Wolff plays down chances of Verstappen to Mercedes in 2026
SPIELBERG, Austria, June 27 (Reuters) - George Russell is more likely to stay with Mercedes next year than Max Verstappen is to join, the Formula One team's boss Toto Wolff said on Friday while confirming his interest for the future.
Russell indicated on Thursday that Mercedes were talking to Verstappen about a move from Red Bull and suggested that was why an extension to his own contract beyond this season was taking time, although he was confident for the future.
"There is no delay in George's contract negotiations," Wolff told Sky Sports television at the Austrian Grand Prix, where Russell was fastest in first practice.
"It's pretty clear since a long time what our timings were and are, we've known each other for such a long time and so there is no such thing as a delay."
Wolff said it was a question of trying to understand what time framework Verstappen, a four times world champion who is contracted to Red Bull until 2028, was operating under and what his plans were.
"And that could be long into the future," he added.
"But that has no effect on us putting a signature on George's contract."
Russell said on Thursday that it was normal Mercedes would want to talk to Verstappen.
Asked if Russell, whose teammate is 18-year-old Italian rookie Kimi Antonelli, was more likely to be in the Mercedes than Verstappen next year, Wolff replied: "Yes."
"What we are trying to do in the team is to be transparent... you can either choose to hold things under wraps or like we have done in the last 10-12 years is put it out there and say 'this is the situation'," said Wolff.
"There is no such thing as saying 'we are going to sign Max'. This is so far away that it is not realistic. With George, we talk about everything."
Speaking to reporters earlier, Wolff said everything was normal and going to plan with Russell's contract talks.
He also did not rule out pairing Russell and Verstappen in future, despite their recent public feuding and on track clashes.
"I can imagine every line-up. I had Rosberg and Hamilton fighting for a world championship, so everything else afterwards is easy," said the Austrian.
"There's pros and cons of having two drivers fighting each other hard.
"We've seen examples where that functioned and other examples where it didn't."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
an hour ago
- The National
For the sake of tennis, one player in particular must rise to the top
You can have all the quality in the world spread across the field but if there's no rivalries, there's no hook. Which, in turn, means no interest or, at least, much diminished interest from the public. One particularly intense, beautiful and hugely competitive rivalry is exactly why men's tennis thrived to the extent it did for a decade-and-a-half from the mid-2000s. That rivalry was the Roger Federer - Rafa Nadal match-up. Across all of sport, there have been few rivalries which have produced quite as much interest, tension, joy, heartbreak and world-class sport as the Federer-Nadal version. It's why there was such a visceral feeling of devastation when first Federer, then Nadal retired. How would men's tennis ever recover, it was asked? Inevitably, though things move on and already, there's a new rivalry that has seamlessly replaced Federer and Nadal as the most compelling head-to-head in tennis. Jannik Sinner and Carlos Alcaraz have filled the vacuum created by the departure of Federer and Nadal and they are, indisputably, the new stars of men's tennis. Of the last eight grand slam tournaments, the pair have won seven between them, with only Novak Djokovic breaking up the monopoly. Sinner and Alcaraz are the biggest names in the sport and, by some margin, the two best players. Their French Open final earlier this month was one of the greatest matches the sport has ever seen. Some have suggested it's the very best ever, although I wouldn't go that far. Alcaraz prevailed in Paris a few weeks ago, and it's the Spaniard who leads the head-to-head 5-2, but it's Sinner who is number one in the world. Whatever the statistics, though, what is clear is that, providing serious injury does not derail the career of either man, it's Alcaraz and Sinner who will dominate men's tennis over the coming years, perhaps even for the next decade. (Image: Andy Cheung/ Getty Images) A rivalry of this quality is, objectively, a good thing for the sport. But for the good of tennis, one man in particular from this duo must prevail. That man is Carlos Alcaraz. There's a number of reasons why it's so important that Alcaraz and not Sinner becomes the next real tennis great. The first reason is down to the style of their tennis. Alcaraz is, to my eye anyway, a far more flashy, skilful and compelling player to watch. The Spaniard has considerably more flair and variety in comparison to Sinner. The Italian is, it cannot be denied, a phenomenon on the tennis court. So consistently outstanding are his ground strokes, he's almost robotic-like. The sparsity of his unforced errors is remarkable. And the quality of his hitting is perhaps the best the sport has ever seen. But, for me, watching that style of tennis for a prolonged length of time, no matter how high quality it is, just isn't all that interesting. Give me variety, flair, imagination and creativity any day of the week, even if it results in quite a few more unforced errors. Alcaraz is the defending champion at Wimbledon (Image: Getty Images) The second reason is personality. Alcaraz is a far more compelling character than Sinner. The Italian is, on the face of it, a nice guy. It's almost impossible to find anyone who has a bad word to say about him, and he certainly comes across in the press as an amicable, friendly and genuinely decent guy. He also, though, is quite boring. Alcaraz in contrast, has a personality that shines through. He seems like a young guy who can't quite believe his luck that he's living this life. There's something very endearing about his