Expert ranks the seven major Aussie instant coffee brands amid disturbing prediction about how much café coffee will cost by the end of the year
Instant coffee has made a comeback after an expert recently predicted that we could be paying between $8 and $12 on average for a barista-made coffee by the end of the year.
The increase in café coffee prices comes after a recent spike in the price in the cost of coffee beans, driven by poor growing conditions and ongoing supply chain issues.
These higher coffee bean prices, coupled with other rising business operation costs, have resulted in an unfortunate but inevitable increase om the cost of café coffee.
As households grapple with cost-of-living pressures, it seems coffee lovers are increasingly turning to cheaper at-home alternatives - leading to the surprise re-emergence of instant coffee.
With so many brands on the market, Sydney nutritionist Lee Holmes has shared her verdict on popular supermarket instant coffees.
Speaking to FEMAIL, the wholefoods chef said Nescafe's two varieties - Blend 43 and Gold - were among her top picks.
'Nescafe Gold is slightly less acidic than other instant coffees, and Nescafe Blend 43 uses 100 per cent natural beans with no additives or preservatives and claims sustainable sourcing,' Lee said.
'However, if avoiding chemicals and ensuring ethical sourcing are your top priorities, you may want to look for certified organic and Fair Trade brands.'
The founder of Supercharged Food then ranked the following instant coffee brands: Robert Timms in second place, followed by Aldi Alcafe, Moccona, Coles and Woolworths.
Surprisingly, her least favourite was International Roast, which she placed last, describing it as a 'basic instant coffee option'.
Her rating comes after Martin Brown, Australian general manager for Nestlé - which owns Nescafé - revealed that while Aussies' love of coffee remains unwavering, they're now more willing to 'trade down' from barista made-coffee to at-home alternatives.
'So we are drinking more soluble (instant) coffee, and we are drinking more premium choices of [instant] coffee,' Martin told The Australian.
The company reported that its Nescafé Gold instant coffee is currently the fastest growing in the market.
His comments are backed by market insight statistics showing that the at-home coffee market is on the rise in Australia and is predicted to grow annually by 3.64 per cent over the next four years.
So, which instant coffee brew are we reaching for?
According to Canstar Blue's Best-Rated Instant Coffee Brand of 2024, the surprise winner - which scored top marks across almost all categories - came from Aldi.
Aldi's Alcafe range- which includes the Aroma Classic Instant Coffee (200g, $5.29), as well as Gold Classic and Gold Dark Instant Coffee (100g, $3.89 each) - proved popular among Aussie consumers.
The budget supermarket's coffee brand received five-star reviews in the categories of taste, texture and consistency, value for money and packaging. However, it received only three stars for variety and range.
A 200g jar yields around 40 cups of coffee, meaning Aldi Alcafe's Aroma Classic Instant Coffee clocks in at around 13 cents per cup.
Close behind in second place was Moccona, which similarly received five-stars for taste but was marked down for value for money, as well as in the texture and consistency categories.
Moccona Freeze Dried Instant Coffee Classic Medium Roast 200g is currently sold at Woolworths for $23.60
In third and fourth place were Nescafé's instant coffee varieties - Blend 43 and Nescafé Gold.
At Coles, a 250g jar of Nescafé Blend 43 costs $14.50 and a 200g jar of Nescafé Gold sells for $20.
Rounding out the top five was International Roast, followed by Robert Timms in sixth.
Both major supermarket's own instant coffee brands ranked at the bottom of the report, with Coles in seventh place and Woolworths in last.
A CHOICE taste test report from 2023 covered a broader range of instant coffee brands and consequently yielded different results.
The report crowned Bushells Classic Gourmet Instant Coffee as the winner, followed by runners-up Robert Timms Full-Bodied Granulated Coffee, Coles Classic Granulated Coffee Smooth & Bold and Vittoria Mountain Grown 100% Arabica Instant Coffee Freeze Dried.
The 2024 Canstar instant coffee brand winner, Aldi Alcafe, was also featured in the 2023 Choice report, where their Gold Dark Instant Coffee product placed seventh.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
'Brits blitz the first Test'
Australia may have lost the first Test at Suncorp Stadium but economically the Lions had a big positive impact in Brisbane, according to Code Sports."The Lions turned Suncorp into their own crimson castle with a robust performance but all the action was at the nearby Paddington Hotel where bar takings were three times as much as the first State of Origin match, proving again there's nothing quite as thirsty as a Lions fan on tour."
