logo
Air India crash: Engines shut down seconds after takeoff, killing 260

Air India crash: Engines shut down seconds after takeoff, killing 260

India Gazettea day ago
NEW DELHI, India: A preliminary investigation into the Air India crash on June 12 in Ahmedabad has revealed that a shift in the fuel control switches occurred just three seconds after the plane became airborne, causing both engines to lose power sequentially, resulting in a crash that killed at least 260 people.
According to the report released late on July 11 by the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB), the fuel cutoff switches for both engines moved from the "RUN" position to "CUTOFF" with a one-second gap between them. This transition happened at exactly 1:38:42 p.m., just three seconds after liftoff.
The cockpit voice recorder captured a brief exchange between the two pilots, where one asked the other why the fuel was cut off. The second pilot responded that he hadn't done it. The report does not identify which pilot made which statement, nor does it confirm whether the switch movement was accidental or deliberate.
Captain Sumeet Sabharwal, 56, was in command of the flight and had over 15,600 hours of flying experience. He was also a senior instructor at Air India. The co-pilot, Clive Kunder, 32, had accumulated more than 3,400 flying hours.
The Boeing 787 Dreamliner was en route to London and began losing thrust almost immediately after takeoff. Moments after liftoff, a backup power system, the ram air turbine, was deployed, indicating a complete engine power loss.
The AAIB report raises critical questions about the design and placement of the fuel cutoff switches. Still, it does not suggest any fault on the part of Boeing or GE Aerospace, the engine manufacturer. At the crash site, both switches were found back in the "RUN" position. Investigators also noted signs that the engines may have attempted to restart before the aircraft crashed at low altitude, killing all but one of the 242 people onboard and 19 people on the ground.
Experts in aviation safety have pointed out that fuel cutoff switches are not easily moved unintentionally. U.S. aviation analyst John Nance remarked that turning them off during flight—especially during the climb phase—would be highly unusual.
The cutoff function is typically used only when a plane is parked at the gate or in the event of a critical emergency, like an engine fire. The report does not indicate that such an emergency occurred.
While the exact cause of the switch movement remains uncertain, the event poses a serious challenge for the Tata Group, which took control of Air India in 2022 and has been working to modernize the airline's image and fleet. In a brief statement, Air India acknowledged the report and said it is cooperating fully with authorities.
The U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) and Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) both acknowledged the report. The FAA stated it would continue to follow the investigation and respond to any identified risks. Boeing also reiterated its support for both the investigation and Air India.
The AAIB, which functions under India's Ministry of Civil Aviation, is leading the inquiry. The agency confirmed that both the cockpit voice recorder and flight data recorder—collectively known as the black boxes—were recovered and analyzed shortly after the crash. These devices are key in reconstructing the final moments of the flight and determining what led to the engine shutdown.
Meanwhile, the broader aviation industry in India faces scrutiny. Air India Express, a budget carrier under the same group, is under investigation by the European Union Aviation Safety Agency after allegations it failed to carry out required engine part replacements and falsified records. India's aviation regulator has also flagged multiple safety violations by Air India, including overdue safety checks and breaches of pilot duty limits.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Air India crash: Pilots slam 'deliberate' ambiguity in report timeline
Air India crash: Pilots slam 'deliberate' ambiguity in report timeline

Time of India

time5 hours ago

  • Time of India

Air India crash: Pilots slam 'deliberate' ambiguity in report timeline

Air India crash KOLKATA: Serving and retired pilots have expressed concern over what they term "deliberate" ambiguity in the timeline mentioned in the preliminary probe report prepared by the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) into the AI 171 crash. They allege this has been done to absolve the aircraft manufacturer of any responsibility in the accident and pin the blame on the dead pilots. They also point out that the word "transition" of fuel switches used in the report attempts to insinuate that they were manually moved. "This is an American expression. In India, it would normally have been written: The switches were moved. It is the fuel valves that transition while the switches can move from RUN to CUT OFF or vice versa," a veteran pilot pointed out. While several timelines are mentioned in the report, it is unclear during the crucial phase immediately after takeoff when the two engines momentarily shut down after fuel flow stopped, leading to the crash. The AAIB provides the timestamp to the exact second for a number of actions. The aircraft started rolling at 8:07:37 UTC (13:37:37 IST, i.e., 37 seconds past 1:37 pm). The aircraft and ground sensors recorded the liftoff at 08:08:39 UTC (13:38:39 IST). It then states the aircraft achieved the maximum recorded airspeed of 180 knots (333 km/h) at about 08:08:42 UTC (13:38:42 IST). Thereafter, the timelines become unclear. It says immediately thereafter, engine 1 and engine 2 fuel cutoff switches transitioned from RUN to CUTOFF position one after another with a time gap of 01 second. It then states, 'In the cockpit voice recording, one of the pilots is heard asking the other why he cut off. The other pilot responded that he did not do so.' You Can Also Check: Kolkata AQI | Weather in Kolkata | Bank Holidays in Kolkata | Public Holidays in Kolkata "When did all of this happen and in which sequence? That is a crucial segment of the flight when something catastrophic happened that took down the plane. It is not possible to move both switches from RUN to CUT OFF in a second. The SOP as laid down in the manual for reviving engines during a dual engine failure is to move the switches from RUN to CUT OFF and back to RUN. The pilots in the ill-fated aircraft did so and we know the engines revived but the plane crashed because it did not gain enough altitude to clear the buildings," another experienced captain explained. The report goes on to state that CCTV footage obtained from the airport showed the Ram Air Turbine (RAT) getting deployed during the initial climb immediately after lift-off, but the time is not mentioned. The next timestamp is when the RAT hydraulic pump began supplying hydraulic power at about 08:08:47 UTC (13:38:47 IST). A pilot pointed out that since the RAT takes around 7-8 seconds from auto deployment to begin functioning, then the plane should have lost the engines around 08:08:40 UTC (13:38:40 IST). "If that is so, then how did the plane achieve the maximum airspeed 2 seconds later at 08:08:42 UTC (13:38:42 IST)?" he questioned. Another pilot said it is critical to know the exact conversation that took place in the cockpit from the start of the takeoff run to the Mayday call to know what the pilots were experiencing in the cockpit before the crash. "This is not just for the sake of learning why flight AI 171 crashed but to ensure that another flight does not meet the same fate in the future," a pilot said. Another captain also pointed out that both pilots in the ill-fated flight were wearing headsets and they spoke on different channels, as is the mandatory procedure during takeoff. "Then why is there no clarity on who said what because it's available in the Cockpit Voice Recorder (CVR)?" he questioned.

