logo
College baseball future may see greater imbalance in competition, high school prospects squeezed out

College baseball future may see greater imbalance in competition, high school prospects squeezed out

The Division I baseball season is less than a week old, and coaches already are planning for 2026 when it's all but certain scholarship limits will be removed, rosters downsized and players will have opportunities to make more money.
They expect the fallout to be fewer opportunities for high school recruits at the top level of the sport, especially if the NCAA adopts a proposal that would extend eligibility from four to five years. They also predict a greater imbalance in competition.
All is contingent on a federal judge approving the settlement of antitrust allegations against the NCAA and the nation's biggest conferences. A hearing is set for April 7 and changes would go into effect July 1, a few days after the baseball season.
The framework for baseball would cap rosters at 34 with no scholarship limit for schools that opt in to the revenue-sharing model tied to the so-called House settlement. Currently there's a 40-man limit during the season and a maximum of 11.7 scholarships that can be spread among up to 32 players.
'I still think the majority of teams are going to be giving partial scholarships to at least part of their roster,' Nebraska coach Will Bolt said. 'Reading the tea leaves, it doesn't look like anyone is going to come up with 34 fulls.'
No change in power structure
Auburn athletic director John Cohen, previously head coach at Mississippi State and Kentucky, doubted the new rules would shake up college baseball's power structure. Only about half of the more than 300 Division I programs currently award 11.7 scholarships, and many of the ones that do could at least double that number next year. Programs that don't award 11.7 now still might struggle to offer that many going forward.
With just a handful of programs generating a profit, financial constraints preclude big scholarship increases at most schools without additional fundraising. Even for schools where increasing scholarships is feasible, Title IX guidelines requiring proportional opportunities for men and women would have to be considered.
The House settlement also would allow athletic departments to share up to $20.5 million in revenue among athletes across all sports starting next school year. Football and men's basketball players would be expected to receive the lion's share. How much is available to baseball players likely would be a fraction of what athletes in revenue-producing sports get and could amount to little or nothing for programs outside the Power Four.
Modest NIL earnings for most
Most players now receive partial scholarships and try to capitalize on opportunities allowing them to make money on their name, image and likeness. According to Opendorse's 2024 annual report, the top 25-earning baseball players could expect to make just under $48,000 per year, based on deals tracked by the NIL platform from 2021-24.
Cohen said that figure seemed low.
'What I know about NIL currently is there is no accurate way to illustrate who's doing what,' he said, 'so it's hard to speak intelligently about NIL because what you're relying on is third-party information. You hear things and you just aren't sure what to believe.'
Clemson coach Erik Bakich said he thought the $48,000 figure seemed high. Either way, he said, NIL money is not lucrative for the vast majority of baseball players.
'The majority of NIL in college baseball has been about paying your bills, not play for pay,' Bakich said. 'College baseball players are using NIL dollars to pay for cost of attendance. I'm for anything that reduces out-of-pocket cost for parents and anything that eliminates the need for any college kid to take out any type of loan debt.'
Coaches said an often-overlooked consequence of roster reductions would be the squeeze it puts on high school prospects, especially at the top end of Division I.
Bolt, the Nebraska coach, said he had honest and difficult conversations with some of his players last fall about where they fit in and whether they should consider transferring, perhaps to a lower division. Bolt typically has carried 45 or 50 players in the fall. The NCAA fall roster limit remains fluid but coaches have recommended it be 38 with the cutdown to 34 on Dec. 1.
Bolt said it takes the typical freshman about three semesters to show whether he can be successful in Division I. The window of opportunity probably will shrink after this year.
'Unless you're a top-100 (high school) prospect or unless you're turning down significant money in the draft to go to college and it's a no-brainer you can play at the Division I level as a freshman, the junior college route does become a very desirable option,' Bolt said.
Older players stick around
The shortening of the Major League Baseball amateur draft from 40 rounds to 20 beginning in 2021 has kept more players in college longer. The transfer portal has allowed teams to fill immediate needs rather than roll the dice with young players. And teams would get older yet if there's passage of a proposal now under consideration to extend athlete eligibility from four to five competitive seasons.
There also is some question about how junior college years will be counted against NCAA eligibility following the federal court injunction that gave Vanderbilt football player Diego Pavia an extra season after he argued his junior college years limited his ability to capitalize on NIL.
Oregon State coach Mitch Canham said all those factors mean promising high school players who don't project to be an immediate starting position player or key member of the pitching staff will be passed over in coming years.
'With a roster of 34, you don't have room to keep a whole bunch of guys around to develop, which is tough because that's something we've done a lot of,' Canham said. 'It's almost as if, am I going to trust an 18-year-old who has never played Division I baseball to come in and do this? You better make sure. Or are you going to get a 21-year-old (transfer) who has hundreds of at-bats and experience against older competition?'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