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Face age and ID checks? Using the internet in Australia is about to fundamentally change
As the old adage goes, 'On the internet, nobody knows you're a dog'. But in Australia it might soon be the case that everything from search engines and social media sites, to app stores and AI chatbots will have to know your age. The Albanese government trumpeted the passage of its legislation banning under 16s from social media – which will come into effect in December – but new industry codes developed by the tech sector and eSafety commissioner Julie Inman Grant under the Online Safety Act will probably have much larger ramifications for how Australians access the internet. Measures to be deployed by online services could include looking at your account history, or using facial age assurance and bank card checks. Identity checks using IDs such as drivers licences to keep children under 16 off social media will also apply to logged-in accounts for search engines from December, under an industry code that came into force at the end of June. The code will require search engines to have age assurance measures for all accounts, and where an account holder is determined to be aged under 18, the search engine would be required to switch on safe search features to filter out content such as pornography from search results. Six more draft codes being considered by the eSafety commissioner would bring similar age assurance measures to a wide range of services Australians use every day, including app stores, AI chatbots and messaging apps. Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email Any service that hosts or facilitates access to content such as pornography, self-harm material, simulated gaming, or very violent material unsuitable for children will need to ensure children are not able to access that content. In her National Press Club speech last month, Inman Grant flagged that the codes were needed to keep children safe at every level of the online world. 'It's critical to ensure the layered safety approach which also places responsibility and accountability at critical chokepoints in the tech stack, including the app stores and at the device level, the physical gateways to the internet where kids sign-up and first declare their ages,' she said. The eSafety commissioner announced the intention of the codes during the development process and when they were submitted, but recent media reporting has drawn renewed attention to these aspects of the codes. Some people will welcome the changes. News this week that Elon Musk's AI Grok now includes a pornographic chat while still being labelled suitable for ages 12+ on the Apple app store prompted child safety groups to call for Apple to review the app's rating and implement child protection measures in the app store. Apple and Google are already developing age checks at the device level that can also be used by apps to check the age of their users. Founder of tech analysis company PivotNine, Justin Warren, says the codes would 'implement sweeping changes to the regulation of communication between people in Australia'. 'It looks like a massive over-reaction after years of policy inaction to curtail the power of a handful of large foreign technology companies,' he says. 'That it hands even more power and control over Australians' online lives to those same foreign tech companies is darkly hilarious.' One of the industry bodies that worked with the eSafety commissioner to develop the codes, Digi, rejected the notion they would reduce anonymity online, and said the codes targeted specific platforms hosting or providing access to specific kinds of content. 'The codes introduce targeted and proportionate safeguards concerning access to pornography and material rated as unsuitable for minors under 18, such as very violent materials or those advocating or [giving instructions for] suicide, eating disorders or self-harm,' Digi's director of digital policy Dr Jenny Duxbury says. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion 'These codes introduce safeguards for specific use cases, not a blanket requirement for identity verification across the internet.' Duxbury says companies may use inference measures – such as account history or device usage patterns – to estimate a user's age, which would mean most users may not have to go through an assurance process. 'Some services may choose to adopt inference methods because they can be effective and less intrusive.' However, those that do may be caught by surprise when it comes into effect, says Electronic Frontiers Australia chair John Pane. 'While most Australians seem to be aware about the discussion about social media, the average punter is blissfully unaware about what's happening with search engines, and particularly if they go to seek access to adult content or other content that is captured by one of the safety codes, and then having to authenticate that they're over the age of 18 in order to access that content, the people will not be happy, rightly so.' Companies that don't comply with the codes will face a fine similar to that of the social media ban – up to $49.5m for a breach. Other measures such as eSafety requesting sites be delisted from search results are also an option for non-compliance. Pane says it would be better if the federal government made changes to the privacy act and introduced AI regulation that would require businesses to do risk assessment and ban certain AI activities deemed an unacceptable risk. He says a duty of care for the platforms for all users accessing digital services should be legislated. 'We believe this approach, through the legislature, is far more preferable than using regulatory fiat through a regulatory agency,' he said. Warren is sceptical the age assurance technology will work, highlighting that the search engine code was brought in before the outcome of the age assurance technology trial, due to government this month. 'Eventually, the theory will come into contact with practise.' After recent media reporting about the codes, the eSafety commissioner's office this week defended including age assurance requirements for searches. 'Search engines are one of the main gateways available to children for much of the harmful material they may encounter, so the code for this sector is an opportunity to provide very important safeguards,' the office said.
