logo
Don't Just Do Something, Stand There!

Don't Just Do Something, Stand There!

Scoop4 days ago
'Every action matters now. Every effort small or large counts. And moving, movement is the essential key to dispelling despair.' That directive sounds compelling, but it's the cri de coeur of the externally oriented activist mindset, and it is simply false.
Sadly, there are three reasons why it made no difference that an estimated 4 million to 6 million people marched in the streets of America on 'No Kings' day.
The first is that mass marches are no remedy for the moribund core of the American body politic that gave rise to the bare-knuckle fascism of the Trump Administration.
There's a tremendous hollowness and untruth behind this sentiment: 'Mass marches are public moments to show the rest of the world that we are the majority and we do not want and will not accept a king.'
Why do activists and pundits need to be reminded that a majority of Americans elected Trump a second time, and that polls are mere numbers, which don't measure the absence of passion in a benumbed people?
Mass marches, inveterate activists maintain, 'Are places to let off steam and make great art and music and network…the expression of our collective sorrow and outrage, thereby saving our own souls.' Bullshit.
Can a woman or man save their individual soul if the soul of their people has expired? Not if s/he denies the collective deadness that gave rise to Trump's authoritarianism, and finds false comfort in 'collective sorrow and outrage.'
The second reason is that once unvarnished evil is entrenched in positions of power, its course cannot be altered by the means that previously affected less mendacious and malignant governments.
Advertisement - scroll to continue reading
President Nixon is an example. As spiteful and malicious as he was, he was brought down by an intact people and an intact Congress. But the American people are no longer whole, and the checks and balances of the founders no longer work, which is why Trump is able to send in thousands of troops to crush non-violent protests in Los Angeles, and leave them there with impunity.
Once in power, only external war or internal revolution can dislodge a complete tyrant. Since humankind cannot have another world war without the total destruction of civilization, and since political revolutions belong to bygone eras in previously distinct cultures and countries, it will take a psychological revolution to rid the world (and not just America) of Daddy Dictator and his ilk, as well as his domestic and international sycophants.
The third reason marches and movements make no difference is that the attitude of 'strengthening the bonds with our own tribe' is very much part of the problem. Tribalism is primal source of the nationalism that tyrants like Trump exploit. Defunct patriotism is no antidote to virulent jingoism.
It's true: 'Your humanity is also your resistance. Don't underestimate its power. It's the only thing they can't take away from you.'
But it's egregiously false to conflate that with 'every action matters now; every effort small or large counts…and moving – movement is the essential key to dispelling despair.'
Engaging in collective movements without individual self-knowing means running away from one's despair through the crowd. Remaining with what is within one is the essential key to dispelling despair, and changing what is. Stepping back from the world, without cutting off and numbing your heart, is essential.
Joining some march to make one feel alive and part of something larger, under the illusion that numbers will make a difference, benefits neither the individual nor the society.
Ironically, the idea that we are separate from the world is also a feature of the mindfulness movement, which has given rise to the retreat industry and the wellness craze. Rather than providing life-giving water to the deserts of political life, the retreat industry reinforces the underlying individualism that has made marches and movements so ineffective.
After all, for the majority of people, mass marches hold the same appeal and have as much meaning as attending big concerts -- 'places to let off steam and make music and network.'
It comes down to what one puts first – collective action, or self-knowing? The first is an extension of externalization and busyness, the accepted excuse for not doing the spadework within, and thereby taking responsibility as a microcosm of humanity.
Despite the risk of isolation and navel staring, self-knowing is the truly radical course. Effective collective action flows from attentive individual inaction. Ten self-knowing human beings, who stand alone before working together, will make more of a difference than ten million clones that march together to ward off alienation, powerlessness and loneliness.
What's at stake is not the socio-political future of a precipitously declining former superpower, or any other nation-state in an utterly dysfunctional and defunct international order, but the viability of the Earth and the future of humanity.
Activism can't cut it. But self-knowing reflection plus shared revolutionary insight can.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Elon Musk says he has created a new US political party
Elon Musk says he has created a new US political party

