Nimisha Priya, Indian nurse on death row in Yemen, set to be executed on July 16, negotiator says
Samuel Jerome Baskaran, a social worker who is currently involved in negotiations with government officials in Yemen and Talal's family, confirmed the development. 'The public prosecutor had issued the letter of prosecution to the jail authorities. The execution is scheduled for July 16. Options are still open. The Government of India can intervene in the matter to save her life,' he said.
Regarding a pardon from the family of Talal, Samuel said: 'We had made an offer to the family during the last meeting. So far, they have not responded. I am leaving for Yemen today to resume the negotiations.'
Nimisha's mother, Prema Kumari, a domestic worker in Kochi, has been camping in Yemen for the past year. Nimisha, a native of Kerala, had worked as a nurse in Yemen for several years until she was accused of murder in 2017.
With Talal's support, Nimisha ran a clinic in Yemen, but she allegedly faced mental, physical and financial abuse, which culminated in the murder.
The death sentence was awarded to her by a trial court in Yemen and upheld by the Supreme Court. Last year, Yemen's President Rashad al-Alimi approved the death sentence for the 38-year-old woman. The order has been with the prosecutor since January this year.
Since then, her fate has been hanging by a thread, depending on a pardon from Talal's family.
Last year, when Yemen's president approved the death sentence, the Ministry of External Affairs in Delhi said it would extend all possible help to her and her family. In December last year, her mother had approached the Delhi High Court to secure an exemption from the travel ban to conflict-ridden Yemen. Since her arrival in Sanaa, Kumari has had a few meetings with Nimisha in prison.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
42 minutes ago
- India Today
Maharashtra language war: Is the showdown aimed at Mumbai civic poll? Experts debate
On 'To The Point', the focus is on Bihar Chief Minister Nitish Kumar's announcement of 35% reservation for women in government jobs, aimed at empowering women and reshaping Bihar's workforce. This policy applies to all government positions at every level and department, but only for original residents of the state. The decision comes months before the Bihar Assembly elections, with women constituting nearly half of Bihar's 7.64 crore voters. In the 2024 Lok Sabha polls, women outvoted men with a 59.4% turnout compared to 53% among men. The government has also approved the formation of a Bihar Youth Commission to address unemployment concerns. The announcement has sparked debate on whether it's a genuine push for empowerment or a well-timed political strategy, especially given that a similar 35% reservation policy has been in place since 2015. Additionally, the transcript covers a controversy between the Indian government and social media platform X (formerly Twitter) over the blocking of Reuters and over 2000 handles. X claims the government ordered blocking without justification, while the government denies issuing any fresh blocking orders, raising concerns about press freedom and censorship. The upcoming Kaavad Yatra is also discussed, with reports of shops and dhabas along the route being made to display 'I am Hindu' posters, sparking a debate on religious profiling and discrimination. The discussion touches on broader issues of religious identity, caste census, and economic discrimination, with opposing views from BJP and Samajwadi Party spokespersons.
India Today
44 minutes ago
- India Today
Aviation body understaffed at top level, can hire retired officials: Ex-minister
Former Civil Aviation Minister and Public Accounts Committee (PAC) member Praful Patel on Tuesday flagged a shortage of senior skilled personnel in the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA), suggesting that retired officials be brought back on short tenures to strengthen oversight and maintain safety standards in Indian after the PAC meeting, Patel said, "Safety is paramount. Anyone who flies wants to be safe and assured that they will reach their destination. Many events took place in the wake of the Air India crash. Obviously, when a crash happens, everything is taken with sensitivity."advertisementHe, however, emphasised that Indian aviation remains safe and there is no need for panic. "Indian aviation is safe, and we don't need to panic. All airlines, including Air India, follow all safety protocols. DGCA is well equipped and does a very good job," Patel said. He added, "DGCA needs to have more people. It is facing a shortage of staff at the top level, of skilled people. Retired officials can be brought back to deal with this understaffing and ensure safety standards are fully compliant at the earliest. Maybe an audit of the entire sector or all the aircraft should be done at the earliest so that passenger confidence is restored."Patel made these remarks after a PAC meeting that was originally convened to discuss "levy charges at airports" but saw an intense focus on the June 12 Air India crash in Ahmedabad. The London-bound flight AI 171 crashed into the BJ Medical College hostel building just seconds after take-off, killing 260 people, including 241 passengers and crew on board, and 19 people on the meeting was attended by senior officials from the Ministry of Civil Aviation (MoCA), DGCA, Airports Economic Regulatory Authority (AERA), Airports Authority of India (AAI), and the Bureau of Civil Aviation Security (BCAS). Air India CEO Wilson Campbell and top officials from IndiGo and Akasa Air were also said MPs asked aviation authorities pointed questions about safety and demanded an immediate audit by BCAS. They sought details on the timeline for black box analysis and raised concerns about the probe committee's selection criteria, including whether foreign aviation experts had been India, in its submission to the PAC, defended the Boeing 787 Dreamliner involved in the crash, calling it one of the safest aircraft in operation and noting that more than 1,000 Dreamliners are flying worldwide. The airline said it was "deeply concerned" about the crash and was awaiting the official inquiry also flagged several safety incidents reported in May and June, along with what they described as the "high-handed behaviour" of private airlines. They pointed to a spike in flight fares following the Pahalgam terror attack and questioned regulatory oversight.- EndsMust Watch