James Scantlebury Commits To Boston University
James Scantlebury Commits To Boston University

Yahoo

time8 hours ago

  • Yahoo

James Scantlebury Commits To Boston University

Chicago Steel forward James Scantlebury has committed to Boston Univeristy, it was announced on Friday. A native of Montréal, Que., Scantlebury played for the Bishop Kearney Selects 16U AAA team last season, tallying 100 points (35 goals, 65 assists) in 56 games. A 2009-born skater, Scantlebury will join the USHL and play for the Steel in 2025-26 before making the jump to the NCAA and joining the Terriers. Make sure you bookmark The Hockey News' NCAA Page for the latest news, exclusive interviews, breakdowns and so much more.

Judge rules against Stephen F. Austin in Title IX case: What are national implications?
Judge rules against Stephen F. Austin in Title IX case: What are national implications?

USA Today

time9 hours ago

  • USA Today

Judge rules against Stephen F. Austin in Title IX case: What are national implications?

A gender discrimination lawsuit against Stephen F. Austin State University could have national implications after Judge Michael J. Truncale issued his decision in the Eastern District of Texas Friday evening. Six Stephen F. Austin State University (SFA) athletes from the women's bowling and beach volleyball teams filed a class action lawsuit against their school this summer claiming Title IX discrimination after the university announced it would be cutting those two programs and men's and women's golf. 'The decision was based on sustained departmental budget deficits and the anticipated financial impact of upcoming revenue-sharing requirements with Division I athletes' SFA athletics said in a press release. The plaintiffs sought to keep the school from axing these programs. SFA argued that the plaintiffs' case is based "exclusively on a three-part test contained in guidance and interpretation documents,' rather than the Title IX statute itself. Defendant lawyers urged the court to disregard the policy interpretation handed down by the U.S. Department of Education 46 years ago, citing a 2024 Supreme Court case between Loper Bright Enterprises and Raimondo. If the court declined, however, defendant lawyers claimed SFA still complies with Title IX under the 1979 guidance. After two days in court, spanning 17 hours and 14 witnesses, Judge Truncale issued a written ruling in favor of the plaintiffs. SFA has been ordered to reinstate all three women's teams. Truncale affirmed that the Loper Bright case cannot be applied to Title IX in what plaintiff attorney John Clune called an "incredibly important" win for gender equity in sports. "If a court were to find that Loper Bright meant that the Department of Education was not allowed to rely on policy interpretations of their own regulations, the entire framework for compliance with gender equity in sports would be thrown out the window," Clune told USA TODAY. "You'd still be required to have gender equity in sports, but what that means and how you decided would no longer exist. "... Really happy about the ruling, but we're not surprised by the ruling. If you follow the law, this is what the outcome should be." SFA has 30 days to file an appeal to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, according to federal rules of appellate procedure. Spokespersons for the athletic department and university did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Should SFA file an appeal, it would likely seek expedited or emergency treatment of this appeal, as fall classes begin Aug. 25. What is the three-part test? Under the Department of Education's three-part test, a school can be in compliance with the participation aspects of Title IX in any one of the following ways: The plaintiffs in this case argued that SFA violated all three prongs. The plaintiffs filed a report by former chief executive officer of the Women's Sports Foundation, expert witness Donna Lopiano, Ph.D., to prove such. Using EADA data and annual NCAA participation reports, Lopiano wrote that women made up 62.8% of SFA's enrollment during the 2023-24 academic year but less than 35% of SFA's varsity athletes. SFA cited a 2024 Supreme Court ruling between Loper Bright Enterprises and Raimondo in an effort