
As session wraps up for summer, Legault vows to lead CAQ into 2026 election
QUEBEC — Facing criticism over reforms on everything from doctors' salaries to the CAQ government's energy policy and with Quebecers feeling the pinch in their pocketbooks, Premier François Legault vowed on Friday to soldier on and seek a new mandate in 2026.
'It's not easy for all governments in the world,' Legault said at a news conference wrapping up what has been a rocky winter sitting of the National Assembly. 'It's not easy. Its easy to say it's the fault of the government.
'I think it's normal. But when you look at the facts, we did better than Ontario and the rest of Canada for increases in salaries and disposable income. But people don't feel it. They say 'I don't feel I have more money. I count on you to explain.''
Referring to his other challenges, Legault said: 'What's important for me is not popularity. It's about results. I'm proud of the results.'
Legault was responding to a series of rocks falling on his administration from all sides — from the powerful medical and labour union movements and the opposition parties, who spent the morning painting the Coalition Avenir Québec government, which is nearing the end of its second term in office, as tired and washed up.
Parti Québécois Leader Paul St-Pierre Plamondon went so far as to say at his end-of-session news conference that Legault no longer has the 'democratic legitimacy' to govern and called on him to call an early election.
'I think he has to take a long walk on the grass,' interim Liberal leader Marc Tanguay added, in a reference to former prime minister Pierre Trudeau's famous walk in the snow in February 1984 where he decided to resign.
'I don't think he is the man of the situation. I think his time is past. François Legault needs to examine his conscience this summer.'
Legault was ready with an answer. He's staying and so are his ministers because he is not planning a summer cabinet shuffle.
'We got a strong four-year mandate,' Legault said at a news conference in the lobby of his office. 'There will be another election in October 2026. It will be up to Quebecers to choose.
'There won't be any walk (in the grass or snow). I will be candidate in 2026, and I am going to win a third majority mandate.'
Referring to Health Minister Christian Dubé's battle with Quebec's medical specialists and GPs over Bill 106, which would peg part of their wages to their performance, Legault said he's ready to fight.
'The easy thing to do is what other governments did, including that of Mr. Couillard, and backtrack,' Legault said. 'But I think for Quebecers it's key for the efficiency of our health-care network that we change the way we pay the doctors.
'It won't be an easy battle, but it is necessary. I won't backtrack, never.'
He had the same tough talk to respond to those who said the government's fresh attempt to reduce the number of permanent and temporary immigrants in Montreal and Laval goes too far.
On Thursday, Immigration Minister Jean-François Roberge called on Ottawa to cut in half the number of temporary immigrants in Quebec at the same time as tabling a consultation document in which Quebec proposes to drastically reduce the immigration category it controls.
'I know Québec solidaire and the Liberals are going to say we are blowing on the embers of intolerance,' Legault said. 'Listen, Quebecers are a welcoming people. We understand many people want to come and live here to improve their lives.
'But we have moved beyond our capacity to integrate. If we want to protect our language and our values, we have to reduce the number we have in Montreal and in Laval.'
Legault also tried to shift the focus away from the gloomy economic picture by arguing his government has the courage to face the turmoil, including that created by U.S. President Donald Trump with his trade tariffs.
He said Quebecers need a government that makes the economy a priority, with ministers who know which 'buttons to push.'
'More than ever, we need a nationalist government focused on the economy,' he said.
He argued that his new, excellent relationship with Prime Minister Mark Carney, a man he has praised because he cares about the economy, can help get more job-creation projects off the ground.
While political leaders indulged in fun banter in wishing each other well for the summer — it was Tanguay's last day on the job because the Liberals will elect a new leader June 14 — the session ended on a sour note with the government invoking closure to fast-track its energy legislation, Bill 69, into law.
Here are a few of the major take-aways from the winter sitting of the legislature:
New laws adopted: Despite almost constant friction with the three opposition parties, the government did push through several key pieces of legislation during the session. Top of the list was Bill 84 on the integration of immigrants. Also passed was Bill 89, the law to shorten and limit strike actions considering the needs of the population; Bill 98, which amends the Election Act to preserve the integrity of the electoral process; and Bill 90, an act to recognize ice hockey as the national sport of Quebec. The government decided to delay the adoption process of Bill 106 on doctors' wages until the fall. Also left hanging at the committee stage for clause-by-clause study was Bill 94 expanding the ban on religious symbols to all the employees in schools. Work on those bills will resume in the fall.
Many sideshows: Current and incidental events rapidly derailed a parliamentary session that was supposed to be focused on secularism and language issues. It was not to be. Instead, the session was dominated by public squabbling between the government and Quebec's medical specialists and GPs over Bill 106. There were also almost daily shocking revelations from the Gallant Commission looking into the SAAQclic fiasco and even more shocking headlines on the state of the Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital.
