Two Israelis questioned by police at Belgium music festival over Gaza war crime allegations
The Federal Prosecutor's Office in Brussels confirmed the questioning in a statement on Monday.
The Israeli Foreign Ministry, however, offered a different account, stating that an Israeli citizen and an Israeli soldier, both on vacation, were taken in for interrogation and released shortly afterwards. The ministry confirmed that Israeli authorities are "dealing with this issue and are in touch with the two."
The discrepancy between the Belgian prosecutor's description of "two Israeli army members" and the Israeli Foreign Ministry's reference to "one civilian and one soldier" remains unclear. The current whereabouts of the two individuals who were questioned have not been immediately disclosed.
The case was hailed as a 'turning point in the global pursuit of accountability' by a Belgium-based group called the Hind Rajab Foundation, which has campaigned for the arrest of Israeli troops it accuses of war crimes and crimes against humanity. The group was named for a young girl who Palestinians say was killed early in the war by Israeli fire as she and her family fled Gaza City.
Israel says its forces follow international law and try to avoid harming civilians, and that it investigates allegations of wrongdoing.
In a written statement, the prosecutor's office said that the two army members — who were in Belgium for the Tomorrowland festival — were questioned after the office received legal complaints on Friday and Saturday from the Hind Rajab Foundation and another group. The prosecution office requested the questioning after an initial assessment of the complaints 'determined that it potentially had jurisdiction.'
The Hind Rajab foundation said it filed its complaints along with the rights group Global Legal Action Network.
The decision to question the two Israelis was based on an article in Belgium's Code of Criminal Procedure that went into force last year and grants Belgian courts jurisdiction over acts overseas that are potentially governed by an international treaty, in this case the 1949 Geneva Conventions and the 1984 United Nations convention against torture, the prosecution statement said.
'In light of this potential jurisdiction, the Federal Prosecutor's Office requested the police to locate and interrogate the two individuals named in the complaint. Following these interrogations, they were released,' the statement said, without elaborating.
It said it was not providing any further information at this stage of its investigation.
The news in Belgium came as the U.N. food agency accused Israel of using tanks, snipers and other weapons to fire on a crowd of Palestinians seeking food aid, in what the territory's Health Ministry said was one of the deadliest days for aid-seekers in over 21 months of war.
The death toll in war-ravaged Gaza has climbed to more than 59,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza's Health Ministry. Its count doesn't distinguish between militants and civilians but the ministry says more than half of the dead are women and children. The ministry is part of the Hamas government, but the U.N. and other international organizations see it as the most reliable source of data on casualties.
Since forming last year, the Hind Rajab Foundation has made dozens of complaints in more than 10 countries to arrest both low-level and high-ranking Israeli soldiers.
'We will continue to support the ongoing proceedings and call on Belgian authorities to pursue the investigation fully and independently,' the group said in a statement. ' Justice must not stop here — and we are committed to seeing it through.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
5 minutes ago
- Reuters
Trump sets 10 to 12-day deadline for Russia on war with Ukraine
TURNBERRY, Scotland, July 28 (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump said on Monday he was setting a new 10 or 12-day deadline for Russia over its war in Ukraine, underscoring his frustration with Russian President Vladimir Putin for prolonging fighting between the two sides. Speaking in Scotland, where he is holding meetings with European leaders and playing golf, Trump said he was disappointed in Putin and shortening a 50-day deadline he had set on the issue earlier this month. "I'm going to make a new deadline of about ... 10 or 12 days from today," Trump told reporters during a meeting with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. "There's no reason in waiting... We just don't see any progress being made." The U.S. president has repeatedly voiced exasperation with Putin for continuing attacks on Ukraine despite U.S. efforts to end the war. Before returning to the White House in January, Trump, who views himself as a peacemaker, had promised to end the three-and-a-half-year-old conflict within 24 hours. "I'm disappointed in President Putin," Trump said on Monday. "I'm going to reduce that 50 days that I gave him to a lesser number because I think I already know the answer what's going to happen." There was no immediate comment from the Kremlin. Trump has threatened new sanctions on Russia and buyers of its exports unless an agreement is reached by early September. But the president, who has also expressed annoyance with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy, has not always followed up on his tough talk about Putin with action, citing what he deems a good relationship that the two men have had previously. "We thought we had that settled numerous times, and then President Putin goes out and starts launching rockets into some city like Kyiv and kills a lot of people in a nursing home or whatever," Trump said. "And I say that's not the way to do it."
