Where to watch Eurovision final live in US? Full list of performances and running order
Here's the complete list of final performances and the official running order -
1. Norway | Kyle Alessandro – Lighter
2. Luxembourg | Laura Thorn – La Poupée Monte Le Son
3. Estonia | Tommy Cash – Espresso Macchiato
4. Israel | Yuval Raphael – New Day Will Rise
5. Lithuania | Katarsis – Tavo Akys
6. Spain | Melody – ESA DIVA
7. Ukraine | Ziferblat – Bird of Pray
8. United Kingdom | Remember Monday – What The Hell Just Happened?
9. Austria | JJ – Wasted Love
10. Iceland | VÆB – RÓA
11. Latvia | Tautumeitas – Bur Man Laimi
12. Netherlands | Claude – C'est La Vie
13. Finland | Erika Vikman – ICH KOMME
14. Italy | Lucio Corsi | Volevo Essere Un Duro
15. Poland | Justyna Steczkowska – GAJA
16. Germany | Abor & Tynna – Baller
17. Greece | Klavdia – Asteromáta
18. Armenia | PARG – SURVIVOR
19. Switzerland | Zoë Më – Voyage
20. Malta | Miriana Conte – SERVING
21. Portugal | NAPA – Deslocado
22. Denmark | Sissal – Hallucination
23. Sweden | KAJ – Bara Bada Bastu
24. France | Louane – maman
25. San Marino | Gabry Ponte – Tutta L'Italia
26. Albania | Shkodra Elektronike – Zjerm
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Pink Villa
2 hours ago
- Pink Villa
Bizarre: Trisha Paytas' Baby Reincarnation Theory Resurfaces on Internet and it Has Ozzy Osbourne Connection
Trisha Paytas' infamous reincarnation theory has resurfaced on the internet, just a day after the death of Ozzy Osbourne. Proving that social media is a weird place, Paytas claims that each of her children is the reincarnated version of the popular celebrities who passed away days before her kids were born. The theory was first hyped up in 2022, and since then the Internet celebrity hasbeen proving it to be true. All about Trisha Paytas' baby reincarnation theory Paytas' baby reincarnation theory first put the internet in a state of amusement in 2022. According to the media personality, her first child, Malibu Barbie, was born less than a week after Queen Elizabeth passed away. A couple of years later, when the podcaster's second child, Elvis, was born, it did not exactly line up with the death of any popular personality. However, the fans went on to connect the birth of Paytas' second daughter with the passing away of Pope Francis. As for the latest development, Trisha announced that she had become a mother for the third time, and her newborn son, Aquaman Mosses' was connected to the passing away of the popular musician Ozzy Osbourne. Following the announcement, the fans of the social media star could not contain their excitement and shared their thoughts over the coincidence in the comment section. Fans react to Trisha Paytas' theory One of the fans, reacting to the theory, stated, 'Ozzy, is that you?' Another user on the internet shared, 'Trisha paytas is 3 for 3 omg.' Moreover, the hashtag 'Trisha' was trending at No. 5 on X, while the term 'Trisha Paytas baby theory' was trending at No. 8 on Google. Meanwhile, previously speaking about the theory, Trisha said to Newsweek, 'Is it just any influential person that dies gets to come reincarnated as my baby? … I don't understand why my womb is carrying all of these souls.' As for Ozzy Osbourne, the musician passed away on Tuesday, at the age of 76.
Indian Express
a day ago
- Indian Express
When chess legend Garry Kasparov tried to make the machine blink… and failed
Over the last couple of years, the world has been gripped by a Y2K-esque paranoia of a different kind: wondering if artificial intelligence will become all-conquering. Garry Kasparov, former world champion and one of the greatest chess players in history, was possibly among the earliest humans to mull this question — will AI take over my job? — sometime back in the 90s. 'I am not unsympathetic to those whose lives and livelihoods have been negatively impacted by disruptive new technology. Few people in the world know better than I do what it's like to have your life's work threatened by a machine,' Kasparov once wrote in his book Deep Thinking, which chronicles his famous battles with machines. An early evangelist of man versus machine contests, Kasparov added: 'No one was sure what would happen if and when a chess machine beat the world champion. Would there still be professional chess tournaments? Would there be sponsorship and media coverage of my world championship matches if people thought the best chess player in the world was a machine? Would people still play chess at all?' Ironically, Kasparov was thinking this in an era where his powers were at their peak. He was the undisputed world champion. And having brushed aside the challenge of every man that faced off against him on the chess board, Kasparov started to seek battles against supercomputers, with minds made out of silicon, nerves of wires and bodies held together in large metal cupboards. Among his many duels with electronic foes, the two battles with a supercomputer created by IBM, called Deep Blue, became the most famous. It is this Kasparov vs Deep Blue battle — famously called 'The Brain's Last Stand' by Newsweek magazine on its cover back then — that forms the setting of 'Rematch', a six-part miniseries released on Lionsgate Play late last week. Starring Christian Cooke with a pitch-perfect accent and a voice with a gravitas befitting the intimidating Kasparov, 'Rematch' uses the first Kasparov vs Deep Blue battle in Philadelphia in 1996 (which Kasparov won easily) to set the backdrop of the actual battle: the second contest in 1997, which Kasparov lost in New York. As Kasparov once pointed out, the first battle was a science experiment. The second one was war with a machine. 'Rematch' captures the drama of both these duels, with a few creative liberties to spice up an already intriguing battle between the greatest general on the battlefield of 64 squares and a large cupboard that could think faster than anyone had thought before. The man behind the machine, Feng-hsiung Hsu, called it a battle between 'man as a performer and man as a toolmaker'. It was a war that made global headlines back in the 90s. 'How do you make a computer blink?' ran the catchphrase across giant posters advertising the 1997 chess match. Kasparov's duels with computers started even before he became a world champion. In one particularly enjoyable one for the Russian, in Hamburg in June 1985, he played a simultaneous exhibition game (called simul) against 32 computers created by four chess computer manufacturers. 