RNZ News

time7 hours ago

  • RNZ News

Elon Musk says he has created a new US political party

Eloin Musk. Photo: AFP / Angela Weiss Elon Musk, an ex-ally of US President Donald Trump, said Saturday (US time) he has launched a new political party in the United States to challenge what the tech billionaire described as the country's "one-party system". Musk, the world's richest person and Trump's biggest political donor in the 2024 election, had a [ bitter falling out[ with the president after leading the Republican's effort to slash spending and cut federal jobs as head of the so-called Department of government Efficiency. "When it comes to bankrupting our country with waste & graft, we live in a one-party system, not a democracy," the Space X and Tesla boss posted on X, the social media platform that he owns. "Today, the America Party is formed to give you back your freedom." Musk cited a poll - posted on X on Friday, US Independence Day - in which he asked whether respondents "want independence from the two-party (some would say uniparty) system" that has dominated US politics for some two centuries. The yes-or-no survey earned more than 1.2 million responses. "By a factor of 2 to 1, you want a new political party and you shall have it!" he posted on Saturday. The Trump-Musk feud reignited in dramatic fashion late last month as Trump pushed Republicans in Congress to ram through his massive domestic agenda in the form of the One Big Beautiful Bill . Musk expressed fierce opposition to the legislation, and ruthlessly attacked its Republican backers for supporting "debt slavery". File photo. US President Donald Trump speaks during a news conference with Elon Musk in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, DC, on 30 May, 2025. Photo: AFP / Allison Robbert He quickly vowed to launch a new political party to challenge lawmakers who campaigned on reduced federal spending only to vote for the bill, which experts say will pile an extra US$3.4 trillion over a decade onto the US deficit. After Musk heavily criticized the flagship spending bill - which eventually passed Congress and was signed into law - Trump threatened to deport the tech tycoon and strip federal funds from his businesses. "We'll have to take a look," the president told reporters when asked if he would consider deporting Musk, who was born in South Africa and has held US citizenship since 2002. - AFP

Trump branded, browbeat and prevailed — but his big bill may come at a cost
Trump branded, browbeat and prevailed — but his big bill may come at a cost