Telegraph
5 minutes ago
- Telegraph
The Lionesses embody English spirit and uncomplicated patriotism
Such was the pure patriotic fervour flooding through Chloe Kelly, ITV had to apologise for her choice of language, protecting the sensibilities of the teatime audience. 'When we were down against Sweden and down against Italy, we f------ showed grit and determination and we came back,' declared the heroine of the hour, the orchestrator of the Lionesses' winning moment at a second straight European Championship final. 'You can't write the English off.' It was not so much the profanity that stood out, though, as the sentiment. After years of squeamishness in the game about attachment to national identity, with fans of the England men's team often guilty of lumpen xenophobia by unleashing inflatable Spitfires on the streets of German cities, the very notion of flag-waving has become fraught. Trust Kelly, then, to cut through the hand-wringing with bracing directness, saying: 'I'm so proud to be English.' Lest she be perceived as an outlier, goalkeeper Hannah Hampton was equally emphatic about crying God for Harry, England and St George. 'We've got that grit, that English blood in us,' she said. 'We never say die.' Those hearing these words for the first time could have been forgiven for falling off their chairs, not because the statements were ill-chosen but because they were so vanishingly rare. How often, in recent years, have you heard these players' male counterparts utter the same? This is not to suggest that Harry Kane feels any less primal a commitment to the England cause than Kelly, merely to point out that she and her team-mates have offered a timely demonstration of patriotism in its rawest form. While Gareth Southgate was an avowedly proud Englishman, a product both of his 57 international caps and the service in World War Two of his grandfather Arthur, there was a sense during his eight years as manager that he over-intellectualised the issue of allegiance to one's country. Take his 2021 letter, 'Dear England', composed amid widespread unrest at his side taking the knee, where he portrayed Englishness less in terms of its football connotations than as an expression of a soaring moral crusade. 'I have never believed that we should just stick to football,' Southgate wrote. 'I have a responsibility to the wider community to use my voice, and so do the players. It's their duty to continue to interact with the public on matters such as equality, inclusivity and racial injustice.' The problem was that a great many England supporters believed this was anything but his duty, imploring him to concentrate only on creating a team that the nation could rally behind. He enjoyed no small success on this front, steering England to two consecutive European finals before Sarina Wiegman did. But by introducing caveats and complexities to his conception of Englishness – 'on this island, we have a desire to protect our values and traditions,' he said, 'but that shouldn't come at the expense of introspection and progress' – he could give the impression that he was lecturing rather than unifying. Kelly's take on the subject is unvarnished. Speaking after the final, just as she did after the semi-final, about her pride in being English, she was not talking less about the Lionesses' contributions to race relations or rainbow activism than about the character of the team, in particular its quintessentially English attributes of never buckling or abandoning hope. After a period when even the display of the St George's Cross could invite panic, because of its past appropriation by the far-right, her view on what it meant to be English felt refreshingly straightforward and wholesome. It is the Lionesses' embodiment of English spirit that ensures they will now become pawns in a political game. Sir Keir Starmer wasted little time in inviting them, straight off the plane from Switzerland, to a reception at No 10, saying: 'You dug deep when it mattered most and you've made the nation proud.' With predictable one-upmanship, Sir Ed Davey, leader of the Liberal Democrats, went further, urging the Prime Minister to order a bank holiday. At a time when one group of remarkable young women are held up as exemplifying the best of us, nobody in power can afford to miss the moment. Even Nigel Farage, more of a cricket man, was in on the act, writing: 'What an absolutely fantastic watch. Well done, girls!' The alignment made sense, given Farage's history of campaigning hard on patriotic values. When Rishi Sunak left last year's D-Day commemorations in Normandy, the Reform leader accused him of being unpatriotic and failing to understand 'our culture'. With Starmer, the positioning is more fluid. Although he has dwelt many times on his memory of belting out Three Lions at the old Wembley in 1996, he also claimed on St George's Day this year that England faced a 'neverending fight for our flag and what it represents'. Against this backdrop, Kelly might seem a little off-grid with her comments, disconnected from the orthodoxy that patriotism is inherently complicated. Starmer's stated view, which bears eerie similarities with Southgate's, is that it is about 'more than just respecting a shared symbol, it is about service to your country, its people and its values'. Kelly, however, has restored it to the Oxford English Dictionary definition: 'A love of your country and the desire to defend it.' Of all her enduring imprints on the English sporting landscape – the winning goal in 2022, the decisive penalty in 2025 – it is her pride in the place where she belongs that should secure her the greatest public affection yet.
