logo
Roadster Glory: 2006 Mazda MX-5 Miata vs. 2006 Pontiac Solstice

Roadster Glory: 2006 Mazda MX-5 Miata vs. 2006 Pontiac Solstice

Motor Trend21 hours ago

[Editor's Note: This story first appeared in the December 2005 issue of MotorTrend] England invented it. America has attempted it. The Japanese perfected it. "It" being the moderately priced, front-engine roadster. How the tables have turned over the years. In little more than a decade, the Mazda Miata became the world's best-selling sports car. The prides of Britain--Triumph and MG--are long gone. And America has never really been in the game.
The 2006 Mazda MX-5 and Pontiac Solstice offer different takes on affordable sports cars. The MX-5 excels with a lighter, more agile drive and a user-friendly design, while the Solstice impresses with its looks and value. Overall, the MX-5 remains the leader in the compact roadster category.
This summary was generated by AI using content from this MotorTrend article Read Next
The balance changes with the arrival of the Pontiac Solstice, with its fraternal twin, the Saturn Sky, not far behind. By now, you know the new General Motors entries will run headlong into a new-from-scratch Miata--sorry, MX-5. The Miata name has been dumpstered for 2006, tossing away immeasurable brand equity for reasons nobody understands.
The Solstice rides on GM's new "Kappa" rear-drive chassis architecture and is powered by a 2.4-liter, 177-horsepower version of the Ecotec I-4 found in everything from Cobalts to Euro-market Opel minivans. A five-speed manual transmission is standard, and an optional five-speed automatic will be phased in as production ramps up. Suspension is via upper/lower control arms front and rear, and four-wheel disc brakes and 18-inch alloy wheels are standard. The styling is like nothing else, the hood opens clamshell style, and the folding cloth top recesses beneath the rear deck. The Solstice is GM product chieftain Bob Lutz's personal baby, and he promised it would base at less than $20 grand. Which it does, by a five-spot.
In spite of the dumb name thing, Mazda knew enough not to mess with a winning formula, yet changed every nut, bolt, and grommet to arrive at this third-generation MX-5. It's two inches longer and 1.6 inches wider than the car it replaces, yet overall weight is about the same, depending upon options. The wheelbase has increased by 2.5 inches, opening up the cabin and giving the car a beefier stance. Too many American males branded the Miata a chick car, so a more macho look was important--and achieved. A fresh 2.0-liter four makes 170 horsepower over a wider powerband than the previous car's 1.8. A five-speed manual is standard, a six-speed stick is available, and the optional automatic also has six ratios. The chassis is stiffer, the convertible top design has been simplified, and safety and standard equipment levels have increased.
The biggest number to crunch is 402--as in how many pounds heavier the Solstice is than the MX-5, at least based on these two test cars. Mazda's made a lot of noise about how lightness has been "engineered in" to the MX-5, but it's legit. It's this weight differential that sets the tone for this pair's relative performance and driving personas. The objective numbers are close; the subjective differences between them greater.
The Solstice is just a tenth slower (6.7 seconds versus 6.6) to 60 mph than the MX-5. A seven-horsepower advantage isn't enough to erase a 400-pound weight differential. But the Solstice has 26 more pound-feet of torque: 166 compared with 140. And the Mazda's close-ratio six-speed requires a shift to third to reach 60, whereas the Pontiac gets there in second. The MX-5's slim lead widens a bit in the quarter-mile times. The MX-5 clears 1320 feet in 15.1 seconds at 91.2 mph, with the Solstice still close at 15.3 seconds at 89.6 mph.
Both machines have strong, four-wheel disc brakes, so this area proved a virtual draw, the MX-5 stopping from 60 in 113 feet to the Solstice's 117. The Mazda cleared our slalom course at 66.5 mph, just nipping the Pontiac's 66.1-mph performance. How they got there, however, felt way different. The Pontiac turns in sharply and has good front-end bite, staying neutral until the limit is approached, then it fades to mild understeer. "The chassis works well and is predictable," notes test-driver Chris Walton, "but it feels like it's getting away with more because the tires are so wide." The MX-5 is more knife-edged and precise, staying neutral longer. It's also more easily provoked into oversteer. "It reminds me of a junior version of the Lotus Elise," says Walton. "There's a fair amount of body roll, but it sticks well, with communication, and is so precise that I could make mid-corner adjustments."
Even though the MX-5 has less torque, the close-ratio six-speed helps keep the engine on boil. It makes a lusty combination of intake, mechanical, and exhaust noises and always feels ready to go play. The Solstice's Ecotec four isn't the smoothest lump ever born, yet it has a pleasant exhaust note and isn't too thrashy. It's not as eager to rev as the Miata motor and gets the job done with midrange torque instead of top-end power. There's considerable rpm falloff on the 2-3 shift; a six-speed would make a serious difference.
