Pietermaritzburg High Court judge rules on fairness in repossession case
Image: Supplied
The purpose of credit regulation must be seen as encouraging good faith engagement and promoting consumer rehabilitation, not as punishing transient default that has been remedied.
This was the message of the Pietermaritzburg High Court in an application by BMW Financial Services (applicant) in which they wanted to repossess a vehicle as they claimed the owner had fallen in arrears with his monthly payment.
The financial service provider wanted a summary judgment to be issued against Ndlangia Funeral Services and its owner Lungisani Ndlanga (the respondents).
A summary judgment is a request for a court to rule in favour of one party without a full trial. This is usually when the court finds that there are no genuine disputes.
But by the time the application had served before the court, the respondents had already paid the arrears. The financial service provider, however, still wanted an order allowing it to repossess the vehicle, as it argued the respondents had breached the sale agreement by falling into arrears in the first place (although this is no longer the situation).
Judge Mokgene Masipa remarked that courts must remain alert to credit providers who weaponise technical breach for swift asset recovery, even where the rationale for enforcement has fallen away.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
The judge noted that at the time the application for summary judgment was launched, the respondents had brought their account up to date, but this was after the default and the issuance of summons.
In opposing the application, the respondents relied on the absence of arrears and their efforts to make payment to resolve the matter.
The applicant told the court that prior to turning to court, a notice in terms of the National Credit Act was issued to the respondents, and thereafter summons.
The core of the applicant's case rests on the enforcement of cancellation and return of the vehicle based on the respondents' failure to timeously meet their payment obligations under the agreement.
Judge Masipa said while it is true that default initially occurred, the agreement was effectively reinstated when the respondents paid the arrears and brought their account up to date. He added that the matter is not one deserving of the stringent remedy of summary judgment.
The continued pursuit of cancellation and repossession in these circumstances raises serious concerns about fairness and proportionality, the judge said.
He added that it would be contrary to public policy for a credit provider to persist with enforcement action, particularly repossession, in circumstances where the defaulting party has rectified its breach prior to the matter being heard.
'Enforcement in such circumstances serves no purpose other than to punish the consumer, and is entirely at odds with the rehabilitative and equitable principles that underpin both the NCA and public policy.'
The judge said the public interest in this matter is real and not incidental. 'The applicant is a financial service provider inherently tied to serving vulnerable members of the public. In this case, it would be contrary to public interest and policy considerations to permit the applicant to enforce its rights strictly on the basis of past default, when the underlying indebtedness has been cured.'
He turned down the application for summary judgment and said the matter should be ventilated through evidence.
zelda.venter@inl.co.za
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
17 hours ago
- IOL News
Rising debt: calls for greater consumer vigilance
The National Financial Ombud Scheme South Africa (NFO) is concerned about high levels of debt exposure in the wake of the release of TransUnion's Q1 2025 Industry Insights Report, which confirms a troubling trend: credit products commonly used by lower- and middle-income consumers are experiencing rapid growth in both uptake and default rates. Image: File With the dramatic shifting of credit from a tool for upward mobility to a survival mechanism for necessities like food, rent, electricity and transport, alarm bells are being sounded about unsustainable debt levels of consumers. The National Financial Ombud Scheme South Africa (NFO) is concerned about high levels of debt exposure in the wake of the release of TransUnion's Q1 2025 Industry Insights Report, which confirms a troubling trend: credit products commonly used by lower- and middle-income consumers are experiencing rapid growth in both uptake and default rates. With many households relying on credit just to meet basic needs, the NFO has warned of a surge in retail and non-bank loan defaults and urges consumers to beware of reckless lending, which can only place them deeper in debt. FINANCIAL STRAIN According to TransUnion, which explores financial trends in South Africa, non-bank personal loans now reflect the highest rate of serious delinquency in over three years, with 41.3% of account holders falling three months or more into arrears. This represents a sharp 520 basis point year-on-year increase and outpaces the default rate for bank personal loans by over 15%. The statistics for other retail credit products are equally concerning for the NFO. Default rates now stand at 27.1% for retail instalment accounts, 25.9% for clothing accounts, and 14.9% for retail revolving credit. The TransUnion report shows that while more consumers are taking up loans, retail instalment credit is up 16%, clothing credit 7.6%, and revolving credit 5.4%. The simultaneous rise in missed repayments signals growing financial strain on households. Kwanda Vabaza, Manager - Adjudication at the NFO's Banking and Credit Division, said: 'These figures are not just statistics. They reflect the reality of households using credit to survive rather than to grow. When nearly half of all non-bank loan holders are behind on their payments, the system is under serious strain. KNOW YOUR CREDIT RIGHTS 'Many consumers remain unaware of their rights under the National Credit Act (NCA), particularly when it comes to reckless lending.' The Banking and Credit Division of the NFO, led by Nerosha Maseti, has jurisdiction on non-bank credit disputes, covering credit agreements such as store and furniture accounts, microloans, non-bank credit cards, non-bank vehicle finance, non-bank home loans and other forms of credit not issued by banks. Vabaza said: 'We continue to see cases where credit was granted to consumers who clearly could not afford the repayments. This is classified as reckless lending and is prohibited by the NCA. In such instances, consumers are entitled to relief, which may include restructured terms or, in extreme cases, a recommendation by the NFO for the cancellation of the debt. 