PHC dismisses petition against KMU fees
A two-judge bench comprising Justice Syed Arshad Ali and Justice Dr Khurshid Iqbal heard the petition filed by 119 students including Muhammad Zulqarnain.
The petitioners, students of Khyber Medical University and affiliated medical and dental colleges, claimed that the university's decision to increase fees by more than 100 per cent was unfair and violated the Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa Universities Act 2012.
The petitioners' lawyer contended that the government's and university administration's decision was a violation of Section 28 of the Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa Universities Act 2012. He said that only the syndicate of a public sector university could make decisions about increases in fees and that the increases could not be more than ten per cent.
On the other hand, the university's lawyer informed the court that the provincial government and Khyber Medical University formulated the admissions policy as well as the annual fees for each academic session, the students had accepted the fee structure at the time of their admission, and their enrolment in medical colleges was based on college policies and prospectuses.
The court was told that the fee increase was discussed in the Khyber Medical University's Finance and Training Committee meeting in 2024 after which the fees had been raised from Rs143,000 to Rs450,000. These recommendations had been presented in the 44th meeting of the University Syndicate and later notified in the college admission policy.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
10 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Assembly forms law & order panel
The Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa Assembly has decided to form a parliamentary committee to address the province's deteriorating law and order situation, calling for collective efforts to restore peace. The committee will oversee measures taken for maintaining peace and stability across the province. Rules and terms of reference for the committee will be finalized in the next session, and an official notification will be issued accordingly. During Friday's assembly session, chaired by Speaker Babar Saleem Swati, Law Minister Aftab Alam proposed suspending the routine proceedings to hold a debate on the worsening security situation. A prayer was also offered for victims of recent terrorist attacks. Leader of the Opposition, Dr Ibadullah, said the House must conduct discussions that restore public trust. He stressed that unless lawmakers show seriousness about public issues, they cannot earn people's confidence. "We must unite on a single-point agenda for peace, but unfortunately, we remain divided," he said, adding that the lack of unity opens the door for other forces to intervene. He criticized the chief minister's inconsistent statements on security matters and said 95 per cent of debates in the House are irrelevant. "India has now taken the CM's remarks to FATF, threatening Pakistan's hard-earned exit from the grey list," he warned. PPP Parliamentary Leader Ahmad Karim Kundi said that people from Chitral to Waziristan are protesting, yet the provincial government has failed to restore peace. "This government is the product of political generals," he said, accusing the CM of backtracking on the Peace Jirga's charter. "By morning, his statements change," he added. Government MPA Ajmal Khan said that Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa is passing through a historically difficult time. "There is a climate of fear in Bajaur," he said, calling for implementation of promises made during the FATA merger. He emphasized the need for dialogue with Afghanistan and for providing shelter and necessities to displaced residents. PTI's Shafiullah criticized repeated military operations in tribal and border regions. "Why are only our people turned into IDPs whenever foreign interests need to be satisfied?" he asked. "Despite a heavily funded border fence, why are terrorists still returning to our land?" He condemned the decades-long suffering of the Pashtun people and stressed that peace must come through negotiation, not force. ANP MPA Arbab Usman said parliamentarians are being disrespected. "Our job isn't to build drains or streets; it's to legislate," he said. "We should compare ourselves with nations like Bangladesh or Afghanistan, but first, we must act like Pakistanis. Our human capital is our greatest asset." The K-P Assembly session ended with a rare display of cross-party consensus on the need for unified political action to restore peace in the province.