Both cars ride well considering their handling-biased mission. The Solstice's wider track, longer wheelbase, greater weight, and milder springing give it the advantage here. Mid-corner bumps more easily upset the MX-5, while the Solstice stays planted with no side stepping, for the same reasons noted above. Both have well-weighted, communicative steering, and their structures feel solid and structurally sound.
Inside, the Solstice's wraparound IP is all about the driver. It's got more legroom than the MX-5 and feels wider, too. Tops up, the Pontiac has more headroom by several inches. There are, however, several ergonomic flaws. There's no easily reachable center-console storage and no door pockets, although some are at the front of the seats. The cupholders spring out of the rear bulkhead, making them tough to reach. And the window switches are mounted too far aft on the door panels, forcing you to reach back to operate them. These are curious design mistakes on a new platform planned from scratch as a two-seater.
The MX5's cabin isn't as swoopy looking, but is easy to live with. The window switches are mounted just behind the shifter. The center cupholders are easy to reach, too, but the pair in the doors will bang your shins. (Why, by the way, are four cupholders required in a two-seater car--how many lattes should one juggle while driving?) The more complete gauge cluster is easy to read. Plastics and other materials are of good quality, a smidge ahead of the Solstice's. The MX-5's longer wheelbase improves cabin room compared with the previous Miata, although it's still snug for over-six-footers. Tie game in terms of seats; both have chairs bolstered well enough to keep you in place when corner carving, yet comfy enough for everyday use and long hauls.
A word about pricing and equipment levels. As noted, the Solstice bases at $19,995, including destination charges; our tester had the Power, Convenience, and Premium equipment packages, plus air-conditioning, ABS, and a few other options that brought the total to $23,785. Our MX-5 was a Grand Touring model, which includes a lot of normally optional hardware in its $24,995 base price. If our Solstice were equipped with the top audio combo (Monsoon sound/CD6/MP3) at $890, roughly equaling the MX-5 Grand Touring's premium Bose system, the price difference would be less than a grand in the Pontiac's favor.
General Motors can take pride in what it's accomplished. The Solstice is a real sports car and not the topless poseur enthusiasts feared. It'll sell on looks and value alone. But if the Solstice is a solid runner, the MX-5 is a fleet-footed sprinter, delivering a more athletic, lithe drive in most every respect.
The MX-5's engine is smoother and happier to rev than the Solstice's. The MX-5 has a more communicative chassis, and it feels every one of those 400 pounds lighter and more responsive than the Pontiac. This Grand Touring model, as equipped with the optional Sport Suspension package (revised anti-roll bars, Bilstein shocks, limited-slip diff), won every performance contest, although the margins were small. The Solstice's top design is fussier than it needs to be; the MX-5's couldn't be simpler. The Mazda's interior is of higher quality and beautifully packaged. While the Solstice's cabin is comfy and racy looking, it suffers from a dearth of storage, a few ergonomic hiccups, and cheapoplasticity.
All things considered, Mazda is still the established master of the compact, affordable roadster game. 1st Place
Mazda MX-5: The driving enthusiast's winner, and still champion, is the new MX-5. 2nd Place
Pontiac Solstice: Credit Pontiac for a legit, value-priced, hot-looking-entry. Top Talk
Mazda and Pontiac take decidedly different approaches to going topless. The Solstice's decklid is hinged at the rear and opens via the remote fob. The top unlocks via one latch on the windshield header and folds into the cargo area. It swallows much of the trunk's 3.8-cubic-foot capacity in doing so, but it looks smooth when the rear deck is closed: The top is fully hidden, no tonneau is required, and those bulbous fairings are among the Solstice's most interesting design touches.
The MX-5's top and trunk designs are more conventional, but easier to manage. Unlatch the top from the single latch on the header, and you can practically throw it over your shoulder at a stoplight. It clicks into place and was designed to look finished in the folded position without the use of a tonneau cover. It's effective, although there are still small cavities at the sides of the top. The MX-5's 5.3 cubic feet of trunk space is unaffected by the top's position and much easier to access than the Solstice's oddly shaped cargo bay, which also asks that you snap home the folding buttresses each time you close the deck.
Both cars have glass rear windows with defrosters. The MX-5 has a flip-down windbocker, while the Solstice has none. Pontiac gives you a cloth top standard, while a vinyl top is standard on base and Sport MX-5s; cloth is reserved for the upmarket Grand Touring level. While the Solstice scores style points for the neat looking rear deck, the MX-5's design is easier to raise and lower and doesn't eat up the trunk in the process. Advantage, Mazda.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Aeva Technologies (AEVA) Rallies 8.55% on Robotics, Autonomous Driving Growth Opportunities
Aeva Technologies (AEVA) Rallies 8.55% on Robotics, Autonomous Driving Growth Opportunities

