SpiceJet shares surge 6% as Supreme Court rejects Maran, KAL Airways' plea seeking ₹1,323 crore damages
A Supreme Court bench comprising Justices Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha and Atul S Chandurkar dismissed the special leave petitions filed by KAL Airways and its promoter Kalanithi Maran, effectively closing the door on their efforts to seek damages from SpiceJet over a failed share transfer deal. "Both the special leave petitions are dismissed," the court stated, marking a definitive end to the appeal process.
Earlier, the Delhi High Court had declined to condone a 55-day delay in filing and a 226-day delay in re-filing the appeal, citing what it called a 'calculated gamble' by the appellants and accusing them of deliberately concealing facts from the court and SpiceJet. The concept of condonation of delay is governed by the Limitation Act, which typically allows 90 days to file an appeal; any delay beyond that requires a credible explanation—something the courts said was lacking in this case.
The dispute originated in 2015 when Maran and KAL Airways transferred their 58.46 percent controlling stake in SpiceJet to its original founder Ajay Singh. The transfer came at a time when the airline was facing a severe financial crisis, prompting Singh to take over operations and liabilities. Maran and KAL later claimed they had paid for convertible warrants and preference shares worth over ₹ 1,300 crore, which they alleged were never issued.
The case went into arbitration, where an initial ruling favoured KAL Airways. However, the Delhi High Court subsequently set aside the arbitral award, a decision that was upheld by the Supreme Court in 2024. Following this, KAL Airways and Maran attempted to revive their damages claim through the High Court and later the apex court—both of which rejected their appeals.
According to legal news platform Bar and Bench, the Supreme Court found the appellants' conduct to be lacking in good faith and part of a deliberate litigation strategy, rather than a result of negligence or delay.
SpiceJet had earlier welcomed the Delhi High Court's decision, stating that a panel of three retired Supreme Court judges had already examined and rejected the damages claim. The airline reiterated that Maran's repeated attempts to revive the case amounted to judicial overreach.
The ruling comes at a time when SpiceJet is grappling with financial stress and a shrinking market share amid multiple operational challenges. As of March 2025, the airline reported a net worth of ₹ 683 crore, supported by a ₹ 500 crore equity infusion from its promoter group, which included ₹ 294 crore added in the March quarter. The airline has also entered strategic partnerships with StandardAero and Carlyle Aviation to accelerate engine overhauls and fleet expansion.
As part of its summer schedule, SpiceJet launched 24 new domestic flights and added new destinations such as Dehradun, Porbandar, and Tuticorin. By the end of 2025, the airline aims to operate a fleet of 52 aircraft, most of which will be leased on wet or dry terms.
Following the Supreme Court verdict, SpiceJet shares rose as much as 6 percent to an intra-day high of ₹ 40.42. However, the stock remains over 49 percent below its 52-week high of ₹ 79.90, touched in September 2024. It recently hit a 52-week low of ₹ 37.87 earlier this month.
Over the past year, the stock has declined by 30 percent. The share price has remained under pressure in 2025, falling 12 percent in June and 6.4 percent in May. While April saw a brief recovery with an 8.4 percent gain, the preceding months were also negative—down 11.8 percent in January, 6 percent in February, and 3.4 percent in March. July so far has seen a marginal decline of 0.3 percent.