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Minority government the new normal in Tasmania as voters turn away from major parties
Tasmania has just had its second state election in 16 months, the shortest gap between state polls in Australia since Queensland in 1957. For some voters it was their fifth trip to the ballot box in less than two years. The state's Labor opposition bore a heavy burden of explaining why voters were going through this just months after rewarding federal Labor with two extra seats in Tasmania. In terms of its own vote share, state Labor clearly failed on Saturday. It had just 26% of the vote with almost 75% of the ballots counted. The election was called after Labor moved a no-confidence motion in Jeremy Rockliff's Liberal minority government – citing issues with budget management, proposed asset sales and major projects delivery. Yet on the campaign trail, Labor's budget repair proposals were modest and undermined by their support for spending on the much-disliked Macquarie Point stadium project. Labor's anti-asset-sales position was also undercut by their intent to offload the state's share in the proposed Marinus Link Bass Strait connector. Meanwhile, the Liberals switched from would-be privatisers to promising a government-owned insurance company, a concept blasted by experts and insurers but which tapped into small business concerns and distracted the news cycle for days. The overall state vote share result is a swing of about 3% from Labor to the Liberals who recorded 40% of the vote. A record field of 44 independents gained, too, in the absence of the Jacqui Lambie Network. The four most prominent independents (incumbents Kristie Johnston, Craig Garland and David O'Byrne, and anti-salmon-farming campaigner Peter George) polled strongly but almost all of the others flopped. Another failure was the latest reappearance of the Tasmanian Nationals. Their endorsement of candidates who sent two Liberal governments to elections and generally ramshackle campaign should raise questions for the party at the federal level. The Nationals were outpolled by the Shooters, Fishers and Farmers party, whose campaign was barely visible, but are in serious contention for one seat and in a multi-way battle for another. Tasmania uses the Hare-Clark proportional representation system where candidates compete against others from their own party as well as other parties – with each of the state's five federal electorates electing seven state members in the 35-seat House of Assembly. The system makes majority government difficult, but voters have frequently routed around that by supporting whichever major party looks most likely to win. Usually, minority governments are followed by majorities of the other side, but polling this time never showed either major party close. With declining major party vote shares, non-majority parliaments look like the new normal in this system. Sign up to Morning Mail Our Australian morning briefing breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion Rockliff's government has gained a seat in Braddon, the north-west and western electorate that at the federal election fell to Labor with a massive swing. It appears to have lost one narrowly in Franklin where George has taken a seat, and is still fighting for possible gains from its starting 14 seats in Bass and Lyons. Dean Winter's opposition seems to have held its 10 seats and is in the mix for a possible gain in Bass through quirks of the Hare-Clark system. Overall, Tasmania is pretty back much where it was. Labor could potentially govern, if willing to do so with support from the Greens and left-wing independents. Such an alliance could have 18 or 19 seats. But Labor could have tried this approach after the 2024 election, or after the no-confidence motion in June, and made no visible attempt to do so. If Labor were to form government after losing votes in an election they are blamed for, and performed badly in, it would look less legitimate than had it done so immediately after last year's election. Rockliff, the premier, has stated his intention to ask the governor to renew his commission. By precedent, he must be granted this, whether or not he can prove he has 18 promised votes on confidence and supply. Of course, it is better to have the appearance of stability, but if he cannot arrange enough support, he can at least go back to the parliament and defy it to vote him out. Then, another no-confidence motion would be needed to install Winter as premier. Labor would come to office with a shallow pool of MPs to draw on, a debt crisis requiring hard decisions that they did not campaign on, and a crossbench hungry to deliver for supporters on issues like native forest logging, salmon farms and the stadium. It's a sticky situation.
