Which is the best new child-meets-alien movie? We give Elio the edge
★★★½
PG. 98 minutes
Child meets alien: it's a tale as old as time, or at least a formula that goes back to E.T. Still, given that Disney and Pixar are two branches of the same company, there's something disconcerting about Pixar releasing Elio just a few weeks after Disney brought us the live-action version of Lilo & Stitch.
Both films centre on a rambunctious young orphan who has trouble making human friends, but does better when extra-terrestrials are involved – and both incorporate the expected heart-tugging moments and moral lessons, along with parodies of science-fiction cliches.
So which one should you or your children see? It's a matter of individual preference, but personally I'd have to give Elio the edge.
Lilo & Stitch is mostly old-fashioned slapstick, though not lacking in charm. Elio is more ambitious, and also a whole lot weirder – which is a plus, though questions might be raised about the advisability of showing a child lying on a beach next to a message scrawled in the sand that reads 'ABDUCT ME,' granting he's spelled out he wants to be abducted by aliens, not just anyone.
At any rate, it isn't long before young Elio (Yonas Kibreab) gets his wish. Light years away from planet Earth, he seems to have found his chosen family in a non-violent, technologically advanced collective of aliens known as the Communiverse, who accept and appreciate him as his well-meaning aunt back home (Zoe Saldana) never could.
Naturally, there are complications. It's not that the members of the Communiverse are hiding anything sinister, but they've jumped to the false conclusion that Elio is Earth's leader.
Rather than confess the humiliating truth, he volunteers for a dangerous diplomatic mission involving the monstrous Lord Grigon (Brad Garrett) – whose young son Glorgan (Remy Edgerly) proves to be even more of a misfit than Elio, with no true desire to move on from his larval form or join the family business of galactic conquest.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sydney Morning Herald
an hour ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Put down the AI toy: kids need you, not a robot
There comes a time in every parent's life when you realise you need the mental grit of a hostage negotiator to withstand the rapid-fire questions from your small child. My six-year-old daughter is in her 'spelling' era. 'Mum, how do you spell 'elephant'? How do you spell 'vacuum'? How do you spell 'kitchen'?' I feel like I'm in a demented game show dreamt up in the literary circle of Hell. But the other day, while testing out Google Gemini 's live function, which is a generative AI capable of speaking in the polite, clipped British tones of Emma Thompson, an idea was born. 'Ask my phone how to spell elephant,' I told my daughter. She did, and Emma Thompson 2.0 (known henceforth as E.T. 2.0) politely acquiesced, spelling out the word and asking if my daughter would like to know anything else about elephants. This became a half-hour conversation full of animal facts and names spelt out: 'Rhinoceros: R H I N O C E R O S,' E.T. 2.0 said without a single trace of irritation in her automated voice. I suddenly realised that E.T. 2.0 is a better mother than I am. But then another thought sparked, like a glitch: should I be letting my kids near generative AI? There are plenty of robot mother stories populating science fiction lately. Last year's The Wild Robot made us fall in love with a robot that methodically teaches a baby duck to fly. In I Am Mother, from 2019, the robot mother in question is a little more sinister, more interested in genetic engineering than in baby ducks. We already have screen 'babysitters' for kids, such as Cocomelon, that rainbow-coloured lobotomy, but we need to brace ourselves for generative AI babysitters. Mattel has recently partnered with OpenAI, the company behind ChatGPT, which should raise concerns about our parenting future. There are already a range of toys out there that use generative AI to 'talk' to kids, like singer Grimes' brainchild 'Grok', a chatty soft toy designed to lure kids away from screen time and back into the real world. Mattel released a 'talking' Barbie in 2015 ('think Siri, not ChatGPT' according to Vox), but privacy concerns made Mattel discontinue her in 2017. And yet, with this recent partnership with OpenAI, they're still trying. Talking toys are creepy AF. Most parents have a horror story of their malfunctioning Bluey toy calling out 'Whackadoo!' in the dead of night under the bed, let alone throwing a chatty toy-bot in the mix. We can thank the films M3GAN and the recent sequel M3GAN 2.0, about a psychotic robot doll, for seeding our latest nightmares. 'Many parents want their children to understand emerging technologies. This leads to a mixed response of curiosity and concern,' Andrew McStay wrote in The Conversation. We know by now how tech companies feel about our personal information: playing around with it like a kid with a toy; and yet, despite our security concerns, we still willingly submit. No one wants to be left behind. But after seeing my daughter chatting away with E.T. 2.0, my greater concern is that we're losing the ability to give our kids undivided attention. It's hard enough to resist screens with the pace of modern life, let alone being offered an even easier way out: a chatty robot who never tires of questions. And what about when we need to explain to our kids that their robo-toy doesn't really care about them? It'll be like telling them that Santa is the dude who runs the kebab shop with a fake beard all over again.
