
Rise Of Deepfakes: Realistic AI Impersonations Threaten Governments, Businesses, And Trust
The phone rings. It's the secretary of state calling. Or is it?
For Washington insiders, seeing and hearing is no longer believing, thanks to a spate of recent incidents involving deepfakes impersonating top officials in President Donald Trump's administration.
Digital fakes are coming for corporate America, too, as criminal gangs and hackers associated with adversaries, including North Korea, use synthetic video and audio to impersonate CEOs and low-level job candidates to gain access to critical systems or business secrets.
Thanks to advances in artificial intelligence, creating realistic deepfakes is easier than ever, causing security problems for governments, businesses and private individuals and making trust the most valuable currency of the digital age.
Responding to the challenge will require laws, better digital literacy and technical solutions that fight AI with more AI.
"As humans, we are remarkably susceptible to deception," said Vijay Balasubramaniyan, CEO and founder of the tech firm Pindrop Security. But he believes solutions to the challenge of deepfakes may be within reach: "We are going to fight back."
This summer, someone used AI to create a deepfake of Secretary of State Marco Rubio in an attempt to reach out to foreign ministers, a US senator and a governor over text, voice mail and the Signal messaging app.
In May, someone impersonated Trump's chief of staff, Susie Wiles.
Another phoney Rubio had popped up in a deepfake earlier this year, saying he wanted to cut off Ukraine's access to Elon Musk's Starlink internet service. Ukraine's government later rebutted the false claim.
The national security implications are huge: People who think they're chatting with Rubio or Wiles, for instance, might discuss sensitive information about diplomatic negotiations or military strategy.
"You're either trying to extract sensitive secrets or competitive information, or you're going after access to an email server or other sensitive network," Kinny Chan, CEO of the cybersecurity firm QiD, said of the possible motivations.
Synthetic media can also aim to alter behavior. Last year, Democratic voters in New Hampshire received a robocall urging them not to vote in the state's upcoming primary. The voice on the call sounded suspiciously like then-President Joe Biden but was actually created using AI.
Their ability to deceive makes AI deepfakes a potent weapon for foreign actors. Both Russia and China have used disinformation and propaganda directed at Americans as a way of undermining trust in democratic alliances and institutions.
Steven Kramer, the political consultant who admitted sending the fake Biden robocalls, said he wanted to send a message about the dangers deepfakes pose to the American political system. Kramer was acquitted last month of charges of voter suppression and impersonating a candidate.
"I did what I did for $500," Kramer said. "Can you imagine what would happen if the Chinese government decided to do this?"
The greater availability and sophistication of the programs mean deepfakes are increasingly used for corporate espionage and garden variety fraud.
"The financial industry is right in the crosshairs," said Jennifer Ewbank, a former deputy director of the CIA who worked on cybersecurity and digital threats. "Even individuals who know each other have been convinced to transfer vast sums of money."
In the context of corporate espionage, they can be used to impersonate CEOs asking employees to hand over passwords or routing numbers.
Deepfakes can also allow scammers to apply for jobs - and even do them - under an assumed or fake identity. For some, this is a way to access sensitive networks, to steal secrets or to install ransomware. Others just want the work and may be working a few similar jobs at different companies at the same time.
Authorities in the US have said that thousands of North Koreans with information technology skills have been dispatched to live abroad, using stolen identities to obtain jobs at tech firms in the US and elsewhere. The workers get access to company networks as well as a paycheck. In some cases, the workers install ransomware that can be later used to extort even more money.
The schemes have generated billions of dollars for the North Korean government.
Within three years, as many as 1 in 4 job applications are expected to be fake, according to research from Adaptive Security, a cybersecurity company.
"We've entered an era where anyone with a laptop and access to an open-source model can convincingly impersonate a real person," said Brian Long, Adaptive's CEO. "It's no longer about hacking systems - it's about hacking trust."
Researchers, public policy experts and technology companies are now investigating the best ways of addressing the economic, political and social challenges posed by deepfakes.
New regulations could require tech companies to do more to identify, label and potentially remove deepfakes on their platforms. Lawmakers could also impose greater penalties on those who use digital technology to deceive others, if they can be caught.