Reuters
5 minutes ago
- Reuters
US, China hold new talks on tariff truce extension, easing path for Trump-Xi meeting
STOCKHOLM, July 28 (Reuters) - Top U.S. and Chinese economic officials met in Stockholm on Monday to resume talks to resolve longstanding economic disputes at the centre of a trade war between the world's top two economies, aiming to extend a truce by three months. U.S. Treasury Chief Scott Bessent was part of a U.S. negotiating team that entered Rosenbad, the Swedish prime minister's office in central Stockholm in early afternoon. China's Vice Premier He Lifeng was also seen arriving at the venue on video footage. China is facing an August 12 deadline to reach a durable tariff agreement with President Donald Trump's administration, after Beijing and Washington reached preliminary deals in May and June to end weeks of escalating tit-for-tat tariffsand a cut-off of rare earth minerals. Without an agreement, global supply chains could face renewed turmoil from U.S. duties snapping back to triple-digit levels that would amount to a bilateral trade embargo. U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said that he did not expect "some kind of enormous breakthrough today" at the talks in Stockholm that he was attending. "What I expect is continued monitoring and checking in on the implementation of our agreement thus far, making sure that key critical minerals are flowing between the parties and setting the groundwork for enhanced trade and balanced trade going forward," he told CNBC. The Stockholm talks come hot on the heels of Trump's biggest trade deal yet with the European Union on Sunday for a 15% tariff on most EU goods exports to the United States, including autos. Trade analysts said that another 90-day extension of a tariff and export control truce struck in mid-May between China and the United States was likely. An extension would facilitate planning for a potential meeting between Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping in late October or early November. The Financial Times reported on Monday that the U.S. had paused curbs on tech exports to China to avoid disrupting trade talks with Beijing and support Trump's efforts to secure a meeting with Xi this year. Previous U.S.-China trade talks in Geneva and London in May and June focused on bringing U.S. and Chinese retaliatory tariffs down from triple-digit levels and restoring the flow of rare earth minerals halted by China and Nvidia's (NVDA.O), opens new tab H20 AI chips and other goods halted by the United States. So far, the talks have not delved into broader economic issues. They include U.S. complaints that China's state-led, export-driven model is flooding world markets with cheap goods, and Beijing's complaints that U.S. national security export controls on tech goods seek to stunt Chinese growth. "Geneva and London were really just about trying to get the relationship back on track so that they could, at some point, actually negotiate about the issues which animate the disagreement between the countries in the first place," said Scott Kennedy, a China economics expert at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington. Bessent has already flagged a deadline extension and has said he wants China to rebalance its economy away from exports to more domestic consumption -- a decades-long goal for U.S. policymakers. Analysts say the U.S.-China negotiations are far more complex than those with other Asian countries and will require more time. China's grip on the global market for rare earth minerals and magnets, used in everything from military hardware to car windshield wiper motors, has proved to be an effective leverage point on U.S. industries. In the background of the talks is speculation about a possible meeting between Trump and Xi in late October. Trump has said he will decide soon on a landmark trip to China, and a new flare-up of tariffs and export controls would likely derail planning.
