logo
In Webinar Of Muslim Legal Fund Of America – Whose Chairman Is American Muslims For Palestine (AMP) Head Hatem Bazian – Attorneys Recommend 'Donating Internationally' To Bypass 'Smear Campaigns', 'Cri

In Webinar Of Muslim Legal Fund Of America – Whose Chairman Is American Muslims For Palestine (AMP) Head Hatem Bazian – Attorneys Recommend 'Donating Internationally' To Bypass 'Smear Campaigns', 'Cri

Memri05-06-2025

During a February 20, 2025, Muslim Legal Fund of America (MLFA) webinar on HR 9495 and its impact on Muslim American nonprofit organizations, Diala Shamas, senior staff attorney at the Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR), said there have been "smear campaigns" accusing student organizations on U.S. campuses of being part of the "international propaganda arm" of Hamas. As a result, these student groups and their supporters risk being accused of providing material support for terrorism. Shamas called this theory "bananas." She expressed concern that under a Trump Department of Justice, there could be expanded criminal charges against pro-Palestinian groups, especially Muslim organizations, such as the Holy Land Foundation. She also discussed the designation of Samidoun as a Specially Designated Global Terrorist (SDGT) organization, and spoke about the legal risks nonprofits face depending on their focus. One example she gave was UNRWA USA, a CCR client that fundraises in the U.S. for UNRWA.
Antonio Glenn, a Muslim attorney based in Texas, stated that many of the nonprofit organizations he works with are facing a "major concern" over accusations that they are providing material support to foreign terrorist organizations (FTOs). He differentiated between groups that focus on local American causes and those that fund overseas operations, noting that there is no FTO counterpart for those accused of supporting domestic terrorism. He said that there is a concerted effort to try and find "remedies and pathways through other nonprofit organizations that have encountered this situation, especially for foreign terrorist… or donating internationally, I should say," to continue supporting Muslim communities internationally.
The Muslim Legal Fund of America (MFLA) is headed by Hatem Bazian, who is also Chair of American Muslims for Palestine (AMP), co-founder of Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP), and a professor at UC Berkeley (see MEMRI TV clips nos. 12040, 12014, 11822, 11947). MFLA represented the Holy Land Foundation, which has been investigated for funneling funds to Hamas, and five of its members served prison sentences for their terror-linked activity. It also represented Al-Qaeda operative Aafia Siddiqui. MFLA has been praised by Rep. Ilhan Omar, Imam Yasir Qadhi, chairman of the Fiqh Council of North America, anti-Israel activist Linda Sarsour.
Diala Shamas: "There has [been] some smear campaigns that all put out this narrative that campus organizing is part of Hamas's propaganda arm, so student organizations, student activists, are actually part of this Hamas international propaganda arm, and therefore, these student groups and those who support them in the U.S. are liable for material support for terrorism. So it's again, a bananas – to use non-legal terminology – theory, it's meritless, to use more legal terminology.
[...]
"We've seen it being used in the past, particularly against Muslim organizations, criminal cases have been brought against the Holy Land [Foundation] Five, and other people who are still serving sentences. What I am worried [about] is that under a Trump DOJ we'll see an expansion of that. It hasn't yet happened. The Biden administration has designated Specially Designated Global Terrorist, under the provisions that we heard about earlier, a Palestinian advocacy organization called Samidoun, has been designated this, so that might be an indicator of a place where we might see efforts expand. What happens is that you first designate groups, and then there are 501C3 implications, but there are also possible criminal implications.
[...]
"The risk profile looks really different from organization to organization. Your risk profile if you are sending money to Gaza looks very different from your risk profile if you are organizing on campuses it is very different from if you are a think-tank doing policy briefings, doing policy.
[...]
"UNRWA USA, our client, is a donor to UNRWA. They're basically fundraising in the U.S., they have donors to UNRWA USA, then [the money] goes... Resources then go to UNRWA. So they certainly are trying to go after what they talk about as the money flow."
[...]
Antonio Glenn: "In some of our nonprofits that we are speaking of now there is a major concern [over accusations] of material support for foreign terrorist organizations [FTO]. Black Lives Matter didn't get so implicated in that because there were no foreign overseas operations going on. So that was a huge distinction here. For the most part, what we learn in those cases, if your sources and advocacy are somewhat focused more locally, nationally, you may not be implicated as much or caught up, so to speak, in these situations.
[...]
"There is no really counterpart for domestic terrorism support as it is for this FTO, and bringing them material support.
[...]
"I think [we need] a little more research on how to do that. I think that is what we are doing now, trying to find the remedies and pathways through other nonprofit organizations that have encountered this situation, especially for foreign terrorist... or donating internationally, I should say, on that part. That we can continue moving forward in donating overseas and helping overseas brothers and sisters with funding without [suffering] these repercussions."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Gaza toll mounts as Tel Aviv protests intensify
Gaza toll mounts as Tel Aviv protests intensify