to have the three-part test thrown out. The Supreme Court's decision made in favor of Loper Bright overturned a 40-year precedent known as 'the Chevron doctrine' directing courts to defer to government agency interpretations of "ambiguous" laws. But Judge Truncale wrote in his decision that Loper Bright is about an agency's interpretation of a statute, not an agency's interpretation of its own regulation. He also wrote that Loper Bright does not overturn any case law that previously interpreted policy. Thus, it does not apply to Title IX's 1979 policy interpretation. Breaking down the Title IX lawsuit against Stephen F. Austin State University Sophia Myers, Kara Kay, Ryann Allison, Elaina Amador, Berklee Andrews and Meagan Ledbetter filed a class action lawsuit on June 30 against Stephen F. Austin State University (SFA) after it announced the elimination of women's beach volleyball, women's bowling and men's and women's golf on May 22. The six plaintiffs, represented by renowned Title IX attorneys Clune and Arthur Bryant, are current athletes on the women's beach volleyball and bowling teams. They argued that the university violated Title IX by depriving them of equal opportunity in intercollegiate athletics and sought an emergency preliminary injunction to preserve the three women's programs 'and all other women's teams at SFA, until this case is resolved.' "Title IX mandates that schools provide equal participation opportunities for men and women to compete in intercollegiate sports," the initial complaint read. "Nonetheless, SFA has a long history of depriving female athletes of an equal opportunity to participate. Consistent with that history, SFA opted to further discriminate against women in violation of Title IX by eliminating three successful women's teams: beach volleyball, bowling, and golf. SFA's decision undercuts Plaintiffs' civil rights and, if permitted to move forward, will irreparably harm their academic and athletic careers." SFA, represented by Marlayna Marie Ellis and Sheaffer Kristine Fennessey of the attorney general's office, argued that the plaintiff's case is based "exclusively on a three-part test contained in guidance and interpretation documents, rather than the statute or 1975 implementing regulation.' Defendant lawyers urged the court to disregard the three-part test but affirmed that SFA is Title IX compliant regardless, citing the test's first and third prongs. The first prong requires 'the number of male and female athletes is substantially proportionate to their respective enrollments.' The third requires 'the institution is fully and effectively accommodating the interests and abilities of the underrepresented sex.' Defendant lawyers claimed there is 'no strict rule' defining "substantially proportionate,' and that SFA 'effectively accommodates the interest and abilities of women, despite the discontinuation of the women's beach volleyball, bowling, and golf teams.' Financial pressure from House settlement not valid defense for cutting women's sports SFA opted into the House settlement, where schools are able to pay athletes directly starting this athletic year with a $20.5 million cap per institution. These new financial pressures are why athletic director Michael McBroom said the decision to cut teams was made. The athletic department reported a $1 million surplus during the 2024 fiscal year, with about $24 million in institutional support out of $28.8 million in total operating revenue. In FY2023, SFA reported a $61,000 deficit, with $19.4 million in institutional support. And in FY2022, SFA reported a $275,000 deficit, with $17.7 million institutional support. Plaintiffs argued, successfully, that "budgetary constraints are not a legitimate defense to Title IX." "The funding of those revenue-sharing payments for football players and men's basketball absolutely cannot come at the expense of women's sports," Clune said. "So this is a huge message to schools across the country. Whatever you have to do to figure out how you're going to fund your revenue-sharing payments, it's not going to come at the expense of women's opportunities to participate in sports. That's a big deal." Reach USA Today Network sports reporter Payton Titus at ptitus@ and follow her on X @petitus25.