1News

time8 hours ago

  • 1News

Trump branded, browbeat and prevailed — but his big bill may come at a cost

Barack Obama had the Affordable Care Act. Joe Biden had the Inflation Reduction Act. President Donald Trump will have the tax cuts. All were hailed in the moment and became ripe political targets in campaigns that followed. In Trump's case, the tax cuts may almost become lost in the debates over other parts of the multitrillion-dollar bill that Democrats say will force poor Americans off their health care and overturn a decade or more of energy policy. Through persuasion and browbeating, Trump forced nearly all congressional Republicans to line up behind his marquee legislation despite some of its unpalatable pieces. He followed the playbook that had marked his life in business before politics. He focused on branding — labelling the legislation the 'One Big, Beautiful Bill' — then relentlessly pushed to strong-arm it through Congress, solely on the votes of Republicans. ADVERTISEMENT But Trump's victory will soon be tested during the 2026 midterm elections where Democrats plan to run on a durable theme: that the Republican president favours the rich on tax cuts over poorer people who will lose their health care. Republican members of Congress reach to shake hands with Speaker of the House Mike Johnson, R-La., centre bottom, after Johnson signed President Donald Trump's signature bill of tax breaks and spending cuts (Source: Associated Press) Trump and Republicans argue that those who deserve coverage will retain it. Nonpartisan analysts, however, project significant increases to the number of uninsured. Meanwhile, the GOP's promise that the bill will turbocharge the economy will be tested at a time of uncertainty and trade turmoil. Trump has tried to counter the notion of favouring the rich with provisions that would reduce the taxes for people paid in tips and receiving overtime pay, two kinds of earners who represent a small share of the workforce. Extending the tax cuts from Trump's first term that were set to expire if Congress failed to act meant he could also argue that millions of people would avoid a tax increase. House Speaker Mike Johnson of La., points to President Donald Trump after he signed his signature bill of tax breaks and spending cuts at the White House, Friday, July 4, 2025, in Washington, surrounded by members of Congress (Source: Associated Press) ADVERTISEMENT To enact that and other expensive priorities, Republicans made steep cuts to Medicaid that ultimately belied Trump's promise that those on government entitlement programs 'won't be affected.' 'The biggest thing is, he's answering the call of the forgotten people. That's why his No. 1 request was the no tax on tips, the no tax on overtime, tax relief for seniors,' said Rep. Jason Smith, R-Mo., chairman of the tax-writing House Ways and Means Committee. 'I think that's going to be the big impact.' Hard to reap the rewards Presidents have seen their signature legislative accomplishments unravelled by their successors or become a significant political liability for their party in subsequent elections. A central case for Biden's reelection was that the public would reward the Democrat for his legislative accomplishments. That never bore fruit as he struggled to improve his poll numbers driven down by concerns about his age and stubborn inflation. Since taking office in January, Trump has acted to gut tax breaks meant to boost clean energy initiatives that were part of Biden's landmark health care and climate bill. Obama's health overhaul, which the Democrat signed into law in March 2010, led to a political bloodbath in the midterms that fall. ADVERTISEMENT Its popularity only became potent when Republicans tried to repeal it in 2017. Whatever political boost Trump may have gotten from his first-term tax cuts in 2017 did not help him in the 2018 midterms, when Democrats regained control of the House, or in 2020 when he lost to Biden. 'I don't think there's much if any evidence from recent or even not-so-recent history of the president's party passing a big one-party bill and getting rewarded for it,' said Kyle Kondik, an elections analyst with the nonpartisan University of Virginia's Center for Politics. Social net setbacks Democrats hope they can translate their policy losses into political gains. During an Oval Office appearance in January, Trump pledged he would 'love and cherish Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid.' 'We're not going to do anything with that, other than if we can find some abuse or waste, we'll do something,' Trump said. 'But the people won't be affected. It will only be more effective and better.' ADVERTISEMENT That promise is far removed from what Trump and the Republican Party ultimately chose to do, paring back not only Medicaid but also food assistance for the poor to make the math work on their sweeping bill. It would force 11.8 million more people to become uninsured by 2034, according to the Congressional Budget Office, whose estimates the GOP has dismissed. 'In Trump's first term, Democrats in Congress prevented bad outcomes. They didn't repeal the (Affordable Care Act), and we did Covid relief together. This time is different,' said Senator Brian Schatz, D-Hawaii. 'Hospitals will close, people will die, the cost of electricity will go up, and people will go without food.' Some unhappy Republicans Senator Thom Tillis, R-N.C., repeatedly argued the legislation would lead to drastic coverage losses in his home state and others, leaving them vulnerable to political attacks similar to what Democrats faced after they enacted 'Obamacare.' With his warnings unheeded, Tillis announced he would not run for reelection, after he opposed advancing the bill and enduring Trump's criticism. ADVERTISEMENT 'If there is a political dimension to this, it is the extraordinary impact that you're going to have in states like California, blue states with red districts,' Tillis said. "The narrative is going to be overwhelmingly negative in states like California, New York, Illinois, and New Jersey.' Even Senator Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, who eventually became the decisive vote in the Senate that ensured the bill's passage, said the legislation needed more work and she urged the House to revise it. Lawmakers there did not. Early polling suggests that Trump's bill is deeply unpopular, including among independents and a healthy share of Republicans. White House officials said their own research does not reflect that. So far, it's only Republicans celebrating the victory. That seems OK with the president. In a speech in Iowa after the bill passed, he said Democrats only opposed it because they 'hated Trump.' That didn't bother him, he said, 'because I hate them, too.'