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
The ECI does not have unfettered powers
The Election Commission of India (ECI) ordered a Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of the electoral rolls in Bihar, which will be facing Assembly elections in November. Political parties in the Opposition have alleged that the SIR is aimed at disenfranchising thousands of voters in Bihar by disqualifying them on the ground that they are not citizens of India. The ECI has denied this allegation and justified the revision. In the meantime, many petitions have been filed in the Supreme Court challenging the ECI's order. While the controversy centres on the motive behind this exercise being conducted just a couple of months before elections, especially when electoral rolls were revised in 2024, this article focuses on the legality of this exercise and the powers of the ECI to undertake it. Reasons for disqualification Article 326 of the Constitution declares that elections to the Lok Sabha and the Assemblies shall be held on the basis of adult suffrage. This means every adult person is entitled to be a voter provided they are not disqualified on certain specified grounds. There are two essential qualifications of being an elector under this Article: the person should be citizen of India and should be aged not less than 18. The Representation of the People Act (RPA), 1950, lays down disqualifications for registration as an elector. These are namely unsoundness of mind as declared by a competent court, and disqualification from voting as provided in Section 11A of the 1951 RPA. Conditions for registration as a voter are laid down in Section 19 of the RPA: the person should not be less than 18 years of age and they should be ordinarily resident in a constituency. The term 'ordinarily resident' is explained in Section 20, which says a person shall not be deemed to be ordinarily resident merely because they own or possess a dwelling house in that constituency. Also, a person does not cease to be ordinarily resident if they absent themselves temporarily from their ordinary place of residence. The ECI enjoys enormous powers in respect of the preparation of electoral rolls and the conduct of elections to Parliament, the State Legislatures, and to the offices of the President and Vice President. Article 324 of the Constitution, which empowers the ECI to undertake these tasks, is characterised by the Supreme Court as a 'reservoir of power'. Since the conduct of free and fair elections is an essential feature of the basic structure of the Constitution, the ECI needs to be vested with all the necessary powers to complete its task. Nevertheless, it is inconceivable that the Constitution should confer on any authority unfettered powers. The Supreme Court has made it clear that the ECI can exercise all powers in its discretion in areas which are not covered by any statute but shall act in accordance with the law wherever it exists. In Mohinder Singh Gill v. Chief Election Commissioner (1978), the Court stated the law as follows: 'Firstly when Parliament or any State Legislature has made valid law relating to or in connection with elections, the Commission shall act in conformity with, not in violation of, such provisions but where such law is silent, Article 324 is a reservoir of power to act for the avowed purpose of pushing forward a free and fair election with expedition.' The qualifying date Let us look at the relevant provisions of the the RPA to get a perspective on the powers of the ECI in regard to revision of the electoral rolls. Section 21 of the 1950 RPA deals with the preparation and revision of electoral rolls. It speaks of four stages of revisions: (1) before elections to the Lok Sabha or Assembly; (2) before each by-election; (3) on the direction of the ECI in any year; and (4) a special revision for a constituency or part of a constituency with the ECI recording reasons for doing so. All revisions except (4) are done with reference to a qualifying date, which, under Section 14, is the first day of January. The only exception is (4): no qualifying date is mentioned because it can be done any time. The ECI order of June 24 mentions the qualifying date as 01/07/2025 and is a direction under Section 21(2)(b) of the RPA. It can be assumed that the revision being done in Bihar is under the same Section. But under this provision, the qualifying date should be 01/01/2025. The revision then should have been done from January 1, 2025. The qualifying date mentioned in the ECI order has no sanction under the law. Similarly, the term 'special intensive revision' is not found in the law. The only case where a special revision can be ordered by the ECI at any time is in relation to a constituency or a part of it and not in relation to an entire State. Thus, it is reasonable to conclude that the SIR in Bihar is not in conformity with the provisions of the RPA. The ECI has claimed in its order that it has power under Section 21 to undertake the exercise. True, but that power is limited to a constituency or part of it under Section 21(3) of the Act. While enjoying enormous powers under Article 324, the ECI is responsible to the rule of law and should be amenable to the norms of natural justice as per the Supreme Court. Electoral registration officers cannot summarily reject applications on the ground that foolproof documents are not being furnished to prove citizenship. Rule 8 of the Registration of Electors Rules clearly state that information shall be furnished 'to the best of ability' of the citizens. The ECI cannot ignore this statutory stipulation.
