Costa Rica is no longer a safe haven for Nicaraguan exiles
Alongside the globe's more horrific despotisms – China, Russia, Cambodia, Equatorial Guinea, Turkmenistan and Zimbabwe, plus the military potentates in Myanmar, Mali, Niger and Burkina Faso – Nicaragua often escapes notice. But a killing last month in neighbouring Costa Rica of a prominent Nicaraguan dissident reminds us that the husband/wife team ruling Nicaragua harshly pursues its critics relentlessly – everywhere.
Roberto Samcam Ruíz, a former Nicaraguan army major, had been a loyal member of the Sandinista political party before breaking with its cruel married rulers – President Daniel Ortega, 79, and Vice-President Rosario Murillo, 74. His assassination in his home in San José, Costa Rica's capital, is believed by human-rights advocates to be one of many hits orchestrated by the Nicaraguan government in Costa Rica. He was at least the sixth Sandinista dissident shot or abducted since 2018.
Since 2007, when Mr. Ortega returned to office after a 17-year absence, the ruling couple have manipulated elections, destroyed judicial independence and made the legislature bow to their authoritarian will.
The Sandinistas, including leader Mr. Ortega, overthrew the previous heavy-handed regime, which was controlled by the kleptocratic Somoza family. The Somozas largely ruled with backing from Washington. They accumulated huge sums of cash – 33 per cent of the nation's GDP – while the country remained poor and largely dependent on banana exports to North America. The Sandinistas, on the other hand, were backed by the Soviet Union and Cuba.
Hundreds of thousands of Nicaraguans fled their country in 2018 and 2019, after Mr. Ortega's regime cracked down on spontaneous protesters. They had repeatedly taken to the streets of Managua in anger at the way Mr. Ortega and Ms. Murillo were betraying the goals of the revolution against the Somozas.
Mr. Ortega responded in a draconian manner: He accused opponents of plotting a coup, jailed hundreds, compelled thousands to flee across nearby borders, confiscated the properties of those who left, and cancelled their Nicaraguan citizenship.
The President and his wife have gained control of every aspect of Nicaragua's government, including the National Assembly, the Supreme Court, the armed forces, the judiciary, the police and the prosecutor's office. Many Ortega adult children have been given franchises in such lucrative enterprises as national television and the sale of gasoline. The Somozas were corrupt; the current leadership duo and their kin are greater kleptocrats, fleecing what is left of one of the poorest nations in the Western Hemisphere.
After the 2018 protests, the Ortega government went on the offensive after changing the social-security system and cutting benefits and increasing contributions, which had caused citizens to erupt. They occupied college campuses and set up roadblocks. Government buildings were set ablaze, cars burned, and protesters and police fought pitched battles.
As a result, hundreds were charged as terrorists, a popular television station closed, and international human-rights observers expelled. Nicaraguan police killed 322 civilians and wounded 1,400. More than 60,000 regime opponents fled to Costa Rica and Honduras.
Nicaragua's intelligence service is tracking opponents. The death of Mr. Samcam is likely but another desperate response by leaders who are reviled by most Nicaraguans.
Costa Rica is no longer, given Mr. Samcam's killing, anything like a safe haven for outspoken critics of the regime. And other nearby countries are even more dangerous. Nor, given Donald Trump's immigration policies, can Nicaraguan freedom fighters find refuge in the United States.
Costa Rica trades extensively with Nicaragua. Its President has been slow to tie Mr. Samcam's murder to the Ortega government. That's in contrast to Washington's actions in Mr. Trump's first term, when his government responded to crackdowns on protesters with surprising strength. Mr. Trump signed the Nicaraguan Investment Conditionality Act, aimed at crippling Nicaragua economically by ceasing lending by international development banks.
Although Costa Rica is still Central America's least corrupt and best governed state, and tourism and tourists are not being targeted so far either by Nicaragua or by Colombian drug smugglers (who are establishing their cocaine trafficking trails in southwestern Costa Rica and in and near San José), Costa Rica is more at risk from actions to its north and south than ever before.
