says China exploits US universities to bolster its military and technological capabilities. And Trump officials argue that some Chinese students may pose risks of espionage and technology theft.
'We are using every tool at our disposal to know who wants to enter this country and whether they should be allowed in,' Tammy Bruce, a State Department spokesperson, said. 'Every visa adjudication is a national security decision.'
Advertisement
To Shue, 64, now president of United Chinese Americans, a Washington D.C.-based civic group, the policy change stirs profound disappointment. His journey to the United States in the late 1980s was emblematic of a period of increasing friendliness between the two superpowers.
Shue recalled the generosity of Americans. David Scott, a wealthy businessperson with ties to the Reagan administration, funded his education through a foundation. That period, Shue remembered, was characterized by the bipartisan embrace of Chinese students, culminating in the Chinese Student Protection Act of 1992, which granted legal residency to thousands of Chinese students in the wake of the Tiananmen Square massacre.
'It was overwhelming support and care and concern,' said Shue, who helped push for the legislation and has long advocated easing China's authoritarian rule and increased freedom within the country.
Shue expressed dismay at the Trump administration's actions, viewing them as a betrayal of the image of the United States as a 'beacon for humanity.'
Related
:
The history of Chinese students in America is long and complex, dating back to the 1850s, when Yung Wing of Yale College became the first Chinese student to graduate from an American university. As Robert Kapp, a retired historian of China and former president of the US-China Business Council, explained, early students sought Western knowledge to modernize China.
The normalization of US-China relations in the 1970s under President Nixon and China's premier, Zhou Enlai, ushered in a new era of academic exchange. Later, China agreed to send thousands of students to the United States, a number that later swelled to hundreds of thousands annually.
Advertisement
For China, it was a crucial step in the country's modernization. For the United States, welcoming China's students was a form of soft power.
The 1980s and 1990s witnessed a surge of talented Chinese students, many of whom have made significant contributions to American academia, business, science, and technology. And the makeup of the Chinese student population at American universities shifted as well, from primarily graduate students in the 1980s to a growing number of undergraduates today.
'Opening up education was important for establishing ties, for building bridges,' said professor David Bachman, an international relations specialist at the University of Washington.
But now, he said, 'I can imagine that there'll be very few Chinese students here in 10 years,' he said.
And vice versa. As geopolitical tension between the United States and China ramped up during the COVID pandemic, the number of American scholars studying in China fell to fewer than 1,000 in 2024 from about 11,000 in 2019, said Rosie Levine, executive director of the US-China Education Trust.
President Trump's latest move, Levine said, may lead Beijing to retaliate, too, further limiting the number of American students in China — and with it, she said, the United States' overall understanding of a critical global power.
While acknowledging the need to address security threats, she said that US policies need nuance.
'These policies are so broad,' she said, 'that they don't give US officers the ability to effectively distinguish between individuals who pose security risks and those who are just genuinely seeking educational opportunities.'
Related
:
Levine said she believed that the administration's focus on ties to the Chinese Communist Party also raised questions about the new vetting procedures.
Advertisement
'There's 99 million CCP members in China,' she said. 'Working for the Communist Party or being a member of the Communist Party is a really poor determinant of someone's intentions.'
For Shue, the moment is personal. After the Trump administration's announcement, he found himself unable to sleep, mulling the contrast between the United States of four decades ago and the nation he lives in today.
'It's something I can barely wrap my head around,' he continued. 'How did we deteriorate to this point where foreign students, especially those from China, are viewed as a potential liability rather than assets?'
This article originally appeared in
.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Off-duty border agent shot in a Manhattan park in apparent botched robbery, police say
Off-duty border agent shot in a Manhattan park in apparent botched robbery, police say

Los Angeles Times

time22 minutes ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Off-duty border agent shot in a Manhattan park in apparent botched robbery, police say

NEW YORK — An off-duty U.S. Customs and Border Protection officer was shot in a Manhattan park after an apparent robbery gone wrong, New York City police and federal officials said Sunday. The 42-year-old officer was in stable condition after the Saturday attack and is expected to survive. A spokesperson for the New York Police Department said there was no indication the shooting was politically motivated. The agent, who was not in uniform, was sitting in a park beneath the George Washington Bridge when he was approached by a man riding on the back of a moped, who shot him in the face and arm, police said. The off-duty officer returned fire as the moped sped off. No arrests had been made as of Sunday afternoon, according to a police spokesperson. The Department of Homeland Security shared video online of the two men on a moped, alleging the shooter was caught entering the country illegally in 2023 but released. The NYPD spokesperson said they had no information about the source of that claim. In a social media post Sunday afternoon, President Trump seized on the shooting, alleging it was evidence of Democrats' failures to secure the border. 'The CBP Officer bravely fought off his attacker, despite his wounds, demonstrating enormous Skill and Courage,' he wrote. The shooting comes as federal officials say there has been a surge of attacks on agents carrying out Trump's mass deportation agenda. Enforcement officers involved in the crackdown often cover their faces, which critics say spreads fear and panic across communities and imperils citizens as well as immigrants without legal status. The Trump administration defends masking, which it says is needed to avoid harassment of agents in public and online. On Sunday, the acting director of U.S. Immigrations and Customs Enforcement, Todd Lyons, said he would allow agents to continue covering their faces, which he called a safety measure 'If that's a tool that the men and women of ICE that keeps themselves and their families safe, then I will allow it,' he said.

