JERA, Woodside Energy agree on supply deal during winter months
The Heads of Agreement was signed at the LNG Producer-Consumer Conference held in Tokyo.
Under the deal, Woodside will supply about 200,000 metric tons of LNG annually during the December to February period, starting in fiscal year 2027, according to a JERA spokesperson.
JERA, jointly owned by Tokyo Electric Power and Chubu Electric Power, is Japan's largest LNG buyer.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
3 hours ago
- Business Times
Clean energy is driving coal's decline in the Philippines, not LNG
OVER the past two decades, coal usage in the Philippines has grown to record highs, but recent data suggests this may be changing. Annual coal-fired electricity generation is on track to fall for the first time since 2008, after declining 5.2 per cent in the first half of 2025. While this is a positive signal for the country's energy transition, understanding why is also critical. Recent media coverage has asserted that growing liquefied natural gas (LNG) imports are responsible for coal's decline, reciting oil and gas industry logic that Asia's energy transition hinges on replacing one fossil fuel (coal) with another (LNG). However, these conclusions overlook basic trends in the Philippines' energy market. Renewables have rapidly outpaced the growth of LNG, while gas-fired power generation remains below historical levels. Outages at existing coal facilities provide a better explanation for declining coal generation than the growth of LNG, which is significantly more expensive than renewables and other energy resources. Many of these issues have been conspicuously ignored and point to a different explanation for coal's dip: renewable energy, not LNG, is driving the Philippines' energy transition. A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU Friday, 12.30 pm ESG Insights An exclusive weekly report on the latest environmental, social and governance issues. Sign Up Sign Up Renewables are growing more quickly than LNG Recent media coverage has primarily attributed falling coal generation in the Philippines to the rise of LNG. However, the numbers tell a different story. For example, government data shows that the country did not add any new greenfield gas or LNG-fired power capacity between 2017 and 2024. The most recent increase in the country's gas capacity was in 2022, when several existing facilities were uprated, indicated Department of Energy (DOE) figures. Meanwhile, the Philippines added more than 1 gigawatt (GW) of solar in 2024 alone. This growth outpaced all other asset classes last year and previous projections for solar deployment. Centralised government auctions, among other government policies, are driving project developments. The government is holding a fourth auction round this year for up to 10.5 GW of new renewables capacity, including 1,100 MW of solar-plus-storage projects. In the Philippines' liberalised electricity market, power projects win supply contracts with distribution utilities through auctions, called competitive selection processes (CSP). Utilities are legally required to supply power in the 'least cost manner', meaning power generators must compete on price. To date, only one greenfield LNG-fired power project has managed to win a CSP. Although that project is beginning operations this year, auctions present a key challenge for the rapid growth of future LNG projects. At the same time, coal capacity has continued to grow despite a moratorium on greenfield plants issued in 2020, due to exclusions for brownfield expansions and projects already underway. Moreover, claims that LNG was responsible for the drop in coal overlook that hydropower and solar generation increased more than gas generation in H1 2025 compared to the same period last year. While several technologies have helped compensate for the decline in coal generation, it is misleading to position LNG as the main driver. Natural gas generation is still below historical levels Another important oversight is that natural gas generation in the Philippines remains below historical levels. Despite an 8.3 per cent rebound in 2024, natural gas generation remained less than in every year between 2007 and 2021. Although natural gas rallied in 2024, coal also increased by nearly 8 per cent. So, while LNG proponents often focus on inverse relationships between coal and LNG consumption, evidence from the Philippines is more nuanced. Natural gas for power declined rapidly in the Philippines between 2019 and 2023, due primarily to falling output from Malampaya, the country's only gas-producing field. This drop occurred before LNG import terminals were online to augment supplies. Since two terminals started operating and LNG imports began in 2023, gas generation has started to recover, but not in a way that would effectively explain coal's decline. Why has coal generation fallen in the first half of 2025? Along with the rise of hydropower and solar, coal plant outages provide another explanation. During the first quarter of 2025, eight coal plants with a combined capacity of 1.4 GW were offline for more than 30 days. Outages at fossil fuel generators in the Philippines occur every year – mainly during hot, dry months – but the average coal plant capacity on outage in Q1 2025 was markedly higher than the same period last year. By contrast, natural gas capacity on outage was slightly lower in the first quarter. Cost is key to the Philippines' energy future Some commentators attribute the drop in coal to falling LNG prices this year, arguing that LNG has become more cost-competitive. However, LNG prices in Asia remain above historical averages. Recent coal prices are nearly four times cheaper than LNG on an energy equivalent basis. Higher LNG fuel costs are reflected in the generation rates of various power plants in the Philippines. Based on data from Meralco, the country's largest distribution utility, LNG imports have put upward pressure on generation prices from gas-fired power plants, which have recently risen to between eight pesos (S$0.18) and 11 pesos per kilowatt-hour. These prices are significantly higher than solar and coal generation rates, as well as purchases from the Wholesale Electricity Spot Market (WESM). They are also above Meralco's overall average purchase price, meaning that LNG is keeping electricity prices high for Filipino consumers. Notably, the Independent Electricity Market Operator of the Philippines recently attributed falling WESM prices to the country's rapid renewables growth and transmission infrastructure investments. A recent analysis by Bloomberg New Energy Finance also shows that solar is now the cheapest source of electricity in the Philippines, with levelised costs from US$35-72 per megawatt-hour, while solar-plus-storage systems are quickly becoming cost-competitive with new thermal plants. In conclusion, arguments that LNG is replacing coal fail to stand up to scrutiny when considering the growth of renewables, coal plant outages and long-term cost trends in the Philippines' energy market. The writer is research lead with the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis, focusing on the economic, financial, and climate risks associated with natural gas and LNG infrastructure developments in Asia