Who Cut the Fuel? Inside the Mystery of the Air India 171 Cockpit Audio
Who Cut the Fuel? Inside the Mystery of the Air India 171 Cockpit Audio

Time of India

time6 hours ago

  • Time of India

Who Cut the Fuel? Inside the Mystery of the Air India 171 Cockpit Audio

'Why did you cut off the fuel?' That chilling cockpit question echoes across aviation corridors after Air India Flight 171 crashed 90 seconds after takeoff, killing all 260 on board. The AAIB's preliminary report suggests both fuel switches were turned off mid-air, but was it pilot error, a design flaw, or a systemic failure ignored for years? Families are calling it a cover-up. Pilots demand fairness. Experts say the story doesn't add up. In this video, we break down the crash timeline, the controversial FAA advisory from 2018, and the cockpit voice recorder transcript that's now triggering global outrage. Was this preventable? Who should be held accountable? Why wasn't the FAA alert acted upon?#airindia171 #fuelcutoffmystery #boeing787crash #aircrashinvestigation #cockpitrecorder #aviationnews #airindia #boeing #planecrash #toi #toibharat #bharat #trending #breakingnews #indianews

Should cockpits have video recorders? Air India crash renews old debate
Should cockpits have video recorders? Air India crash renews old debate

First Post

time7 hours ago

  • First Post

Should cockpits have video recorders? Air India crash renews old debate

The Air India Dreamliner crash has revived an old debate in aviation circles should cockpits be equipped with video recorders to monitor pilots' actions, adding another layer of evidence to help investigators understand what goes wrong during disasters? read more The wreckage of the Air India plane that crashed moments after taking off from the Ahmedabad airport, lies on a building, in Ahmedabad. Both switches feeding fuel to the two engines of Air India flight 171 were cut off followed before the plane crashed in Ahmedabad, seconds after taking off, the first investigation report into the crash has revealed. PTI The deadly crash of Air India flight 171 last month has reignited a long-standing debate in the aviation industry over whether video cameras should be installed in airliner cockpits to monitor pilots' actions—a move that could complement the cockpit voice and flight data recorders already relied on by accident investigators. Willie Walsh, head of the International Air Transport Association (IATA) and a former airline pilot, voiced strong support for cockpit video monitoring during remarks on Wednesday in Singapore. 'Based on what little we know now, it's quite possible that a video recording, in addition to the voice recording, would significantly assist investigators in conducting that investigation on the issue of mental health,' he said. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD A preliminary report by India's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) has raised troubling questions about the Air India crash, suggesting one of the pilots might have cut off fuel to the Boeing 787's engines seconds after takeoff, causing an irrecoverable situation. The crash in Ahmedabad claimed 241 of the 242 lives aboard, along with 19 people on the ground. Advocates for cockpit cameras argue that video evidence can provide critical context missing from audio and data recordings, while opponents warn of privacy intrusions and potential misuse, believing the benefits may not justify the risks. Recent incidents have demonstrated how valuable video can be. The Australian Transport Safety Bureau (ATSB) cited cockpit video footage as 'invaluable' in solving the 2023 crash of a Robinson R66 helicopter, which broke apart mid-air and killed the pilot—the sole occupant. The video revealed the pilot had been distracted by using a mobile phone and consuming food and beverages. The ATSB praised Robinson Helicopters for installing cameras at the factory and urged other manufacturers and operators to consider similar measures for safety. Calls for cockpit video are not new. In 2000, following the 1999 EgyptAir Flight 990 crash, where the first officer intentionally downed the Boeing 767 killing all 217 people on board, U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) Chairman Jim Hall pushed the Federal Aviation Administration to mandate cockpit image recorders. 'In the balance between privacy and safety, the scale tips toward safety, unequivocally,' said air safety expert and former airline pilot John Nance. 'Protecting the flying public is a sacred obligation.' Anthony Brickhouse, another aviation safety expert, agrees on the value of cockpit video, though he acknowledges pilots' concerns about privacy. 'Video on Air India flight 171 would have answered lots of questions,' he said. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD (With inputs from Reuters)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store