logo
Jury reaches partial verdict in P Diddy trial

Jury reaches partial verdict in P Diddy trial

Times17 hours ago
The jury at the trial of Sean 'Diddy' Combs has reached a verdict on four of the five counts against the music mogul but are struggling to reach a unanimous conclusion on a count of racketeering, according to a note passed to the judge on Tuesday night.
Combs, 55, is accused of forcing two former girlfriends to have sex with male escorts in days-long performances that he referred to as 'freak-offs'.
He is charged with sex trafficking, transportation to engage in prostitution and a racketeering conspiracy, which relates to allegations that he used his business empire, and his retinue of assistants and security guards, to coerce his victims.
He has pleaded not guilty.
A note passed to Judge Arun Subramanian on Tuesday evening said: 'We have reached a verdict on counts 2, 3, 4 and 5. We are unable to reach a verdict on count 1 as we have jurors with unpersuadable opinions on both sides.'
The four counts they have decided relate to sex trafficking and transportation to engage in prostitution, in relation to two of his former girlfriends: the singer Cassie Ventura, who dated him on and off for about eleven years until 2018, and a more recent girlfriend who testified anonymously as 'Jane'.
The first count, where they are struggling to reach a verdict, refers to 'racketeering conspiracy'.
The prosecution and Combs's defence attorneys both asked that jurors be told to carry on with deliberations. After consulting them, Judge Subramanian summoned the jurors into the court and told them to do so.
A little later they were dismissed for the day, to continue their deliberations in the morning.
The trial of Combs began in mid-May, and the prosecution case has lasted six weeks. Ventura, 38, his former girlfriend, testified over four days while heavily pregnant. She said she was in love with Combs. But she said she found the 'freak-offs' humiliating and degrading and he threatened to release video he had filmed of them if she did not participate in more. She also described a pattern of violent abuse.
Former employees of Combs testified too: some under subpoena, and some said they had witnessed Combs being violent towards Ventura. A former assistant named Capricorn Clark said Combs came to her home with a gun in December 2012 after he discovered that Ventura was seeing a rapper named Scott Mescudi, and forced her to drive with him to Mescudi's home, shouting: 'We are going to kill this n*****.'
The defence did not call witnesses, and presented its own case in the space of half an hour, placing before the jury text messages from Ventura to Combs, in which she told him that she loved him.
Marc Agnifilo, Combs's lawyer, told jurors that theirs was 'one of the great modern love stories'.'If racketeering conspiracy had an opposite, it would be their relationship,' he said. 'They were truly, deeply in love with each other, for real.'
Prosecutors said Combs regarded himself as above the law. 'That ends in this courtroom,' Maureen Comey told the jury. 'The defendant is not a god.'
The jury deliberations continue.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Brad Pitt reveals ONLY two women have left him starstruck (and it wasn't Jennifer Aniston or Angelina Jolie)
Brad Pitt reveals ONLY two women have left him starstruck (and it wasn't Jennifer Aniston or Angelina Jolie)

Daily Mail​

time8 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Brad Pitt reveals ONLY two women have left him starstruck (and it wasn't Jennifer Aniston or Angelina Jolie)