Washington needs to help the Organization of American States (OAS) do more to curtail the Ortega/Murillo regime or sponsor a campaign leading to regime change.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
18 hours ago
- CTV News
N.S. given mixed review on overhaul of housing for people with disabilities
Vicky Levack, a spokeswoman for the Disability Rights Coalition who lives with cerebral palsy, poses outside her apartment building in Halifax on Thursday, July 31, 2025. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Darren Calabrese An independent monitor says Nova Scotia is making gradual progress in some aspects of its five-year plan to move people with disabilities out of institutions and off wait-lists for community housing. However, Michael Prince also notes in his second annual report that the government is 'heading in the wrong direction' on other portions of its response to a legally binding human rights decision. In his conclusion to the 55-page report, Prince wrote the province is 'gaining traction,' and moving toward meeting the program's 2028 deadlines on 24 out of the 90 legally required steps, but added it is 'not yet advancing consistently and comprehensively toward the outcomes.' The province's five-year plan is the result of a 2021 Appeal Court decision that identified systemic discrimination against people with disabilities seeking housing and supports in the community. A human rights board of inquiry subsequently provided the list of reforms required to address the province's shortcomings. Prince, a professor of social policy at the University of Victoria, was appointed in 2023 to provide annual reports on the province's progress. Under the provincial plan, 400 people are expected to be moved into new housing and care programs in the communities of their choice by 2028, when all of the institutions would be closed. Last year, Prince's report found the province made only 'slight progress' — defined as 'minimal' and 'marginal in result' — on almost half of the 90 legally required steps to improve housing and support of people with disabilities. The latest report says the number of people living in institutions dropped by 189 — about three-quarters of the original plan's goal for this year. In addition, the number of people on a wait list to receive some form of service from the disability supports program has fallen by 293, exceeding the target for this year. In 2022, the list had about 1,800 people on it. However, Prince also notes that in some areas the figures are going in the opposite direction. One example is a program called 'homeshare' — where community members share their home and provide support to individuals with disabilities who choose to live with them. The monitor called this 'a case of inaction,' in that none of the planned 240 homeshare places planned for by now are yet in place. Prince said in his report this poses a risk to the successful transition of about 400 residents" in large facilities to community housing. In addition, the number of people with disabilities who are under 65 still living in nursing homes rose, and there was a sharp increase in people placed in emergency, temporary housing arrangements. 'The increase amounted to 52 more young people admitted to long-term care facilities or 12 per cent growth. It is hard to square these results with the province's assessment of this requirement as complete. This appears to be unnecessary institutionalization, imposing disadvantages on the individuals concerned,' wrote Prince. Prince also noted that only about a third of new staff — 26 of the 65 expected by Year 2 — slated to provide 'intensive' support to help people move were in place. In addition, only about half of the 50 staff slated to provide support in communities by Year 2 were in place. However, the monitor saw improvements in this area from the last year, and noted that by the spring of 2026, the province anticipates a 'targeted recruitment campaign,' over this summer will yield results. The province has pointed to labour shortages in the health care sector as being among the key reasons for the delays in hiring. The annual report emphasized the need for the province to heighten a focus on co-operation among various departments and programs to provide support for people moving from facilities into community. That co-operation will be key in setting up mental health support programs in the community, along with rapid response teams for issues that may arise for people who are living in new forms of housing, says the report. Prince wrote that he believes the premier's office and key cabinet ministers should be more involved in ensuring that various, multidisciplinary support teams start being set up. 'Making the remedy a major policy priority requires sustained strategic involvement by key cabinet minister and the premier's office,' he wrote. This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 1, 2025. Michael Tutton, The Canadian Press
CTV News
18 hours ago
- CTV News
El Salvador opens path for Bukele to stay in power indefinitely. Why critics aren't surprised