Shafaq News

timean hour ago

  • Shafaq News

Gaza toll mounts as Tel Aviv protests intensify

Shafaq News - Gaza At least 72 Palestinians were killed overnight in Israeli airstrikes across the Gaza Strip, including in Khan Younis, Gaza City, and near Palestine Stadium, according to the enclave's Health Ministry. According to Palestinian media, the Israeli military conducted attacks across the Strip with drone and jet strikes, targeting individuals and buildings alike. جانب من غارات الاحتلال على منازل الفلسطينيين في جباليا، شمال قطاع غزة. — شبكة قدس الإخبارية (@qudsn) June 28, 2025 The new casualties raise Gaza's death toll to over 56,000 since the war began in October 2023. More than 6,000 have died since hostilities resumed in March, amid severe shortages of food, water, and medical aid. The humanitarian crisis continues to deepen, with widespread displacement, ongoing bombardments, and restricted access to essential services. Meanwhile, US President Donald Trump projected a truce 'within a week,' citing progress in negotiations involving Israeli and US officials. Israeli Strategic Affairs Minister Ron Dermer is expected in Washington for follow-up consultations to finalize terms. Qatari and Egyptian mediators have reportedly stepped up indirect talks with Hamas and Israel, with Hamas outlining its conditions for a Gaza ceasefire, demanding protections for its political bureau members abroad. Public anger escalated in Tel Aviv on Saturday night, where thousands marched in protest, demanding a ceasefire and the return of hostages. Demonstrators chanted against Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's handling of the war, warning protests would continue until a resolution is achieved.

Israeli forces kill 37 Palestinians, including children
Israeli forces kill 37 Palestinians, including children

Iraqi News

timean hour ago

  • Iraqi News

Israeli forces kill 37 Palestinians, including children

Gaza City – Gaza's civil defence agency said Israeli forces killed 37 people in the devastated territory on Saturday, including at least nine children who died in strikes. Civil defence spokesman Mahmud Bassal told AFP 35 people were killed in seven Israeli drone and air strikes in various locations, and two others by Israeli fire while waiting for food aid in the Netzarim zone in central Gaza. He said the dead included three children who were killed in an air strike on a home in Jabalia, in northern Gaza. Bassal said at least six more children died in a neighbourhood in the northeast of Gaza City, including some in an air strike near a school where displaced people were sheltering. The Israeli military did not respond to a request for comment by Saturday evening. Restrictions on media in Gaza and difficulties in accessing many areas mean AFP is unable to independently verify the tolls and details provided by rescuers. AFP images showed mourners weeping over the bodies of seven people, including at least two children, wrapped in white shrouds and blankets at Al-Shifa hospital in Gaza City. Video footage filmed from southern Israel showed smoke rising over northern Gaza after blasts. Other AFP footage filmed in Gaza City showed a cloud of smoke rising from buildings after a strike. In Jabalia, an AFP photographer saw civil defence rescuers aiding a man with blood on his back. – Gaza ceasefire drive – Israel launched its offensive in Gaza in October 2023 in response to a deadly attack by Palestinian militant group Hamas. After claiming victory in a 12-day war against Iran that ended with a ceasefire on June 24, the Israeli military said it would refocus on its offensive in Gaza, where Palestinian militants still hold Israeli hostages. Qatar said on Saturday that it and fellow mediators the United States and Egypt were engaging with Israel and Hamas to build on momentum from the ceasefire with Iran and work towards a Gaza truce. 'If we don't utilise this window of opportunity and this momentum, it's an opportunity lost amongst many in the near past. We don't want to see that again,' said Qatar's foreign ministry spokesman Majed al-Ansari. Hamas's October 2023 attack resulted in the deaths of 1,219 people, mostly civilians, according to an AFP tally based on Israeli official figures. Israel's retaliatory military campaign has killed at least 56,412 people, also mostly civilians, according to Gaza's health ministry. The United Nations considers these figures to be reliable.

