How to Out-Troll the Trolls, as Told by the Internet's Foremost Posters
Fortunately, a new generation of online avengers has emerged to push back this toxic tsunami of trolling, using all the tools at their disposal. WIRED spoke to some of the internet's most famous (and infamous) combatants, from a science communicator taking on anti-vaxxers to a moderator in one of Reddit's feistiest corners, about how to win a fight online.
Interviews have been edited for length and clarity.
Derek Guy, aka The Menswear Guy, @dieworkwear
Last week, you wrote a long post on X talking about your life as an undocumented immigrant. Vice President JD Vance made a separate post seeming to suggest you should be deported. You followed that up by posting some photos of him and saying, 'I think I can outrun you in these clothes.'
To be honest, that was just a throwaway line. I'm not trying to win an online dunk contest with the vice president of the United States. What stands out most to me in that interaction is not who 'won' the exchange but the fact that the vice president of the United States is so intensely online, at least compared to VPs of the past.
The WIRED Guide to Winning a Fight
Illustration: Shirley Chong
Right now, everyone seems ready to throw down. More than ever, it's important to pick your battles—and know how to win.
That, to me, is one of the more interesting shifts in American politics: A large segment of the Republican coalition—including figures like Charlie Kirk and Matt Walsh—is deeply immersed in online spaces. Even the official government accounts for the Department of Homeland Security and White House appear to be managed by people fluent in the language of Twitter.
I can't imagine any VP in the past, such as Dick Cheney, 'clapping back' or posting memes. Being a highly 'online' person is a very embarrassing thing and should be relegated to basement losers.
Do you often get trolled?
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBS News
2 minutes ago
- CBS News
Supreme Court tees up Louisiana case on whether racial redistricting is unconstitutional
The Supreme Court has teed up a major case for next term on whether racial redistricting is unconstitutional. In a Friday night scheduling order, the high court asked parties to file briefs on whether Louisiana's creation of a second majority-minority House seat violates the 14th or 15th Amendments. The question could significantly curtail efforts to force states to create majority-minority congressional districts. The order is part of a case from the 2024 term regarding Louisiana's congressional map that justices decided to hold over for re-argument. The justices set a deadline of Aug. 27 for briefs to be filed by appellants on the question. Reply briefs are due Oct. 3, the Friday before the beginning of the 2025 session. In June, the Supreme Court ordered further arguments over Louisiana's congressional map that was approved by the state's GOP-led legislature and created a second majority-Black district. An order from the court issued on the last day of the 2024 term restored the case to its calendar for reargument. Justice Clarence Thomas dissented from the move to order more arguments and said the court should have decided the case. The move meant the state's map with two majority-Black districts would remain intact for now. The district lines at the center of the dispute were invalidated in 2022 by a three-judge lower court panel, which sided with a group of self-described "non-African-American voters" who had challenged the House map as an unconstitutional racial gerrymander. The map wasn't the first crafted by the state's Republican-led legislature in the wake of the 2020 Census. Instead, Louisiana's efforts to redraw district lines, as all states do after the census, have resulted in a yearslong legal battle that has been before the Supreme Court twice before. The case demonstrated the challenges state lawmakers face when trying to balance trying to comply with the Voting Rights Act without relying too much on race in the drawing the political lines, which can run afoul of the Constitution's Equal Protection Clause. The Supreme Court's decision is also likely to have implications for the balance of power in the House in the 2026 midterm elections, when Republicans will try to hold onto their tiny Crawford contributed to this report.
Fox News
2 minutes ago
- Fox News
Greg Gutfeld: Kamala Harris didn't even read her own book, even though it's at a fourth grade level
Fox News host Greg Gutfeld and the panel discuss former Vice President Kamala Harris' interview with Stephen Colbert and Gutfeld's upcoming late-night show appearance on 'Gutfeld!'
Fox News
2 minutes ago
- Fox News
Gutfeld torches Dems, liberal media: You ‘only have yourself to blame'
Fox News host Greg Gutfeld and the 'Gutfeld!' co-hosts address the media's response to President Donald Trump bringing back presidential fitness tests.
