Open Polytechnic Launches New Introduction To Generative AI Micro-Credential
A new micro-credential developed by Open Polytechnic, New Zealand's specialist online learning provider, in conjunction with Spark, offers businesses and individuals the opportunity to understand and utilise Artificial Intelligence (AI).
The Introduction to Generative AI micro-credential, now open for enrolment, provides ākonga (learners) with an introductory understanding of how generative artificial intelligence can drive efficiency and innovation in Aotearoa New Zealand.
Topics covered in the micro-credential include practical guidelines for getting the most out of generative AI, the ethical use of AI, and Māori data sovereignty.
'Open Polytechnic is a world leader in online and distance education with significant expertise in educational technology,' says Open Polytechnic Executive Director Alan Cadwallader.
'We are pleased to be able to combine our expertise with a company like Spark NZ to provide opportunities for busy adult learners to upskill in AI and learn more about the latest advancements.'
'By completing this micro-credential, ākonga will learn how to integrate generative AI tools into their workflows, enhance communication, and leverage these technologies to streamline operations and enhance overall performance. This highly relevant micro-credential will also teach ākonga about the ethical implications and limitations of generative AI uniquely applied in an Aotearoa New Zealand context.'
Once ākonga (learners) have completed this micro-credential, they will have a basic understanding of Generative Artificial Intelligence to support their productivity, in both personal and work contexts, and know how to assess the generated content for accuracy, quality, and relevance.
This micro-credential is relevant for people in different industries including media and entertainment, advertising, education, healthcare, and finance.
Open Polytechnic has been pleased to work with Spark in the development of this NZQA accredited micro-credential.
Spark is on its own AI journey, with a focus on upskilling its people through Te Awe, a skills acceleration programme within Spark that is building the 'hard to access' specialist digital skills needed in today's world.
"As the use of AI accelerates, we want to ensure that the skills shift we are experiencing does not further entrench existing inequities within the technology sector and our community. When we created Te Awe, our ambition was to eventually extend offering the digital skills and opportunities to learn them, to those groups who currently have low participation rates in the tech sector, to ensure we are intentionally growing a more inclusive high-tech workforce pipeline for the future,' says Heather Polglase, Spark People and Culture Director.
"We are excited to build on Spark's Te Awe foundations and take that next step now with the creation of an NZQA accredited Generative AI micro-credential. We have taken our learnings from Te Awe and collaborated with Open Polytechnic, as a business division of Te Pūkenga, to create a nationally recognised micro-credential, that will equip more New Zealanders with the skills and knowledge to co-create and engage with AI meaningfully.'
Spark will be sponsoring micro-credentials for 30 digi-coaches (digital teachers) from around the country, who are a part of a Ministry of Social Development (MSD) and Digital Inclusion Alliance Aotearoa programme to support digital literacy in local communities. These digi-coaches will work in public libraries and community venues to help upskill digital literacy skills for local citizens.
'We're excited to be one of the first to engage with this new GenAI micro-credential", said Laurence Zwimpfer, Operations Director for the Digital Inclusion Alliance Aotearoa.
'We have invited 30 jobseekers on our Digi-Coach programme to complete this course as part of their 13-week training, which includes work placements in libraries and other community organisations. We believe this will give them a real advantage in securing jobs and helping the communities and organisations that they work with to better understand and use GenAI tools."
Ākonga who complete the micro-credential receive a digital badge that can then be shared on social media or mentioned on a work-related CV.
The Level 3 micro-credential can be completed online in 40 learning hours, with two intakes each month, making it ideal for personal or professional development.
If you are a business or individual that is interested in utilising AI technology, then go to the Open Polytechnic website. Terms and conditions apply.
At a glance
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsroom
3 hours ago
- Newsroom
Want better career prospects? Learn three languages, says Zespri
Zespri's China corporate affairs manager says learning te reo Māori and a third language alongside a student's native tongue should be mandated in New Zealand's curriculum. Ivan Kinsella, the only New Zealander based in the kiwifruit marketer's Shanghai office, says proficiency in Chinese has propelled his career and that uptake of the language, along with others, makes young people more competent going out into the world.
