Police officer denies he ‘lost control' in aftermath of alleged airport assault
On Wednesday, jurors at Liverpool Crown Court were shown a photograph of injuries to the face of the defendants' mother, said to have been sustained as Pc Zachary Marsden attempted to arrest Amaaz at the T2 car park paystation area.
CCTV footage played to the jury showed Mrs Akhtar knelt near to her son on the floor after a Taser discharge felled him.
Cross-examining Pc Marsden, Imran Khan KC, defending Amaaz, said: 'Did you cause the injury as a result of your conduct on July 23?'
The Greater Manchester Police firearms officer said: 'I believe it is unclear whether or not it was my actions that caused those injuries. I believe I was not the only person who made contact with Mrs Akhtar.'
Mr Khan said: 'I am suggesting that it was you who caused that injury by hitting her with a Taser?'
Pc Marsden said: 'I firmly believe that you can't wholly attribute my actions to those injuries.'
Mr Khan said: 'Did you push the Taser you were holding into Mrs Akhtar at the time she was tending to Mr Amaaz?'
Pc Marsden said: 'I did, yes.'
Mr Khan said: 'Did you think that was justified?'
Pc Marsden said: 'In the circumstances, yes, I did.
'She grabbed my left leg. Using my left hand, I have taken hold of her grip to remove it. She clamped on to my left hand pulling me forward.
'I was being pulled over Mr Amaaz and at risk of falling on top of him and being vulnerable.'
Mr Khan said: 'I am going to suggest to you that was unnecessary. This was a hard push by your Taser on Mrs Akhtar's face?'
Pc Marsden said: 'I disagree.'
Mr Khan said: 'She was concerned for Mr Amaaz. She was not a threat. She was not interfering with anything you were doing and this was conduct, I suggest, where you have lost control.'
Pc Marsden said: 'I would deny that.'
Mobile phone footage was also played to the jury of Pc Marsden later using Pava incapacitant spray on a bystander who he said was effectively 'shielding' another man who officers wanted to detain for obstructing their duties.
Pc Marsden told the court he deployed the tactic because events were 'beyond verbal reasoning'.
The officer was then seen to grab the man around the neck and pull him to the floor, Mr Khan said.
Mr Khan said: 'How do you justify putting your hands around a man's neck?'
Pc Marsden said: 'Immediately prior, I had been subjected to the most violent assault of my life.
'I was now terrified that we are on the tipping point of another volatile situation. They were complicit in watching us being violently assaulted.
'I used pre-emptive force. I was in pain, exhausted and wanted to try the best I could to effect an arrest.'
Mr Khan said: 'Was he doing anything that required Pava spray in the face?'
Pc Marsden said: 'My fear was that he would be combative and we would end up with another hostile fight that I didn't want to happen.'
Cross-examining Pc Marsden, Chloe Gardner, defending Amaad, said: 'I suggest that you and your colleagues were the aggressors.'
Pc Marsden said: 'I can only account for my actions. I deny what you allege.'
He also denied her suggestions that he failed to exercise any self-control and did not act with integrity.
Pc Marsden 'strongly disagreed' with another suggestion that he had not been honest with the jury.
Amaaz is alleged to have assaulted Pc Marsden and Pc Lydia Ward, causing them actual bodily harm.
He is also accused of the assault of Pc Ellie Cook and the earlier Starbucks assault of Abdulkareem Ismaeil.
Amaad is alleged to have assaulted Pc Marsden, causing actual bodily harm.
