
Akshay Kumar 'demanded' a particular actress to star opposite him in a movie, says famous Bollywood producer and shares why
You Might Also Like:
'Want diet food in morning and drugs at night': Famous Bollywood producer spills dark secrets about actors
Veteran filmmaker and former CBFC chief Pahlaj Nihalani has offered a blunt look at how Bollywood 's power dynamics have drastically changed over the years. In a recent interview on the Learn From The Legend podcast, Nihalani reflected on how the control once held by producers and directors in casting decisions has now completely shifted to actors. Drawing from his own experience, he recalled that the first time he ever encountered an actor insisting on a particular co-star was during the making of Talaash in the early 2000s, when Akshay Kumar demanded Kareena Kapoor be cast as the lead actress.According to Nihalani, the 2003 action thriller was one of the most expensive films of its time, with a lavish budget of ₹22 crore. It featured extravagant sets, including 22 built from scratch, scenes shot in South Africa, and even a moving train sequence. The producer recalled that Akshay was ready to start the shoot very next day as the script was ready, but he demanded that the heroine has to be Kareena Kapoor. He speculated that Akshay had already worked with Karisma Kapoor and wanted to be paired with a younger heroine, possibly to appear younger himself on screen.What stood out, however, was the shift in decision-making: from directors and producers to actors calling the shots on co-stars to technicians. Nihalani remarked that today's industry functions like a "racket," where the actor decides everything while the producer is reduced to someone who simply arranges finances and delivers the project.The producer also weighed in on Akshay Kumar's recent slump at the box office, with 10–12 films reportedly flopping back-to-back. He noted that while the actor began his career with discipline, punctuality, and sincerity—qualities that ensured continued work despite his early films not performing well—those strengths may no longer align with current audience preferences. Nihalani pointed out that even when Akshay takes up philanthropic efforts now, the timing seems to be working against him.In a recent podcast, filmmaker Pahlaj Nihalani criticised the growing entitlement of actors, highlighting how stars today demand massive entourages, including multiple vanity vans for workouts, meetings, and meals. He noted that what once required one person now needs ten, including separate staff just to hold mirrors. He also alleged rising costs for makeup and fitness, and even claimed that drug use remains prevalent in the industry, saying it's sometimes visible in the very eyes of certain actors.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Print
6 hours ago
- The Print
Why Union Minister Suresh Gopi-starrer ‘Janaki' is in censor board's crosshairs
Ironically, the notice was sent to the film makers on the day the movie was scheduled for a world-wide release. In a show cause notice dated 27 June, issued to the makers of Malayalam feature film JSK–Janaki v/s State of Kerala, the Board asked them to change the name of the lead character 'Janaki' in the title and dialogues, or wherever it occurs in the movie. The objection is under Clauses 2(xii) and 6 of the Guidelines for certification of Films of Public Exhibition. New Delhi: The word 'Janaki' is provocative, vulgar, offensive and contemptuous of race and religion. Or so the Central Board for Film Certification (CBFC) thinks. To make matters worse, the Board's notice gave liberty to the production company to appeal against the former's order before a tribunal that has been abolished. The notice said the company, if aggrieved by its order, can move the Film Certification Appellate Tribunal (FCAT) within 30 days. However, with the notification of the Tribunals Reforms Act, 2021, FCAT no longer exists. In Hindu mythology, 'Janaki' specifically refers to Sita, the wife of Lord Ram. The notice has now been challenged in the Kerala High Court, where the film producer has claimed that the Board's move is not just discriminatory, but also lacks consistency. In the writ petition filed before the HC, the producer—Cosmos Entertainment—claimed that many films with the word 'Janaki' in the title have been released in the past, with CBFC's clearance. Besides, films with titles or lead characters with names referencing other Hindu figures too have