Taiwan's Lai seeks cooperation with Japan to deter Chinese pressure
TAIPEI (Kyodo) -- Taiwanese leader Lai Ching-te called Monday for stronger cooperation between Taiwan and Japan to deter increasing military pressure from mainland China as he met former Japanese industry minister Yasutoshi Nishimura in Taipei.
Claiming Chinese military exercises in the Taiwan Strait and the East and South China seas have undermined regional peace and stability, Lai told Nishimura that the self-ruled island and Japan should work together to ensure maritime security and counter Beijing's "gray-zone" threats.
Gray-zone activity refers to aggressive acts that fall short of an armed attack. Lai also sought bilateral cooperation in such areas as semiconductors, artificial intelligence and drones.
The senior member of Japan's ruling Liberal Democratic Party, who had close ties with the late Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, referred to Abe's claim that "a Taiwan contingency is a Japan contingency" and went further to assert that "a Taiwan contingency is a global contingency."
The House of Representatives member said he believes like-minded countries must work together to send a clear message in support of peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait.
Nishimura's four-day trip to Taiwan through Tuesday came after a visit last week to the island by former Japanese economic security minister Sanae Takaichi, who also had close ties with Abe.
Communist-led China claims Taiwan as its "inalienable" territory and tensions have been on the rise since Lai, who Beijing condemns as a separatist, assumed the presidency in May last year. The two sides have been governed separately since they split in 1949 due to a civil war.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
33 minutes ago
Nippon Ishin Vows to Boost Take-Home Pay
News from Japan Politics Jun 30, 2025 21:48 (JST) Tokyo, June 30 (Jiji Press)--Japanese opposition Nippon Ishin no Kai (Japan Innovation Party) said Monday that it will focus on social security reform to boost household income in its campaign for the July 20 election for the House of Councillors, the upper chamber of parliament. In its campaign platform, the party promised to cut the country's annual medical expenses by over 4 trillion yen to lower social insurance premiums for working generations by 60,000 yen per person annually. It blamed social insurance burdens on sluggish take-home pay. To reduce medical expenses, the party proposed excluding insurance coverage for prescribed drugs with ingredients similar to those of over-the-counter drugs, reducing unnecessary hospital beds by 110,000 and raising out-of-pocket medical expenses for the elderly to 30 pct in principle. The party also calls for the establishment of a system to guarantee minimum pension benefits. It also proposed establishing a second capital of the country, apparently in Osaka, its home turf, to take over some functions from the current capital, Tokyo. [Copyright The Jiji Press, Ltd.] Jiji Press
The Mainichi
34 minutes ago
- The Mainichi
China lifts a nearly 2-year ban on seafood from Japan over Fukushima wastewater
BEIJING (AP) -- China has reopened its market to seafood from Japan after a nearly two-year ban over the discharge of slightly radioactive wastewater from the tsunami-destroyed Fukushima nuclear power plant. A notice from the customs agency said the ban had been lifted Sunday and that imports from much of Japan would be resumed. The ban, imposed in August 2023, was a major blow to Japan's scallop and sea cucumber exporters. China was the biggest overseas market for Japanese seafood, accounting for more than one-fifth of its exports. The decision to lift the ban coincides with efforts by China and Japan to improve ties as both face economic uncertainty because of the American tariffs imposed by President Donald Trump. The nuclear plant at Fukushima was heavily damaged by a deadly tsunami that followed a huge offshore earthquake in 2011. Water still must be pumped in to cool the radioactive fuel. The water is then stored in what was an ever-growing complex of tanks on the property. After years of debate, the utility won Japanese government permission to discharge the water gradually into the sea after treating it to remove most of the radioactive elements and diluting it with seawater. Japanese officials said the wastewater would be safer than international standards and have negligible environmental impact. China disagreed and imposed a ban, saying the discharge would endanger the fishing industry and coastal communities on its east coast. Over months of talks, Japan agreed to let China take samples of the water for testing. The sampling has not found any abnormalities, the customs agency notice said China still opposes the wastewater discharge, but based on scientific evidence and analysis, it is allowing imports on a conditional basis from parts of Japan that meet China's standards, Foreign Ministry spokesperson Mao Ning said. A ban remains in place for seafood from 10 of Japan's 47 prefectures, including Fukushima and nearby ones. Japanese seafood exporters will have to reapply for registration in China and all imports will have to include a health certificate, a certificate of compliance for radioactive substance testing and a certificate of origin, the Chinese customs agency said. Shipments to China are expected to resume gradually, Japanese government spokesperson Kazuhiko Aoki told reporters in Tokyo on Monday, noting the re-registration requirement. He said it was unclear how quickly scallop and sea cucumber exporters would return to China, because they had sought out other markets since the ban. But he predicted sales of sea cucumbers, a prized delicacy in China, would recover to a certain degree. Aoki said the Japanese government would continue to press for the lifting of the export ban on the other 10 prefectures.
