Ofcom head calls age checks a ‘big moment' for child online safety
Melanie Dawes, the head of Ofcom, said on Sunday that the new checks, which have to be in place later this month, would prove a turning point in regulating the behaviour of the world's biggest online platforms.
But she is coming under pressure from campaigners – many of them bereaved parents who say social media played a role in their children's deaths – who say the new rules will still allow young people to access harmful material.
Dawes told the BBC on Sunday: 'It is a really big moment, because finally, the laws are coming into force.
'What happens at the end of this month is that we see the wider protections for children come online. And so what we're expecting to see then is that any company that shows material that shouldn't be available to under-18s, pornography, suicide and self-harm material – that should be either removed from their service or they're going to need highly effective age checks to screen out under-18s.'
She added: 'It is a very big moment for the industry, a very serious moment.'
The rules, which come in on 25 July, are the latest elements to be enacted from the Online Safety Act, which the Conservatives passed in 2023.
That act was brought partly in response to criticism from campaigners such as Ian Russell, whose 14-year-old daughter, Molly, died in 2017 from an act of self-harm after viewing several thousand pieces of online content relating to depression, self-harm and suicide.
Tory ministers removed sections of the bill in 2022, however, amid an internal row over whether it went too far by banning certain types of content deemed to be 'legal but harmful'.
Russell, who has previously called the act 'timid', said on Sunday he was worried about how it was being enforced by Ofcom. The regulator has told technology companies they can choose how to carry out verification checks, but will assess how well they are working.
Russell said: 'The Ofcom PR is often spun such that it sounds like everything will change for the better in a matter of weeks. But I think it's quite clear that Ofcom, as a regulator, needs to do more than just be good at spinning their PR. They need to act within the bounds of the act in the strongest possible way, and they're not doing that.
'They're sitting in the middle, pushed on one side by families who've lost people, like me, and pushed on the other side by the power of the big tech platforms.'
Sign up to TechScape
A weekly dive in to how technology is shaping our lives
after newsletter promotion
Russell called on Dawes to use her position to put pressure on the government to take tougher action against technology companies.
Some critics have accused ministers of leaving major gaps in regulation, for example by failing to act on misinformation.
A committee of MPs argued last week that social media companies incentivised the spread of misinformation after last year's murders in Southport, helping to fuel the riots that followed. Chi Onwurah, the Labour MP who chairs the science and technology committee, said the Online Safety Act 'just isn't up to scratch'.
Dawes refused to call for powers to tackle misinformation, however, saying: 'If parliament decides to widen those towards mis- and disinformation, or wider issues around addiction for the kids, for example, then, of course, Ofcom stands ready to implement that.'
She did, however, take aim at the BBC following the row over its coverage of Glastonbury and whether it should have continued to broadcast footage of the band Bob Vylan after its lead singer led the crowd in anti-Israel chants.
'The BBC need to get a grip quicker, get these reports and investigations [into the incident] concluded sooner,' she said. 'Otherwise there is a real risk of a loss of confidence in the BBC.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
20 minutes ago
- Telegraph
We must finally bury the absurd idea that Keir Starmer is honest
The headlines are stubbornly refusing to allow our Prime Minister to look forward to a relaxing holiday as Parliament trundles towards the start of the summer recess. The latest spot of mischief is a new poll by Ipsos that unhelpfully (from Keir Starmer's perspective) asked respondents to compare a range of the Labour leader's qualities with those of Nigel Farage. In almost every category, ranging from understanding the problems facing Britain to being considered a strong leader, Farage comes out on top. In only one characteristic does the Prime Minister beat his opponent: honesty. This will come as something of a surprise to many. Not that Starmer is any more prone to being economical with the truth than many of his predecessors or