College at center of USA Fencing fight agrees to deal with Trump admin on trans athletes
College at center of USA Fencing fight agrees to deal with Trump admin on trans athletes

The Hill

time12 hours ago

  • The Hill

College at center of USA Fencing fight agrees to deal with Trump admin on trans athletes

Wagner College, a small, private liberal arts college in Staten Island, N.Y., has agreed to comply with the Trump administration's restrictions on transgender student-athletes following a federal investigation that stemmed from an incident at a women's fencing competition in March, the Education Department announced on Friday. The department's Office for Civil Rights (OCR) launched an investigation into Wagner after USA Fencing officials disqualified a woman from a tournament at the University of Maryland on March 30. Stephanie Turner, 31, had refused to compete against Red Sullivan, a 19-year-old Wagner student, taking a knee to protest Sullivan's participation in violation of the competition's rules. A video of Turner's disqualification quickly went viral, amplified by conservative activists, political figures and Fox News. 'This is heroic on her part,' Rep. Mike Lee (R-Utah) wrote in a post on X, responding to a video of the exchange posted by Riley Gaines, a frequent critic of transgender women in women's sports. In May, the House Subcommittee on Delivering on Government Efficiency (DOGE) held a hearing on the incident and invited Turner to testify. Participation in the University of Maryland's Cherry Blossom Open, hosted annually during springtime, is not limited to college students, according to the school's fencing club, of which Turner, who now lives in suburban Philadelphia, is a former member. Sullivan, a sophomore at Wagner, entered the competition individually. She had competed for the college's women's fencing team until February, when the NCAA said it would comply with President Trump's executive order to ban transgender student-athletes from girls' and women's sports. In an interview with Rolling Stone in April, Sullivan said the exchange with Turner left her bewildered. 'Nothing close to this has ever happened. No one has ever had a problem with me fencing in a women's event,' said Sullivan, who became medically eligible for women's tournaments last year. USA Fencing, the sport's governing body, announced in July that it would amend its transgender and nonbinary participation policy to align with a new U.S. Olympic & Paralympic Committee policy barring transgender women from competing in Olympic women's sports. As part of its deal with the Trump administration, Wagner will formally amend its athletic policies to reflect 'biology-based' definitions of the words 'male' and 'female,' consistent with an executive order Trump signed on his first day back in office proclaiming that the U.S. recognizes only two unchangeable sexes. The college will also issue a public statement pledging to comply with Title IX, the federal civil rights law against sex discrimination in schools that the Trump administration has said prohibits transgender students from competing in girls' and women's sports. The University of Pennsylvania, Trump's alma mater, agreed to a nearly identical resolution in July. In a statement on Friday, Wagner College President Jeffrey Doggett said the school would continue to foster a welcoming and supportive community, but that it has a responsibility to comply with federal laws as the government interprets them. He apologized to any student-athletes who were negatively impacted by the school allowing transgender women to compete. The college's agreement with the administration, Doggett said, is 'markedly different' from those of other universities found to have violated Trump's orders. 'Working cooperatively with the OCR investigators, we were able to negotiate terms that are limited, minimally intrusive and tailored to the particular facts of Wagner's situation,' he said. Doggett added that the college had been following NCAA and USA Fencing rules applicable at the time when it allowed Sullivan, whom the statement does not name directly, to participate on the women's fencing team. The agreement with OCR 'makes clear that there was no admission or finding of any wrongdoing by the College,' he said. 'As we know, higher education is in the midst of great change,' Doggett continued. 'Like many institutions, Wagner College is doing what it must to advance its mission during this period of turbulence. I believe that it is of the utmost importance that Wagner set a course that ensures its long-term success, and part of that is to continue to foster an open and supportive community that follows the laws and regulations with which it must comply. In bringing an end to this investigation I believe we can continue to do both.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store