Air India crash: US body says media reports 'premature'
India's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB), which is investigating the accident, had released a preliminary report last week which raised questions about the engine fuel cutoff switches.
Since the report came out, there have been several media reports speculating over the cause of the crash in Indian and Western media, pointing to a possible pilot error. The report itself has been condemned for not providing enough information.
What did the US agency say about the Air India crash report?
The NTSB is an investigative agency that investigates civil transportation accidents.
"Recent media reports on the Air India 171 crash are premature and speculative. India's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau just released its preliminary report. Investigations of this magnitude take time," NTSB Chair Jennifer Homendy said in a statement shared on X.
According to the AAIB report, in the blackbox voice recording , "one of the pilots is heard asking the other why did he cutoff," and the other pilot "responded that he did not do so."
First officer Clive Kunder was believed to be flying the plane while Captain Sumeet Sabharwal was monitoring, hence it has been assumed that his hands were free to toggle with the fuel switch.
The switches were restored 10 seconds later but the plane crashed, having already lost thrust.
The report did not clarify what caused the engine fuel to cut off.
How has media reported on the cause of the crash?
Some media reports and aviation experts have speculated that Sabharwal could have been suicidal and intentionally switched off the fuel.
The AAIB had condemned western media reports for being "irresponsible" and drawing conclusions "through selective and unverified reporting," Times of India reported.
The Federation of Indian Pilots (FIP) sent legal notices to the Wall Street Journal and Reuters, saying the findings were "neither substantiated by the official investigation nor endorsed by any competent authority," newspaper The New Indian Express said.
India's Civil Aviation Minister Kinjarapu Ram Mohan Naidu urged the press and people not to "jump to conclusions" and wait for the final report.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times of Oman
43 minutes ago
- Times of Oman
Are Trump's tariffs the new sanctions?
US President Donald Trump's reliance on tariffs rather than sanctions has been described as both the "world's worst bet" and "a powerful proven source of leverage" to protect the national interests of the United States. While tariffs essentially are taxes on imports to protect domestic industries, sanctions are penalties imposed on other countries to punish or influence their governments. Sanctions typically put restrictions on trade or finance. Since his return to the White House in January, Trump's tariff threats against dozens of countries have created great uncertainty among US businesses and global trading partners. What's become known as "tariff tango" — bold pledges of steep duties on foreign goods, followed by abrupt reversals — suits Trump's shifting political or economic goals. Yet, financial markets remain on edge, not knowing how or when the president may deploy tariffs next. The tariff on China, the biggest economic and military rival to the US, reached historic highs in April, soaring to 145% before being significantly cut the following month after trade talks in London. Trump's sudden increase and later rollback of tariffs show how he uses them as a flexible way to fix what he sees as unfair trade, based on past trade disputes. "What shapes the president's views is the rapid rise of Japan in the 1980s, and the feeling that the Japanese were out-competing the iconic American car industry because the US has been too generous in its trade terms," Jennifer Burns, associate professor of history at Stanford University, told DW. Tariffs suit Trump's 'America First' vision Tariffs are Trump's preferred weapon to tackle the massive US trade deficit, particularly with China, which amounted to $295 billion (€253 billion) in 2024, according to the US Census Bureau. They also align with his "America First" agenda to protect domestic industries and boost US job creation. The White House has defended the president's approach, insisting that tariffs can be quickly deployed and, unlike sanctions, don't completely shut foreign markets to US firms. "[Trump] can add this pressure when he wants and then bring it back when markets start to freak out or it stops serving his purpose," Sophia Busch, associate director of the Geoeconomic Centre at the Atlantic Council think tank, told DW. "This is much easier with tariffs than with sanctions." Although tariffs have been widely criticized for their potential to stoke inflation, they do raise revenue for the US Treasury, unlike sanctions. US tariff revenues are up 110% to $97.3 billion in the first half of the year, compared to the same period last year. Tariffs are expected to raise $360 billion next year, according to the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center. Trump sees tariffs as more flexible, easier to deploy Tariffs give Trump direct, unilateral control, using executive orders without needing approval from the US Congress. Sanctions, on the other hand, often require complex legal frameworks and cooperation with international partners, like the European Union. The preference for tariffs over sanctions reflects Trump's aim for rapid, visible economic leverage, but raises concerns about the destabilizing effects of such policies on global trade and peace. "The reason [tariffs] have such a bad reputation is because they're linked to these episodes of de-globalization, and in the 20th century, they were linked to armed conflict," said Burns. "If low tariffs and open markets knit countries together in a way that forestalls armed conflict, does it mean that we might be moving away from that?" Trump blurs the line between tariffs and sanctions "Sanctions are more about punishing countries for violating international norms," Stanford's Jennifer Burns told DW. "They're in response to specific actions, and if those actions cease, the sanctions can be undone." Trump's second-term policies suggest he is using tariffs to achieve objectives typically associated with sanctions, such as pressuring countries like Canada, Mexico and China on nontrade issues like immigration and drug trafficking. These tariffs have prompted retaliatory measures or threats, which have intensified global trade tensions. Similarly, Colombia was threatened with tariffs after it rejected US deportation flights, while threatened levies on the European Union were partly announced as a response to EU privacy and climate regulations. Earlier this month, Trump threatened to impose a 50% tariff on imports from Brazil, which were framed as retaliation for the prosecution of former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro, a close ally. The far-right politician faces trial for allegedly plotting a coup to overturn his 2022 election loss, including plans to assassinate political rivals. Noting how the uncertainty around Trump's tariff policy had left US firms and global trade partners reeling, Burns warned that "years of tariff uncertainty" may cause a "serious economic slowdown, as businesses and investors wait for a more predictable landscape."