Fragile Truce: Unpacking the uneasy ceasefire between Israel and Iran
Fragile Truce: Unpacking the uneasy ceasefire between Israel and Iran

Shafaq News

time2 days ago

  • Shafaq News

Fragile Truce: Unpacking the uneasy ceasefire between Israel and Iran

Shafaq News The recent ceasefire, announced by US President Donald Trump, momentarily silenced the 12-day exchange of fire between Israel and Iran. Yet, for seasoned observers, this halt in direct military confrontation marks not an end to hostilities but rather a complex, transitional phase. Analysts widely anticipate a pattern of continued low-intensity conflict, drawing stark parallels to the fragile ceasefire in Lebanon that Israel frequently breaches. The prevailing sentiment among experts is that neither Tehran nor Tel Aviv has fully achieved its strategic objectives, with Israel's perceived unmet goals particularly fueling this pervasive skepticism. This unresolved tension sets the stage for a period characterized by recurrent violations, escalating accusations, and a persistent, multi-faceted struggle encompassing intelligence, political, and economic warfare, all of which hold the potential to reignite full-scale military conflict. A Decades-Long Shadow War Escalates The recent escalation is rooted in a decades-long, undeclared conflict between Iran and Israel. What began as a "cold peace" in the aftermath of the 1979 Iranian Revolution, which saw the ousting of the pro-Western Shah, gradually transformed into open hostility. Iran's rejection of Israel's legitimacy and its support for regional proxy groups, notably Hezbollah in Lebanon and various factions in Syria, Gaza, and Yemen, solidified its "Axis of Resistance." In response, Israel, viewing Iran's nuclear program and regional influence as an existential threat, adopted a more aggressive posture. This strategic rivalry has manifested through covert operations, assassinations of nuclear scientists and military figures, cyberattacks, and targeted airstrikes. The immediate trigger for this recent 12-day confrontation, which began on June 13th, 2025, remains a subject of intense debate, but it undeniably marked a significant escalation beyond the typical "shadow war" into direct, overt military action. This period saw Israel launching extensive strikes targeting what it claimed were Iranian nuclear facilities and missile production sites, while Iran retaliated with its own ballistic missile and drone attacks. The US, a key ally of Israel, also engaged in strikes against Iranian nuclear infrastructure, raising the stakes and highlighting the global dimensions of this regional rivalry. Unfulfilled Ambitions and Strategic Divergence The announced ceasefire has been met with a mix of cautious acceptance and profound skepticism across various stakeholder groups, each driven by their own perceived gains and losses, and their long-term strategic objectives. From Lebanon, Qassem Qasir, a seasoned political writer, emphasized that the ceasefire "cannot be considered the end of the war." He articulated that Israel's publicly stated goals focused on dismantling Iran's nuclear infrastructure and missile capabilities. However, Qasir pointed to a more ambitious, unstated objective, "the overthrow of the regime in Iran," citing the unprecedented scale of apprehended spy networks as compelling evidence of this deeper agenda, suggesting that these networks played a crucial role in enabling the targeting of missile and drone launches. 'This reflects a pervasive belief that Israel views the very existence of the current Iranian regime as an impediment to regional stability and its own long-term security.' Dr. Munqith Dagher, the head of the Independent Institute of Administration and Civil Society Studies (IIACSS), asserted that the "conflict has not ended; it is still ongoing because neither party (Iran or Israel) feels they have achieved their goals yet, especially Israel." Dagher posited that Israel perceives the current situation as a "golden opportunity" – a fleeting window not just for neutralizing Iran's nuclear program, but for pursuing the far more ambitious goal of "attempting to topple the regime." Consequently, Dagher anticipates that even if the ceasefire holds militarily, the broader "war" will persist through non-conventional means, including intensified "intelligence, political, and economic" warfare, with the looming threat of renewed military escalation. He also offered a shrewd interpretation of US President Trump's role, suggesting that his intervention was driven by a desire for a "propaganda victory to reduce pressure from the Zionist lobby for his non-participation in the war, thereby trying to present himself as a war hero who entered and quickly ended it." Dr. Issam Al-Faili, a professor of political science, acknowledged the international perception Trump sought to cultivate – that of a global peacemaker capable of halting major conflicts. He conceded that a sustained ceasefire could indeed be hailed as a "major political achievement." However, Al-Faili grounded his analysis in the immediate realities, cautioning that "current data indicates this truce will be fragile." Furthermore, Al-Faili underlined the deep-seated grievances driving the two sides, "both parties to the conflict seek revenge; Iran will not forget the assassination of its leaders, and Israel does not want to maintain any nuclear or missile program, but rather to eliminate the Iranian regime to prevent any obstacles to the Abraham Project, which represents Israel's continuity in the region." A Strategic Crossroads for Iran The consensus among analysts is that the ceasefire, rather than concluding the conflict, has merely ushered in