The Spinoff
3 hours ago
- The Spinoff
New Zealanders don't tend to talk about pay. What would happen if we did?
A new bill that aims to facilitate colleagues talking about what they're paid is well on its way to becoming law, having passed its second reading last week. But is it law or culture that silences chats about pay? 'One night, at a work farewell, a few of us started talking about how no one knew what the others earned,' says Sandra. It was 2015. The group all worked in marketing and communications at a large bank which used a banding system to determine salary ranges – but some of the bands were $40,000 deep. Inhibitions shrugged off with the help of a few drinks, the colleagues divulged their salaries. Despite having a larger team and same-sized budget to manage, Sandra was earning $30,000 less than her colleagues. It took years, chance and wine for her to find out. These kinds of stories filter through as tales of the importance of talking about pay, but they're relatively rare. There's a culture in New Zealand of not discussing pay with colleagues or friends. In my experience, it's seen as a little uncouth and confrontational. A new member's bill, the Employee Remuneration Disclosure Amendment Bill, aims to remove some barriers people face in talking about pay – namely the fear of retaliation from employers. When Labour MP Camilla Belich introduced her bill at its first reading in parliament in November 2024, she noted 'persistent and unexplained' pay gaps for Māori and Pacific workers and women. Her hope is that by bringing increased pay transparency, discrimination can be eliminated, she said. During the select committee process the bill received 225 public submissions – almost 90% were in support of the bill and 4% were opposed. Last Wednesday, the bill passed its second reading with support from all parties apart from Act and NZ First. While fear of retaliation from employers may be a reason for colleagues not talking about what they're paid, only three cases related to dismissal following remuneration disclosure have been brought to the Employment Relations Authority or the Employment Court since 2000. People are free to discuss pay unless there is a pay secrecy clause in their contract. It's not known how common these clauses are in New Zealand – this week experts have told me 'not that common' and 'potentially more common than people thought'. What they have agreed on is that regardless, people in New Zealand don't tend to discuss pay with their colleagues or friends. Jarrod Haar, professor of management and Māori business at Massey University, says that 'we have a culture of secrecy' around pay, while Amy Ross, an independent expert in employment relations and investigations, describes pay as a 'taboo subject'. It seems, then, that the legal issues the bill deals with aren't the biggest barrier to pay transparency. The mystery surrounding pay rates is a fairly recent phenomenon. For most of New Zealand's history, wages were set by the national awards system. The system, run by the state, set minimum pay and conditions across industries and jobs, made them public and reviewed them yearly with feedback from workers. That system was 'much more open and more public' in terms of wages, says Ben Peterson, assistant secretary at Unite Union. And so, even if money wasn't discussed at the pub or around the dinner table, workers knew roughly what was considered appropriate and fair for their industry and their neighbours'. The awards system ended with the neoliberal reforms of the 1980s, replaced by the Employment Contracts Act 1991, which instead focuses on individual contracts and basic minimum conditions (minimum wage, 15-minute tea breaks, 10 days of sick leave, etc) set out for all. 'It's very individualised, and then that becomes an incentive for employers to discourage people talking about stuff,' says Peterson. Quite simply, if an employer is paying someone $26 an hour and others doing the same job $24 an hour, they don't want those workers knowing and then requesting $26. Individualising contracts also puts the burden of negotiating pay onto individuals, which can further reinforce bias on gendered and ethnic lines. It can be a 'don't ask, don't get' situation, and some people have been brought up not to ask. In folding wages into individual contracts, companies have been able to treat them as confidential information, even without secrecy clauses. Simon Schofield from Auckland University's law school says that while there may have always been a cultural 'modesty' in New Zealand about pay rates, the neoliberal system has allowed businesses to 'play into that cultural norm' to keep people quiet about their pay in order to suppress wages. After the reforms, the share of GDP that goes to wages dropped away. 