logo
'Why Step Out So Early?' Highway Body's Shocker After 40-Hour Jam, 3 Deaths

'Why Step Out So Early?' Highway Body's Shocker After 40-Hour Jam, 3 Deaths

NDTV01-07-2025
Bhopal:
The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI), entrusted with maintaining the country's road network, stunned many in court this week with a remark that revealed more about institutional apathy than it did about accountability.
"Why do people even leave home so early without any work?"
This was the question posed by NHAI's lawyer in response to a 40-hour traffic jam on the Indore-Dewas highway, a jam that left three dead.
The comment, casually made in open court, has sparked outrage and disbelief. For the families who lost their loved ones, it wasn't just insensitive - it was cruel.
Three Lives Lost, Thousands Stranded
The jam began Friday and stretched for 8 kilometers, trapping over 4,000 vehicles. Among the dead were Kamal Panchal (62) from Indore - died of a heart attack after suffocating in the heat while stuck in traffic for over an hour. Balram Patel (55) from Shujalpur and Sandeep Patel (32) from Gari Pipalya village.
Sumit Patel, Balram's nephew, was furious: "No one has the time to roam the streets without reason. We were on the road trying to save a life - my uncle's. If an NHAI official had been stuck like us, they'd understand the trauma."
The traffic jam lasted 40 hours
The jam and resulting deaths prompted advocate Anand Adhikari from Dewas to file a Public Interest Litigation (PIL). Ironically, he too was stuck in the same jam while attempting to reach Indore. The Madhya Pradesh High Court, led by Justices Vivek Rusia and Binod Kumar Dwivedi, heard the case on Monday.
The court made multiple agencies party to the case, including: NHAI (Delhi and Indore offices), The Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, The Indore Collector, Indore Police Commissioner, The road construction company and Indore Dewas Tollways Ltd.
The court noted that it had already ordered the completion of a diversion road within four weeks back in September. But the road remains unfinished. NHAI blamed a 10-day crusher unit strike, yet had previously requested three to four months to complete the work. The court appeared unimpressed, questioning the logic behind such delays.
Senior Advocate Girish Patwardhan, representing the petitioner, stated, "The High Court has issued notices to NHAI, the Indore Police Commissioner, and the Indore Collector, directing them to submit their replies within one week. Additionally, the court has ordered that the toll company and the road construction company be made parties to the case. NHAI has been instructed to issue notices to the road contractor and the toll operator."
He further added: "The High Court has specifically made NHAI, Indore-Dewas Toll Bridge Company, the construction firm, the Police Commissioner, and the Collector as respondents, asking them to respond within a week."
The court raised a pointed question: "In September, it was claimed that the diversion road would be completed in four weeks. Why hasn't it been done yet?"
In response, NHAI cited a strike by crusher units as the reason for the delay.
On NHAI's argument in court - 'Why do people leave their homes without any work?', Patwardhan said: "This comment was indeed made in court. The Honourable Court responded that such reasoning is unacceptable, as it would mean that ordinary citizens could no longer safely step out of their homes. The court did not take this argument seriously."
Indore Collector Ashish Singh conducted a field inspection and stated that the service road constructed by NHAI was too weak to handle the pressure of heavy vehicles. The road gave way, causing traffic to come to a halt. The court has set July 7 as the date for the next hearing and asked all parties to file written responses.
But the real question remains: Will someone else die the next time they step out without "a valid reason"? Or will NHAI begin issuing "permission slips" for citizens to travel on Indian roads?
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Supreme Court slams Karnataka High Court over bail actor Darshan
Supreme Court slams Karnataka High Court over bail actor Darshan

India Today

timean hour ago

  • India Today

Supreme Court slams Karnataka High Court over bail actor Darshan

The Supreme Court has strongly criticised the Karnataka High Court for granting bail to Kannada actor Darshan in the Renuka Swami murder case, highlighting a stark disparity in justice. The apex court questioned the High Court's handling of the matter, with one justice stating, "What's troubling us is the approach of the High Court!" The top court observed it was a "perverse exercise of discretion" for the High Court to delve into the merits of the evidence at a bail stage. This development comes after Darshan, accused of a brutal murder, was granted regular bail in December 2024, partly on medical grounds, despite later travelling abroad for a film shoot. The Supreme Court has now reserved its order on the Karnataka government's plea to cancel the bail, raising serious questions about influence and judicial impartiality.

