Government accused of making ‘an absolute hames' of rental reforms
Opposition politicians raised the rent controls issue at Leaders' Questions on Tuesday for the fourth time in a row.
Advertisement
Sinn Féin, Labour and the Social Democrats said the Government proposals would drive up rents and accused the coalition of sowing confusion.
Taoiseach Micheál Martin said Ireland needed to boost its private rental and housing supply (Cillian Sherlock/PA)
Sinn Féin leader Mary Lou McDonald said the average length of a tenancy was three-and-a-half years, and so the tenancy changes would be felt quickly.
She said those who move between rental properties frequently for work or education will be 'hammered' by higher and higher rents.
Taoiseach Micheál Martin said Ireland needed to boost its private rental and housing supply.
Advertisement
He said the reforms would provide 'stronger protections than ever before' and said Sinn Féin would have to vote for them.
'What will happen is that the contrast between the Sinn Féin hyperbole and what will happen when we put these legislative pieces through the House, will be a yawning gap.'
He said that no existing tenant will have their rent increased under the measures, and said that the market reset under six-year tenancies introduced from March 1st next year would attract investment.
Mr Martin said Sinn Féin aimed to reduce the size of the private rental sector.
Advertisement
He accused Ms McDonald of opposing up to 1,700 housing units in Clonliffe College and of not treating it like a housing emergency in her constituency.
Ms McDonald replied: 'It might interest the Taoiseach to know that, far from having an ideological objection to rental accommodation, I was raised in rental accommodation. Imagine that.'
She said it was not true that her party wanted to reduce the private rental supply and said her opposition was to renters being 'fleeced and gouged in the way that is currently happening'.
Labour leader Ivana Bacik said that the Government's 'chaotic drip feed' of housing policies had caused uncertainty and confusion.
Advertisement
Mr Martin said supply needed to increase, and under his Government, 5,938 houses had been completed in the first quarter of the year.
He said this was the highest rate since 2011, bar the spike after the Covid-19 pandemic.
'After 2026, linking new units to the consumer price index (CPI) as well as a right to reset after six years is the crucial piece that will allow inward investment in to get supply up,' he said.
'If we do not get supply up, then the rate at which prices will moderate will be slower.'
Advertisement
Social Democrats TD Jennifer Whitmore said the Government had 'made an absolute hames' of rental reforms announced last week.
'Even the Taoiseach's Cabinet colleagues could not make sense of them,' she said.
'That is because driving record rents even higher, according to the Government, is somehow going to bring rents down. Make that make sense.
'No wonder the Taoiseach's Cabinet colleagues are utterly bewildered.'
Mr Martin responded: 'I reject the use of language like 'chaotic' and all that.
'Very few apartments have been built. We have a problem there and we need to attract private sector investment in to get the supply up.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
29 minutes ago
- Reuters
Russia accuses Kyiv and the West of rejecting diplomacy to solve conflict in Ukraine
July 27 (Reuters) - Russia prefers political and diplomatic means to resolve conflict in Ukraine, but Kyiv and the West rejected that path, Russian news agencies reported on Sunday, citing Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov. "Our preferred route is through political and diplomatic means," Peskov said, according to TASS state news agency. Peskov added, without providing evidence, that Moscow continues its military operation in Ukraine because "all proposals for dialogue were rejected, both by Ukraine and by Western countries."
The Guardian
29 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Call it the Kemi Badenoch conundrum: it's why the Tories are going nowhere fast
Kemi Badenoch's reshuffle of the shadow cabinet this week fell between two stools. It was not a de minimis reorganisation to account for the departure of Edward Argar from the health portfolio as a result of illness, but nor was it the sort of 'big bang' restructure that might have lent her leadership a sense of renewed momentum. I have heard few serious complaints about the appointments she did make, though a few – such as the removal of Jack Rankin, a close ally of Robert Jenrick, from his justice brief and his replacement with the Badenoch supporter Ben Obese-Jecty – have prompted some eye-rolls. You can detect similar tactics at work in the return to the frontbench of James Cleverly, who will now square off against Angela Rayner as shadow housing secretary. It's by no means an unwise appointment; Kevin Hollinrake, his predecessor, was not impressing in the role, and Cleverly is a strong media and Commons performer. But it can also be read as a bit of a balancing act. It is obviously destabilising for Badenoch's leadership to have Jenrick, the man almost universally regarded as her likely successor, as the highest-profile and best-performing member of the shadow cabinet. Elevating Cleverly, a potential rival, to a position where he can build a profile makes sense, in a divide-and-rule sort of way. The more serious sins, however, are sins of omission. By making changes to several major portfolios, such as appointing Richard Holden to transport, Badenoch has made all the changes she didn't make look like actual decisions. As such, her decision to retain the services of Priti Patel – whose only big moment since the general election has been a rash of well-deserved bad publicity when she asked to be thanked for the post-Brexit immigration 'Boriswave' – inevitably looks like an actual endorsement. Not helpful, if you're a leader trying to establish your own credibility on immigration. Ditto her not making space for rising stars of the 2024 intake, such as Katie Lam. In government, such