SAN SALVADOR, El Salvador — El Salvador's Legislative Assembly pushed through a constitutional reform overnight eliminating presidential term limits, fueling concerns Friday that it paves the way for President Nayib Bukele to indefinitely stay in power. Watchdogs and critics of the self-described 'world's coolest dictator' said they've seen this coming for years, watching Bukele's administration slowly chip away at democratic institutions, attack opponents and consolidate power in the president's hands. Bukele, who regularly posts streams of tongue-in-cheek remarks on social media, remained notably silent Friday. His government didn't respond to multiple requests for comment. 'It's not surprising. But that doesn't mean it's not severe,' said Claudia Ortiz, one of the country's few remaining opposition lawmakers. 'The implication of this is more concentration of power, more risk of abuse of the rights of Salvadorans ... and the complete dismantling of all democratic checks and balances.' Here's what happened overnight in El Salvador On Thursday night, Bukele's New Ideas party and its allies approved changes to El Salvador's constitution, which were jammed through Congress by the party's supermajority. The changes will: 1. Allow for indefinite presidential reelection, wiping out an existing ban on reelection that Bukele dodged last year when he sought reelection. 2. Extend presidential terms to six years from five. 3. Eliminate the second round of elections, where the two top vote-getters from the first round face off. The vote passed with 57 in favour and three opposed. Damian Merlo, a U.S. lobbyist and consultant hired by Bukele's administration, defended the changes, noting that many European countries don't have term limits, and said the move only gives Bukele the option of reelection, not an automatic extension of his mandate. 'It's up to the people to decide who the leader will be,' Merlo said. 'It's been made very clear by the electorate they are very happy with the president and his political party — and this move represents the will of the people of El Salvador.' Why watchdogs aren't surprised Ortiz, the opposition congresswoman, called the defense 'absurd,' and said that Merlo was citing countries — Germany and France — with democratic systems of government answering to the countries' parliaments. In El Salvador, power is now entirely concentrated in the hands of Bukele, she said. Bukele, 44, was first elected president in 2019 after founding the New Ideas party, casting aside the country's traditional parties thoroughly discredited by corruption and lack of results. Bukele's highly controlled messaging of beating back the country's gangs and rooting out corruption have gained traction in El Salvador, especially as homicide rates have sharply dropped. But critics say many of the moves he has justified as tackling corruption and violence have actually whittled away at the country's democracy. Over the years, his attacks on opponents and critics have gradually escalated. In recent months, things have come to a head as Bukele has grown emboldened by his new alliance with U.S. President Donald Trump. A number of high profile arrests and a slew of other actions have forced more than 100 members of civil society — lawyers, activists and journalists — to flee their country as political exiles in the span of months. A look back at some of the actions he's taken: 2020: Bukele showed up to the country's Legislative Assembly with armed soldiers to pressure lawmakers to approve one of his proposals. 2021: a newly elected legislature controlled by his party purged the country's courts, including the Supreme Court. The lawmakers stacked the courts with loyalists. 2022: Bukele announced a 'state of emergency' to beat back El Salvador's gangs. The move suspended some constitutional rights, and has allowed the government to arrest 86,000 Salvadorans — more than one per cent of the country's population — with little evidence. Detainees held in prisons have little access to due process. The government also passed an elections redistricting law that critics said would stack elections in favor of Bukele's party, which was already very popular. 2023: Bukele opened a mega-prison for gangs, known as the Terrorism Confinement Center (CECOT), where Venezuelan deportees from the U.S. were detained for months this year. The prison has been the source of accusations of mass human rights abuses. 2024: Bukele sought reelection, despite El Salvador's constitution clearly blocking consecutive presidential terms. In an interview with The Associated Press, the country's vice president denied last year that El Salvador had become a police state and refused to answer questions about whether he and Bukele would seek a third term. Following his landslide victory, Bukele railed against critics and press. Intensifying his crackdown in 2025 This year, watchdogs have warned that Bukele has ramped up his crackdown on dissent, emboldened by his new alliance with Trump. What critics saying: In May, police violently repressed a peaceful protest near Bukele's house asking the president for help in stopping the eviction of their rural community. Shortly after, the government announced it was passing a 'foreign agents' law, similar to those used by governments in Russia, Venezuela, Nicaragua and Belarus to silence dissent by exerting pressure on organizations that rely on overseas funding. Police have arrested a number of high profile critics. Among them was Ruth López, an anti-corruption lawyer for a top human rights organization. At a court appearance in June, a shackled López escorted by police shouted: 'They're not going to silence me, I want a public trial. ... I'm a political prisoner.' The government also arrested prominent constitutional lawyer Enrique Anaya after he called Bukele a 'dictator' and a 'despot' on live TV. In July, López's organization Cristosal announced it was evacuating all staff from El Salvador in the face of intensifying repression. It comes amid a flight of critics and other civil society leaders. The recent constitutional reform has fueled a new wave of criticism by civil society in the Central American nation, with leaders saying that Bukele's government has finally done away with one of its last democratic norms. Roxana Cardona, a lawyer and spokeswoman for the Movement of Social Justice and Citizen Control, said 'a democratic state has been transformed into an autocracy.' Cardona was among those to provide legal representation for Venezuelans detained in El Salvador and other Salvadoran youth accused of being gang members. 