Trump says US will partner with Israel to run additional food centers in Gaza, but details are scant
Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One as he returned from a trip to Scotland that Israel would preside over the new food centers 'to make sure the distribution is proper.'
'We're going to be dealing with Israel, and we think they can do a good job of it,' Trump said.
The opaque details come as the Trump administration is facing calls at home and abroad to do more to address the hunger crisis in Gaza . The U.S.'s close ally, Israel, is at the center of an international outcry as more images of emaciated children continue to emerge.
That pressure comes after the U.S. pulled out of talks last week to try to broker a ceasefire in the 21-month Israel-Hamas war, accusing Hamas of acting in bad faith. But Trump this week broke with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu , disagreeing publicly with him about starvation in Gaza and citing the pictures of hungry people.
The White House described it as 'a new aid plan' to help people in Gaza obtain access to food and promised that details would emerge. It did not elaborate.
State Department spokeswoman Tammy Bruce said Tuesday that she didn't know 'the framework' of how the new aid distribution would work.
'I'm waiting for the president to return. I don't want to get ahead of him,' Bruce said.
Democrats in Congress have implored the Trump administration to step up its role in addressing the suffering and starvation in Gaza.
More than 40 senators signed a letter Tuesday urging the Trump administration to resume ceasefire talks and sharply criticizing the Israeli-backed American organization that had already been created to distribute food aid.
Sen. Tim Kaine, a Virginia Democrat on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, questioned why the U.S. was not allowing long-standing aid groups to run food centers.
'I'm glad that the president is saying that this is a problem. But if we want to solve the problem, turn to the folks who have been doing this for decades,' Kaine said.
The few details Trump provided about the new food centers appeared similar to a program that was already rolled out in May, after Israel had blocked all food, medicine and other imports for 2½ months.
The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, an Israeli-backed American contractor, opened four food distribution sites that month.
Israel and GHF said that system was needed to prevent Hamas from siphoning off aid. The United Nations, which has been distributing food in Gaza throughout the war when allowed, denies any significant diversion of aid by Hamas.
Hundreds of Palestinians have been killed by Israeli forces while heading to the GHF sites, according to witnesses, health officials and the U.N. human rights office. Israel says its forces have only fired warning shots at people who approach its forces, and GHF says its armed contractors have only used pepper spray and fired occasional shots in the air to prevent dangerous crowding.
The aid sites are in Israeli military zones, which is off limits to independent media.
The U.N. refuses to cooperate with GHF, saying its model violates humanitarian principles by forcing Palestinians to travel long distances and risk their lives for food and because it allows Israel to control aid and use it to further mass displacement.
Trump said Tuesday that he last spoke to Netanyahu two days earlier and that the Israeli leader wants to distribute food 'in a proper manner.'
'I think Israel wants to do it,' Trump said. 'And they'll be good at doing it.'
The president, for the second day in a row, remarked on the images of starving people and kids in Gaza, which seemed to prompt him this week to announce the new plan and his break with Netanyahu.
Trump said Tuesday that everyone who saw the images coming out of Gaza would declare it terrible 'unless they're pretty cold-hearted or, worse than that, nuts.'
'Those are kids that are starving. They are starving,' Trump said. 'They've got to get them food. And we're going to get them food.'
The shift brings Trump closer to some in his MAGA base, who have rejected the Republican Party's long-standing, unequivocal support for Israel and see aid money flowing to the country as yet another misguided foreign intervention.
They include Georgia Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene , a staunch Trump ally, who has echoed the rhetoric of progressive Democrats in recent days.
'I can unequivocally say that what happened to innocent people in Israel on Oct. 7th was horrific. Just as I can unequivocally say that what has been happening to innocent people and children in Gaza is horrific. This war and humanitarian crisis must end!' she wrote on Sunday on X.
On Monday night, she went further, calling what is happening in Gaza 'genocide.'
But Greene's comments do not represent MAGA as a whole.
On Monday, podcaster Charlie Kirk, who leads the powerful Turning Point network, railed against what he deemed a 'propaganda campaign trying to make it seem as if Israel is intentionally starving the people of Gaza.'