a delay might make sense – but one of the urgent tasks facing the Tories is to present a fresh face to the electorate after 14 years in power, and Badenoch has missed an opportunity to do so. Politically, we might say that in the eyes of the party Badenoch had one mulligan on the shadow cabinet. Most people accept that it takes time for a new leader to find their feet, and that a leader's assessment of a colleague might be sharpened by actually working with them in opposition. Now she's had that mulligan, but at the same time hasn't really used it. More important, perhaps, is the departure of Lee Rowley as her chief of staff. Backroom appointments get less attention than ministerial changes, but they can be more significant. Rowley was one of Badenoch's few really close allies in politics, and such people play a critical role in any leadership. Theresa May might have survived the departure of Nick Timothy and Fiona Hill after the 2017 election, but it marked the point when she lost control of her own destiny. So what is going on? The semi-reshuffle illustrates a number of deep, structural problems facing Badenoch. Some of these are not her fault, others are. First, there is the simple fact that there are barely enough Conservative MPs to adequately staff the opposition frontbench. As such, any leader would need to give jobs to far more people than they didn't, which limits their ability to craft a shadow cabinet in their image – a problem compounded by the fact that the parliamentary Conservative party is deeply divided on the critical questions of what mistakes the party made in office and what it should do next. Any leader would face those problems. Badenoch has, however, made them more difficult for herself, most obviously by the way she won last year's leadership contest. Badenoch stood as a unifier, and has tried to make a virtue of party unity since becoming leader. But that unity was bought at a heavy price: not taking any policy positions. She summed up her pitch at her launch event as: 'I don't pretend I have all the answers, but I'm an engineer – and I know how to find them.' Tactically, this worked. But it did so by letting lots of people project their own hopes and preferences on to her. As a result, she can't build the shadow cabinet around a policy agenda because she doesn't have one yet; worse, agreeing one will be more difficult because nobody who backed her leadership committed themselves to any controversial policy changes by so doing. Further compounding all this is Badenoch's rapidly deteriorating position as leader. One plausible reason for not tapping up the 2024 intake is that bringing new people into the shadow cabinet team means kicking people out – and she cannot afford to create new enemies in the parliamentary party if she can possibly help it. In many ways, Badenoch's position is actually very similar to Rishi Sunak's during the dying days of the last government: trapped in an ever-weakening position and lacking the strength, the allies or the vision to make the sort of bold manoeuvre that alone might offer a way out. Henry Hill is deputy editor of ConservativeHome
BreakingNews.ie
29 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Trump gets down to business with trade talks with European Commission president
Donald Trump will meet the president of the European Commission as work gets under way on a five-day visit to Scotland. The US president flew into the country on Friday night and was then seen playing golf at his Trump Turnberry resort the following day. Advertisement However, on Sunday he will meet European Commission Ursula von der Leyen for talks on the trading relationship between Europe and the US. Following a good call with @POTUS , we have agreed to meet in Scotland on Sunday to discuss transatlantic trade relations, and how we can keep them strong. — Ursula von der Leyen (@vonderleyen) July 25, 2025 The talks come ahead of discussions with British prime minister Keir Starmer on Monday, which are also expected to focus on the issue of trade. The UK and the US struck a trade deal recently, with discussions between the two men expected to focus on this – with reports suggesting Mr Starmer will be looking for the US to cut the tariffs for British steel. The start of discussions show the US president getting down to business on what is a private, five-day visit to Scotland. Advertisement On Saturday he was spotted playing a round at the famous Turnberry course, which he purchased back in 2014. A large security presence followed the US President as he golfed on the famous Turnberry course (Robert Perry/PA) A massive security operation was in place as the president played golf on the course. He drove his own golf buggy, but a heavy security presence saw Mr Trump flanked by a fleet of similar vehicles. Even before he took to the course, police officers and military personnel could be seen searching the area around the Trump Turnberry resort – which has had a metal fence erected around it as part of heightened security measures. Advertisement No protesters were seen while he was golfing on Saturday – but hundreds of people gathered in both Edinburgh and Aberdeen for demonstrations against his visit organised by the Stop Trump Coalition. After spending some time at his South Ayrshire resort, the president will head to Aberdeenshire, where he is expected to open a second course at his Trump International golf resort in Balmedie. Scottish first minister John Swinney is also due to hold talks with the US President (Steve Welsh/PA) During his time in the north-east, Mr Trump is also due to meet Scottish First Minister John Swinney. Speaking ahead of the talks, Mr Swinney said it was his responsibility to 'raise global and humanitarian issues of significant importance, including the unimaginable suffering we are witnessing in Gaza' with the President. Advertisement Saying he wanted to 'ensure Scotland's voice is heard at the highest levels of government across the world' Mr Swinney added: 'That is exactly what I will do when I meet with President Trump during his time in Scotland.'
