As gangs prepare to attack Haiti's capital, U.S. freezes critical aid for security mission
The administration's 90-day halt of foreign assistance has frozen a $15 million contribution to the United Nations-controlled Trust Fund for the Kenya-led Multinational Security Support mission in Haiti, the global agency confirmed to the Miami Herald on Tuesday. The fund was set up at the insistence of the U.S. to give donors a way to contribute to the mission, which eight months after its deployment remains underfunded, ill-equipped and with just over a third of the 2,500 security personnel it's was slated to have.
On Tuesday, 70 Salvadoran soldiers arrived in Port-au-Prince. However, the soldiers, all aviation specialists, are in the country not to engage in combat but to provide medical evacuations, which until now were being handled by U.S. and Dominican military aircraft.
U.N. spokeswoman Stephanie Tremblay told the Herald that on Jan. 28 the agency was was notified by the State Department's Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs about the $15 million the U.S. had contributed to the fund.
'The communication relayed an 'immediate stop work order... pending further notice,' she said. The U.N. had already spent $1.7 million of the $15 million, Tremblay said.
President Donald Trump's wide-ranging freeze on foreign assistance has affected everything from health to security around the world. In Haiti, in particular, where the U.S. is the single largest donor, clinics offering HIV/AIDS treatment have been unable to get funding and security advisors hired to assist the Haiti National Police and Kenya-led mission have been laid off.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio, on a visit to Costa Rica on Tuesday, defended the freeze even amid reports that despite waivers for humanitarian programs and life-saving medications such as HIV/AIDS treatments some clinics in places like Africa have had to shut down.
'We froze foreign aid so that we can review those programs,' he said. 'I issued a blanket waiver that said if this is life-saving programs, if it's providing food or medicine or anything that is saving lives and is immediate and urgent, you're not included in the freeze.'
Last week, several police advisers hired by the U.S. government to assist the Haiti National Police and the Kenyans in operations, intelligence gathering and other areas critical to the anti-gang fight were informed that they were laid off until further notice. On Tuesday, police advisers from Canada, also part of the mission, departed Port-au-Prince asl well because of the cuts.
During his Senate confirmation hearing for his Cabinet position, Rubio thanked the Kenyans for their efforts in Haiti and signaled support for the mission. However, neither he nor Trump have said if the U.S. intends to maintain its financial support, which amounted to more than $600 million under the Biden administration. Nor has the new administration said if it will support a proposal by the previous administration to convert the current mission into a formal U.N. peacekeeping force, a move that requires the support of Russia and China on the U.N Security Council.
Just what the U.S. policy toward Haiti and its growing instability will be is expected to be the lead discussion item when Rubio meets with Dominican authorities, including President Luis Abinader, on Wednesday and Thursday. The two countries share the island of Hispaniola, and the Dominican Republic has been a leading advocate of getting foreign troops into Haiti.
Diego Da Rin, Haiti analyst for the International Crisis Group, said the $13 million the United States has frozen was never going to solve the financial problems of the Kenya-led mission. 'But this was a small yet crucial contribution at a time when the mission is struggling to strengthen its presence,' he said.
He noted that during Rubio's confirmation hearing, he called on Western Hemisphere nations to contribute more to the effort, indicating that the Trump administration may not be as ready as the Biden administration was to continue providing the lion's share of the funding.
Before leaving office in January, the Biden administration had privately warned Haitians that the mission's funding would end in March if it did not get a serious injection of cash. The Defense Department had identified an additional $120 million for Haiti, but the State Department, when asked, would not say if the money was disbursed before Biden left office.
In another example of how the U.S. freeze is affecting the effort, the Salvadoran soldiers who arrived in Haiti on Tuesday were transported by Canada and not by the U.S. military, which had transported the last contingent that including 150 Guatemalans and eight members of El Salvador's military.
Last week, a U.S. military aircraft arrived in Port-au-Prince with food for the multinational mission. However, another aircraft that was supposed to take supplies for the police and the multinational mission did not arrive, a source told the Herald. Also seemingly on hold is the deployment of the 600 remaining police officers from Kenya, which had committed 1,000 officers to the mission.