Disclaimer: The views and recommendations made above are those of individual analysts or broking companies, and not of Mint. We advise investors to check with certified experts before making any investment decisions.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
6 hours ago
- Economic Times
Trump hits Brazil with tariffs, sanctions but key sectors excluded
AP Brazil's former President Jair Bolsonaro points a photo of him during a motorcycle caravan by supporters to protest the Supreme Court trial where he faces charges for alleged involvement in a 2022 coup attempt, in Brasília, Brazil, Tuesday, July 29, 2025. (AP Photo/Luis Nova) U.S. President Donald Trump on Wednesday slapped a 50% tariff on most Brazilian goods to fight what he has called a "witch hunt" against former President Jair Bolsonaro, but softened the blow by excluding sectors such as aircraft, energy and orange juice from heavier levies. Trump announced the tariffs, some of the steepest levied on any economy in the U.S. trade war, as his administration also unveiled sanctions on the Brazilian supreme court justice who has been overseeing Bolsonaro's trial on charges of plotting a coup. "Alexandre de Moraes has taken it upon himself to be judge and jury in an unlawful witch hunt against U.S. and Brazilian citizens and companies," Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said in a statement. Bessent said Moraes "is responsible for an oppressive campaign of censorship, arbitrary detentions that violate human rights, and politicized prosecutions - including against former President Jair Bolsonaro." Last week, the Brazilian justice levied search warrants and restraining orders against Bolsonaro over allegations he courted Trump's interference in his criminal case, in which he is accused of plotting to stop President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva from taking office in 2023. Trump's final tariff order and the sanctions followed weeks of sparring with Lula, who has likened the U.S. president, a close ideological ally of Bolsonaro's, to an unwanted "emperor." On Wednesday, Lula and his government closed ranks behind Moraes, calling the U.S. sanctions "unacceptable." "The Brazilian government considers the use of political arguments to defend the trade measures announced by the U.S. government against Brazilian exports to be unjustifiable," it said in a statement. Lula added that Brazil was willing to negotiate trade with the U.S., but that it would not give up on the tools it had at hand to defend itself, hinting that retaliation was possible. Still, Trump's tariff order threatened that if Brazil were to retaliate, the U.S. would also up the ante. DIPLOMACY AT WORK Despite Trump's effort to use the tariffs to alter the trajectory of a pivotal criminal trial, the range of exemptions came as a relief for many in Brasilia, who since Trump announced the tariff earlier this month had been urging protections for major exporters caught in the crossfire. "We're not facing the worst-case scenario," Brazilian Treasury Secretary Rogerio Ceron told reporters. The new tariffs will go into effect on August 6, not on Friday as Trump announced originally. Trump's executive order formalizing a 50% tariff excluded dozens of key Brazilian exports to the United States, including civil aircraft, pig iron, precious metals, wood pulp, energy and fertilizers. Planemaker Embraer, whose chief executive has met with officials in Washington and U.S. clients in recent days to plead its case for relief, said an initial review indicated that a 10% tariff imposed by Trump in April remains in place, with the exclusion applying to the additional 40%. The exceptions are likely a response to concerns from U.S. companies, rather than a step back from Trump's efforts to influence Brazilian politics, said Rafael Favetti, a partner at political consultancy Fatto Inteligencia Politica in Brasilia. "This also shows that Brazilian diplomacy did its work correctly by working to raise awareness among U.S. companies," he said. Brazil's minister of foreign affairs, Mauro Vieira, said he met with U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Wednesday to express the nation's willingness to discuss tariffs after negotiations stalled in June, though he stressed Bolsonaro's legal troubles were not up for debate. It remains unclear what Brazilian authorities "are bringing to the negotiating table to, for instance, open the domestic market," Goldman Sachs said in a note to clients. IMPACT SMALLER THAN EXPECTED The effective tariff rate on Brazilian shipments to the U.S. should be around 30.8%, lower than previously expected due to the exemptions, according to Goldman. Oil shipments to the U.S., which had been suspended, are set to restart after being spared, lobby group IBP said. Meanwhile, mining lobby Ibram said the exemptions covered 75% of mining exports. However, it was still too soon to celebrate, said former Brazilian trade secretary Welber Barral, estimating that Brazil exports some 3,000 different products to the United States. "There will be an impact," Barral said. Trump's tariff exemptions did not shield two of Brazil's key exports to the U.S., beef and coffee. Meatpackers expect to log $1 billion in losses in the second half of the year on the new tariffs, lobby group Abiec, which represents beef producers including JBS and Marfrig , said. Coffee exporters will also continue to push for exemptions, they said in a statement. The government said it was readying measures to protect Brazil's businesses and workers. If Brazil were to retaliate against Trump's measures, that "would generate a larger negative impact" on activity and inflation, Goldman said. "The political inclination may be to retaliate, but exporters and business associations have been urging the Brazilian administration to engage, negotiate and de-escalate."
