logo
Kanwar Yatra: When governance becomes management of religious events

Kanwar Yatra: When governance becomes management of religious events

Hans India2 days ago
It looks like the Yogi Adityanath regime in Uttar Pradesh and large sections of the Sangh Parivar equate governance with the management of religious events. First it was Mahakumbh and now it is Kanwar Yatra. Incidentally, it is not just the government machinery, but life itself finds itself enmeshed in the intricacies of pilgrimages. The Kanwar Yatra, a deeply revered Hindu pilgrimage undertaken in the month of Shravan, draws lakhs of devotees, known as Kanwariyas, walk long distances to fetch water from the Ganga and offer it to Lord Shiva in temples.
Over time, this event has evolved from a humble spiritual exercise into a massive and heavily orchestrated religious procession, drawing extensive state support. In UP, as in other BJP-ruled states like Uttarakhand, Haryana, and Delhi, the Kanwar Yatra transforms the civic and administrative landscape for several weeks each year. It is no different this year. As the yatra gains momentum, several districts in UP have taken the extreme step of shutting down schools temporarily. The ostensible reason is to safeguard students amid overwhelming road congestion, traffic diversions, and the general chaos that accompanies the event.
District administrations have also rerouted traffic, deployed thousands of police personnel, and put civic services on high alert. Roads are reserved for Kanwariyas, while ordinary citizens face long detours and disruptions to daily life. Worse still, educational institutions being closed for religious reasons sets a problematic precedent. It sends a clear message: spiritual events, when they reach a certain magnitude, can override secular responsibilities like education. Students, particularly from rural and lower-income families who rely heavily on government schools, are the silent victims. Their academic calendar, already fragile due to Covid-related disruptions in recent years, is being tampered with for reasons that are no way related to education.
This normalisation of such disruptions reflects a misplaced priority. Thankfully, the Supreme Court has taken cognisance of petitions challenging another controversial move by the state government: a directive mandating eateries and dhabas along the Kanwar route to display QR codes with ownership information. Ostensibly framed as a security measure, critics argue that this directive opens the door to surveillance and possible targeting of minority-run establishments.
There is a growing perception that such policies are less about public safety and more about religious profiling, under the guise of administrative diligence. The apex court has rightly sought an explanation from the Uttar Pradesh government on the legality and intent behind this decision. What is alarming is how all stakeholders—administrators, judges, law enforcement—are sucked into the vortex of this religious exercise, willingly or otherwise. From district magistrates to police commissioners, from municipal workers to teachers, almost every arm of governance is redirected to facilitate a pilgrimage.
This is not just an expression of religious accommodation but an institutional surrender to spectacle. Governance is becoming indistinguishable from the management of festivals. This must stop. There is nothing wrong with supporting religious events in a secular and diverse democracy like India. It is entirely reasonable for the state to ensure safety, hygiene, and traffic regulation during such events. However, when religious festivities start dictating the tempo and tenor of governance, it becomes problematic.
When students are denied education so that roads can be cleared for devotees, when businesses are monitored in the name of religious security, when hospitals, fire services, and administrative offices and that is when one should take such initiative with a pinch of salt.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Dubo Dubo Ke vs Patak Patak Ke: Raj Thackeray Responds To Nishikant Dubeys Threat Amid Marathi Vs Hindi Battle
Dubo Dubo Ke vs Patak Patak Ke: Raj Thackeray Responds To Nishikant Dubeys Threat Amid Marathi Vs Hindi Battle

India.com

time17 minutes ago

  • India.com

Dubo Dubo Ke vs Patak Patak Ke: Raj Thackeray Responds To Nishikant Dubeys Threat Amid Marathi Vs Hindi Battle