Yahoo

time39 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Aeva Technologies (AEVA) Rallies 8.55% on Robotics, Autonomous Driving Growth Opportunities

Aeva Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ:AEVA) is one of the . Aeva Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ:AEVA) rallied by 8.55 percent on Friday to close at $36.43 apiece ahead of the quarterly window dressing, sparked by growth opportunities from the booming industrial automation and robotics, and autonomous driving. Aeva Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ:AEVA), a company focused on manufacturing and selling light detection and ranging (lidar) systems, is set to benefit from the increasing adoption of industrial automation, with various companies now transitioning to robotics to do jobs. A close-up of a LiDAR-on-chip sensor mounted in a consumer-grade electronic device. At home, e-commerce giant Amazon earlier this month underscored the future of warehouse automation and robotics, saying that it will need fewer people to do some of the jobs over time. 'In our fulfillment network, we're using AI to improve inventory placement, demand forecasting, and the efficiency of our robots—all of which have improved cost to serve and delivery speed,' Amazon CEO Andrew Jassy was quoted as saying. Additionally, autonomous driving is now taking center stage, sparking optimism for further growth for the lidar industry. Just this month, auto giant Tesla Inc. (NASDAQ:TSLA) launched its robotaxi operations in Texas, while Uber Technologies Inc. (NYSE:UBER) was mulling over acquiring Pony AI's US subsidiary. While we acknowledge the potential of AEVA as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 20 Best AI Stocks To Buy Now and 30 Best Stocks to Buy Now According to Billionaires. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey. Sign in to access your portfolio

Massively Turbocharged Five-Rotor Sounds More Like an F1 V10 Than an F1 V10
Massively Turbocharged Five-Rotor Sounds More Like an F1 V10 Than an F1 V10

The Drive

time43 minutes ago

  • The Drive

Massively Turbocharged Five-Rotor Sounds More Like an F1 V10 Than an F1 V10

The latest car news, reviews, and features. I don't know about you all, but I'm tired of every high-revving engine being compared to a Formula 1 V10. Like, I get it—YouTubers want clicks and we car people are suckers for that sweet 2000s nostalgia. But the truth is, most of the time, whatever garage-built project they're talking about doesn't sound like an F1 V10. This insane five-rotor with a 106-millimeter turbo, however, does. It's the work of David Mazzei, who started a company called Mazzei Formula. He specializes in nasty rotary engines, and before this, he crafted a four-rotor for an FD RX-7. This build, dubbed the Formula Five, uses a Superlite SL-C kit car as its base and goes wild from there. Mazzei started the project in 2021 when he acquired the SL-C. He wrote about his plans for the car in a forum post: 'Five-rotor, first one in the world. Crankshaft is currently off for balancing. We plan to run a billet engine, full peripheral port, and a modified G57 turbo to achieve around 1,500 [rear-wheel horsepower] and produce a V10 F1 sound. Rotary fires 1x per rev, four-stroke piston fires once every other rev. With the 72-degree lobe angle offsets, and an equal length five-into-one collector with merge angle and collector design mimicking the [Mazda] 787b four-rotor, we theorize it should sound identical to a V10 F1 at 18,000 [rpm] when running at 9,000 rpm. Major third harmonic, one being root tonic, and the third and octave above the root.' To me, that sounds like a guy who knows what he's talking about. Fast forward roughly four years, and Mazzei has made good on his promise. He uploaded a video earlier this week showing the Formula Five on the road with cameras inside the car and out. My favorite view has to be the rear-facing angle, focusing on the engine and the massive 106-millimeter turbo strapped to the back. It has an air-actuated Holinger MXT sequential transaxle that only makes the sound better as he clicks through the gears. And as for the 3.3-liter engine, it has a six-stage dry sump oiling system with a cable-driven, spur-geared fuel pump. Being honest with you guys, I didn't even know a dry sump system could have six stages, and I've never heard of a spur-geared fuel pump. I guess that means I need to spend more time in the pits. Watching this video makes me realize that I'll never be able to build something like this. And you know what? That's fine. I'm more than happy to leave the crazy projects to people like Mazzei with the smarts and—importantly—patience to make them happen. Man, what a sound. Got a tip or question for the author? Contact them directly: caleb@

‘Looks Like We Both Winning:' Lyft Customer Gets Charged $80 for Ride. Then She Asks Her Driver This Question That Saves Her $40
‘Looks Like We Both Winning:' Lyft Customer Gets Charged $80 for Ride. Then She Asks Her Driver This Question That Saves Her $40

Motor 1

timean hour ago

  • Motor 1

‘Looks Like We Both Winning:' Lyft Customer Gets Charged $80 for Ride. Then She Asks Her Driver This Question That Saves Her $40