'The NFO also frequently receives complaints relating to clothing accounts, furniture and appliance credit, store cards, and non-bank personal loans. ''These disputes typically involve issues such as prescription (legally expired debt), incorrect balances, credit bureau listing disputes, fraud, and affordability assessments that were either not conducted or done improperly, leaving consumers burdened with unsustainable debt. 'Consumers have the right to receive credit only when it is affordable and in their best interests. They are also entitled to clear explanations of the total cost and legal consequences of any credit agreement they enter into.' Fortunately, for those who must contend with credit woes, they need not suffer in silence when things go wrong - the NFO is ready to help consumers with their challenges, ensuring financial fairness, transparency and justice in credit-related matters. The NFO offers free alternate dispute resolution, thus protecting and empowering credit-active consumers. 'Where rights are violated, consumers should contact our office. Our services are free and impartial, and we aim to resolve disputes in a way that is fair to both the credit provider and the consumer,' said Vabaza. CREDIT APPLICATION TIPS The NFO encourages all consumers to keep the following tips in mind when using or applying for credit: Only borrow what you can afford to repay, and do not misrepresent your affordability prospects. Before accepting any credit, check your income and monthly expenses to make sure you can manage the repayments comfortably. Avoid using credit for day-to-day expenses: Relying on credit to buy food, fuel, or airtime can quickly lead to debt spirals. Credit should be used wisely, not for survival. Understand all the terms and costs: Ask for a Pre-Agreement Statement and Quotation, which contains a full breakdown of interest rates, monthly repayments, and total costs before signing a credit agreement. Know your rights under the National Credit Act (NCA): You are entitled to fair treatment, proper affordability checks, and clear communication from any credit provider. If these are not followed, you may have a valid complaint. Pay on time and keep track of your accounts: Set up reminders or debit orders to ensure you never miss a payment. Keep a record of all your credit agreements and statements to avoid surprises 'If you are struggling or believe your credit agreement may not have been fair, contact the NFO. We are here to help ensure accountability and to protect your rights as a credit consumer,' Vabaza concluded. The National Financial Ombud Scheme of South Africa
IOL News
3 days ago
- IOL News
Prudential Authority: Ithala Bank's survival must respect the rule of law
The future of Ithala bank continues to argued in court Image: Doctor Ngcobo / Independent Newspapers The need to preserve the existence of Ithala Bank cannot override the rule of law, as Ithala was always required to comply with the Banks Act; this was the argument heard by the three Judges (full bench) at the Durban High Court on Friday. This is because the Ithala's Repayment Administrator (RA) and the South African Reserve Bank's Prudential Authority (PA) are appealing the Pietermaritzburg High Court decision that the entity can continue to conduct its business. Ithala held an exemption from the PA, which allowed it to take deposits. That exemption expired in December 2023. In January, the PA filed for Ithala's liquidation, and Johannes Kruger, the RA, instructed Absa Bank Limited to freeze all Ithala's accounts following the expiration of the exemption. However, Ithala continued to accept deposits and failed to assure the PA that it would cease its deposit-taking activities. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ As a result of Kruger's instruction, Ithala's day-to-day running effectively stopped on January 16, 2025. Ithala took this to the Pietermaritzburg High Court, and Judge Muzi Ncube interdicted and restrained Kruger from issuing any instructions. He said, pending the outcome of the liquidation appeal, Ithala could continue with its day-to-day running. T he Judge also stated that Kruger lacks operational and management control over Ithala's day-to-day operations. Moreover, Judge Ncube said if Ithala was forced to close its doors, members of the public would not be able to access their funds, and those who are South African Social Security Agency (Sassa) recipients would not be able to access their grants. He said the bank could be sued by unpaid service providers, and it could be evicted from its lease premises. Additionally, the Judge granted PA and Kruger leave to appeal his ruling at the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) and made an order for his ruling to remain in force, pending the appeal. In written arguments heard by the full bench, Kruger said Ithala should not frustrate his ability as RA to take over the operations and its assets to achieve the objective of his appointment. On December 18, 2023, the PA appointed Kruger as the RA. His appointment related to the repayment management of deposits collected unlawfully by Ithala. He asked for the full bench to set aside the orders made by Judge Ncube to give the bank the green light to function. 'If depositors will suffer harm and Ithala also claims that it will suffer harm, for purposes of the interim interdict, this court will weigh the balance of convenience,' the PA argued. The PA further argued that, according to sections 18(1) and 18(3), Judge Ncube should have rejected Ithala's application if it meant that depositors would also face irreparable harm, as this would violate their rights. 'Granting the orders would also go against the clear responsibilities outlined in the Banks Act, which are designed to protect depositors' interests,' read the arguments. In its response, Ithala said both PA and Kruger believe that they have the effect of suspending the constitution of the country, the basic conditions of the Employment Act 75 of 1997, the Companies Act of 71 of 2008, and the Income Tax Act 58 of 1962, amongst others. 'They believe they can unilaterally decide to halt the operations of a State-owned company and cancel all its contracts with its employees and service providers without a court order in circumstances where there is a pending litigation before the Courts over the extent of their powers,' Ithala said in its written arguments. It added that on January 20, 2025, Kruger, in defiance of an existing court order, unilaterally determined that salaries and benefits of Ithala employees would not be paid. Ithala warned that if the full bench rules in favour of PA and RA, the bank will shut down before the SCA appeal on its liquidation is heard. The provincial government, which has joined the fight in support of Ithala, said the findings of Judge Ncube were correct. 'Ithala has been placed in limbo through the conduct of Kruger,' it said.