Greater investments in digital literacy could also boost people's immunity to online deception by teaching them ways to spot fake media and avoid falling prey to scammers.
The best tool for catching AI may be another AI program, one trained to sniff out the tiny flaws in deepfakes that would go unnoticed by a person.
Systems like Pindrop's analyze millions of datapoints in any person's speech to quickly identify irregularities. The system can be used during job interviews or other video conferences to detect if the person is using voice cloning software, for instance.
Similar programs may one day be commonplace, running in the background as people chat with colleagues and loved ones online. Someday, deepfakes may go the way of email spam, a technological challenge that once threatened to upend the usefulness of email, said Balasubramaniyan, Pindrop's CEO.
"You can take the defeatist view and say we're going to be subservient to disinformation," he said. "But that's not going to happen."
(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hans India
10 minutes ago
- Hans India
Russia plays down Trump's N-rhetoric
Moscow: Russia said on Monday that everyone should be "very, very careful" about nuclear rhetoric, responding to a statement by US President Donald Trump that he had ordered a repositioning of US nuclear submarines. In its first public reaction to Trump's comments, the Kremlin played down their significance and said it was not looking to get into a public argument with him. Trump said on Friday that he had ordered two nuclear submarines to be moved to "the appropriate regions" in response to remarks from former Russian president Dmitry Medvedev about the risk of war between the nuclear-armed adversaries. But Trump did not say whether they were nuclear-powered or nuclear-armed submarines. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said American submarines were on combat duty anyway and dismissed the idea that there had been an escalation. "Very complex, very sensitive issues are being discussed, which, of course, many perceive very emotionally," Peskov said - though he added that everyone should be "very cautious" with nuclear rhetoric. US envoy Steve Witkoff is due to visit Russia on Wednesday, according to Russian media. Medvedev - who in recent years has espoused increasingly extreme rhetoric online - had accused Trump of "playing the ultimatum game" with Russia after the US President set a new deadline for Vladimir Putin to end the war with Ukraine. Medvedev did not react to Trump's response and has not been active on X since sending the offending post. Relations between the US and Russia improved significantly after Trump took office in January - although in recent months the US President has signalled he suspects Putin may not be truly committed to ending the war in Ukraine, which began when Moscow launched its full-scale invasion in February 2022.


India.com
10 minutes ago
- India.com
New twist in billionaire Sunjay Kapur's death as his mother Rani Kapur now demands probe into his...., says 'before I die...'
Former chairperson of Sona Comstar, Sunjay Kapur's tragic death after reportedly swallowing a bee while playing polo, shook the entertainment and business industry. The ex-husband of Bollywood actress Karisma Kapoor, Sunjay's unexpected death caught attention in international media. However, his tragic death in London has led to his mother, Rani Kapur, appealing for a formal investigation by the UK authorities. Sunjay Kapur's mother demands an investigation into her son's sudden demise According to media reports, Sunjay Kapur's mother, Rani Kapur, has lodged a 'criminal complaint' in the UK. The former chairperson of Sona Comstar requested a detailed investigation into her son's death, as she describes it as 'mysterious.' A report by ANI reads that the complaint highlights the events that led to Sunjay Kapur's death and requests the British authorities to look into the matter and come to a conclusion. A source close to Sunjay Kapur's family claimed that his sudden demise has been 'deeply troubling'. Further, the source confirmed pushing the UK authorities to probe Sunjay Kapur's demise on a priority basis to reveal the truth. US and UK authorities dig into Sunjay Kapur's mysterious death It is worth noting that Sunjay Kapur was an American citizen; he also held a British passport. While Sunjay's family appealed to UK law enforcement authorities, the US authorities are also keeping a close eye on the case, not his mysterious death has been making international headlines. In a recent conversation with ANI, Rani Kapur revealed that she still doesn't know what happened to her son, Sunjay. She further said, looking at the way things are moving forward, her legal team will soon step in. 'I'm old now and need closure before I go. I may be old and frail now, but my memory of being with my husband when Sona (Sona Comstar) was set up is strong,' said the former chairperson of Sona Comstar. Take a look at this video: #WATCH | Mumbai | Mother of late businessman Sunjay Kapur, Rani Kapur says, 'I still don't know what happened to my son. I'm old now and need closure before I go. I may be old and frail now, but my memory of being with my husband when Sona (Sona Comstar) was set up is strong. I… — ANI (@ANI) July 29, 2025 Sujay Kapur's death The late businessman Sunjay Kapur, former chairperson of Sona Comstar, passed away while playing polo in London. According to media sources, Sunjay reportedly swallowed a bee, which led to cardiac arrest. Despite multiple efforts to revive Sunjay, he was declared dead by the authorities on June 12. Discussing his married life, he was previously married to Karisma Kapoor. After divorcing in 2016, the couple has two children, Samaira Kapoor and Kiaan Raj Kapoor. Sunjay Kapur, married for the third time to Priya Sachdev, has welcomed their son, Azarius Kapur.