Bad financial news: In March, Finance Minister Eric Girard presented his spring budget, one that confirmed Quebec's bleak financial picture. Arguing Quebec had to boost infrastructure spending to save the economy from Trump, Girard announced a historic deficit of $13.6 billion for 2025-2026. Three weeks later, the respected Standard & Poor's (S&P) lowered Quebec's credit rating from AA- to A+. It was the first time in 30 years that Quebec got a downgrade.
Opposition party ups and downs: The Québec solidaire opposition again found itself mired in controversies and dissent in the last few months. In March, after signalling for weeks his frustration, party co-spokesperson Gabriel Nadeau-Dubois stepped down from that role, saying he was worn out by the constant struggles within the party.
'The successive crisis have left scars,' a tearful Nadeau-Dubois said.
Things got worse for the party. In the March 17 byelection in Terrebonne riding, the QS candidate, Nadia Poirier, bagged less than five per cent of the vote. Disillusioned that not a single MNA helped her during the campaign, Poirier defected to the PQ.
The PQ itself ended the session on a high note, leading the pack in public opinion polls, but it emerged during the federal election that there was friction between it and its cousins in the Bloc Québécois.
The Liberals end their session with high expectation that the new leader they pick June 14 helps them move out of the political hinterland.
The legislature resumes sitting Sept. 16.
This story was originally published June 6, 2025 at 4:37 PM.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Montreal Gazette
15 hours ago
- Montreal Gazette
Opinion: Will the Supreme Court throw Legault a lifeline?
Op Eds A decision from the Supreme Court this fall could potentially reshape Quebec and Canadian politics for years to come. It could also be the political lifeline François Legault was secretly praying for. Canada's top court has announced it will begin public hearings on the legal challenge to Bill 21 in September. A record 38 groups are to testify before the justices, most of them publicly opposed to Quebec's secularism law. With his Coalition Avenir Québec trailing far behind in the polls, Legault couldn't have wished for better timing. The clock is ticking on next fall's general election, and he desperately needs a drastic shift in public opinion. It's unlikely the cabinet shuffle he promised at the beginning of summer will be enough to revive his government's fortunes. He needs much more than that. A constitutional showdown with Ottawa could be the catalyst Legault is looking for. A strong majority of Quebecers support the principle of separating state and religions. This debate has been simmering for over two decades now — remember Hérouxville, Bouchard-Taylor and the 'reasonable accommodations' crisis under Jean Charest? For many voters, especially francophones, secularism has become over the years a fundamental, non-negotiable value. When it was first adopted in 2019, Bill 21 was supported by nearly two-thirds of Quebecers. If the Supreme Court rules against it, the backlash could be fierce — and Legault may try to harness the public's anger to his advantage. In his position, a smart move might be to call a snap general election, asking for a strong mandate to defend Quebec's core values and fight for the right to legislate without federal interference. At this stage, it could be his last remaining wild card — both to save face and to salvage his party's future. At the heart of the case lies an important legal question: Can a province invoke pre-emptively Section 33 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms — the so-called 'notwithstanding clause' — in order to shield legislation from future court challenges? But the clause exists for a good reason. As former Quebec minister and respected constitutional scholar Benoît Pelletier once wrote: 'Contrary to what some have argued, the notwithstanding power does not undermine the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Rather, it is part of it. It is intended to ensure that collective interests are fairly taken into account.' A ruling against Bill 21 could spark a constitutional crisis the likes of which Canada hasn't seen since the failure of the Meech Lake Accord 35 years ago. For many Quebecers, it would be seen as blatant and abusive federal overreach into the province's internal affairs — a move that could even reignite debates over Quebec's place in Canada and bolster support for sovereignty. Aside from Legault, Parti Québécois Leader Paul St-Pierre Plamondon is likely watching with anticipation. A nationalist surge in response to the court's ruling could benefit both the CAQ and PQ — potentially at the expense of Pablo Rodriguez's Quebec Liberal Party. So it seems the Supreme Court is walking a political tightrope. There's reason to be wary when unelected judges appear poised to tell millions of people — and their democratically elected National Assembly — that they are wrong on an issue as emotionally, historically and culturally charged as secularism in Quebec — a society which, even 60 years after the Quiet Revolution, still bears the scars of centuries of domination by the then all-powerful Catholic Church. If nationalists play their cards right, the consequences of this ruling could extend far beyond the specific legal question, potentially pushing more Quebecers to seek greater autonomy or even independence from the rest of country. With just a year to go before the next provincial election, the Supreme Court's decision could prove to be a major — and risky — political turning point. The stakes are high, and Canada's unity now rests in the hands of its nine Justices.

