Police Association president criticises leaking info related to Jevon McSkimming investigation
Photo:
RNZ / Angus Dreaver
The Police Association President has criticised the
leaking of information
in relation to the ongoing inquiries into the former deputy commissioner of police.
Jevon McSkimming resigned as the country's second most powerful cop last month amid a four-month investigation by the Independent Police Conduct Authority and police.
His resignation came after Police Minister Mark Mitchell said he was recently informed of allegations of a "very serious nature", separate to the investigation that led to him being suspended.
RNZ earlier revealed
pornography found on McSkimming's work computer
is being investigated as alleged objectionable material.
He declined to comment on the allegations through his lawyer.
A High Court judge earlier reserved her decision on whether the media should be allowed to report the nature of the allegedly objectionable material found.
Police Association president Chris Cahill addressed leaking in his latest column in the Police News magazine.
Cahill wrote that raising concerns about "serious wrongdoing" in the workplace was safeguarded under the Protected Disclosures Act.
"This recognises the importance of good faith disclosures about wrongdoing, and encourages transparency, accountability and prevention of corruption."
However, leaking details of an ongoing investigation was not whistleblowing, he said.
"Over the nine years I have been in my role, I have watched a steady escalation in the number of leaks to media and the accompanying erosion they have caused to police's reputation.
"The latest high-profile leak has me literally shaking my head.
"Ignoring the media frenzy it has created, we must ask what it says about the professionalism of those in police. What protection can victims, witnesses and even suspects expect when such inappropriate disclosures come with all manner of innuendo and potentially pseudo allegations?"
Cahill said that during his decades in police he had been involved in many "sensitive investigations".
"I know the damage leaked material could have caused. I would have had no qualms about investigating the breach itself, and I expect this to happen in this current case.
"Underlying this situation that is saturating the news, we must still abide by the right to natural justice, irrespective of whether we sympathise or empathise with an alleged offender or not."
He said there was also a trend of leaking information on internal employment investigations.
"This is not whistleblowing. It is the practice of the selfish saboteur, often driven by personal gain at the expense of others.
"I know of bullying allegations being made to settle grievances and then leaked to media, who lap up the reports irrespective of their credibility."
He acknowledged some people who leaked may have had a "legitimate grievance".
"But laundering it through the media is no more acceptable than the behaviour behind the grievance itself.
"These scenarios reflect poorly on the professionalism of both the media and police institutions.
"Police criminal investigations - whether internal or external - should be kept as tight as a drum to protect the rights of victims, witnesses and the accused.
"All Kiwis have a right to expect that this standard is preserved. Within Police, it is at the heart of its professional, integrity and empathy values."
Former Deputy Commissioner Jevon McSkimming.
Photo:
Getty Images
In response to questions from RNZ, Cahill confirmed his column was spurred by the investigation into McSkimming which he said was "just an example of a wider issue of leaking".
"The leaking of active investigation information paints police in a very unprofessional light. Victims, witnesses and suspects all have the right to expect their statements etc will be treated with privacy and only made public as is appropriate during the justice process.
"When it comes to suspects, the very idea of innocent until proven guilty and the access to a fair trial are cornerstones of the justice system. The leaking of information can undermine this."
He said if no offending was identified by an investigation, the damage to an individual's reputation could be permanent, "especially in today's world of the social media and online content sharing".
"When an investigation is still in progress, I do not believe the public interest overrides the need for these privacy protections."
Asked if he had expressed his concerns to police, Cahill declined to comment.
In the same edition of Police News it was announced that Cahill would not be seeking re-election to his role.
"I believe it is positive for an organisation to have change in leadership and while nine years has gone very quickly, it is time for someone else to bring their style and energy to the role.
"I am comfortable the association is in a strong position with a positive leadership team at both board and operational levels to support the new president and continue to build on the legacy of past members."
He intended to take a break before deciding on what was next for him after October, but added "I will not be looking at national politics".
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
15 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Can the national ticketing project get back on track?