Both men, from Rochdale, Greater Manchester, deny the allegations.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Metro
an hour ago
- Metro
Officer in Manchester Airport brawl 'was an uncontrolled bully with a badge'
A police officer who allegedly kicked a suspect in the head, stomach and groin while he was on the ground is an 'uncontrolled bully with a badge', a court has heard. PC Zachary Marsden was involved in a violent clash with brothers Mohammed Fahir Amaaz, 20, and Muhammad Amaad, 26, at Manchester Airport in July last year. Footage which appeared to show him stamping on Amaaz's head went viral after being shared on social media. The brothers, from Rochdale, are currently on trial for assaulting PC Marsden, but deny the charge and insist they were acting in self-defence and defence of each other. Amaaz also accused of attacking two female colleagues involved in the fracas and a member of the public in an earlier altercation. Police were called to the airport following a report of a man, Abdulkareem Ismaeil, being headbutted in the Starbucks cafe in the Terminal 2 arrivals lounge. The court heard PC Marsdsen, arriving with PC Ellie Cook and PC Lydia Ward, grabbed Amaaz from behind at a car park paystation in the lounge. Chloe Gardner, defending Amaad, told jurors on Friday: 'We see PC Marsden stride up to his brother's left side and grab first his arm and then his head and neck. 'Nothing is said by any of the officers. No announcement of any sort. No-one says they are police officers. That's crucial. 'Pc Marsden used unnecessary violence. His behaviour is indicative of how he behaves in general, certainly that day. Aggressive and uncontrolled.' Amaaz was previously accused of beginning to resist immediately, before his brother intervened and both alledgedly inflicted a 'high level of violence' on the officers. But Ms Gardner said Amaad attempted to de-escalate, referring to footage in which he's heard to say 'easy, easy, easy… no, no, no'. She said is words had 'zero effect on PC Marsden' who was 'pretty much covered in red mist'. Ms Gardner went on: 'We say that from the outset, Pc Marsden had no regard for procedure and acted how he wanted. His way was the only way. 'Mr Amaad told you his intention was solely to get Pc Marsden's hands off his brother. Mr Amaad was clear that at no point did he try to grab Pc Marsden's throat.' She said PC Marsden lied in statements about his interactions with Amaad, adding: 'We say it is critical when you consider Pc Marsden's credibility. 'He has come into this courtroom and he has lied to you.' Amaad did 'no more than was necessary' to defend his brother and then himself as he believed he was 'under attack', she continued.. Taser strikes were fired at both brothers, the court has heard, and their mother, Shameem Akhtar, was injured in the melee. The defendants say PC Marsden tasered Ms Akhtar in the face, while the officer claimed Amaad accidentally elbowed her. More Trending After the apparent head-stamping shown in the viral clip, Ms Gardner said, PC Marsden went on to kick Amaad in the stomach and the groin and 'smack him in the head' with his Taser. She said: 'Even when he has both brothers immobile and the mother has been hit in the face and is bleeding, he continues to assault Mr Amaad. 'He is an uncontrolled bully with a badge. He defied protocol, ethics, procedure and law.' The trial continues on Monday, when jurors are expected to be sent out of court to deliberate. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: McDonald's branch bans children from new adults-only area during weekdays MORE: Multiple bodies found in Cornwall woodland during police hunt for missing man MORE: Heroes chase down dirt bike rider who sped off after knocking pensioner down
ITV News
2 hours ago
- ITV News
Policeman involved in Manchester Airport incident was ‘uncontrolled bully with a badge', jury told
A police officer involved in a fracas at Manchester Airport was an 'uncontrolled bully with a badge', a jury has been told. PC Zachary Marsden is claimed to have been "aggressive and uncontrolled" as he responded to a report a member of the public had been headbutted at a Starbucks cafe in Terminal 2 arrivals just minutes earlier on the evening of 23 July 2024. It is alleged Mohammed Fahir Amaaz, 20, resisted as he was grabbed from behind at a car park ticket machine with his brother, Muhammad Amaad, 26, intervening as both inflicted a 'high level of violence' on the officers. In her closing speech at Liverpool Crown Court, Chloe Gardner, defending Amaad, said: 'We see PC Marsden stride up to his brother's left side and grab first his arm and then his head and neck. 'Nothing is said by any of the officers. No announcement of any sort. No-one says they are police officers. That's crucial. 'PC Marsden used unnecessary violence. His behaviour is indicative of how he behaves in general, certainly that day. Aggressive and uncontrolled.' She said Amaad was heard to say 'easy, easy, easy… no, no, no' in a bid to de-escalate the situation, but his words had 'zero effect on PC Marsden' who was 'pretty much covered in red mist'. Ms Gardner went on: 'We say that from the outset, PC Marsden had no regard for procedure and acted how he wanted. His way was the only way. 