been screened without any objection from the Board, the petition claims. Therefore, the Board's move to block JSK—Janaki v/s State of Kerala—amounts to selective targeting and demonstrates non-application of mind, which is an arbitrary exercise of power, says the petition. The petition further asserts that the continued use of the name 'Janaki' in Indian cinema underscores that it is not intrinsically offensive or controversial. During a hearing Tuesday, the Kerala HC bench of Justice N. Nagaresh accepted the production company's suggestion to view the film before deciding on the petition. The film shall be screened for him on 7 July at 10 am at Lal Media, Palarivattom. Though the CBFC has officially not given reasons for the show cause notice it issued to the production company, before the court its lawyer had contended that the character 'Janaki' in the film is sexually assaulted. Speaking to ThePrint, the production company's advocate Anand Menon said that the objection came as a surprise to his client. 'When the movie was previewed in Trivandrum, the board's representatives orally told the production company that the movie would receive a UA 13+ certificate for its release,' he said. Also the Board's examining committee had cleared the movie. Sub-clause 12 of Clause 2 of the said guidelines provides that the Board shall ensure that the visuals or words that are contemptuous of racial, religious or other groups are not presented. Clause 6 authorises the Board to scrutinise the titles of the films carefully and ensure they are not provocative, vulgar, offensive or violative of any other guidelines. CBFC derives these delegated powers from sections 5B(1) and 5B(2) of the Cinematograph Act, 1952 that enumerates guiding principles to certify films. Under section 5B(1), the Board can decline to certify a film for public exhibition if the film or any part of it is against the interests of the security of the State, friendly relations with a foreign State, public order, decency or morality, or involves defamation or contempt of court or is likely to incite the commission of offence. The Guidelines for Certification of Films of Public Exhibition, which have been invoked to raise objection against JSK—Janaki v/s State of Kerala, have been issued by the Centre under section 5B(2) of the Act. This provision says the Centre can set out principles that will guide the competent authority to clear the film for release Significantly, the production company's advocate Anand Menon said that the Board has not recommended any other cuts or modifications, which indicate that the film, otherwise, satisfies the statutory certification standards. 'The refusal to certify the film solely on the basis of a fictional name reflects an excessive, unreasonable and disproportionate exercise of discretion,' he said. As per the petition in the HC, the CBFC had on 28 March issued a teaser certificate to the film without any objections. On 18 June, the film was screened before the CBFC's examination committee. When the production house did not receive any feedback from CBFC, it moved a petition in HC, seeking its intervention in light of the inaction and delay on the Board's part in issuing the censor certificate. During a hearing of this petition on 25 June, the Board told the HC it had constituted a revising committee to view the film and that it would file its report before the court. Two days later, however, the movie producer received the show-cause notice, objecting to the film's name. According to the production house, the film is slated for theatrical release in 21 countries and any disruption now will result in escalated logistics and distribution costs. The direction to change the name 'Janaki' in the title and dialogues at this belated stage will impose an unreasonable and disproportionate burden on the film's producers as implementing the change would require extensive re-dubbing by at least 16 voice artists, the petition points out. This will be 'commercially catastrophic, operationally impracticable and manifestly arbitrary,' the petition has said. Lead actor Suresh Gopi would alone have to re-dub over 96 instances where the name 'Janaki' appears. This is likely to take 15 days, whereas the film is scheduled to release in five languages and corresponding re-dubbing in all those languages would also be necessitated. CBFC's objection also threatens to disrupt the movie's release on OTT platforms since the contractual terms require the production company to hand over the final cut of the film by 30 July. (Edited by Viny Mishra) Also read: 127 cuts for Punjab '95 shows institutional paranoia