'The freezing of funds from the mission's primary financial backer puts its future in serious jeopardy,' Da Rin said. 'Without significant new contributions soon, not only will further deployments be impossible, but even the continued presence of troops already on the ground will be at risk.'
Gangs prepare for large-scale attack
Gangs have continued their siege of the capital and last week moved into the mountains of Kenscoff, southeast of Port-au-Prince, hoping to take over areas not currently under their control. There are an estimated 1,000 to 3,500 gang members in the hills. They've emptied out entire farming communities, killed at least 40 people and set fires to homes.
In recent days, they've also set up supply up lines for food and water. Haitian police and the multinational mission have deployed to the region, but the area is so broad and mountainous that the fight to push gangs back is proving difficult. On Monday, as the threat grew, many schools were closed and Haitians and international aid workers stayed home.
The U.N. said Tuesday that at least 5,626 people died in 2024 as a result of gang violence, self-defense groups and police operations. At least 1,732 of those deaths occurred between October and the end of December, when gangs carried out several mass killings in Port-au-Prince.
The report renewed concerns over the continued rape and sexual exploitation of women and girls by gang members, and the recruitment of children by gangs.
Yet despite the alarming reports, experts fear that neither the U.S. nor others in the international community grasp the gravity of the situation.
The new battlefront being opened by armed groups, for example, along the last remaining access route between the capital and the southern regions of Haiti brings gangs closer to the upscale communities of Pétion-Ville, Fermanthe and Kenscoff — all of which, until now, had managed to stay out of the gangs' grips.
Aware that gangs are preparing a large-scale offensive in hopes of taking over the enclaves, diplomats have been trying to get local authorities to come up with a plan and deploy what little resources they have.
'It is probably the worst timing ever and unfortunately the gangs know it,' said Romain Le Cour, a senior expert at the Switzerland-based Global Initiative against Transnational Organized Crime.
Haiti's gangs, he said, are using the funding freeze and lack of attention by the U.S. to take advantage in the run-up to three important dates: Feb. 7, historically the day that a new president usually takes office, is always a tense political moment; Feb. 29, which will mark the one-year anniversary since the official public creation of the powerful Viv Ansanm gang coalition, and March 7, the date that Leslie Voltaire, the current head of the Transitional Presidential Council, is expected to pass the baton to Fritz Alphonse Jean in the rotating presidency.
'We're in for a very, very tense and crucial month. The problem of Haiti will not go away if the U.S. stops looking for funding. It's only going to get worse,' said Le Cour. 'Right now abandoning the ship is just going to push it into the arms of the gangs. '
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Pride reminded me capitalism can't save us from Trump. Only we can do that.
On the last weekend in June, I walked down Fifth Avenue alongside people dressed in their best rainbow regalia and parade floats blasting Beyoncé for New York City's annual Pride March. Commemorating the June 28 Stonewall uprisings, the march has taken place every year since 1970. But most of the LGBTQ+ people I am in community with were far away from the colorful, bank-friendly festivities. There's sort of an unspoken rule of pride in the city: The annual Dyke March and Queer Liberation March over pride weekend are for the politically active members of the community, while the city's official celebration is for corporations. But as Pride Month fades away and the summer heat blazes on, I'm left thinking about what queer resistance should look like during a second Donald Trump presidency. Will we miss corporations as they become more squeamish about supporting the LGBTQ+ community? Or is it time for us to reclaim our history and show people that we are a force to be reckoned with? If you didn't know, Trump spent June antagonizing the LGBTQ+ community. That month, his administration announced that the 988 National Suicide & Crisis Lifeline would be severing ties with LGBTQ+ organizations and that Harvey Milk was no longer worth honoring. Because of Trump, this Pride Month feels different. Hateful. But we will win. | Opinion The transgender community was specifically targeted. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that trans youth did not have a right to gender-affirming care. Trump threatened to pull funding from California because a single 16-year-old girl competed in a high school track and field state championship. The Stonewall National Monument didn't put up any transgender pride flags to commemorate Pride Month, even though trans people were central to the fight for liberation that took place all those years ago. This has affected how corporations are willing to interact with the community, too. NYC Pride March and other pride celebrations across the country saw corporate donors back out of supporting the events. Target and other stores pushed their pride collections to the side. Sure, we're still visible, but the political climate is telling us it's better to be seen and not heard. Now more than ever, we must remember the origins of why we celebrate the month of June. It's not just about rainbows and glitter. It's about defiance. It's about our rights. As a gay man, I'm finally flying a pride flag. I don't know what took so long. | Opinion After the march, I made my way to PrideFest, the street fair hosted by NYC Pride. 'RuPaul's Drag Race' alums Jan Sport and Jackie Cox were emceeing the main stage; the dating app Grindr had a yellow bus parked down the street. Folks were sipping various frozen concoctions out of tall, skinny cups and sweating under the June sun. I spotted a miniature poodle named Scuttle, dyed purple and orange and wearing a rainbow costume, and stopped to talk to his owner, Zach Aaronson. Aaronson was also dressed for the occasion, sporting a rainbow skirt and matching dyed beard. 'The experiences that we've had this month show you that you're not alone, that you can express yourself and live outside of the binary all year,' Aaronson, 35, of Manhattan, told me. Maybe that's the true beauty of Pride Month in its current form – it gives people a springboard to jump from, so that they can be themselves all year long. As I was walking to exit the festival, I spotted Emily Clark, 18, of Staten Island, who had 'Baby's first Pride' written in pen on her arm. She smiled as she told me how supportive and loving everyone she'd met that day had been. Opinion alerts: Get columns from your favorite columnists + expert analysis on top issues, delivered straight to your device through the USA TODAY app. Don't have the app? Download it for free from your app store. I still have my qualms about rainbow capitalism and the way pride has been reduced to a party rather than a protest. I don't believe corporations will save us – if it weren't profitable to be aligned with the LGBTQ+ community, their support would disappear. For some companies, it already has. Your Turn: Pride mattered when it was 'our' holiday. There's nothing to be proud of now. | Opinion Forum At the same time, I feel lucky. Lucky that I have found community in New York City, lucky that I stopped being 'straight' years ago. Lucky that my mother and father put up a pride flag outside their home in my small, conservative hometown. Lucky that I'm even able to critique what pride has become, thanks to what pride once was. None of us stop being gay just because June is over and Target is no longer selling rainbow T-shirts with cutesy slogans. None of us will go back into the closet when J.P. Morgan is no longer sponsoring a float. We don't need your performative activism on our behalf. We are here, in spite of it all, and we have something to say. Follow USA TODAY columnist Sara Pequeño on X, formerly Twitter: @sara__pequeno You can read diverse opinions from our USA TODAY columnists and other writers on the Opinion front page, on X, formerly Twitter, @usatodayopinion and in our Opinion newsletter. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: I went to NYC Pride and all I got was an ego check | Opinion


Axios
21 minutes ago
- Axios
ICE operations in Colorado raise legal questions
Images of masked, heavily armed immigration agents pulling people off Colorado streets and out of courthouses in unmarked cars have left many shocked and wondering: Is all of this legal? It is — at least for now. Why it matters: Since its post-9/11 creation, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has operated with broader powers and fewer restrictions than local police — rules designed to help the FBI identify and detain terror suspects. But under the Trump administration, those tools have been redirected to target unauthorized immigrants, potentially millions of them, and critics say ICE has become the closest thing the U.S. has to a secret police force. Zoom in: ICE agents aren't required to wear body cameras, can hide their identities, use unmarked cars and detain people without judicial warrants — as long as they suspect someone is in the U.S. illegally. They're not supposed to detain U.S. citizens, but some have been caught in the dragnet due to ICE errors. What ICE can't do: Agents can't enter a private home unless they have a judicial warrant. ICE also can't force a local law enforcement agency to join an operation, though police are obligated to keep order if protesters surround one. The latest: ICE's powers continue to expand in Colorado. ICE agents told at least two Denver-area counties they won't allow detained immigrants to attend local court hearings in person, per CPR. Adams County Sheriff Gene Claps told CPR the new policy is hurting victims' right to due process, while ICE Denver Field Office director Robert Guadian said the decision stems from a lack of confidence that local sheriffs will return detainees, making it too risky to release them for court appearances. What we're watching: ICE's footprint in Colorado could soon grow.