The nationwide ticketing project would allow NZers to tag on to buses, trains and ferries using contactless payments. File photo. Photo: RNZ / Rebekah Parsons-King The long awaited $1.4 billion national ticketing project needs to get back on track, says the transport minister, with Waka Kotahi advice earlier this year seen as "overly optimistic" about the project's viability. Meanwhile, the US firm responsible for its development has seen its credit rating drop this month. The nationwide ticketing project would - for the first time - allow New Zealanders to easily tag on to buses, trains and ferries using contactless payments across the country. In 2022 an almost $500 million was signed with US defence contractor Cubic to deliver the plan, with rollout having started in December with a pilot on Route 29 in Christchurch. It has since fallen behind targets to be piloted in other parts of the country, due to technical complications with the project. In April , Auckland councillor Andy Baker said it may be time for the city to walk away from the plan and Auckland Mayor Wayne Brown told RNZ he was very concerned about it. It was meant to be on public transport across the country by the end of next year, but a review of the project has been launched, and a revised rollout plan was due to be announced in August. In a briefing document to Transport Minister Chris Bishop from NZTA Waka Kotahi in February, the transport agency was positive about the project's rollout. "The NTS project is on target to be completed on time and within budget". The paper did note that there were some time and budget pressures with the payment overhaul, but further information on this was redacted in the document. When RNZ approached Bishop's office with the briefing he said although the Christchurch pilot showed "some promising signs", he was concerned about the project. "I believe NZTA may have been overly optimistic in their evaluation of the project's viability moving forward in their briefing from February." Bishop said he had met with the NTS governance group to stress the significant investment in the payment plan and "encourage them to exercise leadership to get the project back on track". "The group has commissioned an independent review into the project to identify opportunities for improvement in the programme, and I expect to receive a copy of its findings in July, along with a plan to deliver the project." He was advised that its budget was not an issue. In a response to RNZ, NZTA Waka Kotahi said the NTS Governance Group was working to address challenges with complex parts of the technology. "In May 2025 the NTS Governance Board commissioned an independent review of the programme to provide an independent assessment on the current plan, the challenges for delivery and approach to managing programme delays, and to support the successful delivery of the NTS programme. "The independent review is expected to be completed with a final report presented to the NTS Governance Board at the end of July 2025." US defence and transport contractor Cubic has developed the ticketing overhaul with Waka Kotahi. On 9 July the financial agency Fitch Ratings downgraded the company's credit rating from B negative to triple C negative - rating which indicated that there was a substantial credit risk for the technology business. The change was due to the company completing a restructure of its debt. In a statement to RNZ, Cubic said that it had reached an agreement with its financial sponsors and lenders that would enhance its liquidity, strengthen its capital structure and position it to accelerate its strategic investments. Both the transport minister and NZTA Waka Kotahi would not comment on whether they were concerned about the company. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
15 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Flood victims will not be on their own, says chair of contentious report
There will always be a role for the government in alleviating hardship, says the head of a panel that looked at how the government should adapt to climate change. Photo: RNZ The chair of the panel behind a contentious report on how the government should adapt to climate change says its authors never meant that flood victims should get no help from the taxpayer. The report was criticised for leaving people to manage their own flood risk after a transition phase of possibly about 20 years. But Matt Whineray says there will always be a role for the government in alleviating hardship, beyond the initial disaster response. "I think the government will always have a role in alleviating hardship - that's my view and that's the discussion we had at the reference group - but most critically it's not linked to the property value." Whineray said councils and central government could not keep buying properties at market rates when they were not suitable for rebuilding and were not covered by private insurance. He cited overseas examples of homes being rebuilt in the same place six times, with the government as the default insurer. Whineray said that did not mean people should be left on their own, even after a cut off date, and even after homeowners have been supplied with the best available risk information. He said currently there was an unofficial but powerful assumption that people will be compensated to their full pre-flood value - an expensive proposition for tax- and/or rate-payers, as climate change and poor development decisions increase the number of ruined homes. But Whineray said there were other ways to supply compensation, like capping the amount people can get for relocation assistance. "It's just how you determine how you do that and step away from a world where you say someone gets to get $5 million because because that's what they thought it was worth the day before the event happened. "There will be an impact (on property prices)," he said. "If you moved directly to a world where there is no automatic buyout, you have that abruptness. The idea of the transition period is to smooth the impact. "At some the point in the future where the government is no longer underwriting those property values, that will have been reflected by the market." Canterbury University Professor and climate scientist Dave Frame has been studying how much worse extreme events