___
Associated Press writers Stephen Groves and Joey Cappelletti in Washington, Jill Colvin in New York and Joseph Krauss in Ottawa, Ontario, contributed to this report.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump pushes rate cut as Fed meets, second quarter data released
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -President Donald Trump on Wednesday again called on the Federal Reserve to lower benchmark rates after data showed U.S. economic growth rebounded more than expected in the second quarter. "2Q GDP JUST OUT: 3%, WAY BETTER THAN EXPECTED! 'Too Late' MUST NOW LOWER THE RATE. No Inflation! Let people buy, and refinance, their homes!" Trump wrote on Truth Social as the central bank prepared to release its policy statement. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Washington Post
6 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Gaza airdrops deliver a fraction of what trucks could, aid groups warn
Of the scant paths for food aid to reach Gazans facing starvation, one is particularly ineffective, aid groups warn: dropping pallets of food from planes. Airdrops, tried briefly by the United States and others in March of last year, resumed over the weekend, amid a starvation crisis that the world's leading hunger monitor said this week had 'worsened dramatically' to the point of famine. Israel made an initial drop Saturday, followed by aid flights from other countries in the region, including Jordan, amid mounting international criticism over the impact of Israeli policies in Gaza. Israel also said it would facilitate more deliveries of food by trucks, open secure corridors and pause fighting each day in certain areas to allow aid to increase. As aid groups scramble to try to meet the needs of Gazans, they warn that airdrops, while better than no aid at all, should not be seen as a solution. 'While we welcome any effort to get aid to desperate civilians in Gaza, we know that airdrops are very expensive, often ineffective and not sustainable,' said Katy Crosby, senior director for policy and advocacy for the international aid group Mercy Corps. David Miliband, the head of the International Rescue Committee, a humanitarian relief organization, and Philippe Lazzarini, the head of the United Nations agency for Palestinian refugees, among others, say the way to get aid to Gaza is clear: Open land crossings to allow in a high volume of trucks and allow aid groups unfettered humanitarian access to reach Gazans in need. UNRWA, the U.N. agency for Palestinian refugees, had the equivalent of 6,000 trucks in Jordan and Egypt waiting to be allowed into Gaza as of Saturday, Lazzarini said in a statement posted to X. Israel's military says it does not limit trucks entering Gaza. Israel accuses Hamas of corrupting the long-standing U.N.-coordinated system of aid delivery by systematically stealing and looting. It also says humanitarian groups have failed to collect and distribute the aid — charges they deny. Before the war, the Gaza Strip depended on about 500 truckloads of aid per day, under strict regulations imposed by Israel and Egypt. After the war in Gaza began in response to the Oct. 7, 2023, Hamas attack on Israel, the number of trucks fluctuated but steeply declined overall, with many days seeing only a few dozen, and with Israel controlling major parts of the aid delivery process. Aid groups report onerous inspections, limited land entry points and faulty deconfliction channels. Despite the struggle to deliver aid by other methods, airdrops are 'considered an absolute last resort' in the humanitarian community — used when there are 'actual geographic barriers' such as flooding and earthquakes that block roads, said Crosby, of Mercy Corps. Airdrops, which are not precision-guided, can easily go astray, she said. In Gaza, one of the most densely populated areas in the world, the risks are particularly high. People can be crushed by the pallets of food, which weigh more than 1,000 pounds, or they can chase off-course boxes into dangerous areas. 'You are essentially having to run after a parachute, to put it bluntly,' Crosby said. Once dropped goods reach the ground, there is nobody standing by to organize distribution. Desperate people may rush to collect food, while the most vulnerable — children, women, the elderly and disabled people — often struggle to get it. 'Airdrops are not a solution. They really are theater, it's theatrics,' said Bushra Khalidi, the policy lead for the aid group Oxfam in the Palestinian territories. Lazzarini echoed that view, calling them a 'distraction.' The Coordination of Government Activities in the Territories (COGAT), the branch of the Israeli military that handles civil affairs in the occupied territories, did not respond immediately to a request to comment on the criticism of airdrops. Humanitarian groups have long raised alarms of a looming famine in Gaza. More than 147 people, including 88 children, have died of malnutrition, according to Gaza's Health Ministry. After imposing an 11-week total block on all food and medicine entering Gaza in March, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said his decision to ease restrictions was in part an effort to placate international allies. The U.S.-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, a new organization with opaque origins and funding sources, has in recent months taken over the distribution of aid in areas controlled by the Israeli military. Hundreds of civilians have been shot dead in the crush to enter these distribution sites, many of them allegedly felled by Israeli soldiers positioned nearby. Israel says its forces fired warning shots. The recent airdrops are a return to a method tried earlier in the war. The United States under President Joe Biden joined the effort to drop aid to Gaza early last year. Military aircraft — from the U.S., Jordan, Britain and others — flew and dropped crates wrapped in protective plastic and fitted with shock-absorbing bases. Within six weeks early last year, Britain made 11 airdrops carrying a total of 121 tons of aid from 120 parachutes — about 11 tons per drop. In an announcement at the time, then-Foreign Secretary David Cameron said: 'It is only by land that we will be able to transport the full amount of humanitarian assistance needed.' In that initial wave, the airdrops came under criticism from rights groups as inefficient — and even deadly. Five people were killed by a crate of aid whose parachute malfunctioned in March 2024, and 12 Gazans drowned when they tried to reach airdropped boxes that landed in the sea, Gaza health authorities said. The U.N.'s Lazzarini said that driving aid into the territory is easier, more effective, cheaper and safer. It's also 'more dignified' for the people of Gaza, he said. Some criticism has come from inside Gaza as well. Renad Attallah, an 11-year-old in Gaza with a large online following, posted on Instagram: 'I want to tell you that airdropping aid is an ineffective and humiliating method. … Just because we are being starved doesn't mean we should accept humiliation.'