Hamas says ready to start Gaza ceasefire talks 'immediately'
Hamas says ready to start Gaza ceasefire talks 'immediately'

RNZ News

time9 hours ago

  • RNZ News

Hamas says ready to start Gaza ceasefire talks 'immediately'

Photo: JACK GUEZ Israel was considering its response after Hamas said it was ready to start talks "immediately" on a US-sponsored proposal for a Gaza ceasefire . The security Cabinet was expected to meet after the end of the Jewish sabbath at sundown to discuss Israel's next steps, as Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu prepared to head to Washington for talks on Monday with US President Donald Trump. Trump has been making a renewed push to end nearly 21 months of war in Gaza, where the civil defence agency said 35 people were killed in Israeli military operations on Saturday. "No decision has been made yet on that issue," an Israeli government official told AFP when asked about Hamas's positive response to the latest ceasefire proposal. Hamas made its announcement late Friday after holding consultations with other Palestinian factions. "The movement is ready to engage immediately and seriously in a cycle of negotiations on the mechanism to put in place" the US-backed truce proposal, the militant group said in a statement. Two Palestinian sources close to the discussions told AFP that the proposal included a 60-day truce, during which Hamas would release 10 living hostages and several bodies in exchange for Palestinians detained by Israel. However, they said, the group was also demanding certain conditions for Israel's withdrawal, guarantees against a resumption of fighting during negotiations and the return of the UN-led aid distribution system. Hamas ally Islamic Jihad said it supported ceasefire talks, but demanded guarantees that Israel "will not resume its aggression" once hostages held in Gaza are freed. Trump, when asked about Hamas's response aboard Air Force One, said: "That's good. They haven't briefed me on it. We have to get it over with. We have to do something about Gaza." The war in Gaza began with Hamas's October 2023 attack on Israel, which sparked a massive Israeli offensive in the territory that aimed to destroy Hamas and bring home all the hostages seized by Palestinian militants. Two previous ceasefires mediated by Qatar, Egypt and the United States secured temporary halts in fighting and the return of Israeli hostages in exchange for Palestinian prisoners. Of the 251 hostages taken by Palestinian militants during the October 2023 attack, 49 are still held in Gaza, including 27 the Israeli military says are dead. The Egyptian foreign ministry said Saturday that top diplomat Badr Abdelatty held a phone call with Washington's main representative in the truce talks, Steve Witkoff, to discuss recent developments "and preparations for holding indirect meetings between the two parties concerned to reach an agreement". Meanwhile, ahead of its weekly protest demanding the return of the hostages, the main group representing their families renewed its call for a negotiated agreement to bring them home. "This is the hour to bring about a comprehensive deal that will guarantee the return of the last hostage," the Hostages and Missing Families Forum said. But recent efforts to broker a new truce have repeatedly failed, with the primary point of contention being Israel's rejection of Hamas's demand for guarantees of a lasting ceasefire. Nearly 21 months of war have created dire humanitarian conditions for the more than two million people in the Gaza Strip, where Israel has recently expanded its military operations. A US- and Israel-backed group, the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, took the lead in food distribution in the territory in late May, when Israel partially lifted a more than two-month blockade on aid deliveries. The group said two of its US staff members were wounded "in a targeted terrorist attack" at one of its aid centres in southern Gaza's Khan Yunis on Saturday, adding that reports indicated a pair of assailants "threw two grenades at the Americans". The Israeli military said it had evacuated the injured. UN agencies and major aid groups have refused to cooperate with the GHF over concerns it was designed to cater to Israeli military objectives. Its operations have been marred by near-daily reports of Israeli fire on people waiting to collect rations. UN human rights office spokeswoman Ravina Shamdasani said Friday that more than 500 people have been killed waiting to access food from GHF distribution points. But GHF chairman Johnnie Moore, a Christian evangelical leader allied to Trump, on Wednesday rejected calls for the lead role in Gaza aid distributions to revert to UN agencies, saying: "We will not be shut down." Civil defence spokesman Mahmud Bassal said Israeli military operations killed 35 people across Gaza on Saturday. Media restrictions in Gaza and difficulties in accessing many areas mean AFP is unable to independently verify the tolls and details provided by the civil defence agency. Contacted by AFP, the Israeli military said it could not comment on specific strikes without precise coordinates. The Hamas attack of October 2023 resulted in the deaths of 1219 people, mostly civilians, according to an AFP tally based on Israeli official figures. Israel's retaliatory campaign has killed at least 57,338 people in Gaza, also mostly civilians, according to the Hamas-run territory's health ministry. The United Nations considers the figures reliable. - AFP

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store