Brad Pitt revealed that only two women have ever left him starstruck. While appearing on Wednesday's episode of the New Heights podcast with Jason and Travis Kelce, the F1 actor, 61, divulged the names of the two actresses that truly took his breath away. 'When I first met Geena Davis and Susan Sarandon, I was. Yeah,' the two-time Oscar winner admitted of feeling initially starstruck around his former Thelma & Louise costars. He continued: 'I got over it quickly, though.' Pitt's role in the 1991 film, Thelma & Louise, propelled him to stardom as the charming and charismatic hitchhiker, J.D., who sleeps with Thelma (Davis), before stealing her money and vanishing. Previously, the father-of-six praised Davis for being 'so sweet and kind and delicate' during their sex scene during an interview with W Magazine in 2023. 'That love scene, I think, went on for two days of shooting. She took care of me,' he told the publication. Despite still establishing his name in Hollywood, at the time, Sarandon said the then-rising star 'really impressed' her with 'his sense of humor' in addition to 'his good looks and great body.' 'I thought, "Ah, this guy's interesting, you know, he's not just a really gorgeous face,"' she told Extra in 2021. The Dead Man Walking went on to note that Pitt has 'continued to push the envelope' throughout his career. During his interview with the Kelce brothers, Pitt shared his love for Travis' team, the Kansas City Chiefs. This prompted Taylor Swift's boyfriend, Travis, 35, to apologize for their Super Bowl loss. 'We got you this year. I let you down,' the tight end told the actor. Pitt replied that hardships were 'what makes sports movies so special.' 'That's what I mean about life. Life throws struggles your way. Sometimes everything goes quiet, it's perfection, it's sublime. Other periods, life throws these struggles at you and it's how you deal with those and how you come back from those,' Pitt explained. On the same episode of the New Heights podcast, Travis confessed to his brother and listeners that he was too starstruck to 'figure out how to ask questions.' Although Pitt refrained from going into any specifics about his personal life, the star recently opened up about needing to 'wake the f**k up' and getting sober while appearing on Dax Shepard's Armchair Expert podcast, last week. During their chat, Pitt spoke about attending AA meetings and 'trying anything and everything' to turn his life around following his split from Jolie, 50. ''It was a difficult time. I needed rebooting,' he shared. While attending AA, Pitt said he felt nervous about speaking and was inspired by 'everyone [being] so open' about their experiences. 'It gives you permission to go, "OK, I'm gonna step out on this edge and see what happens,"' he explained. 'And then I really grew to love it.' Pitt went on to praise Shepard, who was sober for 16 years before relapsing in 2020, for always being 'so f**king honest.' 'I just thought it was incredible, men sharing their experiences with their foibles, their missteps, their wants, their aches and a lot of humor with it,' Pitt said. As someone born in Oklahoma and raised in Missouri, the actor explained he was raised around men that always insisted 'everything is great' and didn't complain.

University of Virginia president resigned after ‘pressure campaign' from Trump admin to remove him from post
University of Virginia president resigned after ‘pressure campaign' from Trump admin to remove him from post

The Independent

time8 minutes ago

  • The Independent

University of Virginia president resigned after ‘pressure campaign' from Trump admin to remove him from post

The president of the University of Virginia has resigned after facing pressure from the Justice Department over his institution's alleged failure to DEI values, according to reports. James Ryan submitted his resignation on Friday and posted an open letter on social media explaining the decision, saying he had made it 'with a very heavy heart' and that, while he is 'inclined to fight for what I believe in,' he could not 'make a unilateral decision to fight the federal government in order to save my own job.' His departure from the school he has served since 2018 will be effective 'no later than August 15,' The New York Times has since reported. The NYT first reported that the administration was trying to force Ryan out of his role on Thursday, a saga that began earlier this year when members of the UVA board alleged that it was not in compliance with Trump's January executive order banning organizations that receive federal funding from engaging in DEI hiring practices. The UVA's Board of Visitors voted unanimously to shut down its DEI offices in March but Harmeet Dhillon, who leads the Justice Department's civil rights division, went on to write to Ryan on April 28 notifying him about the complaints regarding his leadership. That was followed by another letter on June 17 that warned the administrator: 'Time is running short, and the department's patience is wearing thin.' Ryan's resignation letter last week made clear that he felt he faced an ultimatum: step down or cost the university millions of dollars in vital support. 'While there are very important principles at play here, I would at a very practical level be fighting to keep my job for one more year while knowingly and willingly sacrificing others in this community,' he wrote. Dhillon, who happens to be an alumna of the UVA School of Law, responded to his ousting by saying: 'The United States Department of Justice has a zero-tolerance policy toward illegal discrimination in publicly-funded universities. We have made this clear in many ways to the nation's most prominent institutions of higher education, including the University of Virginia. 'When university leaders lack commitment to ending illegal discrimination in hiring, admissions, and student benefits – they expose the institutions they lead to legal and financial peril. We welcome leadership changes in higher education that signal institutional commitment to our nation's venerable federal civil rights laws.' A spokesperson for the university said: 'UVA is committed to complying with all federal laws and has been cooperating with the Department of Justice in the ongoing inquiries. The federal government's support of the university is essential to continue the core mission of research, education and clinical care.' Two of the state's Democratic senators, Mark Warner and Tim Kaine, have since leapt to Ryan's defense, declaring in a joint statement: 'It is outrageous that officials in the Trump Department of Justice demanded the Commonwealth's globally recognized university remove President Ryan – a strong leader who has served UVA honorably and moved the university forward – over ridiculous 'culture war' traps. 'Decisions about UVA's leadership belong solely to its Board of Visitors, in keeping with Virginia's well-established and respected system of higher education governance. This is a mistake that hurts Virginia's future.' Warner also spoke up for Ryan on CBS's Face the Nation on Sunday morning, telling anchor Margaret Brennan: 'This is the most outrageous action, I think, this crowd has taken on education. 'Jim Ryan had done a very good job; just completed a major capital campaign. For him to be threatened, and, literally, there was indication that they received the letter that if he didn't resign on a day last week, by five o'clock, all these cuts would take place.' The Trump administration has shown an appetite for taking on America's elite Ivy League universities as centers of entitlement and liberal values, attacking both Harvard and Columbia in a very public manner, although its battle with UVA was conducted much more discreetly, a process enabled by internal conservative opposition to Ryan's tenure. Several members of UVA's board were appointed by the state's Republican governor Glenn Youngkin while the institution also has an outspoken right-leaning alumni organization known as the Jefferson Council, whose co-founder, Jim Bacon, has accused Ryan of 'indoctrinating' students by championing social justice and diversity. Ross Mugler, acting CEO and board chair of the Association of Governing Boards of Universities and Colleges, warned: 'The situation at the University of Virginia represents a serious escalation in the political pressure campaign against higher education – and a clear signal that this fight is not confined to elite private institutions like Harvard or Columbia. 'What we're seeing is a widening effort to reshape governance, leadership and institutional autonomy across the entire sector – including public universities that serve as civic anchors and engines of opportunity in their states.'