New Delhi: Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS) chief Raj Thackeray has launched a sharp counterattack against BJP MP Nishikant Dubey over his controversial 'patak patak ke maarenge' remark targeting Marathi people. In a fiery public address, Thackeray warned, 'You come to Mumbai, we will drown you in the sea here, Dubey, tum Mumbai me aajao, Mumbai Ke Samundar Mein Dubo Dubo ke Maarenge" The war of words comes amid an escalating row over language politics in Maharashtra, with the MNS chief making it clear that he will not tolerate disrespect toward the Marathi language or its people. #WATCH | Mumbai: On 'Patak Patak ke Maarenge' remark of BJP MP Nishikant Dubey, MNS chief Raj Thackeray says, "A BJP MP said, 'Marathi logon ko hum yahan pe patak patak ke maarenge'...You come to Mumbai. Mumbai ke samundar mein dubo dubo ke maarenge." — ANI (@ANI) July 18, 2025 'I will not make any compromises over Marathi and the people of Maharashtra. Those who live in Maharashtra should learn Marathi as soon as possible. Speak Marathi wherever you go,' Thackeray said, addressing a crowd at a rally in Mira Bhayandar. He compared the assertiveness shown by Kannada speakers in Karnataka to the need for a similar stand in Maharashtra. 'In Karnataka, even a rickshaw driver knows the government backs him on language. You must speak Marathi with pride, be like a pillar,' he added. Though he maintained that he was not trying to stir controversy, Thackeray made his stand clear. 'I am a Hindu, but Hindi cannot be imposed on me. This land belongs to us, the sons of Maharashtra. Others have come from outside. If someone crosses the line here, beat them up,' he warned. The comments came after reports that the Maharashtra government, led by CM Devendra Fadnavis, had considered making Hindi mandatory in primary schools. The plan triggered outrage, leading to the withdrawal of two such government orders following strong public opposition. Still, Fadnavis maintained that a three-language formula would be introduced, and whether Hindi should be taught from Class 1 or Class 5 would be decided by an appointed committee. But Raj Thackeray was far from convinced. 'If they impose Hindi from Class 1 to 5, we will not hesitate to shut down schools. When they tried earlier, we shut down shops,' he declared. He also accused certain Gujarati business lobbies of trying to create a divide between Mumbai and the rest of Maharashtra. 'They've had their eyes on Mumbai for years. Making Hindi mandatory is just the first step. Their real aim is to shift everything to Gujarat,' Thackeray alleged. Despite his tough stand, Thackeray clarified that he wasn't against Hindi as a language. 'I speak better Hindi than most politicians in Maharashtra. My father spoke fluent Hindi. I am not against any language, but I oppose its imposition,' he said. The controversy adds fuel to the already sensitive debate around linguistic identity in Maharashtra, particularly in Mumbai, where tensions around language and regional pride often flare up during political showdowns.

TRF a proxy of Pakistan-based terror outfit Lashkar-e-Taiba, say security forces
TRF a proxy of Pakistan-based terror outfit Lashkar-e-Taiba, say security forces

The Hindu

time17 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

TRF a proxy of Pakistan-based terror outfit Lashkar-e-Taiba, say security forces

The Resistance Front (TRF), now designated by the United States as a global terror outfit, is a proxy of Pakistan-based proscribed group Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT). The outfit was floated in the aftermath of the abrogation of Article 370 to evade international sanctions against Pakistan, according to Indian security agencies. TRF has carried out terror attacks in Jammu & Kashmir's Keran, Handwara, Sopore, Shopian, Anantnag, Reasi, and Pahalgam. Notable attacks include the Pahalgam attack on April 22, 2025; the killing of nine Hindu pilgrims in Reasi on June 9, 2024; the murder of six migrant labourers and a doctor in Ganderbal on October 20, 2024, the killing of three Army and police personnel in Anantnag on September 13, 2023; and the murder of a BJP leader and two of his family members on, July 8, 2020. The Indian government designated the outfit as a terror organisation under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act in January 2023. ​Founded by Muhammad Abbas Sheikh (now deceased) in October 2019, it is currently headed by designated terrorist Sheikh Sajjad Gul. The National Investigation Agency (NIA) has declared a reward of ₹10 lakh for him. 'Muhammad Abbas Sheikh, previously associated with Hizbul Mujahideen, played a key role in setting up TRF. He was killed in an encounter with security forces on August 23, 2021. ​After his death, Basit Ahmed Dar aka Abu Kamran, became its chief operational commander. He was also killed in an encounter on May 7, 2024, in Jammu & Kashmir's Kulgam,' said an official. The current TRF chief was allegedly a part of the conspiracy to assassinate prominent Kashmiri journalist Shujaat Bukhari in 2018. 'Gul was instrumental in launching TRF's digital media platform 'Kashmir Fight', through which threats were also issued to migrant Kashmiri Pandit employees,' the official said. Via 'Kashmir Fight', TRF indulges in anti-India propaganda, campaigns for recruitment, and also claims responsibility for attacks. Its website was registered on December 10, 2024, through an entity said to be based in Iceland. TRF has a presence on several digital platforms, including Mastodon, Chirpwire, and BiP. 'TRF usually focused on security forces and political figures, but late 2024 onward it started to target infrastructure projects and civilians, including non-locals, in Jammu & Kashmir,' the official said. Citing its direct role in the Pahalgam attack, the U.S. has formally designated TRF as a foreign terrorist organisation and a specially designated global terrorist entity. 'The U.S. statement acknowledges TRF's links with LeT and Pakistan Army; General Asim Munir's role; and the legitimacy of India's calibrated military response through 'Operation Sindoor' that was aimed at neutralising the terror launchpads,' the official said.