Forbes
31 minutes ago
- Forbes
Climate: The Great Leap Backward
Current Climate brings you the latest news about the business of sustainability every Monday. Sign up to get it in your inbox. getty In passing President Trump's budget bill Congressional Republicans last week ignored warnings that eliminating federal incentives for large-scale clean power and manufacturing projects could kill jobs and development in Red States. That outcome was expected, but is still a remarkable break historically with the tradition of politicians always trying to ensure they secure goodies for their districts–like big solar panel plants in Georgia or billion-dollar battery factories in Ohio and North Carolina. The bill Trump signed into law on July 4 adds more than $3 trillion to the federal deficit, mainly by extending tax cuts for wealthy Americans and pumping up defense spending to $1 trillion. It also phases out tax credits for big wind and solar projects by next year and kills electric vehicle tax credits in September. At the same time, traditional fossil fuels, a top source of dangerous climate change, won new benefits in the legislation, including new access to drill in Alaska and the Gulf of Mexico, cheaper royalties to mine coal on federal land and new tax breaks for oil and gas drilling. It seems odd that such long-established industries, operating for well more than a century, still need the kind of government assistance now being denied to newer, more promising alternatives. Energy analysts see the shift away from rapidly growing clean energy, the top source of new electricity generation in the U.S., as a risky move not only because it allows countries such as China to widen its dominance in producing batteries, electric cars, wind turbines and solar panels, but also because it's likely to raise energy prices for Americans in the years to come. That's because energy demand is rising quickly, but adding less wind and solar with battery storage to the grid, especially in the late 2020s as incentives vanish, ensures that utility rates will rise. 'This Trump energy tax will cost electricity customers billions of dollars in higher bills. Drivers will need to fill up more often at the pump. And costs for things like cleaner cars, solar energy and efficient air conditioners will skyrocket,' said Manish Bapna, president of the Natural Resources Defense Council. The bill will 'bring the renaissance in American clean energy production to a halt and send good, domestic manufacturing jobs to our foreign rivals.' Trump called his budget the 'One Big Beautiful' bill. But given how damaging it could be for clean energy jobs and investment, it looks like a great leap backward for the U.S. energy sector. Charlie Riedel/AP File President Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act would cut the legs out from under the renewable energy industry. The biggest hit: The bill would quickly phase out federal tax credits that have for years enabled wind and solar developers to offset 30% or more of project costs. Yes, it could have been even worse. At the last minute, the Senate's Republican leadership ditched a proposed excise tax on wind and solar projects using Chinese components which could have added 20% to the cost of many projects. But it left in a fast phase-out of the tax credits. Moreover, there are lots of other anti-green, pro-fossil fuel bullets the industry didn't dodge. The bill would open more federal lands to oil and gas leasing at lower royalty rates; end tax credits and other subsidies for electric vehicles; and refill the Strategic Petroleum Reserve. There's also a new tax break to incentivize mining metallurgical coal, now to be considered a strategic mineral. Uncertainty, and the looming end of federally subsidized tax equity financing, could plunge renewables investing into a deep freeze, says Sandhya Ganapathy, CEO of Houston-based EDP Renewables North America (which operates wind and solar plants). 'It severely hamstrings the U.S. ability to meet skyrocketing power demands and dilutes its economic competitiveness on the global stage,' she says. Ironically, the impact will hit especially hard in Republican areas–a fact that Forbes (and others) thought last November might protect the industry from such savage cuts. A map (below) created by Michael Thomas, founder of Cleanview, shows that 78% of renewable energy projects underway are located in Red districts. Read more here Hot Topic SecondMuse Todd Khozein, CEO of global climate and social advisory firm SecondMuse, on the end of Biden's Inflation Reduction Act The new budget bill makes dramatic changes, essentially ending the IRA. How do you assess the change? We gave American innovation a fighting shot with the IRA and the Bipartisan Infrastructure. And we saw extraordinary progress, like the number