The Diplomat
43 minutes ago
- The Diplomat
China's Bet on Iran: What Now?
One can imagine the shock at No. 2 Chaoyangmen South Boulevard, Beijing, the home of China's Ministry of Foreign Affairs, upon hearing the news that in the early hours of June 22 Iranian time, the United States had attacked, in extraordinary fashion, the three key sites of Iran's nuclear enrichment program. It was only four years ago that China inked a $400 billion, 25-yearlong strategic partnership with Iran, focusing on trade, investment, energy, infrastructure, military cooperation, and key for China, a ready and steady source of oil, presumably at preferential pricing. Yet now, China's strategic partner has just seen its nuclear enrichment program – which could lead to a nuclear bomb – attacked. What must be worst for China is that Iran didn't even see the B-2 bombers and their bunker-busting payloads coming. From a Chinese perspective, this is not just a loss of face for Iran, but also a loss of face for China. Beijing does not like to be seen backing a losing hand, much less depending upon it. It was only just over two years ago that China used, and then nominally won, a great deal of political capital when it successfully finalized a rapprochement between long-time foes Iran and Saudi Arabia. China has limited experience in engaging in such high-level international diplomacy, much less with success. However, it turns out that the real meat of the negotiations between Iran and Saudi Arabia took place over several rounds beginning in 2021 in Iraq and Oman. It was only in the final days of the negotiations, the United States Institute of Peace reported, that China was brought in as the closer, and was magnanimously given the win. As the institute related, 'The two regional rivals have conducted talks in Oman and five rounds in Iraq in the past two years. They could have chosen either country to get to the finish-line, but instead chose China' – shortly after Xi Jinping visited Saudi Arabia. Notably, China has been all but absent on the diplomatic stage during a true crisis involving Iran. Since the United States bombed Iran's nuclear facilities, China has made several statements criticizing and condemning the U.S. actions, and questioning U.S. credibility going forward. The remarks from China, however, have been predictably boilerplate, lacking in either force or conviction. The Chinese Consulate General in New York put out a statement on June 22 saying that 'China strongly condemns the U.S. attacks on Iran and bombing of nuclear facilities under the safeguards of the IAEA. The actions of the U.S. seriously violate the purposes and principles of the U.N. Charter and international law, and have exacerbated tensions in the Middle East.' The statement went on to call for a ceasefire, to keep civilians safe, and the start of dialogue. 'China,' the statement said, 'stands ready to work with the international community to pool efforts together and uphold justice, and work for restoring peace and stability in the Middle East.' Why the boiler-plate language from China? Why the reiteration of the same old tropes? Where, if China is truly Iran's friend and strategic partner, is the outrage? China's foreign policy is still on training wheels. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) lacks the real-world experience with and exposure to the rest of the world to be able to successfully read the room or respond to it appropriately – at least at the rapid-fire pace necessitated by a crisis. China's near silence on the dramatic, power map changing events of June 22 expose not only its discomfort with the U.S. strikes, but also its inability to respond quickly with new ideas and leadership of its own. China and Iran find themselves on the same side of certain historical and cultural issues. To the Chinese, even the very idea of monarchy can cause a person to curl one's lip in distaste. China overthrew its monarchy in the early 20th century, and the CCP has been very successful since in teaching its citizens that the evils of emperors, and the greed of imperialists, is what kept China poor and backward for so many centuries. Iran has followed a similar trajectory since Islamist revolutionaries overthrew the Pahlavi dynasty in 1979. It took decades, but finally, and often one piece at a time, the United States admitted to having collaborated with the United Kingdom to remove Iran's democratically-elected leader, which took place on August 19, 1953. Iranian Prime Minister Mohammad Mossadegh was the victim of a plot to secure Iran's oil for British interests, and that, as Lapham's Quarterly recounted, put him squarely in the cross hairs of 'the world's preeminent postwar powers.' The coup – which didn't work the first time, but did the second – put the Iranian monarchy in the person of the Shah firmly back in power for the next 25 years. But it also made the U.S., and the West in general, a prime target for displays of Iranian nationalism in the post-Shah era. This is another point China and Iran have in common: their rulers both find political capital among their relative domestic audiences in denouncing previous foreign involvement in their countries. The fuel that fires much of both China's and Iran's expressed anger and resentment toward the West in general also forges a bond of shared victimhood that is a common trait among autocratically-led countries. Against that backdrop, it is notable that, as Iran quite literally came under attack by the hated Americans, China sat on the sidelines, only offering some empty words of support. Indeed, Iran's foreign minster hurried to Russia – not China – in the immediate aftermath of the U.S. bombing in a quest for support. Tehran apparently understands all too well Beijing's limitations.
