Eye-Watering Bill for Trump Birthday Parade Includes Paint Job for Tanks
Armor including M1A2 tanks, Stryker armored fighting vehicles and M109 self-propelled howitzers have been arriving the capital for the parade—ostensibly to celebrate 250 years of the Army.
But the total cost was already disclosed to have hit $45 million, which will include repairing roads not designed to take heavy armor.
Now, the bill has been revealed to include sprucing up the materiel before it rolls in front of the president on his 79th birthday.
Retired Army Lt. General Mark Hertling, speaking Tuesday on MSNBC's Morning Joe, expressed reservations about the parade's scale and cost. To pull off the spectacle, the armor was brought by rail from bases across the country, while helicopters and planes will fly overhead during the parade.
Hertling commanded the 1st Armored Division in combat in Iraq in 2007 and 2008, has a Purple Heart and multiple Bronze Stars and Distinguished Service Medals.
'I'm personally, truth be told, not a parade kind of guy,' Hertling said. 'Even when I was a cadet at West Point, I hated parades.'
Initially conceived as a small event, the parade's scope expanded significantly, now involving nearly 8,000 soldiers marching alongside armored vehicles transported from various military bases across the country.
The birthday celebration could cost as much as $45 million in taxpayer dollars, with an extra $16 million reportedly set aside for road repairs.
Hertling described the parade as 'mission creep foisted upon the Army by politicians,' reflecting concerns that the military is being tasked with an expensive political spectacle.
The logistical challenges are significant, too. According to Hertling, the vehicles have been freshly painted to present a polished image—because of a previous, rushed deployment of military hardware that Hertling says 'looked bad' and 'were not a good reflection of the Army.'
'How much is this going to cost? It's going to cost a lot,' he said. 'Not only [do] those vehicles use a lot [of fuel], they have been transported from different military bases, [and] as you can see, looking at those tanks and Bradleys that you're showing right now, they've all been freshly painted,' he said.
'The last time a bunch of tanks were brought to Washington, D.C. it was at a last-minute time frame and they looked bad. I mean, they were not a good reflection of the army. So obviously the commanders and the soldiers who take a great deal of pride in their vehicles, want them to be looking well.'
He said all of this has contributed to the spiraling cost of the event.
'And, you know, that's created more cost other than the train load and the railhead and the helicopters [that] are going to be flying overhead and the and the fuel that's going to be used and the support for the almost 8,000 soldiers that are going to be marching inside of that column with the other vehicles to represent wars that the nation has fought in different period dress and uniforms.
'It was a good idea by the army to celebrate this and use it as a recruiting tool. It's just generated a lot more interest because of the connection with the president's birthday, that's for sure.'
While the Army has defended the event as a recruiting tool and a celebration of the nation's military heritage, the timing—coinciding with the president's birthday—has raised questions about the parade's true purpose.
Meanwhile, as much as $16 million has been earmarked for filling in the damage left by tanks rumbling down civilian streets, according to U.S. military officials.
Steel plates at least an inch thick will be laid across sections of the route where M1A1 Abrams tanks, each weighing around 140,000 pounds, and other treaded vehicles will make turns. Similar protection will not be laid out along straight sections of the roadway.