Newsweek
6 minutes ago
- Newsweek
China Is Winning the Trade Talks With Trump
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The U.S.'s latest round of trade talks with China concluded in Stockholm on Monday without much headway in the trade war between the world's two largest economies. While U.S. negotiators continue to use tough rhetoric, including the threat of secondary sanctions to discourage China from fueling Russia's war against Ukraine, geopolitical analysts say President Donald Trump's administration is at a disadvantage in the negotiations. Newsweek has contacted the White House for comment via email. Why It Matters Trump dramatically escalated economic tensions in April. Citing unfair Chinese trade practices and promising to revitalize U.S. manufacturing, he announced heavy tariffs on Chinese goods. The move rattled global supply chains and prompted swift retaliation from Beijing, which introduced its own tariffs and a suite of other tit-for-tat measures. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, who led the U.S.'s negotiating team in Stockholm, called the talks productive but said it was up to the president to extend the 90-day pause agreed to in May on the most severe tariffs. A trade truce between the countries is set to expire on August 12. What To Know Trump has already surrendered too much negotiating power in his pursuit of a sweeping deal with China, critics say. This includes the administration's recent decision to reverse restrictions on exports of Nvidia's H20 chips. The H20 is one of many chips to be restricted in a bid to slow China's progress in artificial intelligence—viewed by Washington as a national security threat given Beijing's policy of military-civil fusion. Additionally, the U.S. Commerce Department has been instructed to hold off on imposing new export controls on China, in what officials describe as an effort to keep trade talks on track, the Financial Times reported on Tuesday, citing both former and current U.S. officials. Chinese President Xi Jinping, left, and U.S. President Donald Trump during a welcome ceremony at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing on November 9, 2017. Chinese President Xi Jinping, left, and U.S. President Donald Trump during a welcome ceremony at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing on November 9, 2017. Andy Wong/Associated Press Other alleged concessions center on Taiwan, the self-governed island that China claims as its territory and has vowed to unify with, by force if necessary. The Trump administration has blocked Taiwanese President Lai Ching-te from making a brief stopover in New York during a planned trip to visit Taiwan's diplomatic allies in Latin America, according to the Times, which cited multiple sources. Both Lai's predecessors and Lai himself in his previous role as vice president were permitted to make brief stopovers in the U.S., during which they met with supporters and officials. A separate report from the British paper said a planned meeting between the Taiwanese Defense Minister Wellington Koo and the U.S. Under Secretary of Defense for Policy Elbridge Colby was canceled at the last minute last month. Newsweek was unable to independently confirm either of these reports. The move sparked criticism from prominent China watchers, who warned against using the self-ruled democracy and key trade partner as a bargaining chip. Liu Pengyu, a spokesperson for the Chinese Embassy in Washington, D.C., told Newsweek that he was not aware of the details of the reports. He emphasized Beijing's firm opposition to visits to the U.S. by Taiwanese leaders, invoking the "one China" policy—which holds that the government in Beijing is the sole legal government of China. China's concessions during the talks have been limited by comparison. They include designating two more chemicals as precursors to fentanyl, the powerful opioid behind the U.S. overdose crisis that has become a sticking point in bilateral ties—with Washington pressing Beijing to do more to stem the flow of the drug into the U.S. Following the first round of talks in May, China also announced it would ease some restrictions on rare earth magnets, which are vital for a range of both military and civilian technologies. However, the U.S. and other countries continue to complain of ongoing delays in the export of these resources. Beijing weaponized its dominance over rare earths in April by curbing exports in response to Trump's tariff salvos. What People Are Saying Li Chenggang, the Chinese vice minister of commerce and international trade representative, told state media: "Both sides had candid communication regarding each other's important economic and trade concerns. … The two sides will continue to push for the extension of the pause on 24 percent of reciprocal tariffs of the U.S. side, as well as counter measures of the Chinese side." David Sacks, a fellow for Asia studies at the Council of Foreign Relations, wrote in an article: "The cancellation of President Lai's transit, paired with the Trump administration's decision to allow Nvidia to sell its H20 inference chip to Chinese customers and to freeze planned export controls, suggests that the administration is pausing any actions that China may find offensive in favor of setting the table for a meeting between Trump and Xi." What Happens Next Trump administration officials have suggested that an in-person meeting between the president and his Chinese counterpart, Xi Jinping, is likely by the end of the year. On Monday, Trump wrote on Truth Social that he would consider such a meeting only if Xi extended an invitation, adding, "otherwise, no interest!"