Trump says Washington football and Cleveland baseball teams should change names back
Trump says Washington football and Cleveland baseball teams should change names back

Los Angeles Times

time22 minutes ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Trump says Washington football and Cleveland baseball teams should change names back

CLEVELAND — President Trump wants Washington's NFL franchise and Cleveland's Major League Baseball team to revert to their former names, which where changed in recent years because many considered them racist. Trump said Sunday on his social media site that 'The Washington 'Whatever's' should IMMEDIATELY change their name back to the Washington Redskins Football Team. There is a big clamoring for this. Likewise, the Cleveland Indians, one of the six original baseball teams, with a storied past. Our great Indian people, in massive numbers, want this to happen. Their heritage and prestige is systematically being taken away from them. Times are different now than they were three or four years ago. We are a Country of passion and common sense. OWNERS, GET IT DONE!!!' Josh Harris, whose group bought the NFL's Washington Commanders from former owner Dan Snyder in 2023, said this year the name was here to stay. Not long after taking over, Harris quieted speculation about going back to Redskins, saying that would not happen. Cleveland Guardians president of baseball operations Chris Antonetti indicated before Sunday's game against the Athletics that there weren't any plans to revisit the name change. 'We understand there are different perspectives on the decision we made a few years ago, but obviously it's a decision we made. We've got the opportunity to build a brand as the Guardians over the last four years and are excited about the future that's in front of us,' he said. Both teams have had their current names since the 2022 seasons. Washington dropped Redskins after the 2019 season and was known as the Washington Football Team for two years before adopting Commanders. Cleveland announced in December 2020 it would drop Indians. It announced the switch to Guardians in July 2021. In 2018, the team phased out 'Chief Wahoo' as its primary logo. The name changes had their share of supporters and critics as part of national discussions about institutions and teams to drop logos and names considered racist. The Guardians are the fifth name for Cleveland's baseball franchise. It joined the American League in 1901 as one of the eight charter franchises as the Blues. It switched to the Bronchos a year later and used the Naps from 1903 through 1914 before moving to the Indians in 1915. Washington started in Boston as the Redskins in 1933 before moving to the nation's capital four years later. Washington and Cleveland share another thing in common. David Blitzer is a member of Harris' ownership group with the Commanders and holds a minority stake in the Guardians. Reedy writes for the Associated Press.

Commerce chief Lutnick insists Aug. 1 is ‘hard deadline' for EU and tariffs: ‘They're going to start paying'
Commerce chief Lutnick insists Aug. 1 is ‘hard deadline' for EU and tariffs: ‘They're going to start paying'

New York Post

time22 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Commerce chief Lutnick insists Aug. 1 is ‘hard deadline' for EU and tariffs: ‘They're going to start paying'

Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick was adamant Sunday that the Aug. 1 date President Trump gave Europe to negotiate new trade arrangements is a 'hard deadline.'' 'So on Aug. 1, the new tariff rates will come in. But nothing stops countries from talking to us after Aug. 1, but they're going to start paying the tariffs on Aug. 1,' Lutnick told CBS News' 'Face the Nation' when asked the European Union, whose representatives he was on the phone with before the interview. 'That's a hard deadline,' the Trump official said. Advertisement The president has shifted his deadline several times. On April 2, 'Liberation Day,' he debuted his customized rates, which were supposed to go into effect April 9. They it got pushed 90 days and then to Aug. 1. Trump has threatened to slap a 30% tariff rate against the EU and a flurry of customized tariff rates on other countries that fail to cut a new deal with him. Those tariffs come on top of the 10% baseline tax against virtually all countries. 3 President Trump moved his tariff deadline several times, but Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick stressed Aug. 1 is now a firm cut-off. AFP via Getty Images Advertisement 3 Trump has made recalibrating US trade policy a top priority of his second term. AP Despite the fast-approaching deadline, Lutnick conveyed confidence that the US and EU will come to some sort of arrangement. 'There's plenty of room. Look, the president and the European Union, these are the two biggest trading partners in the world talking to each other. We'll get a deal done. I am confident we'll get a deal done,' the commerce secretary said. 'You are going to see the best set of trade deals you've ever seen for America and for the American people.' Advertisement Lutnick also stressed that the 10% baseline tariff rate is 'definitely going to stay' amid negotiations. So far, the Trump administration has announced tariff deals with the United Kingdom and Vietnam as well as a tariff truce with China, which Trump claims is subject to a 55% rate. 'The next two weeks are going to be weeks for the record books. President Trump is going to deliver for the American people,' he said. In addition to the baseline tariffs and levies on imports from China, the Trump administration has imposed 25% tariffs on automobiles, aluminum, steel and imports from Canada and Mexico that don't comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement. Advertisement 3 Lutnick urged US trading partners to finish negotiating deals with the Trump administration by the deadline. REUTERS Trump has threatened to raise that to 35% against Canada and 30% for Mexico. This month, he has been blasting out letters to smaller US trading partners urging them to get a deal done or face the 'Liberation Day' tariffs. But Lutnick indicated that many of the smaller countries may simply face the 10% baseline rate while the Trump administration focuses on retooling trade with larger nations. 'I think what you've got is you should assume that the small countries, you know, the Latin American countries, the Caribbean countries, many countries in Africa, they will have a baseline tariff of 10%,' Lutnick said. 'Then the bigger economies will either open themselves up or they'll pay a fair tariff to America for not opening themselves up and [for] treating America unfairly.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store