Montreal Gazette
2 days ago
- Montreal Gazette
Lincoln: ADM conduct in airport expansion flies in the face of good corporate citizenship
Op Eds The Gazette's front-page headline of July 24 — '' Airport consultation flies under radar '' — came as no surprise to me. Aéroports de Montréal appears to have developed an ingrained habit of flying low, far too low, regarding consultation on its projects and their impacts. In 2021, ADM decided to extend its wings into commercial development. It undertook to sublease federal land under its airport-management lease to a Montreal corporate group, Medicom/Meltech, for a substantial mask manufacturing plant of 15,500 square metres. The facility would have covered the large expanse of milkweed plants known as the Monarch Fields, an essential habitat for the endangered monarch butterfly, protected federally under the Species at Risk Act. The reaction of broad swaths of civil society was swift, incredulous and sharply negative. Substantive briefs were submitted during the short consultation period, and public protests ensued. Recognizing the legitimacy of the public outcry, Medicom/Meltech proved a responsible corporate citizen with its praiseworthy decision to locate its plant elsewhere. For ADM, however, this public lesson in responsible corporate citizenship seemed to fall on deaf ears. Whether in a fit of pique to show those pesky protesters who was the boss, or for whatever reason, ADM chose summertime in 2022 to suddenly raze to the ground an estimated 4,000 milkweed plants of the Monarch Fields covering 19 hectares. The highly descriptive words of Marwah Rizqy, MNA for St-Laurent, vividly capture the complete exasperation of civil society: 'Pendant que les Québécois fêtaient la Saint-Jean-Baptiste, Aéroports de Montréal passait la tondeuse.' Indeed. While Quebecers were celebrating la Fête nationale, ADM was mowing the field. This spring, ADM was at it again. It announced it is taking over the land it leases to the City of Dorval for its golf course to build a fuel depot and decarbonization plant. Not only did Dorval Mayor Marc Doret point out that more suitable alternative areas existed, but he also joined representatives from Montreal, St-Laurent and civil society to underscore the irony of obliterating mature trees and flora — the surest natural sequesters of carbon — to replace them with a facility surrounded by paved access roads and parking areas to ... decarbonize. Hopefully, this is another plant that will not see the light of day on federal land. The article of July 24 refers to a $10-billion expansion project. I repeat, $10 billion. Yet the consultation period for each of the two separate components of the project is a mere 30 days! Is this a joke, and does ADM believe this is responsible behaviour for a not-for-profit corporation entrusted to provide a major essential service to millions? In the article, Pierre Lachapelle, president of Les Pollués de Montréal-Trudeau, referred to realistic consultation periods offered by organizations such as the Bureau d'audiences publiques sur l'environnement (BAPE), which holds independent environmental impact assessments on provincial projects. Consultations for the $6.3-billion REM project lasted two years. They were widespread and contentious, as the huge investment and its impacts clearly demanded. Here, ADM is giving interested citizens 30 days for written submissions on a massive project. May I suggest the qualifiers 'outrageous' and 'arrogant' are not out of line? It brought to mind another airport project where, obviously, due diligence and meaningful consultations must have lacked the thoroughness its importance demanded. Had the billions now being spent on the back of finessed ''consultations'' been directed instead to fast-rail access and the projected extension of Highway 13, maybe the white elephant that Mirabel became could — should — have been Montreal's airport of the long-term future. For several years, an extensive consensus of civil society has endured regarding the crucial importance of protecting the federal lands around the airport. Prime Minister Mark Carney has stated that this unique natural site is one being considered as a national urban park. It is high time ADM should become a conscientious corporate citizen and, along with the federal government, start earning our trust for this worthy cause.


CTV News
2 days ago
- CTV News
Advance voting underway in provincial riding of Arthabaska
A person votes in Montreal on the first Monday of October 2018, election day in Quebec. (The Canadian Press/Graham Hughes) Advance voting is taking place this weekend in the provincial riding of Arthabaska, in Quebec's Centre-du-Québec region, ahead of the Aug. 11 byelection. Ten candidates are in the running. The race appears to be shaping up as a contest between Quebec Conservative Party leader Éric Duhaime and Parti Québécois candidate Alex Boissonneault. The governing Coalition Avenir Québec (CAQ) is fielding Keven Brasseur. Other candidates from parties represented in the National Assembly include Chantale Marchand for the Quebec Liberal Party and Pascale Fortin for Québec solidaire. Also running with authorization from Élections Québec are Louis Chandonnet (Équipe autonomiste), Denis Gagné (independent), Trystan Martel (Climat Québec), Arpad Nagy (independent) and Éric Simard (Union nationale). The byelection was triggered by the resignation of CAQ MNA Éric Lefebvre, who left provincial politics mid-mandate to run federally. He was elected April 28 under the Conservative Party of Canada banner in the federal riding of Richmond–Arthabaska. In the last Quebec general election in October 2022, Lefebvre was handily re-elected with 51.75 per cent of the vote — more than 12,200 votes ahead of his closest challenger, Conservative candidate Tarek Henoud. This report by The Canadian Press was first published in French on Aug. 3, 2025.