Pink Villa
13 hours ago
- Pink Villa
Jurassic World: Rebirth Box Office Preview: Scarlett Johansson starrer run time, screen count, advance booking & opening day
The dinosaurs are back to rule the big screen with Jurassic World: Rebirth. The film features Scarlett Johansson, Mahershala Ali and Jonathan Bailey in lead roles, and is the fourth part of the Jurassic World franchise. The science fiction action thriller is all set to release in India on July 4, and has been certified U/A by the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) with an approved run time of 2 hours and 13 minutes. Jurassic is a popular franchise in India, and among the first from the West to break-out over here, with a strong reach in the mass belts too. The film is looking at a wide release on about 2500 screens nationwide, though the showcasing is hampered due to competition from films like Metro: Inn Dino as also holdovers like Sitaare Zameen Par, Maa, and F1. There are centers in Mumbai, Delhi, and Kolkata where the film has got lower shows than Metro: Inn Dino, which is surprising, as the pre-sales of the Anurag Basu directorial are nowhere close to the Dinosaur saga. The showcasing dispute resulted in the advances to kick-off late on Wednesday night, but the film is showing good momentum in the pre-sales ever since the tickets went live on the counters. As on Thursday at 6 PM, Jurassic World: Rebirth has sold 35,000 tickets in the top 3 national chains – PVRInox and Cinepolis – and the film will be looking to close its pre-sales around the 50,000 mark. The advances would have been much higher with a usual advance booking cycle, and the delay has significantly impacted the sales. A lot for Jurassic World: Rebirth depends on the spot bookings through the day, and being a franchise that caters to the masses, it is expected to make up for the shortfall in pre-sales. Jurassic World: Rebirth should be targeting first-day business in the range of Rs 8.50 crore to Rs 9.50 crore, with an outside chance of hitting the Rs 10 crore mark depending on the spot bookings. With right showcasing and advance cycle, a Rs 10 crore start was a no-brainer for a franchise like Jurassic World, but now a lot is left on the ticket sales at counter. None-the-less, a good opening is on-cards for the Scarlett Johansson starrer, and the film should see good spikes over the weekend to pack a solid punch. After Final Destination: Bloodlines, Mission Impossible 8, and F1, the film is a strong contender for being another success story from Hollywood in India. With a start around the Rs 9 crore mark, the first weekend of Jurassic World: Rebirth could hit the Rs 40 crore mark, as a rise in showcasing in key urban markets is expected on Saturday and Sunday. Stay tuned to Pinkvilla for more updates~!


India.com
14 hours ago
- India.com
Saif Ali Khan And Akshay Kumar To Reunite After Years For Priyadarshan's ‘Haiwaan'?
Mumbai: Bollywood stars Saif Ali Khan and Akshay Kumar, who have collaborated on films such as 'Main Khiladi Tu Anari', 'Yeh Dillagi', and 'Aarzoo', are reportedly set to reunite for a new movie. If a source is to be believed, Akshay and Saif have come on board together for ace filmmaker Priyadarshan's project titled 'Haiwaan'. The shooting for 'Haiwaan' is expected to commence in August, and the makers are eyeing a grand release in 2026. Saif and Akshay were last seen together in Vijay Krishna Acharya's directorial 'Tashan', which came out in 2008. It also starred Saif's wife and actor Kareena Kapoor Khan in a pivotal role. However, an official announcement regarding the film has not been made yet. Meanwhile, Akshay is basking in the success of his film 'Housefull 5'. As per the makers, the film has reportedly earned Rs 300 crore at the global box office and Rs 200 crore net at the domestic box office in 25 days. It was released on June 6. Directed by Tarun Mansukhani, the film also stars Riteish Deshmukh, Abhishek Bachchan, Fardeen Khan, Nana Patekar, Jackie Shroff, Ranjeet, Johny Lever, Jacqueline Fernandez, Nargis Fakhri, Chunky Panday, Dino Morea, Sonam Bajwa and Soundarya Sharma. 'Housefull 5' boasts multiple endings. On the other hand, Saif Ali Khan was recently seen in Netflix's film ''Jewel Thief: The Heist Begins', also starring Jaideep Ahlawat, Kunal Kapoor, and Nikita Dutta in pivotal roles.