IOL News
6 days ago
- IOL News
Ingonyama Trust Board announces R4 million refund for ancestral land residents
Ingonyama Trust Board acting CEO Siyamdumisa Vilakazi says spending over R4 million to reimburse homeowners who paid rental fees to occupy traditional land in KwaZulu-Natal will not financially harm the board. Image: Ingonyama Trust Board website The Ingonyama Trust Board (ITB) has described the more than R4 million that it has to spend to reimburse homeowners who, from 2007, paid rental fees to occupy traditional land in KwaZulu-Natal as a drop in the ocean. The board, whose sole trustee is Zulu King Misuzulu, succumbed to the Pietermaritzburg High Court and Constitutional Court pressure to reimburse all those who were charged rent for living on their ancestral land after their permission to occupy land were converted to lease agreements. Those who obtain the right to occupy the traditional land through paying the khonza fees to traditional leaders will not be refunded. During a press briefing held at the board's headquarters in Pietermaritzburg on Wednesday, ITB acting chief executive officer, Siyamdumisa Vilakazi, said there were 2.4 million people who would be refunded. Vilakazi said the reimbursement would not affect the operations of the trust as it makes about R100 million a year via various sources of income. 'We are looking at a period that is about close to 20 years now, from 2007, and we are looking at a total accumulation of R4 million. 'You can imagine that it is a drop in the ocean according to the revenue that we make on an annual basis,' said Vilakazi. He said besides leasing the land for residential purposes, which had not come to a stop, the trust has other forms of revenue generation, such as commercial rights on its land. 'The infrastructure that gets built provides the lease holding for that, which is the main source of income. The other sizable source of income that we have is our interest, royalties, dividends from investments, because we collect money on behalf of communities. 'We end up with a substantial cash reserve, which we reinvest in the market. The board also gets a grant from the government, which on average is about R24 million, and that grant is solely so that the board can function and board members can be paid,' said Vilakazi. He said that the fact that the trust would have to trace all those who were due to be refunded added to the administrative burden, as some of the beneficiaries had since passed away. 'It is also compounded by the fact that these are rural people we generally deal with and infrastructure for telecommunication is a new phenomenon, so there is a struggle in getting [hold of] them,' said Vilakazi. He said there were expectations that the board would spend more than R100 million refunding those who leased the land for residential purposes. 'We are refunding not more than R4.2 million in total because what we generally refund were people who had already existed when the conversions happened and some of them continue sitting and staying without making those rental payments,' said Vilakazi. The Council for the Advancement of the South African Constitution (CASAC) had taken the board to the high court, which in 2021 ruled that it was wrong that people of the province's rural areas be charged rents for the land they occupied for residential purposes. The court had ruled that the people residing on trust-held land were the true beneficiaries and that they should not be required to pay lease fees for land they already own under customary law. The trust applied to appeal the high court ruling at the Supreme Court of Appeal, which also dismissed the application for leave to appeal because there are no reasonable prospects of success. It also failed to fight this at the Constitutional Court. Vilakazi said at present, the board was actively working to honour the court orders and was currently contacting or tracing approximately 1 620 people who made payments under the leases from around 2008 until the date of the court order. 'So far, approximately 208 individuals have been traced and refunded, and we have given ourselves a period of 18 months to finilise contact tracing, payment and lease cancellation,' said Vilakazi. He said those who were charged rents paid various amounts, but on average it was about R1 200 per year. But this amount varied according to areas they lived in, and their age. [email protected]