Cabinet colleagues. But his short but spectacular rise to the top of his party within five years of his first becoming an MP at the age of 52 involved a series of – how to put this delicately? – rebranding of some of his previously stated principles. For example, Starmer bravely resigned on principle from Jeremy Corbyn's front bench in 2016 in protest at the former leader's unsuitability for office. But by the end of the year Starmer was back, this time with a promotion to shadow Brexit secretary and a newfound enthusiasm to make his 'friend' Prime Minister at the first opportunity. That was quite a turnaround, though Starmer was by no means alone in his decision to put his personal career prospects and those of his party above what he had previously described as his principle. There was more. In order to win the approval of the many hundreds of thousands of party members who were crazy enough to vote for Corbyn (twice), Starmer came up with a list of Left-wing policies he promised to support if only they would make him leader following Corbyn's resignation. The members duly complied, after which Starmer ditched virtually every single promise he had made. He fell out with one of his own MPs, Rosie Duffield, over whether women could exclusively claim to be in possession of cervixes ('That isn't right,' he claimed, though not directly to Rosie) and maintained generously and imaginatively that '99.9 per cent of women don't have a penis'. By the time the 2024 general election came along, though, this too had been ditched as a principle that risked losing votes. After a discussion with another man (Tony Blair), Starmer then decided that women could be defined, after all, as 'adult females'. After he reached Downing Street, we jumped on a veritable rollercoaster as the Prime Minister embraced a series of issues then disowned them faster than you could say 'Island of strangers'. First, there was Israel. Starmer was instinctively inclined, when in opposition, to support the nation against the barbarism of Hamas terrorism. But that was before four formerly safe Labour seats were unexpectedly lost to 'pro-Gaza' independent candidates at the election. Both the Prime Minister and his Foreign Secretary, David Lammy, suddenly discovered the electoral advantages of agreeing to allow the International Criminal Court to issue an arrest warrant for 'war crimes' for Benjamin Netanyahu. Previous courageous support for Israel in the wake of the Islamist pogrom of October 7, 2023, was banished by the Labour Government's adoption of export restrictions to Israel. With friends like these . . . There was the Island of Strangers speech itself, which merely warned that immigration rules must be applied fairly to all, but some hyper-sensitive comrades were appalled at comparisons with Enoch Powell's infamous 'rivers of blood' speech in 1968. Soon after, Starmer basically apologised for using the term, leaving everyone wondering how much of the speech he had actually meant. All of that is before the many and sundry U-turns that have entertained the country since then. Steadfast, immovable positions of principle have been quickly abandoned at the first sign of a raised eyebrow from an anonymous back bencher. The Supreme Court ruling that decided that 'woman' in the Equality Act meant biological female – the aforementioned possessor of a cervix, no less – was even welcomed by Starmer and his ministers as confirming what they had always believed, despite a cursory reading of any number of previous statements proving the precise opposite. And yet Nigel Farage is seen as less honest. We must conclude that this is down to Farage's barrow boy-cum-used car salesman vibe, which he has adopted and benefited from for many years, rather than individual incidents of untruthfulness. Unlike the Reform leader, Starmer is actually expected to make dozens, if not hundreds of decisions every day, whereas Farage can get away with simply telling his audiences whatever it is they wish to hear on any given day. This is not to say that the poll's respondents were wrong in their judgement: despite Farage's success, particularly in the last year, he has not yet sealed the deal with a naturally cynical electorate. He benefits from the simple fact that he is not seen as part of the political establishment rather than possessing cohesive alternative platform for government. As for Starmer, he should be well pleased that in this one measure for outstripping his populist rival. He might be as surprised as the rest of us, but at this stage in the game, it's best not to look a gift horse in the mouth. Especially while there's still a consensus on what a horse actually is.