D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser has previously voiced her concerns about damage to city streets. 'Military tanks on our streets would not be good,' she said at an April 7 news conference. 'If military tanks were used, they should be accompanied by many millions of dollars to repair the roads.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a minute ago
- Yahoo
Michelin posts H1 sales in line with market forecasts
By Mathias de Rozario (Reuters) -French tyre maker Michelin reported a 3.4% decline in sales in the first half of the year, in line with market expectations, as a fall in sales volumes was partly offset by higher selling prices. The group confirmed its previous guidance for the full year, in the absence of any further deterioration in the economic environment in the second half of the year. WHY IT'S IMPORTANT Michelin's business continues to be impacted by a slowdown in the automotive market, especially in Europe. The group, which, at the end of last year, employed more than 23,500 people at its production sites across the U.S. and Canada has, since March, been facing tariffs imposed by U.S. President Donald Trump. It is looking at accelerating investments in the United States to counter the impact of tariffs. BY THE NUMBERS Sales fell to 13.03 billion euros ($15.33 billion) in the first half from 13.48 billion euros a year ago. That compared with the forecast 13.08 billion euros in a company-provided consensus. The company recorded a 6.1% drop in volumes, mainly in its original equipment sales. The impact from the U.S. tariffs were around 65 million euros in the first half of the year. They are expected to have an impact of around 200 million euros over the full year. KEY QUOTES "Our results have been severely penalised by the fall in volumes linked to our original equipment activities, whether in the automotive or truck sectors, or in a number of specialities, including heavy goods vehicles, agriculture and infrastructure," , Chief Financial Officer Yves Chapot said on call with journalists. "We have chosen to be as localised as possible, so 70% of what we sell in the United States is made in the United States" he added on the impact of tarrifs. ($1 = 0.8499 euros) Sign in to access your portfolio

USA Today
3 minutes ago
- USA Today
TACO or tariffs? Trump's big trade deadline is coming. Here's what to expect
If Trump holds firm to his third deadline, a slew of countries will face steep levies, including a 50% tariff on imports from Brazil and a 30% tariff on the European Union. Standing in the Rose Garden and holding a giant chart, President Donald Trump, who likes to call himself 'Tariff Man' showed off the 'reciprocal' tariffs he was planning to levy on dozens of countries. That was April 2, christened 'Liberation Day' by Trump. Almost four months and two extensions later, a new Aug. 1 deadline is looming. A slew of countries will face steep tariffs − including a 50% tariff on imports from Brazil and a 30% tariff on the European Union. A baseline tariff of 10% remains for all countries. 'We'll have a straight, simple tariff of anywhere between 15% and 50%," Trump said during an AI summit in Washington, on July 23. "We have 50 (percent) because we haven't been getting along with those countries too well." Are new tariffs really coming? Will there be another extension? Trump has said no. But Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent recently left the door open for a third reprieve. The first deadline, on April 9, was paused for 90 days − until July 9 − after it caused significant turbulence in the financial markets and economists warned of a potential recession. "I thought that people were jumping a little bit out of line," Trump said on April 9. 'They were getting yippy, you know. They were getting a little bit yippy, a little bit afraid." Trump's shifting on the deadlines also gave birth to an acronym: TACO, for Trump Always Chickens Out, mocking his on-again-off-again tariff policies. A pause – then a tariff storm On July 7, two days before the new tariffs were to go into effect, Trump extended the deadline to Aug. 1, saying several countries were negotiating deals. Trump also began sending letters on July 7 to countries letting them know of the new, updated tariffs that would be imposed on them. The first batch of 14 letters to countries including South Africa and Malaysia also made clear that if they retaliated against the United States with their own tariffs, their target tariffs would go even higher. On July 9, he sent tariff letters to another eight countries, including Brazil. So far, the United States has sent 25 tariff letters, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said on July 23. What trade deals have been struck so far? While the U.K. was the first country to reach a trade agreement with the United States, the latest and the most significant deal so far has been with Japan, Washington's fifth-largest trading partner. Other countries with whom Trump announced deals in recent months include Indonesia, Vietnam and the Philippines. On July 22, Trump announced a 'massive deal' with Japan under which the United States would impose a 15% tariff on Japanese imports. Trump had previously threatened a 24% tariff on Japan. He also wrote said Japan would invest $550 billion in the United States and that the United States would receive 90% of the profits, without offering any details. His announcement also said Japan had agreed to open up to imports of vehicles, rice and other agricultural products from the United States. Of the five countries that the United States has struck trade deals with, it only runs a trade surplus with the U.K. TACO time? On July 21, in an interview with CNBC, Bessent was noncommittal on whether there could be an extension for countries negotiating in good faith. 