Bolsonaro ordered to wear ankle tag over fears flight risk concern amid criminal trial
Bolsonaro ordered to wear ankle tag over fears flight risk concern amid criminal trial

Indian Express

time19 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

Bolsonaro ordered to wear ankle tag over fears flight risk concern amid criminal trial

Brazil's former President Jair Bolsonaro has been ordered to wear an ankle monitor, authorities said on Friday, in a move he described as 'a supreme humiliation.' The development came as federal police conducted searches at his home and his party's headquarters in Brasília, following a Supreme Court order. The court also imposed several restrictions: Bolsonaro is barred from leaving his home at night, contacting foreign diplomats or ambassadors, approaching embassies, using social media, or communicating with other individuals under investigation — including his son, Eduardo Bolsonaro. Eduardo, a Brazilian lawmaker living in the United States and closely allied with US President Donald Trump, is facing a separate probe for allegedly coordinating with US authorities to sanction Brazilian officials. Bolsonaro is currently on trial at Brazil's Supreme Court over allegations that he attempted to orchestrate a coup to overturn the 2022 election result, which saw him defeated by current President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva. As per a report by AP, speaking to journalists after putting on the ankle monitor, Bolsonaro said: 'It is a supreme humiliation. I never thought about leaving Brazil, I never thought about going to an embassy, but the precautionary measures are because of that.' On Thursday, Trump issued a statement calling Bolsonaro's treatment 'terrible and unjust,' and urged an end to the trial. 'This trial should end immediately!' the US President said, claiming he had 'strongly voiced' his disapproval through recent tariffs on Brazil. The Supreme Court's restrictions are part of a wider investigation into Bolsonaro's conduct and his alleged attempts to undermine Brazilian democracy. Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes, the lead judge in the case, said the actions of both Bolsonaro and Eduardo amounted to 'blatant confessions of criminal conduct,' including coercion, obstruction of investigations, and attacks on national sovereignty. Eduardo Bolsonaro responded online, saying: 'Alexandre de Moraes doubled down,' referring to the court's latest actions. His brother, Senator Flávio Bolsonaro, also criticised the order on X (formerly Twitter): 'Prohibiting a father from speaking to his own son is the greatest symbol of the hatred that has consumed Alexandre de Moraes.' Live footage showed federal police outside Bolsonaro's residence during the search. Congressman Sóstenes Cavalcante, leader of Bolsonaro's party in the lower house, said officers also searched the party's headquarters and called it 'another chapter in the persecution of conservatives and right-wing figures' in Brazil. A lawyer for Bolsonaro has yet to comment. In a report to the Supreme Court earlier this week, Prosecutor-General Paulo Gonet wrote: 'The evidence is clear: the defendant acted systematically, throughout his mandate and after his defeat at the polls, to incite insurrection and the destabilisation of the democratic rule of law.' Bolsonaro has repeatedly dismissed the proceedings as a 'witch hunt,' echoing language often used by Trump. Last week, the US president imposed a 50% import tax on Brazilian goods, explicitly linking the tariffs to the trial. Trump previously hosted Bolsonaro at his Mar-a-Lago resort in 2020, when both leaders were still in office. Despite mounting political pressure, Brazil's Supreme Court appears unfazed. A court official, speaking anonymously, said some justices had privately agreed that US tariffs would have no bearing on the trial's outcome. The proceedings are expected to resume between August and September. (With inputs from Associated Press)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store