Powys County Times
30 minutes ago
- Powys County Times
Israel strikes tanks in southern Syria as forces clash with Druze militias
Israel's army said it has struck military tanks in southern Syria as Syrian government forces and Bedouin tribes clashed with Druze militias there. Dozens of people have been killed in the fighting between local militias and clans in Syria 's Sweida province. Government security forces that were sent to restore order on Monday also clashed with local armed groups. The Interior Ministry has said more than 30 people died and nearly 100 others have been injured in that fighting. The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, a UK-based war monitor reported at least 50 dead, including two children and six members of the security forces. Israel has previously threatened to intervene in Syria in defence of the Druze religious minority. Over half of the roughly one million Druze worldwide live in Syria. Most other Druze live in Lebanon and Israel, including in the Golan Heights, which Israel captured from Syria in the 1967 Mideast War and annexed in 1981. In Israel, Druze are seen as a loyal minority and often serve in the armed forces. Israel has been suspicious of Syria's new leaders since the fall of former president Bashar Assad in December, saying it does not want Islamist militants near its borders. Israeli forces earlier seized a UN-patrolled buffer zone on Syrian territory along the border with the Golan Heights and have launched hundreds of airstrikes on military sites in Syria. Clashes initially broke out between armed groups from the Druze and Sunni Bedouin clans, the observatory said, with some members of the government security forces 'actively participating' in support of the Bedouins. Interior Ministry spokesperson Noureddine al-Baba told the state-run Al-Ikhbariya TV that government forces entered Sweida in the early morning to restore order. 'Some clashes occurred with outlawed armed groups, but our forces are doing their best to prevent any civilian casualties,' he said. The observatory said the clashes started after a series of kidnappings between both groups, which began when members of a Bedouin tribe in the area set up a checkpoint where they attacked and robbed a young Druze man. Rami Abdurrahman, who heads the observatory, said the conflict started with the kidnapping and robbery of a Druze vegetable seller, leading to tit-for-tat attacks and kidnappings. Syria's defence and interior ministries were deploying personnel to the area to attempt to restore order. The Interior Ministry described the situation as a dangerous escalation that 'comes in the absence of the relevant official institutions, which has led to an exacerbation of the state of chaos, the deterioration of the security situation, and the inability of the local community to contain the situation despite repeated calls for calm.' Factions from the Druze minority have been suspicious of the new authorities in Damascus after Assad fled the country during a rebel offensive led by Sunni Islamist insurgent groups. Earlier this year, Druze groups in Sweida clashed with security forces from the new government. The Druze religious sect is a minority group that began as a 10th-century offshoot of Ismailism, a branch of Shiite Islam. In Syria, they largely live in the southern Sweida province and some suburbs of Damascus, mainly in Jaramana and Ashrafiyat Sahnaya to the south. The Druze developed their own militias during the country's nearly 14-year civil war. Since Assad's fall, different Druze factions have been at odds over whether to integrate with the new government and armed forces.
Daily Mail
37 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Reform council complains Labour is being TOO TOUGH on migrant workers warning clampdown on care sector could see vital staff 'going home'
A Reform-run council has complained to ministers about Labour 's crackdown on migrant workers in the UK - saying it is too tough. Kent County Council leader Linden Kemkaran has written to Home Secretary Yvette Cooper about a new law cutting the number of care worker visas. But rather than being in favour of the change, Ms Kemkaran, whose party wants to drastically cut legal immigration, has complained that it could leave its services and private providers on a 'cliff edge'. In the letter, co-signed by the council's cabinet Member for adult social care and public health, Diane Morton, she said she had 'grave concerns' about the proposed law change. Under changes laid in Parliament earlier this month, care worker visas will be scrapped and the salary threshold for skilled worker visas will rise from £38,700 to £41,700. It will also up the threshold to degree level for skilled workers, which will cut eligibility for 111 occupations. In her letter, Ms Kemkaran wrote: 'Across the contracts for the Council's adult social care and health services there are approximately 150 providers we are aware of who have sponsorship licences which is equal to 20-25 per cent of our social care workforce being from overseas... 'Paired with the changes announced in the autumn Budget in 2024 that resulted in changes to employer National Insurance contributions from April 2025, this is totally unsustainable, and the risk is that many care workers at this level will go home and leave providers on a cliff edge.' She added: This is obviously a national issue, and it is too early to describe the long-term impact on the council and care providers ... however, due to the challenges facing the adult social care system in general, and care providers in particular, we urge you to reconsider these changes and look forward to your support in addressing these urgent pressing matters.' Legislation to end the recruitment of care workers from abroad is set to be introduced as part of a raft of immigration reforms. New rules to be laid in Parliament on Tuesday will also seek to increase salary and skills thresholds up to degree level for skilled workers, which will cut eligibility for 111 occupations. The salary threshold for skilled worker visas will rise from £38,700 to £41,700 under the proposals. A new time-limited temporary shortage list will also be introduced until the end of 2026 for below degree level, where recruiting foreign workers is key to build critical infrastructure or industrial strategy. But those workers will no longer be able to bring their families and will not be entitled to salary and visa fee discounts. The legislative measures are the first policy changes to be introduced from the Government's Immigration White Paper to tighten controls and cut migration to the UK.