'At the end of the day, the companies are making substantial money out of that,' he says. Unions and collective agreements work against this, but in March last year only 14.5% of employees in New Zealand were part of a union. Ross says another problem is a lack of understanding of employment rights and pay in New Zealand. 'It's not taught at school. It's not really taught anywhere.' Ross was once contracted to give advice to students on moving from universities into the workplace. She was working with a group of students in their fourth and final year of studies – 'highly intelligent people', she says – when one of them put their hand up to ask a question. 'What's a union?' they asked. Ross was shocked. 'This is where we are, actually,' she says. 'People don't even know how to access the fundamental rights at work here.' She says that this allows for people, particularly more vulnerable people, to be exploited in the workplace. But it's not only the people on low wages who don't want to talk about pay. People who suspect, or know, their pay is higher than their colleagues' are often uncomfortable or embarrassed to talk about it, says Ross. 'People who are on huge, big, fat salaries – they feel like they don't want to talk about that. Maybe it's time to start asking why.' Peterson has found that some employers aren't great at talking about pay either. 'Every employer likes to think of themselves as a good employer,' he says, but evidence to the contrary – like low wages – often emerges during negotiations between the union and employers. 'People get very personally confronted,' he says. Instead of focusing on the numbers and facts in front of them, some employers can get offended by a perceived attack on their character. Peterson says this is 'unhelpful' during negotiations. For Sandra, knowing that her colleagues earned more gave her the onus to ask for a pay rise and know she was justified. 'I did and got it,' she says. 'It definitely helps to have a sense of what others are earning and some sense of solidarity.'
Scoop
20 hours ago
- Scoop
New Skills Survey Reveals Strong Career Confidence, With Younger Graduates Lagging Behind
A nationwide learner outlook survey has revealed high confidence among recent graduates about their future and career progression but also shows that school leavers are significantly less certain about their next steps. The 2025 The Learner Outlook Aotearoa, New Zealand survey, published by Skills Group, included responses from learners across Skills Ignite, Skills Premier, Etco, E-tec, and ICE. It found that 63% of learners feel very or extremely confident about their future. Skills Group Head of Marketing and Communications Michael Pryor says confidence in qualifications supporting career progression was similarly strong, with 62% expressing high or extreme confidence. 'However, confidence was not evenly distributed,' Michael says. 'Younger learners aged 17 and under consistently reported the lowest levels of certainty across all key measures - future outlook, career progression, and job market perception. This group averaged a confidence in qualification for career progression rating of just 2.6 out of 5, compared to 3.7 among learners aged 25–54. 'However, the findings are encouraging overall as they show that the majority of graduates believe in the value of their qualifications. But the data also tells us we need to do more to support school leavers as they transition into the workforce or further education.' The report highlights a need for earlier and clearer career guidance, particularly to help younger learners connect their study choices with real-world opportunities. Other key findings include: Distance learners reported the highest overall confidence in both future outlook and career value. Most learners had medium-term plans (1–3 years), with business ownership and overseas work ambitions more common in the long term. While job market perceptions were generally positive, younger learners and Māori respondents expressed more uncertainty than average. The survey collected responses from 1,206 graduates who completed qualifications through the Skills Group between 2023 and 2024. It will form the baseline for a new annual longitudinal study tracking learner outcomes and perceptions over time. 'Understanding where learners are confident and where they're not gives us the insight we need to close the gaps - particularly for younger New Zealanders just beginning their career journey,' Michael says. Notes: Research is undertaken to the highest possible standards and in accord with the principles detailed in the RANZ Code of Practice which is based on the ESOMAR Code of Conduct for Market Research. This report was prepared by SIL Research for SKILLS. A total of 1,206 graduates participated in the survey, drawn from across Etco, ICE, Skills Ignite and Skills Premier. This sample size allows the results to be reported with a margin of error of ±2.82% at the 95% confidence level when responses are evenly split (50/50), and ±2.26% when responses are more polarised (80/20).