are getting on a hotter planet, and how much worse they might be expected to get in different parts of the country. He said he understood why some experts wanted a fund for property buyouts, and he also understood why others were wary of promising guaranteed compensation. "Often the people who are most adept at tapping into those funds are the kind of people who've been climate sceptics their whole life, brought a low lying property and now want to exit without paying a bill. It's the classic moral hazard," he said. "It's actually a really subtle one for the government to find a way of exercising prudent judgement, like it seems to me to be pretty clear that the people up Esk Valley weren't being unduly risky in in their behaviour." Professor Jonathan Boston of Victoria UNiversity led a previous report on how to stage a planned exit from the most risky areas. That report said financial help was needed to avoid worsening inequality and keep communities functioning, but the primary goal should not be restoring people's full wealth. Boston agreed that offering uncapped compensation or government insurance encouraged people to stay (and build) in places they should not, and said councils often struggled to stop them. But he said many people would not have the money to leave on their own, without some government assistance. "Some people will have mortgages and they run the risk of being left without any equity, in fact in debt, other people might not have a mortgage but the property might be unsaleable so they have no means of purchasing another property... they are in what a colleague has called property purgatory." Boston said he found it mind boggling that society would allow people with kids or serious disabilities to stay in harm's way, as councils withdrew sewage, water and road maintenance. He did not believe the decision to exit can be left to individual choice, even once people have access better access to risk information. "With sea level rise, more powerful storms and so on, if you look out decades and indeed centuries fro now, tens of thousands if not hundreds of thousands of properties in New Zealand are going to be vulnerable to one kind of flooding or another, or other hazards, and if there's no assistance to help people move, well it's pretty clear that we're going to have a hell of a mess." The environment ministry is working on options to present to the government, on how to move from today's ad hoc regime to something more financially sustainable. What that looks like and who pays still is not clear. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
'Difficult conversations' for employers if staff chat about pay, lawyers say
Camilla Belich's bill would prevent employers prosecuting employees for discussing their salaries. Photo: VNP / Phil Smith Employers may need to be ready to face up to some uncomfortable discussions about employee pay, employment experts say. On Wednesday night, Labour MP Camilla Belich's Employment Relations (Employee Remuneration Disclosure) Amendment Bill passed its second reading, with National voting alongside the three opposition parties. The bill would ensure that pay secrecy clauses, which prevent employees from discussing their salaries with colleagues, would no longer be enforceable, meaning employers could not take legal action, if an employee talked about pay. Simon Schofield, a professional teaching fellow in University of Auckland law school, said it would be a positive move. "The underlying reason for the bill is to ensure that people who are discriminated against have the ability to see where they sit relative to other employees doing the same work and allows them to discuss that." He said some employers may have to deal with challenging situations, justifying why certain people were paid a certain rate compared to others. "Those questions may be uncomfortable for an employer to answer, but I don't think that means an employee should be dismissed for having those discussions. "If someone isn't feeling that they're getting paid well compared to their peers, they'll often just leave the employment relationship, but by ensuring that people can have these discussions, it puts the onus on employers to justify some of their decisions around pay, which sometimes… can have elements of unconscious bias involved and that feeds into the gender pay gap." Hesketh Henry partner Alison Maelzer said remuneration was slightly taboo, so people might be reluctant to talk about it anyway. "It's awkward both ways," she said. "If you find out you're being paid less than the person you're talking to or if you're being paid more than the person you're talking to, either way, it opens up all kinds of a can of worms." She said, if the bill passed, salaries could become a water cooler conversation for a while. "It might be prompting people to ask their colleagues a question they might not have done otherwise." Duncan Cotterill partner Alastair Espie said he saw people getting into trouble over pay disclosure "very infrequently". "It's an issue that is often difficult for employers to prove, so concerns about employees talking about their salary will often go unaddressed or be dealt with through more informal channels." Maelzer said she had been an employment lawyer for more than 20 years and had not been on either side of such a matter. "Perhaps employers are reluctant to take disciplinary action, because it could open up a can of worms related to the reasons why the employee is sharing salary details." She said agreements often contained a clause that made the terms of employment confidential. "The way it would be in there is not a specific clause, but when you're defining confidential information, client information, marketing strategy or whatever, you'd also include the terms of your employment in that list." She said the bill would not prevent employers doing that, but would prevent them taking action against an employee for remuneration disclosure. Schofield said action had been taken against employees who disclosed their pay. "Employers are entitled to treat pay as confidential information, therefore - because there's been a breach of that confidential information - employers may think they're entitled to dismiss an employee for that disclosure." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