of entrants into the long-duration energy storage field, the amount of investment that was going on, the investor enthusiasm, the coordination between grants from either the Department of Energy or the National Science Foundation. This really gave the U.S. a shot to take a major share of the $270 trillion global climate transition. There's a major economic opportunity that the biggest economies in the world are all going after, and it feels like America is bowing out of it. I think it's tragic because that's jobs. I feel like we've lost our way a little bit. We've gotten so focused on beating the other side politically that we've forgotten about this country. There's this extraordinary promise of America, that a bunch of people from a bunch of different places, where all of us are immigrants except for the indigenous communities here, have all been able to come together and build something pretty extraordinary. We've kind of lost sight of that and gotten so wrapped up into one-upping things. We've forgotten that the way that you build things is by people working together. We don't need so much heat. Just tone it down. Let's work together and build something extraordinary. I think that we were on a path to doing that. Now it feels like taking a backseat. What are the international implications? Nobody's going to be cheering louder than China. This is a global market that we're choosing not to participate in. So we're not going to define it and we're not going to be able to have a seat at the table in the way we did before. The tragedy of this is that you have extraordinary American innovators that went to really good schools and are doing really well, and some of the most brilliant scientists. We've lost the thread of what makes an economy great, what makes a country strong, what makes a society vibrant. I feel like this is a sign of where we've effectively dismantled something and haven't really put anything else in its place with this bill which, in my opinion, is tragic. Do you see reasons to be optimistic about how the U.S. cleantech sector can contend with the shift in federal policy? What I think is hopeful and what I see is 10 years ago there was effectively no climate tech market in New York. … We had a really clear state government leader and leadership that said, 'this is our strategy and we're going to build this.' There was clear legislation, the Climate Leadership And Community Protection Act, the legislation said we're going to become leaders in climate tech. And when you go to New York Climate Week, New York has become one of the leading hubs of climate technology in the world. It was because we did things. So I feel like this is actually a really empowering story because it means that all you need is a consistent and sustained strategy. If you have a consistent and sustained strategy from a government level and you have some mechanism to get people to come together, figure out what people's problems are and then target new legislation around the problems that are getting in the way of real entrepreneurs in a real way, this can happen at a local level. This can happen at the state level. If you do that, you will succeed. Did we rely on federal support to help the rest of our business? 100%. Did a lot of our entrepreneurs receive non-dilutive capital? 100%. But we got $430 million in the last two and a half years of private sector capital investing in these businesses. This was because of state mandates. The city and all of its real estate and all of its buildings use new climate technologies to make climate targets. You can do so much at the state level. That may be the thread of hope. What Else We're Reading Key roles were vacant at National Weather Service offices in Texas as floods hit ( New York Times ) Pope Leo XIV approves an environmental protection mass. He'll celebrate the private Mass for the Care of Creation on July 9 ( Religion News ) EPA puts on leave 139 employees who spoke out against policies under Trump ( Associated Press ) Trump promised deregulation. His new law would regulate energy to death ( Heatmap ) How a major new environmental reform will affect homebuilding in California ( Los Angeles Times ) EPA leader shakes up agency with 'drill baby drill' mandate. Administrator Lee Zeldin promotes a shift in priorities that puts him at odds with staff ( Wall Street Journal ) There's a race to power the future. China is pulling away. Beijing is selling clean energy to the world, Washington is pushing oil and gas ( New York Times ) More From Forbes Forbes Elon Is Asking For It: What Musk's Latest Trump Spat Means As Tesla Sales Sink By Alan Ohnsman Forbes New Science Shows Why Some People Just Don't Care About Climate By Phil De Luna Forbes The World's Biggest Carbon Emitters—And The Story Behind The Numbers By Robert Rapier