'Today, democracy has died. A technocracy has been born. Today, we live in a dictatorship,' she said. Others, like human rights lawyer Jayme Magaña, said the idea of alternating power, crucial in a country that still has decades of civil war and dictatorships of the past simmering in its recent memory, has been broken. Magaña said she worried for the future. 'The more changes are made to the system of government, the more we see the state's repression of the Salvadoran population intensifying,' she said. —— Janetsky reported from Mexico City. Megan Janetsky And Marcos Alemán, The Associated Press
CTV News
19 hours ago
- CTV News
Family fears for elderly UK couple held by Taliban
The family of elderly British couple Peter and Barbie Reynolds, detained for six months without charge in Afghanistan, fears the worst as their health declines. 'I don't know if they're still alive,' said their son, Jonathan Reynolds, who has not spoken to his parents since their last phone call on June 15. 'How would I know if they were no longer alive? Who's going to call me? The Taliban's never called me. Who's going to call? I don't know,' asked Reynolds, one of the couple's four children. Peter Reynolds, 80, and his 76-year-old wife were arrested in February along with Chinese-American friend, Faye Hall, who was released in March, and an Afghan translator. The couple were married in Kabul in 1970, and have spent almost two decades living in Afghanistan running educational programs after moving there. They also became official Afghan citizens. Taliban officials have refused to detail why the couple was arrested in February as they were returning to their home in central Bamiyan province. 'They were told by the judge that they were not guilty of any crimes,' said their son. 'So many times we've been told two to three days and then you'll be released ... But it's six months on Saturday,' he added. The couple were first held in a maximum security facility, 'then in underground cells, without daylight, before being transferred' to the intelligence services in Kabul, according to UN experts. In late July, the independent UN human rights experts called for the Taliban to free the pair warning of the 'rapid deterioration' of their physical and mental health, stating that they 'risk irreparable harm or even death'. UN experts shared a voice message from the couple with their son, but he has not been reassured. 'You have to remember their age,' Reynolds, 45, told AFP during a video call from his home in Chicago. 'Are they in danger? Yeah, they're an elderly couple who are unjustly held ... in captivity. They are not free,' he said. 'Their bodies are not used to being put through this, they're being trapped, they're sleeping on a little mattress on the floor,' he said. 'Weak and fragile' The couple's children have set up a website called Free Peter and Barbie to campaign for their release, which counts down the number of days they have been held. Since being detained, Peter Reynolds has suffered two eye infections and intermittent tremors in his head and left arm, according to the UN experts. 'My dad has had heart attacks ... he has a stent in his heart. He has had skin cancer,' Jonathan Reynolds said. 'So he needs an ECG (electrocardiogram), blood test, EEG (electroencephalogram), CT scans. He needs all of that,' he added. His mother suffers from malnourishment and anemia after months of being 'fed once a day in prison,' her son added. She is 'weak and fragile,' the experts said. The Taliban government's top diplomat Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaqi said the couple had been receiving medical care. 'Their human rights are being respected,' he told a press conference in Kabul. 'They are being provided with medical care. They are in occasional contact with their families.' 'Their case isn't anything serious,' the Taliban interior ministry said in April, adding they hoped it would be 'resolved soon'. The couple run an organization in Afghanistan called Rebuild, which provides educational programs for women and children. 'My parents have never thought about their security and safety,' Reynolds said, it was 'no way to treat an elderly couple who've given the last two decades of their life for the good of Afghanistan'. When the Taliban returned to power in 2021, the couple remained in Afghanistan against the advice of the British embassy. Their son recalled the embassy asking them: 'Why are you staying? You're on your own.' His parents had replied: 'How could we leave these people in their darkest hour? We came here because we love these people, and that's what we'll give the rest of our lives to, even if it means we die.'