youthful exuberance, with the way he celebrated his French Open victory with the Roland Garros ball kids the perfect example of just what's so likeable about the Spaniard. The final reason is perhaps the most pertinent for me. Earlier this year, Sinner served a doping ban. The details of his case are somewhat convoluted but, to simplify it, Sinner claimed that his trainer had a banned substance on his hands and when treating the Italian, the substance transferred to Sinner and caused his positive test. The Italian was banned from tennis for three months but there was considerable outcry over the alleged preferential treatment he was given and the leniency in allowing him back on tour after such a short suspension. His return was, conveniently, just in time for the French Open meaning the world number one didn't miss a major tournament during his time on the sidelines, nor did he lose his number one ranking. While Sinner wasn't unjustly 'let off' with anything, he was, it seems, treated very favourably as a result of his lofty standing within the sport. The outcry over the unfairness of his treatment was entirely justified because when you compare how fast his infringement was dealt with, as well as his lenient punishment, it's hard to argue that his doping case was handled in a comparable way to the cases of his lower-ranked peers following doping allegations. I don't believe Sinner is a prolific doper, not even close. I actually think his explanation for his positive test is entirely plausible. But I do think it's not a good look for any sport to have a doping conviction on the record of the top player. It's hard to see any way in which this new era of men's tennis isn't the Sinner and Alcaraz era. Tennis will benefit from this pair dominating; they're both outstanding tennis players and will, in all likelihood, move the game on even from the remarkable standard that Federer and Nadal set during their time of dominance. With Wimbledon beginning tomorrow, only a fool would bet against the prediction that we're heading for yet another Sinner-Alcaraz final. Objectively, this would be positive for the sport, particularly if the Wimbledon final is another classic in the way the French Open final was but in this head-to-head, I'll always be willing the Spaniard on. So while having this duo at the top of the game is a good thing for tennis, what will be really good for tennis, for so many reasons, will be if Alcaraz prevails, and emerges as the top dog.
The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
For the sake of tennis, one player in particular must rise to the top
One particularly intense, beautiful and hugely competitive rivalry is exactly why men's tennis thrived to the extent it did for a decade-and-a-half from the mid-2000s. That rivalry was the Roger Federer - Rafa Nadal match-up. Across all of sport, there have been few rivalries which have produced quite as much interest, tension, joy, heartbreak and world-class sport as the Federer-Nadal version. It's why there was such a visceral feeling of devastation when first Federer, then Nadal retired. How would men's tennis ever recover, it was asked? Inevitably, though things move on and already, there's a new rivalry that has seamlessly replaced Federer and Nadal as the most compelling head-to-head in tennis. Jannik Sinner and Carlos Alcaraz have filled the vacuum created by the departure of Federer and Nadal and they are, indisputably, the new stars of men's tennis. Of the last eight grand slam tournaments, the pair have won seven between them, with only Novak Djokovic breaking up the monopoly. Sinner and Alcaraz are the biggest names in the sport and, by some margin, the two best players. Their French Open final earlier this month was one of the greatest matches the sport has ever seen. Some have suggested it's the very best ever, although I wouldn't go that far. Alcaraz prevailed in Paris a few weeks ago, and it's the Spaniard who leads the head-to-head 5-2, but it's Sinner who is number one in the world. Whatever the statistics, though, what is clear is that, providing serious injury does not derail the career of either man, it's Alcaraz and Sinner who will dominate men's tennis over the coming years, perhaps even for the next decade. (Image: Andy Cheung/ Getty Images) A rivalry of this quality is, objectively, a good thing for the sport. But for the good of tennis, one man in particular from this duo must prevail. That man is Carlos Alcaraz. There's a number of reasons why it's so important that Alcaraz and not Sinner becomes the next real tennis great. The first reason is down to the style of their tennis. Alcaraz is, to my eye anyway, a far more flashy, skilful and compelling player to watch. The Spaniard has considerably more flair and variety in comparison to Sinner. The Italian is, it cannot be denied, a phenomenon on the tennis court. So consistently outstanding are his ground strokes, he's almost robotic-like. The sparsity of his unforced errors is remarkable. And the quality of his hitting is perhaps the best the sport has ever seen. But, for me, watching that style of tennis for a prolonged length of time, no matter how high quality it is, just isn't all that interesting. Give me variety, flair, imagination and creativity any day of the week, even if it results in quite a few more unforced errors. Alcaraz is the defending champion at Wimbledon (Image: Getty Images) The second reason is personality. Alcaraz is a far more compelling character than Sinner. The Italian is, on the face of it, a nice guy. It's almost impossible to find anyone who has a bad word to say about him, and he certainly comes across in the press as an amicable, friendly and genuinely decent guy. He also, though, is quite boring. Alcaraz in contrast, has a personality that shines through. He seems like a young guy who can't quite believe his luck that he's living this life. There's something very endearing about his youthful exuberance, with the way he celebrated his French Open