India Today
6 hours ago
- India Today
Unjustified: President Lula slams Trump over tariffs and sanctions on Brazil
The Brazilian government has warned of possible retaliation and economic countermeasures after US President Donald Trump announced steep 50% tariffs on most Brazilian goods, set to take effect from August move escalated trade tensions between the two countries, with Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva calling the US action unjustified. He also vowed to protect national interests under Brazilian Trump's announcement, President Lula abruptly left an animal rights event, stating that he needed to "defend the sovereignty of the Brazilians" in response to the tariff RESPONSE TO US TARIFF MEASURES The Brazilian government issued a statement reiterating its willingness to engage in trade negotiations with the United States. However, it emphasised that Brazil will not give up the tools it has under national law to defend itself, hinting that retaliation could be statement criticised the use of "political arguments" by the US to justify the tariffs. It also expressed support for Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes, who recently faced US sanctions, describing such measures as an "unacceptable" interference in Brazil's judicial industry lobby, the CNI, has estimated that that the imposition of 50% US import tariffs could result in the loss of over 100,000 jobs and knock off 0.2 percentage points from Brazil's annual economic growth, resulting in a downfall for economic growth and employment . Brazil's agribusiness lobby, CNA, warns exports to the US -- the country's second-largest trading partner -- could fall by half. And this is an especially delicate juncture for tensions escalated on April 2, declared as the Liberation Day by Trump, Brazil faced the minimum 10% tariff rate, but if a deal is not reached by the end of this week, South America's largest economy is staring at a whopping 50% levy imposed by OFFICIALS FRUSTRATED OVER US RESPONSEA Brazilian government official expressed frustration over the lack of dialogue from the US, saying, "Trade deals are a result of negotiations, but there is no dialogue if the US doesn't respond to our letters. I'm worried."Despite the challenges, Brazilian Treasury Secretary Rogerio Ceron remained cautiously optimistic, stating, "We're not facing the worst-case scenario. It's a more benign outcome than it could have been."The tariffs imposed have excluded Brazilian exports to US in sectors like civil aircraft, pig iron, precious metals, wood pulp, energy and fertilizers. Despite the exemptions, Brazilian trade secretary Welber Barral stated that there will be an to Rafael Favetti, a partner at the political consultancy Fatto Inteligencia Politica in Brasilia, the exceptions probably stem from worries of US firms, rather than representing a retreat from Trump's attempts to manipulate Brazilian politics.- EndsWith inputs from ReutersTune InMust Watch
The Hindu
11 hours ago
- The Hindu
On SC directive, CBI registers 22 cases to probe alleged builders-banks nexus; conducts searches at 47 locations in NCR
The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) on Wednesday (July 30, 2025) conducted searches at 47 locations in the national capital region (NCR) after registering 22 cases, on the Supreme Court directive, to probe the alleged nexus between builders and financial institutions for cheating homebuyers. Names of the companies and their top functionaries mentioned in these First Information Reports include Supertech Limited, AVJ Developers (India), Earthcon Universal Infratech, Rudra Buildwell Projects, Geotech Promoters, Shubhkamna Buildtech, Bulland Buildtech, Decent Buildwell, Rudra Buildwell Construction, Saha Infratech, and Dream Procon. Logix City Developers, Shubhkamna Buildtech, Jaypee Infratech, Sequel Buildcon, Ajnara India, Vatika Limited, CHD Developers Limited, Ninex Developers, Jaypee Sports International Limited/Jaiprakash Associates Limited, Idea Builders, and Manju J Homes India Limited have also been named, according to the agency. Hundreds of homebuyers in the NCR, being cheated by builders/developers and further aggrieved by the coercive action of financial institutions against them, had approached the Supreme Court seeking relief. Noting that they were cheated by innovating and introducing a 'subvention scheme' of home loans, the Court had in April directed the CBI to institute seven preliminary enquiries. Accordingly, the agency completed its inquiry in six matters within three months and submitted a status report before the Court. 'Upon perusal of the status report submitted by the CBI, the Hon'ble SC directed the CBI to register 22 regular cases, against different builders in the NCR area and unknown officials of financial institutions,' the agency said, adding that the searches were conducted in Delhi, Gurugram, Noida, Greater Noida, and Ghaziabad. In the FIR against Supertech, the agency alleged the builders — in connivance with banks/financial institutions, —innovated the subvention scheme for sale of its nine residential projects stating 'No Pre-EMI till delivery of possession of residential unit', thereby lured homebuyers for booking/purchasing residential units. While the projects were launched from 2010 to 2017, Supertech started defaulting on payment of EMIs in 2018-2019 and neither constructed/completed the project nor continued to pay pre-EMI/EMI as promised till handing over the possession of flats to homebuyers. Their deposits were also not refunded, as alleged. The agency found that the banks started deducting EMI from homebuyers and in the event of default reported their accounts as non-performing asset and therefore, their CIBIL score were adversely impacted. Among the accused persons in the case are unknown officials of erstwhile Indian Bank, ICICI Bank, Indiabulls Housing Finance Limited, HDFC Housing Finance Limited, PNB Housing Finance, India Infoline Housing Finance, L&T Housing Finance, and Aditya Birla Housing Finance. Similar instances were found in other projects in question. In the various FIRs, the role of unknown officials of banks and financial institutions such as the State Bank of India, formerly State Bank of Travancore, UCO Bank, Reliance Housing Finance Limited, Axis Bank, Tata Capital Housing Finance, Diwan Housing Finance Limited, Central Bank of India, Samman Capital Limited, and Punjab National Bank will also be investigated by the agency.