Express Tribune
11 hours ago
- Express Tribune
SLIC officer penalised for online abuse
In a defining moment for digital accountability and workplace justice, President Asif Ali Zardari has upheld the decision of the Federal Ombudsperson for Protection Against Harassment of Women at Workplace (FOSPAH) in a high-profile case involving sexual harassment via digital platforms at the State Life Insurance Corporation of Pakistan (SLIC). The complainant, Urooj Wahid, had filed a complaint under the Protection Against Harassment of Women at the Workplace Act, 2010, alleging inappropriate and unsolicited messages from Kamran Channa, Assistant General Manager, which included sexually suggestive comments. While Kamran admitted to sending the messages, he contested the findings of FOSPAH, which had imposed the major penalty of removal from service along with a fine of Rs300,000. Channa filed a representation with the President of Pakistan. According to the spokesperson for FOSPAH, upon personal appearance at the hearing before the president, Channa expressed unreserved regret and issued a public apology to both Urooj and her mother, without presenting any further defence. The president, after hearing both parties and acknowledging the complainant's mental and professional hardship, affirmed the factual findings of harassment, converting the penalty of removal from service into compulsory retirement, citing Channa's 29 years of previously unblemished service as a mitigating factor. However, in a powerful gesture of support for survivors, the President enhanced the compensation to Rs1million, recognising the mental trauma and forced resignation endured by Urooj.
Business Recorder
a day ago
- Business Recorder
Challenging dominant ideology of patriarchy
EDITORIAL: That the scourge of toxic patriarchy has long made life a relentless battle for women in Pakistan — curbing their freedoms, crushing their agency and denying them basic rights in homes, workplaces, courts, and corridors of power — is a brutal reality that demands urgent reckoning. It is highly welcome then that the Supreme Court's July 23 verdict directly confronts one facet of this deeply entrenched patriarchal mindset, unequivocally condemning the cruel and discriminatory weaponisation of a woman's infertility as a means to strip her of rights guaranteed under Pakistani law. Chief Justice Yahya Afridi, while dismissing a petition in which a husband had challenged his wife's right to maintenance and dower, castigated him for the sheer cruelty he inflicted upon her, not just in marriage but through prolonged litigation. The petitioner had abandoned his wife within a year of their union and failed to provide any support or maintenance thereafter. Years later, when she turned to the courts seeking recovery of her dowry, maintenance and dower, he responded with some vindictive claims, alleging she was medically unfit for conjugal duties, incapable of bearing children, and effectively challenged her identity as a woman under the law to deny her rightful legal entitlements. This deeply offensive and baseless claim, disproven by medical evidence, formed the crux of his legal strategy. In doing so, he subjected his estranged wife to years of public humiliation, emotional trauma and highly invasive medical examinations through three tiers of court, causing the judicial process itself to become a tool of degradation. In his seven-page order, where the petitioner was also fined Rs500,000 for his malicious assertions, the chief justice made it unequivocally clear that infertility, in any case, cannot be used as a pretext to deny a woman her right to dower or maintenance, nor can it be grounds to question her womanhood. In a country where women are routinely deprived of maintenance on flimsy, fabricated or no grounds at all, the moral clarity and unambiguous reasoning of this ruling decisively shuts the door on all such regressive justifications. The Supreme Court's ruling is a commendable intervention, but more must be done to protect women against such malevolent legal harassment and systemic erosion of their rights. As the chief justice noted, '… women in our society constitute a vulnerable group, whose dignity requires vigilant protection and care'. In an ideal system, the respondent should never have had to defend her womanhood in open court, an ordeal that could have been avoided with greater sensitivity and restraint from the lower judiciary. While the Supreme Court has, in recent years, largely stood firmly on the side of justice for women facing systemic and social abuse, it is the lower courts where the adoption of more gender-sensitive approaches is essential to ensure that the legal process does not become a harrowing experience for female litigants. Therefore, more gender-sensitive training, procedural safeguards and legal protections must be introduced to ensure that women are not re-victimised by the very system they turn to for justice. Here, it is also important to question societal norms that have turned infertility and personal choices around child-bearing into sources of stigma, reducing a woman's worth to her reproductive capacity. This mindset not only fuels discrimination within families and communities but also enables structural injustices to be inflicted upon women without shame or consequence. Breaking this stigma is vital to ensuring women are treated with dignity, both in society and before the law. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