Independent Singapore
4 hours ago
- Independent Singapore
Tourism sector welcomes heritage-focused investment zones in Johor Bahru under 13MP
JOHOR BAHRU: The tourism industry has lauded the federal government's move to introduce Special Tourism Investment Zones (STIZ) under the 13th Malaysia Plan (13MP), describing it as a timely initiative to elevate heritage-based tourism while safeguarding Malaysia's diverse cultural legacy. Malaysian Tourist Guides Council president Jimmy Leong praised the decision as both 'timely and wise', stressing that heritage-centred destinations could become educational tourism assets with lasting value, the New Straits Times reported. Heritage must be more than a trend Leong urged that the STIZ should not only serve as a vehicle to attract tourism investment but also become a platform for artistic expression and the preservation of Malaysia's cultural and natural history. According to New Straits Times , Leong said that heritage in tourism goes beyond just buildings or artefacts and includes natural landscapes, local customs, historical stories, places of worship, and traditional practices passed down through generations. He warned against treating heritage tourism as a temporary trend, instead advocating for it to be firmly embedded as a cornerstone of Malaysia's tourism identity and long-term economic strategy. See also Johor sees 13MP as strategic roadmap to 2030 development goals 'Our variegated past gives our country a unique edge,' Leong noted. 'These heritage attractions—namely museums, battlefield sites, historic towns, gardens, and wilderness areas—should be developed as protected educational tourism products.' Grassroots inclusion seen as key to success 'It's crucial that tourism players on the ground are included in the process. We need to create experiences that are not only marketable but also meaningful and authentic,' Leong said, as quoted by the New Straits Times . Heritage tourism should reflect the experiences, plights, and cultural values of the communities it seeks to portray. This will ensure that economic benefits are shared equally while traditions are kept alive. Implications for Singapore tourism and cross-border collaboration Johor has been named as one of the host states for the new STIZ; thus, the move is likely to influence cross-border tourism trends between Malaysia and Singapore. As Johor seeks to improve its heritage-based offerings, Singaporean visitors may be drawn to new cultural attractions and educational experiences just across the Causeway. The STIZ could also create joint tourism packages, festival collaborations, and heritage trail linkages that enrich the overall visitor experience on both sides. For Singapore, Johor's commitment to heritage tourism may improve regional tourism flows. Through this initiative, opportunities for partnerships and heritage-themed travels that can benefit both Johor and Singapore may further flourish. Read also: Johor sees 13MP as strategic roadmap to 2030 development goals
CNA
17 hours ago
- CNA
India will continue to buy Russian oil, government sources say
NEW DELHI: India will continue to purchase oil from Russia, despite US President Donald Trump's threats of penalties, two Indian government sources said, speaking on condition of anonymity due to the sensitivity of the matter. "These are long-term oil contracts," one of the sources said. "It is not so simple to just stop buying overnight." Trump last month indicated in a Truth Social post that India would face additional penalties for purchases of Russian arms and oil. On Friday (Aug 1), Trump told reporters that he had heard that India would no longer be buying oil from Russia. The New York Times on Saturday quoted two unnamed senior Indian officials as saying there had been no change in Indian government policy, with one official saying the government had "not given any direction to oil companies" to cut back imports from Russia. Reuters reported this week that Indian state refiners stopped buying Russian oil in the past week after discounts narrowed in July. "TIME-TESTED PARTNERSHIP" WITH RUSSIA "On our energy sourcing requirements ... we look at what is there available in the markets, what is there on offer, and also what is the prevailing global situation or circumstances," India's foreign ministry spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal told reporters during a regular briefing on Friday. Jaiswal added that India has a "steady and time-tested partnership" with Russia, and that New Delhi's relations with various countries stand on their own merit and should not be seen from the prism of a third country. The White House in Washington did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Indian refiners are pulling back from Russian crude as discounts shrink to their lowest since 2022, when Western sanctions were first imposed on Moscow, due to lower Russian exports and steady demand, sources said earlier this week. The country's state refiners - Indian Oil Corp, Hindustan Petroleum Corp, Bharat Petroleum Corp and Mangalore Refinery Petrochemical Ltd - have not sought Russian crude in the past week or so, four sources familiar with the refiners' purchase plans told Reuters. 100% TARIFF THREAT On July 14, Trump threatened 100 per cent tariffs on countries that buy Russian oil unless Moscow reaches a major peace deal with Ukraine. Russia is the top supplier to India, responsible for about 35 per cent of India's overall supplies. Russia continued to be the top oil supplier to India during the first six months of 2025, accounting for about 35 per cent of India's overall supplies, followed by Iraq, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates. India, the world's third-largest oil importer and consumer, received about 1.75 million barrels per day of Russian oil in January-June this year, up 1 per cent from a year ago, according to data provided to Reuters by sources. Nayara Energy, a major buyer of Russian oil, was recently sanctioned by the European Union as the refinery is majority-owned by Russian entities, including oil major Rosneft. Last month, Reuters reported that Nayara's chief executive had resigned after the imposition of EU sanctions, and company veteran Sergey Denisov had been appointed as CEO.