a new, more complex phase of strategic maneuvering. For Iran, this period presents a critical crossroads, forcing a re-evaluation of its long-term strategy in the face of unprecedented pressure. George Al-Aqouri, a Lebanese writer and political researcher, asserted a significant shift in the regional power balance, contending that regardless of the ceasefire's durability, it "reflects the reality that nuclear and ballistic Iran has ended after decades of efforts to acquire nuclear capability, as it was eliminated within minutes by American strikes, and ballistic missiles were melted down." This is a bold claim, suggesting a profound setback to Iran's strategic deterrence capabilities. Al-Aqouri further observed a notable lack of response from Iran's regional proxies, "Iran's proxies in the region did not move, and indeed, lack the ability to move, from Hezbollah in Lebanon to the new reality in Syria, down to Yemen; any movement by them would have been a suicidal act." He also drew a historical parallel, suggesting that "Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei might once again drink the bitter cup of 1988 when an agreement was reached to end the war with Iraq," indicating that Khamenei might be forced to accept a difficult reality to preserve his regime. Salim Al-Jumaili, a former Iraqi intelligence officer, offered Iran two stark strategic models: the "Japanese model" and the "Iraqi model." The Japanese model, he explained, references post-World War II Japan's decision to abandon militarism, embrace industrial development, and forge a strategic alliance with the United States for national survival and prosperity. 'This path emphasizes economic pragmatism over ideological confrontation.' In contrast, the Iraqi model, following the 1991 Gulf War, describes Iraq's choice of 'continued defiance and diplomatic maneuvering, which ultimately led to the regime's overthrow 12 years later.' Al-Jumaili warned that "Iran today realizes that the Russia, China, and North Korea axis protects no one, and that it is merely a fragile balance that cannot stand against America." Dr. Asif Melhem, Director of JSM-Center for Scientific Research & Studies in Moscow, provided a geopolitical lens, arguing that a core objective of the conflict was to render "the front in Iran almost vulnerable, similar to the situation in Lebanon, which Israel constantly violates." Melhem articulated the US strategic perspective: "America views Israel as a spearhead, an advanced base, and an executive tool in the Arab region, and therefore it must remain in a state of continuous conflict." What distinguishes this recent conflict, he noted, is its geographical scope, extending "far from Israel's security perimeter" into Iran itself. He posited that the conflict's deeper aim was not merely Iran's nuclear program, but rather "to ignite Iran and its surroundings," encompassing Central Asia, the Caucasus, Pakistan, and Afghanistan – regions that "directly affect Russia, China, and India." Melhem further linked this to the formation of a new anti-American bloc, comprising "China, Iran, Russia, and North Korea" within frameworks like BRICS and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization. "The war has not ended but has moved into a new phase where blackmail and pressure increase, and thus America got what it wanted, which uses wars as a tool to achieve economic gains." This implies a long-term strategy of attrition and economic leverage. A Protracted Struggle and Redefined Regional Dynamics The ceasefire, rather than ushering in peace, signals a new, more complex phase of confrontation. This period will likely be characterized by: -Sustained Non-Military Warfare: Expect intensified intelligence operations, cyber warfare, political pressure campaigns, and economic sanctions. These will be the primary tools of engagement, aiming to achieve objectives that direct military force could not, or could not sustain. -Persistent Violations and Accusations: The inherent fragility of the truce, coupled with the unresolved objectives of both sides, guarantees a cycle of accusations and counter-accusations regarding violations, potentially leading to limited, retaliatory strikes. The "Lebanese scenario" of an unstable border and frequent breaches may well become the norm for the Israeli-Iranian dynamic. -Heightened Regional Instability: The conflict has demonstrated the willingness of major powers to engage directly in the region. This increases the risk of broader regional conflagration, particularly if Iran's proxies are further weakened or if it feels compelled to take more aggressive retaliatory action. -Re-evaluation of Deterrence: For Iran, the impact on its nuclear and missile programs, as perceived by some analysts, will necessitate a re-evaluation of its deterrence strategy and its reliance on regional proxies. -Economic Consequences: Beyond the immediate military and human costs (about 650 Iranian deaths and 5332 injured, alongside 28 Israeli deaths reported as of June 24th), the protracted uncertainty and potential for renewed conflict will continue to deter investment, disrupt trade routes, and impact energy markets, with significant economic ramifications for the entire Middle East. In brief, the deep-seated animosities, unfulfilled strategic objectives, and the involvement of global powers suggest a protracted period of instability rather than a genuine resolution. The Abraham Project, implicitly aimed at reordering regional alliances against Iran, and Iran's unwavering commitment to its Axis of Resistance philosophy, ensures that the fundamental drivers of conflict remain intact.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store