Economic Times
38 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Trump says he's cut drug prices by up to 1,500%. That's not possible
Synopsis Donald Trump claimed significant drug price cuts, even up to 1500%. Experts refute this, stating such cuts are impossible. They suggest it would mean people are paid to take medicine. The White House defended Trump, citing price differences with other nations. Trump also mentioned future price drops. Some drugmakers are open to cuts. AP Days after he sent letters instructing top pharmaceutical manufacturers to use a "most favored nation" pricing model for prescription drugs, President Donald Trump told reporters on Sunday that he had cut costs by up to 1,500%. But Trump's grandiose claim is mathematically impossible. Here's a closer look at the facts. TRUMP: "You know, we've cut drug prices by 1,200, 1,300, 1,400, 1,500%. I don't mean 50%, I mean 14 - 1,500%." THE FACTS: This is false. Cutting drug prices by more than 100% would theoretically mean that people are being paid to take medications. The Trump administration has taken steps to lower prescription drug prices, but experts say there's no indication costs have seen such a massive drop. Geoffrey Joyce, director of health policy at the University of Southern California's Schaeffer Center, called Trump's claim "total fiction" made up by the Republican president. He agreed that it would amount to drug companies paying customers, rather than the other way around. "I find it really difficult to translate those numbers into some actual estimates that patients would see at the pharmacy counter," said Mariana Socal, an associate professor of health policy and management at Johns Hopkins University who studies the U.S. pharmaceutical market. She added that Trump's math is "really hard to follow." Asked what Trump was using to back up his claim, White House spokesman Kush Desai said: "It's an objective fact that Americans are paying exponentially more for the same exact drugs as people in other developed countries pay, and it's an objective fact that no other Administration has done more to rectify this unfair burden for the American people." The White House provided a chart of price differentials for drugs in the U.S. and comparable countries, but did not offer any other evidence. On Sunday, Trump also described cuts to drug prices as a future development, not that already happened. "So we'll be dropping drug prices," he said. "It will start over the next two to three months by 1,200, 1,300 and even 1,400%." Prices for most prescription drugs - unbranded generics are the exception - are higher in the U.S. than they are in other high-income countries. This is in large part due to the way drug prices are negotiated in the United States. Trump made his recent appeal in letters to 17 pharmaceutical manufacturers, the White House announced last week. He asked them to reduce costs in the U.S. by matching the lowest prices of prescriptions drugs in other comparably developed countries. Some drugmakers have since indicated that they are open to cutting costs. This move follows an executive order Trump signed in May setting a 30-day deadline for drugmakers to electively lower prices in the U.S. or face new limits in the future over what the government will pay. The federal government has the most power to shape the price it pays for drugs covered by Medicare and Medicaid. It's unclear what - if any - impact the Trump administration's efforts will have on millions of Americans who have private health insurance. Socal pointed out that if drug manufacturers had cut costs to the extent Trump claims, they would be shouting it from the rooftops, especially given the heat they've taken over the years for their pricing practices. "My expectation would be that they would make announcements - public announcements - and that those announcements would come way in advance of the actual effective dates when those price cuts would come into effect," she said. Joyce agreed that there has been no indication of a substantial cut. "Not at all, not at all, none whatsoever," he said. "And let alone 1,500."