'Mr Amaad told you his intention was solely to get PC Marsden's hands off his brother. Mr Amaad was clear that at no point did he try to grab PC Marsden's throat.' She said PC Marsden had told lies in various statements about his interactions with Amaad at the pay station area. Ms Gardner said: 'We say it is critical when you consider PC Marsden's credibility. 'He has come into this courtroom and he has lied to you.' She said Amaad did 'no more than was necessary' to defend his brother and then himself as he believed he was 'under attack'. Taser strikes were later fired at both brothers, the court has heard, and their mother, Shameem Akhtar, was injured in the melee. The defendants say PC Marsden struck her in the face with his Taser, while the officer said he believed Amaad accidentally elbowed her. Mobile phone footage of the officer kicking the head of Amaaz and in a stamping motion was shared on social media and went viral last year. Ms Gardner said PC Marsden went on to kick Amaad in the stomach and to the groin and 'smack him in the head' with his Taser. She said: 'Even when he has both brothers immobile and the mother has been hit in the face and is bleeding, he continues to assault Mr Amaad. 'He is an uncontrolled bully with a badge. 'He defied protocol, ethics, procedure and law.' Amaaz is alleged to have assaulted PC Marsden and Pc Lydia Ward, causing them actual bodily harm. He is also accused of the assault of emergency worker PC Ellie Cook, and the earlier assault by beating of a member of the public, Abdulkareem Ismaeil, at a Starbucks cafe in T2 arrivals. Amaad is alleged to have assaulted PC Marsden, causing actual bodily harm. Both defendants, from Rochdale, Greater Manchester, deny the allegations and say they were lawfully acting in self-defence or in defence of each other.
Telegraph
6 hours ago
- Telegraph
Asylum seeker ‘faked baby with European' to win right to stay
An asylum seeker won the right to stay in Britain after using fake birth and death certificates to claim he had a baby, an immigration court heard. Sameer Khan, a Pakistani citizen, presented the forged documents to a tribunal as part of his bid to stay in the UK, judges were told. He used the certificates to successfully argue the child proved his marriage to a European citizen was not one of 'convenience' but a genuine relationship, which therefore gave him the right to remain in Britain. But the Home Office has since uncovered evidence that the documents presented to the court to support his case were fake, throwing into doubt whether the child had ever been born. After the accusation of fraud, Mr Khan's case will now be heard again after judges were told his alleged dishonesty undermines his entire case to stay in Britain. An upper immigration tribunal was told Mr Khan had applied for leave to remain under the European Union settlement scheme after claiming to have married an EEA citizen – named at the hearing as Ms Rumenova – in Cyprus in August 2020. The Home Office refused the application on the basis that there were 'reasonable grounds for suspicion that the marriage was entered into for the purpose of securing leave to remain, and so was a marriage of convenience', the tribunal was told. Mr Khan appealed, and a hearing of a first-tier tribunal in November 2024 presided over by Judge Sarah Farmer was shown documents 'said to establish cohabitation and the relationship'. 'There was also a birth certificate for a child, 'AK', said to have been born in the United Kingdom on 10 August 2023 in Slough, County of Berkshire,' the tribunal was told. '[Mr Khan] and [Ms Rumenova] were named on the birth certificate as the parents of AK.' But the couple did not attend the asylum hearing, the tribunal heard, having emailed to say that the baby had died the week before. 'The Judge recorded in the Decision that [they] had emailed the Tribunal on the morning of the hearing, to say their child, AK... had died in the week before the hearing, and so they could not attend the hearing,' the tribunal said. Later that day, the judge was emailed a death certificate, saying the child had died of epilepsy related seizures and vomiting on Nov 15 2024, at Wexham Park Hospital in Slough, and the death had been registered on Nov 18 2024, the same day as the hearing. Judge Farmer allowed Mr Khan's appeal against the Home Office's decision to deny him leave to remain after finding that there was a 'wealth of reliable evidence', including the birth and death certificates, to show the relationship was not one of convenience. Document authenticity concerns After officials made checks, the registry office confirmed the birth and death certificates were forgeries. As a result, upper tribunal judges Daniel Sheridan and Hannah Graves said the evidence undermined the original ruling. They said there was 'sufficient' evidence to establish that there are 'legitimate concerns about whether those documents are genuine and capable of reliance'. 'We therefore find that the Judge was led into error, albeit inadvertently. We find that error was material and infects the credibility assessment made by the Judge, which was central to the findings of fact made and the outcome of the appeal,' they said. 'We therefore do not preserve any findings made in the Decision but set it aside in its entirety. The matter is now remitted to the First-tier Tribunal for a fresh hearing, before another judge than Judge Farmer.'