Taking a rideshare like Lyft or Uber is easy and convenient, but it can also be expensive for some rides. A content creator says she has a simple trick to cut the costs of your next rideshare. Get the best news, reviews, columns, and more delivered straight to your inbox, daily. back Sign up For more information, read our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use . TikToker Valuable V ( @vistheway ) posted a video about how she lowered the cost of a Lyft ride in a way that benefited both her and the driver. The post went viral with 8.4 million views as of this writing. It prompted a thoughtful discussion among viewers. Many shared how this tactic can save money and even land you a private driver. How Did She Save $40 On a Lyft? In her post, Valuable V says she saved $40 by asking the driver a simple question: 'How much is Lyft paying you for this ride?' The ride was locked in at $80, she says. The driver informed her they were only getting paid $20, however. 'Cancel the ride and here is $40 cash,' she says she offered the Lyft driver. They accepted, she says. 'All these charges for these rideshare people… Let me make a deal for you!' she captions the post. Others claim they have done the same. 'I did this and found an everyday driver,' one commenter shared. 'This happened to me. They were giving the driver $50 and charged me almost $300. Canceled and gave him $150,' another rider said. 'I offered this one time and the rider hired me as his private driver. I work no other jobs and can afford my entire life,' a purportedly former rideshare driver said. How Does Lyft Pricing Work? Lyft operates using dynamic pricing. Dynamic pricing bases products or services' prices on evolving market trends, Harvard Business School reports. Trending Now 'I Listed It For a Fair Price:' Man Lists Jeep on Facebook. Then a Prospective Buyer Brings a Friend Named 'Tommy Roughknuckles' 'Do Not Leave Your Car Out in the Heat:' Woman Says It's So Hot Her Grandmother's Buick's Tires Exploded. Is That Possible? As Lyft Engineering explains, 'Dynamic pricing aims for optimizing the entire rideshare network by looking at both riders and drivers to improve the throughput of rides. The algorithm starts counting and gathering input signals, and then trying to find a reasonable balance between demand and supply.' On Lyft's website , the company explains that fares are determined by estimated time and distance to complete the ride and distance to the pickup. The fare also depends on what's going on in your area, such as the number of ride requests, how many drivers are on the road, and how busy it is at the destination. It basically means that a ride costs more when there's higher demand, such as during rush hour or after a large sporting event, or fewer drivers, like in the middle of the night. The former is referred to as surge pricing. How Much Do Lyft Drivers Get Paid? According to Glassdoor , the average pay for a Lyft driver ranges from $17-23 an hour. Business Insider reports the hourly rate can be as low as $9-12 and up to $23-28. The wide variance between hourly rates is because pay is based on a variety of factors, such as tips, expenses, and how Lyft calculates the fare and fees. The rideshare industry has faced criticism for purportedly underpaying drivers. Last year, over a hundred people commented on a Reddit thread asking about Lyft drivers' pay. 'I recently had a driver who told me that out of a $120 fare he was only paid $20,' a redditor asked. 'Surely that must be a lie? I can't see Lyft charging the customer $120 and only paying the driver $20, so I've come here to ask if this could be true?' A Redditor who says they drive for the company commented, 'I had a ride last week that paid $92 and I got $12. Lyft is straight thieves.' 'Not a lie. This Saturday they were charging about $100 for an airport ride and paying like $25' another purported driver added. Lyft told Motor1 , "Drivers are essential to our purpose. That's why we've released a series of new features aimed at increasing driver pay. This includes an earnings commitment that ensures drivers always make at least 70% of the weekly rider fares after external fees.' This means that if a driver's earnings fall below that threshold in a given week, Lyft will pay them the difference, minus the external fees. According to Lyft, these are all the external fees that can take away from the driver's pay: Commercial auto insurance & other risk-related costs, Airport fees, Data processing fees, Payment processing fees, Sales tax, Government fees, and Ancillary insurance fees. Lyft told Motor1 that there's yet another fee that impacts driver pay but is largely outside its control: Car insurance. "It's also important to remember that runaway insurance costs are taking up an increasing percentage of the total rider fares,' the company said. 'That's bad for both riders and drivers, and it's why we are working with state lawmakers across the country to pass common-sense insurance reform that will help get these costs under control." People concerned about Lyft and other rideshare drivers' pay can always opt to take Valuable V's advice. 'This lowkey is something everybody should start doing,' one person commented. Motor1 has contacted @vistheway via TikTok direct message. This story will be updated should she respond. More From Motor1 Lyft Sends $1K Card To A Family Named Uber Uber's New Autonomous Vehicle Is the VW ID. Buzz Uber Cars Will Be Only Electric From 2030 Uber loses London licence, again Share this Story Facebook X LinkedIn Flipboard Reddit WhatsApp E-Mail Got a tip for us? Email: tips@ Join the conversation ( )

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store