Times of Oman
15 hours ago
- Times of Oman
India's Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar resigns from his post
New Delhi: Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar on Monday evening resigned from his post "to prioritise health care and abide by medical advice." Dhankhar, who is also Chairman of Rajya Sabha, sent his resignation letter to President Droupadi Murmu. "To prioritise health care and abide by medical advice, I hereby resign as the Vice President of India, effective immediately, in accordance with Article 67(a) of the constitution," the letter said. "I extend my deepest gratitude to Your Excellency - the Hon'ble President of India for her unwavering support and the soothing wonderful working relationship we maintained during my tenure," it added. The Vice President also expressed his deep gratitude to Prime Minister Narendra Modi and the the Council of Ministers. "Prime Minister's cooperation and support have been invaluable, and I have learned much during my time in office," he said. Dhankhar said that the warmth, trust, and affection he has received from all the Members of Parliament would ever be cherished at and embedded in his memory. "I am deeply thankful for the invaluable experiences and insights I have gained as Vice President in our great democracy. It has been a privilege and satisfaction to witness and partake in India's remarkable economic progress and unprecedented exponential development during this significant period. Serving in this transformative era of our nation's history has been a true honor," he said. "As I leave this esteemed office, I am filled with pride in Bharat's global rise and phenomenal achievements and hold unwavering confidence in her brilliant future," he added.
Times of Oman
16 hours ago
- Times of Oman
China begins construction on world's largest dam in Tibet
Beijing: China's Premier Li Qiang announced that construction has begun on what will be the world's largest hydropower dam on the Yarlung Tsangpo river, at the eastern rim of the Tibetan Plateau. The announcement was made at the ceremony on Saturday, as reported by the Chinese media. However, the planned dam has sparked concerns from India, Bangladesh and NGOs. Why does China want to build the dam? The Yarlung Tsangpo River, which is 2,900 kilometres long, starts in the Himalayas and winds through what is said to be the world's deepest land-based canyon. At one section, the river drops 2,000 meters (6,561 feet) in elevation within 50 kilometers (31 miles). China has cited expanding renewable energy, reducing carbon emissions, and economic goals in the Tibet region as reasons behind the estimated $170 billion (€147.4 billion) project. "The electricity generated will be primarily transmitted to other regions for consumption, while also meeting local power needs in Tibet," state media reported. The dam will reportedly consist of five cascade hydropower stations with capacity to produce 300 billion kilowatt hours of electricity each year — equivalent to the amount consumed by the UK last and Bangladesh raise concerns As the Yarlung Tsangpo flows south, it becomes the Brahmaputra River in India and Bangladesh. Millions rely on the river as a water source and for agriculture. Both countries have expressed concerns over the dam's impact on millions of people living downstream. NGOs have also warned of risks of irreversible damage to the ecologically sensitive plateau. In January, India's Foreign Ministry raised concerns with China, saying it will "monitor and take necessary measures to protect our interests." The ministry stressed that China has been "urged to ensure that the interests of the downstream states of the Brahmaputra are not harmed by activities in upstream areas." A 2020 report from the Lowry Institute, an Australian think tank, reported that "control over these rivers gives China a stranglehold on the Indian economy." How has China responded to the concerns? Chinese authorities have not said how many people would be displaced by the construction of the Yarlung project. In December, China's Foreign Ministry said that the project would not have any "negative impact" downstream, adding that Beijing "will also maintain communication with countries at the lower reaches" of the river. This is not the first time geopolitical issues have been raised by rivers crossing international borders. The Yarlung Tsangpo dam is expected to be operational in the 2030s.