'One of the organisers warned me that playing against machines was different. Because they would never get tired or resign in dejection the way a human opponent would; they would play to the bitter end,' wrote Kasparov in Deep Thinking. Kasparov won each of the 32 games. 'These were the good ol' days of human versus machine chess. But this golden age would be brutally short,' he noted. So short, that in 1997, just 12 years after he had defeated 32 computers in a row in a span of five hours, Kasparov was handed defeat in New York by IBM's $10 billion supercomputer, Deep Blue. 'Chess computers went from being laughably weak to being nearly unbeatable during my 20 years as the world's top player,' Kasparov wrote. For those interested in computer speak on how Deep Blue ended up making Kasparov blink instead of the other way round (Kasparov won one game out of six while the machine won two games), the second machine which took down the Russian used '32 processors to perform a set of coordinated, high-speed computations in parallel. Deep Blue was able to evaluate 200 million chess positions per second, achieving a processing speed of 11.38 billion floating-point operations per second, or flops', notes the IBM website. 'They improved the databases dealing with chess endgames, created a more powerful evaluation function for chess positions, hired additional chess grandmasters to advise the team, and developed methods to disguise the computer's strategy.' In 'Rematch', before the second man vs machine battle, Kasparov is doing an interview where he is asked by a reporter: 'In a factory, when a machine outperforms an employee, the employee will often lose their job.' An introspective Kasparov/Cooke opts not to answer the question. This question is the elephant in the room of the whole battle. In one of the earliest scenes of 'Rematch', the man behind the Deep Blue asks Kasparov/Cooke: 'Aren't you even a little concerned you might lose?' A belligerent Kasparov responds: 'Why would I be concerned? It's a science experiment and computers are the future. I want to see what Deep Blue is capable of more than anyone else. But of course I will win.' Machines did become much stronger. Much stronger than humans will ever be on the board. But yet, the world does not spend time watching two machines fight each other while being tended to by human handlers. It would rather watch humans test themselves, even with flaws in their game play, against other humans. Why? The answer lies in what transpired after Kasparov's defeat in New York. Even though the Russian was deeply livid at his defeat — at the press conference afterward, he is said to have 'personally guaranteed' that he would 'tear Deep Blue into pieces' in games if it started playing competitive chess tournaments — Kasparov lent himself to plenty more 'science experiments'. One of them, in 1998 in Leon, saw Kasparov team up with a computer running his preferred chess program (German chess program Fritz 5) while taking on Veselin Topalov using ChessBase 7.0. They didn't just use the computers in the background for their prep as every professional chess player does now. They were allowed to use them during the game. The result was a 3-3 tie. And therein lies the problem with computer perfection. If two of the world's best computers played against each other, the result would inevitably be a dead draw. Who would want to watch that? Amit Kamath is Assistant Editor at The Indian Express and is based in Mumbai. ... Read More
Time of India
a day ago
- Time of India
Days of Our Lives spoilers: Kayla gears up to confront EJ over his high-handed ways, will she pay a price?
Days of Our Lives spoilers: Days of Our Lives, which premiered in the 1960s, remains one of the most beloved shows on television, despite competition from new favorites. The soap opera is synonymous with shocking twists and compelling character arcs. The July 22 episode of Days of Our Lives promises to be just as captivating as the ones before it. Here are some spoilers for the same. Today's episode features major developments in the lives of characters such as Kayla and Tate. Kayla fumes at EJ's high-handed attitude EJ has taken over the University Hospital completely and is calling the shots. Needless to say, the Chief of Staff Kayla is unhappy about this. EJ keeps bossing her around, making it difficult for her to carry out her duties. He has also put in place strict regulations concerning the flow of money. Kayla never wanted him to be involved, but it's too late to change that. As such, she reaches her breaking point and decides to confront EJ. Their impending confrontation could change the power dynamics at the hospital for good. Will Sophia's lies be exposed? Meanwhile, on the latest episode of Days of Our Lives, Melinda realises that helping Sophia cover up her lie isn't an easy task. Sophia tells Tate a cock and bull story about giving birth in Chicago and putting the baby up for adoption. However, what she may not fully comprehend is that the truth could come out sooner than expected, as Amy has seen the baby. If this happens, will Melinda pay a price for her actions? Only time will tell! A post shared by Days of our Lives (@dayspeacock) Tate is already a worried man because of his niece Ari's abduction and Sophia simply adds to his troubles. She tells him that they have a daughter together. Brady is there to support his son but this lie has the potential to wreak havoc in everyone's lives. Sarah comes up with a plan to destroy Xander Elsewhere on Days of Our Lives, Sarah is a worried mom. She is set to challenge Xander for the custody of their daughter, Victoria. Her estranged husband is relying on Gabi to win the legal battle. Moreover, Sarah fears that he may have a few more aces up his sleeve. As such, she comes up with a legal plan that may destroy his chances. This episode of Days of Our Lives also sees Stephanie and Alex have a disagreement. Steph suddenly snaps at her friend. However, it is not cleat what exactly has gone wrong between them. It seems one will have to watch the show to find out. Days of Our Lives is available to stream on Peacock.