Cabinet directs action on two officials for Tirupati stampede
Cabinet directs action on two officials for Tirupati stampede

The Hindu

time2 hours ago

  • The Hindu

Cabinet directs action on two officials for Tirupati stampede

The Andhra Pradesh Cabinet has instructed the authorities to take criminal and departmental action on the officials found responsible for the stampede at Padmavati Park in Tirupati in January 2025, while approving the report submitted by the one-man commission of inquiry headed by retired High Court judge Justice M. Satyanarayana Murthy. The Commission found two officials, a DSP and a TTD functionary, negligent in discharging their duties during the tragic incident that claimed six lives. The eCabinet meeting on Thursday, chaired by Chief Minister N. Chandrababu Naidu, also ratified judicial and administrative decisions, including permanent appointments for seven outsourced drivers working in the judiciary. Briefing reporters after the meeting, the Minister for Information and Public Relations, Kolusu Parthasarathy, said the Cabinet gave its approval for the implementation of the Talliki Vandanam scheme from the 2025–26 academic year and the establishment of a new Noor Basha/Dudekula Economic Corporation under the BC Welfare Department. The Revenue Department received clearance for land allotment for a Kendriya Vidyalaya in Anakapalli, a market yard in Banaganapalle, and industrial parks in Madakasira. The Cabinet also approved a one-time waiver of ₹86 crore abnormal water tax interest dues of farmers. Tourism received a boost with approvals for five-star hotels in Visakhapatnam (ITC Hotels, Lansum Leisure and entertainment LLP) and Tirupati. Wildlife, eco, heritage, and temple tourism circuits will be promoted to generate employment and preserve heritage. In the agriculture sector, revised tobacco procurement guidelines were approved, including a 20-quintal limit per farmer and logistical support. Construction of a BC girls' residential school in Banaganapalle was also cleared. A proposal for land acquisition for developing a road network from Amaravati capital city through 24 villages, by amending the earlier Government Orders related to land pooling scheme, got the Cabinet clearance. These lands will be taken from farmers for the Seed Access Road, and trunk roads.

Rajasthan man, 53, to be tried as juvenile for raping minor 37 years ago
Rajasthan man, 53, to be tried as juvenile for raping minor 37 years ago

India Today

time2 hours ago

  • India Today

Rajasthan man, 53, to be tried as juvenile for raping minor 37 years ago

Thirty-seven years after raping an 11-year-old girl in Rajasthan's Ajmer, a man, now nearly 53, was declared a juvenile by the Supreme Court. The court upheld the conviction but sent the case to a Juvenile Justice Board for sentencing under the Juvenile Justice incident occurred in November 1988 when the victim was raped while fetching water at her school. The Supreme Court bench, led by Chief Justice BR Gavai and Justice Augustine George Masih, reviewed school records showing the convict was born in 1972, making him 16 years and 2 months old at the time. advertisementThe court set aside the previous five-year jail sentence and directed that the punishment follow the Juvenile Justice Act of 2000 which limits penalties to three years in a juvenile home. As the convict is now 53, legal experts suggest he may face alternative penalties like community service. He has already served one year in jail during the court noted the issue of juvenility was not raised during the trial or High Court proceedings. It was brought up for the first time in the Supreme Court appeal. In January 2025, the court ordered Rajasthan authorities to verify the convict's age. A report from the Additional Sessions Judge in Ajmer confirmed his 1972 birth year based on school bench said that juvenility can be raised at any stage even after the case has been resolved. The conviction was upheld based on the victim's statement, supported by witness testimonies and medical evidence. The court stated that a credible victim statement alone can be sufficient for conviction in sexual offense cases and there will be no need further corroboration.- Ends

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store