Movie fans slam remake of beloved film 23 YEARS after original release
Movie fans slam remake of beloved film 23 YEARS after original release

Daily Mail​

time9 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Movie fans slam remake of beloved film 23 YEARS after original release

Twenty three years ago, Universal Pictures and DreamWorks Pictures released The Cat in the Hat - a whimsical movie adaptation of Dr. Seuss' famous book. The 2003 film featuring Mike Myers flopped in the box office, losing the studio $8 million. But years later, the movie is remembered as a classic, often watched and praised for its absurdity and touch of innuendo. This is probably why fans of the original Cat in the Hat did not appreciate that a new version of the film was set to release on February 27, 2026. While the announcement for the film was made in March 2024, Warner Bros. just released the trailer for the new animated feature. The trailer depicts a chaotic Cat in the Hat on a mission to give a brother and sister the 'best day' of their lives. But rather than just being accompanied by Thing 1 and Thing 2, it appears that the 2026 adaptation features all the way up to Thing 17. And while this new version of the film (featuring Bill Hader as the voice of Cat in the Hat) seems to be aimed at children - while the 2003 version may have been inappropriate for a younger audience - many adults have given their two cents on the new trailer. Many fans compared the 2026 version to the original movie, which featured Mike Myers and came out in 2003 Fans of the 2003 movie first pointed out how 'ugly' and 'cheap' the animated version looked. And many couldn't help but compare the two films. 'What a complete and utter downgrade from the 2003 Mike Myers masterpiece,' one fan wrote. One X (formerly Twitter) user even called the 2026 version 'horrendous slop.' In fact, many had more to say about the animation style than the actual content of the trailer. They referred to the visuals as 'awful' and a 'mess.' Other fans felt that the project felt random, explaining that it felt like it wasn't done with the original essence of Cat in the Hat in mind. 'Some things only ever needed a 30 min animated special that adapted the original story,' one user wrote. Fans of the original 2003 movie pointed out how disappointed they were in the release of the trailer 'This just seems so... cringe. There's no heart in it. 'I don't know what I was expecting but not this!' But on the other side of spectrum, fans were surprised at how many people were championing the 2003 version, considering how unpopular and unsuccessful the film was when it first came out. 'Watch people try and praise the Mike Myers one now that there's a remake happening,' one user accurately predicted when the poster for the 2026 movie dropped prior to the trailer.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store