victory with the Roland Garros ball kids the perfect example of just what's so likeable about the Spaniard. The final reason is perhaps the most pertinent for me. Earlier this year, Sinner served a doping ban. The details of his case are somewhat convoluted but, to simplify it, Sinner claimed that his trainer had a banned substance on his hands and when treating the Italian, the substance transferred to Sinner and caused his positive test. The Italian was banned from tennis for three months but there was considerable outcry over the alleged preferential treatment he was given and the leniency in allowing him back on tour after such a short suspension. His return was, conveniently, just in time for the French Open meaning the world number one didn't miss a major tournament during his time on the sidelines, nor did he lose his number one ranking. While Sinner wasn't unjustly 'let off' with anything, he was, it seems, treated very favourably as a result of his lofty standing within the sport. The outcry over the unfairness of his treatment was entirely justified because when you compare how fast his infringement was dealt with, as well as his lenient punishment, it's hard to argue that his doping case was handled in a comparable way to the cases of his lower-ranked peers following doping allegations. I don't believe Sinner is a prolific doper, not even close. I actually think his explanation for his positive test is entirely plausible. But I do think it's not a good look for any sport to have a doping conviction on the record of the top player. It's hard to see any way in which this new era of men's tennis isn't the Sinner and Alcaraz era. Tennis will benefit from this pair dominating; they're both outstanding tennis players and will, in all likelihood, move the game on even from the remarkable standard that Federer and Nadal set during their time of dominance. With Wimbledon beginning tomorrow, only a fool would bet against the prediction that we're heading for yet another Sinner-Alcaraz final. Objectively, this would be positive for the sport, particularly if the Wimbledon final is another classic in the way the French Open final was but in this head-to-head, I'll always be willing the Spaniard on. So while having this duo at the top of the game is a good thing for tennis, what will be really good for tennis, for so many reasons, will be if Alcaraz prevails, and emerges as the top dog.
Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
Managing Red Bull as Max Verstappen signs new deal and Yuki Tsunoda is replaced
A look at how Red Bull could look next season as they strive to keep world champion Max Verstappen from Mercedes' clutches amid their continuing second driver issues Speculation over Max Verstappen's Red Bull future continues to rage. Despite having a contract with the team until 2028, the Formula 1 champion continues to give non-committal answers to questions about his 2026 plans. That will be music to Mercedes boss Toto Wolff 's ear, with the Austrian keen to bring him to the Silver Arrows, probably at the expense of Canadian Grand Prix winner George Russell. Rookie Kimi Antonelli, 18, is set to be given more than a year to prove himself. That would be harsh on the King's Lynn driver, who bettered Lewis Hamilton in 2024 and has become the team leader this season. But F1 is a ruthless business, and Wolff, who has already held talks with Team Verstappen, will not pass up the opportunity to land the best driver on the grid. Even Russell, who himself has been linked with Aston Martin, has no qualms about Mercedes' continued interest in his arch-rival. Speaking ahead of the Austrian Grand Prix, he said: 'Why wouldn't teams be interested in Max? If every driver had no contracts for next year, Max would be No.1 for every single team. And that's understandable.' That said, Red Bull should be doing everything they can to keep their prized asset, especially given that no one else seems capable of getting the best out of a troublesome car. Here's how 2026 could ideally look for Red Bull... Verstappen signs new deal The Dutchman is already in the middle of a long-term contract, albeit with rumoured get-out clauses. There is technically no rush for the parties to discuss a new deal. But Red Bull should look to tie Verstappen, 27, to a watertight contract that will take him well into his 30s. Not only would that be a boon for Red Bull, there would be the added bonus of team principal Christian Horner getting one over on arch nemesis Wolff. If that deal isn't forthcoming - even if he stays for '26 - the speculation surrounding their leading man will drag on. Tsunoda dropped It feels like half the grid has had a go at being Verstappen's stablemate. Since Daniel Ricciardo made the rash decision to leave for Renault (now Alpine), it's been a poisoned chalice. Yuki Tsunoda is the latest incumbent and while he's faring better than Liam Lawson, who was demoted back to Racing Bulls after two disastrous grand prix, he's been well off Verstappen's pace. With Red Bull refusing to admit that building a car that only Verstappen can get the best out of might be an issue, the beleaguered number two continues to carry the can. Therefore, the popular Japanese driver will almost certainly be discarded at the end of 2025, unless he can up his game. Hadjar steps up The next cab on the Red Bull rank is impressive rookie Isack Hadjar, who has been superb in the sister Racing Bulls team this season. Not only has the Frenchman shown searing pace, he's displayed impressive mental toughness, a necessary trait when you're Verstappen's team-mate. Hadjar endured a nightmare start to 2025, crashing on the warm-up lap in the wet in Melbourne, but has bounced superbly to be arguably the most impressive rookie of the season so far. Hadjar has high-level support in Marko, who has likened him to F1 great Alain Prost. The Red Bull advisor is reportedly already pushing for the 20-year-old to replace Tsunoda, having been impressed with the youngster's consistency.