'We'll see what the president wants to do,' Bessent said. He added that reverting to the steep tariffs that were first proposed after the deadline might force countries to come up favorable terms. 'But again, if we somehow boomerang back ... I would think that a higher tariff level will put more pressure on those countries to come with better agreements,' said Bessent. Meanwhile Trump has repeatedly said there will be 'no change' in the deadline. 'In other words, all money will be due and payable starting AUGUST 1, 2025 − No extensions will be granted,' he wrote on Truth Social on July 8. What's happening with tariffs on Canada, Mexico and China? Trump threatened a 25% tariff on imports from Mexico and Canada shortly after his election victory. Ten days after taking office, Trump went after the top three trading partners of the United States with an executive order imposing 25% tariffs on nearly all goods from Canada and Mexico. Trump said it was to force the countries to stem the flow of migrants and fentanyl across the United States border. Meanwhile, China was hit with a 10% tariff. Canada and Mexico immediately responded with retaliatory tariffs of their own. Two days later, Trump agreed to a 30-day pause. In March, Trump waived tariffs on goods compliant with the United State-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMC) and the imposed 25% universal tariffs on steel, aluminum and automotive imports, including those from Mexico and Canada. Tariffs on steel, aluminum and copper were raised in June to 50% − Canada is the biggest supplier of steel and aluminum to the United States − while the tariffs on automotive imports held steady. Trump sent a letter to Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney in July saying he planned to impose 35% tariffs across-the-board on imports from Canada come Aug. 1. Trump said fentanyl was "hardly the only" challenge United States had with Canada and that its trade barriers and non-tariff polices were causing "unsustainable" trade deficits. "Canada charges extraordinary Tariffs to our Dairy farmers – up to 400% - and that is even assuming our Dairy Farmers even have access to sell their products to the people of Canada," Trump said in the letter. In a letter to Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum, Trump said that the country had helped in 'securing the border.' But he said Mexico had 'still not stopped the Cartels who are trying to turn all of North America into a Narco-Trafficking Playground.' After months of tit-for-tat tariffs and trade war with China, which saw the U.S. tariffs spiking to 145% and Chinese tariffs on U.S. goods reaching 125%, the two called a truce in May, agreeing to a 90-day suspension of the levies, set to expire on Aug 12. On June 11, Trump announced a deal had been 'done' subject to 'final approval' by both leaders. He said the U.S. tariffs would be set at 55% on imported Chinese goods while China's tariffs remain at 10%. Bessent, who is scheduled to meet his Chinese counterpart on July 28 in Stockholm, Sweden, indicated the deadline was likely to be moved. 'We'll be working out what is likely an extension' Bessent told Fox Business on July 22. Swapna Venugopal Ramaswamy is a White House correspondent for USA TODAY. You can follow her on X @SwapnaVenugopal

Los Angeles Times
3 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
What's happening with forgiveness for student loans on income-based repayment plans?
Amid a federal overhaul of student loan plans, many borrowers have been left wondering what it means for their hopes of loan forgiveness. In particular, those who are enrolled in a repayment plan known as income-based repayment, or IBR, have wondered if forgiveness will still be available to them. A recent update from the Education Department said forgiveness through the IBR plan is paused while systems are updated. 'IBR forgiveness will resume once those updates are completed,' the agency said. IBR is not affected by a federal court's injunction blocking former President Joe Biden's Saving on a Valuable Education, or SAVE, plan. The IBR plan was created by Congress separately from other existing repayment plans, including those known as PAYE and ICR. It's also exempt from some changes coming from President Donald Trump's tax and spending bill. Here's what to know. Following a court injunction last summer, loan forgiveness for the SAVE, Income-Contingent Repayment, or ICR, and Pay As You Earn, or PAYE, plans is currently paused because those plans were not created by Congress. The legal action called into question whether student loan forgiveness was authorized under the federal statute that governs those plans. The IBR plan was created under a different authority. IBR, created by Congress, reduces monthly payments for borrowers with lower incomes. It also invokes a statute that authorizes student loan forgiveness of the balance at the end of a 20- or 25-year repayment term. The Education Department hasn't given a timeline for when its system update will be complete and forgiveness will resume. Borrowers enrolled in IBR who have reached the threshold for forgiveness but who are not seeing their loans discharged as a result of the pause may continue to make payments with the expectation that the Education Department will refund the excess payments. The plan offers forgiveness after 240 or 300 monthly payments, depending on when borrowers enrolled. Borrowers can also request forbearance from their loan servicer. In that case, interest would continue to accrue on any remaining balance. Trump's tax and spending law will eventually phase out the ICR, PAYE and SAVE plans, replacing them with the Repayment Assistance Plan. IBR plans will continue to exist and to provide forgiveness after 20 or 25 years. RAP, in contrast, will require 30 years of repayment before forgiveness is granted. Lewis writes for the Associated Press.