The Age
an hour ago
- The Age
Put down the AI toy: kids need you, not a robot
There comes a time in every parent's life when you realise you need the mental grit of a hostage negotiator to withstand the rapid-fire questions from your small child. My six-year-old daughter is in her 'spelling' era. 'Mum, how do you spell 'elephant'? How do you spell 'vacuum'? How do you spell 'kitchen'?' I feel like I'm in a demented game show dreamt up in the literary circle of Hell. But the other day, while testing out Google Gemini 's live function, which is a generative AI capable of speaking in the polite, clipped British tones of Emma Thompson, an idea was born. 'Ask my phone how to spell elephant,' I told my daughter. She did, and Emma Thompson 2.0 (known henceforth as E.T. 2.0) politely acquiesced, spelling out the word and asking if my daughter would like to know anything else about elephants. This became a half-hour conversation full of animal facts and names spelt out: 'Rhinoceros: R H I N O C E R O S,' E.T. 2.0 said without a single trace of irritation in her automated voice. I suddenly realised that E.T. 2.0 is a better mother than I am. But then another thought sparked, like a glitch: should I be letting my kids near generative AI? There are plenty of robot mother stories populating science fiction lately. Last year's The Wild Robot made us fall in love with a robot that methodically teaches a baby duck to fly. In I Am Mother, from 2019, the robot mother in question is a little more sinister, more interested in genetic engineering than in baby ducks. We already have screen 'babysitters' for kids, such as Cocomelon, that rainbow-coloured lobotomy, but we need to brace ourselves for generative AI babysitters. Mattel has recently partnered with OpenAI, the company behind ChatGPT, which should raise concerns about our parenting future. There are already a range of toys out there that use generative AI to 'talk' to kids, like singer Grimes' brainchild 'Grok', a chatty soft toy designed to lure kids away from screen time and back into the real world. Mattel released a 'talking' Barbie in 2015 ('think Siri, not ChatGPT' according to Vox), but privacy concerns made Mattel discontinue her in 2017. And yet, with this recent partnership with OpenAI, they're still trying. Talking toys are creepy AF. Most parents have a horror story of their malfunctioning Bluey toy calling out 'Whackadoo!' in the dead of night under the bed, let alone throwing a chatty toy-bot in the mix. We can thank the films M3GAN and the recent sequel M3GAN 2.0, about a psychotic robot doll, for seeding our latest nightmares. 'Many parents want their children to understand emerging technologies. This leads to a mixed response of curiosity and concern,' Andrew McStay wrote in The Conversation. We know by now how tech companies feel about our personal information: playing around with it like a kid with a toy; and yet, despite our security concerns, we still willingly submit. No one wants to be left behind. But after seeing my daughter chatting away with E.T. 2.0, my greater concern is that we're losing the ability to give our kids undivided attention. It's hard enough to resist screens with the pace of modern life, let alone being offered an even easier way out: a chatty robot who never tires of questions. And what about when we need to explain to our kids that their robo-toy doesn't really care about them? It'll be like telling them that Santa is the dude who runs the kebab shop with a fake beard all over again.
News.com.au
10 hours ago
- News.com.au
People are only just learning what the ‘Disney Hug Rule' is
If there's anything that can heal your inner child, it's watching compilations online of kids hugging their favourite characters at Disneyland. They really get you every time, but if you look closely, you might notice a familiar pattern – the Disney character will keep hugging the child until they break off the hug. While it's not an officially mandated rule (although many others exist … more on that later), it's an informal guideline that many Disney theme park staff have embraced, so it's now become a standard practice. The adorable guideline helps ensure that the child feels their beloved character isn't pulling away. According to the Disney fan site Inside the Magic, the practice dates back to Walt Disney himself, who apparently said, 'You never know how much that child may need that hug.' TikTok features countless videos of this rule in action, including one heartwarming clip from @flickdash, showing a montage of kids hugging the characters for as long as they wish, and the characters patiently hold on until they let go. In another clip by @mccallcook, liked by 3.3 million people, a girl called Hazel is seen running up to Anna from Frozen and refusing to 'Let It Go' for more than two minutes. The character is seen chatting with Hazel and asking her questions endlessly until her parents finally manage to guide her away. 'I THINK SHE BROKE THE RECORD WHAT DO YOU THINK?' Hazel's mum wrote in the caption. 'I think Hazie would've sat there all day long if there wasn't a line behind us.' In the comments, people were getting teary over the adorable moment. 'This is so pure and innocent,' said one. 'I'm sorry, but how do you not break down crying every time this happens?' another asked. However, some wondered whether the parents should've stepped in to break the hug sooner and let another child have their turn. 'As a parent, I would have stopped it earlier,' said one. 'The parents should know that the hug went on for way too long as they put the Disney worker in an awkward position,' added someone else. Other official rules at the parks include that characters must never eat in public, tattoos need covering, staff must be able to sign autographs as their character, and no staff member can say 'I don't know' in response to a question. Also, if a staff member wears glasses and their character doesn't, they'll need to wear contact lenses to keep it authentic. For guests, no one over 14 is allowed to wear costumes so they aren't mistaken for real characters, and guests staying at the Disney Hotel aren't permitted to hang wet towels, swimmers, or clothes off their balconies.
