logo
Despite controversy, Miami moved election date. One candidate has already sued

Despite controversy, Miami moved election date. One candidate has already sued

Yahoo2 days ago
A lawsuit filed Monday is challenging last week's controversial Miami City Commission vote to postpone the city's upcoming November election to 2026.
The 41-page complaint by Miami mayoral candidate Emilio González argues that the decision to move the city from odd- to even-year elections effectively granted Mayor Francis Suarez and city commissioners an additional year in power without the consent of voters.
'The commissioners unconstitutionally bypassed the democratic will of the people in a way that the Florida Constitution, the Miami-Dade Charter, and the City's Charter expressly prohibit,' the lawsuit alleges. 'Reminiscent of regimes in Venezuela, Nicaragua, Bolivia, or Cuba — the very places so many of Miami's people come from — those in power, while in power, forced upon those voters what they think is best for elections going forward — and secured for themselves additional time in power, without a vote of the electorate. That cannot stand.'
Representatives for the city did not immediately respond to requests for comment Tuesday, but City Attorney George Wysong has defended the election change as appropriate and legal.
Suarez could still issue a veto on the controversial measure but would have to do so within 10 days of last week's city commission vote on June 26. However, that seems unlikely; the Herald previously reported that Suarez was working behind the scenes to push the even-year change.
Proponents of the measure, including its sponsor, Commissioner Damian Pardo, have argued that aligning elections with national races will boost voter turnout and prove a boon for democratic participation. But opponents have accused city officials of pursuing a self-serving extension of their terms. Florida's governor and attorney general both warned the city not to change the election date without first asking voters in a ballot referendum.
'Attorney General James Uthmeier has already warned that this violates the law, and Governor Ron DeSantis has strongly supported that position,' retired U.S. Army colonel González, a former Miami city manager, said in a press release announcing the lawsuit. 'Disenfranchising voters undermines our democracy and robs citizens of their voice at the ballot box.'
Ahead of last week's vote, Wysong defended the legal and ethical grounds of moving this year's election to 2026 to align with federal elections. 'Somebody is gonna get that extra year, whether you do it now, or next year, or two years from now,' Wysong said at the June 26 meeting.
Ultimately, Commissioners Pardo, Ralph Rosado and Christine King voted in favor of the measure, which passed by a vote of 3-2, with Commissioners Joe Carollo and Miguel Angel Gabela voting against the change.
In an interview Tuesday, González said commissioners had only offered 'nonsensical, bogus justifications' for the change.
'I've never sued anybody in my life and I've never run for public office so this is all new to me,' González told the Miami Herald. 'But I've spent my adult career as a U.S. Army officer serving around the world promoting and defending democracy — only to find I now have to promote and defend democracy here in my hometown.'
'I'm a real stickler for process and procedure,' González added. 'This isn't a campaign publicity stunt. I'm filing this as a voter.'
While González is the first to sue, other candidates who planned to run in the November 2025 election have been critical of the change as well.
'Miami voters want new leadership in the city. For them, these elections cannot come soon enough,' mayoral candidate Ken Russell, a former city commissioner, told the Herald. 'Commissioners enriching themselves and violating their own term limits erodes voter trust.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Minnesota lawmaker shootings suspect tells judge he's ‘looking forward' to facts coming out at trial
Minnesota lawmaker shootings suspect tells judge he's ‘looking forward' to facts coming out at trial

Yahoo

time13 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Minnesota lawmaker shootings suspect tells judge he's ‘looking forward' to facts coming out at trial

Vance Boelter, the suspected shooter of two Minnesota lawmakers and their spouses, told the judge during a court hearing Thursday he's 'looking forward' to the facts coming out at trial. Boelter, 57, is facing both state and federal charges related to the deadly shootings of Democratic State House Speaker Emerita Melissa Hortman, and her husband Mark, on June 14. He's also been charged over the shootings of Democratic State Senator John Hoffman and his wife, Yvette, who both survived the attack. Boelter is yet to enter a plea. During the federal court hearing, Boelter waived his right to a detention hearing, where prosecutors provide evidence supporting the suspect's charges, and told the judge he was 'looking forward to court,' where the truth would come out, The New York Times reported. Boelter said this included events related to 'what happened before the 14th,' seemingly referring to the date of the shootings. During the hearing, the judge ordered Boelter to remain in jail while awaiting trial. At his last hearing in late June, a sleep-deprived Boelter complained to a judge over the treatment he had received at the Sherberne County Jail. Boelter's lawyer, Manvir Atwal, said her client had been placed on suicide watch and was living in a cell with only a mat and a pillow. She also claimed the lights were kept on all day and night and another inmate in Boelter's unit had been spreading feces on the wall. Boelter told the judge he hadn't slept for 12 or 14 days and he'd 'appreciate' delaying proceedings, 'So I can get some sleep.' The judge agreed and postponed the hearing until Thursday. The suspect said in court Thursday the lights were still being kept on 24/7, and it has made it difficult to 'know if it's day or night,' the NYT reported. Sherburne County Sheriff Joel Brott called Boelter's complaints 'absurd' in a statement made after the suspect's June 27 hearing. "He is not in a hotel. He's in jail, where a person belongs when they commit the heinous crimes he is accused of committing,' the sheriff said. 'Lights are on 24-7, and need to be so correctional officers doing welfare checks can see that the inmates are okay.' Federal prosecutors say Boelter disguised himself as a police officer to carry out the attacks, which occurred at the lawmakers' Minneapolis-area homes in the early morning hours. Boelter was arrested near his rural Minnesota home after a two-day manhunt. Authorities called the shootings 'politically-motivated.' Prosecutors say handwritten notes were found in Boelter's car with the names of dozens of Minnesota state and federal elected officials which included some of their home addresses. Boelter's wife, Jenny, said in a statement through her lawyer late last month she and her family are 'appalled and horrified' by the shootings. "We are absolutely shocked, heartbroken and completely blindsided,' she said. 'This violence does not at all align with our beliefs as a family. It is a betrayal of everything we hold true as tenets of our Christian faith.'

Slate Auto drops ‘under $20,000' pricing after Trump administration ends federal EV tax credit
Slate Auto drops ‘under $20,000' pricing after Trump administration ends federal EV tax credit

Yahoo

time16 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Slate Auto drops ‘under $20,000' pricing after Trump administration ends federal EV tax credit

Slate Auto, the electric vehicle startup backed by Jeff Bezos, has stopped promoting that its upcoming pickup truck will start 'under $20,000' following passage of President Trump's tax cut bill. The bill, which is expected to be signed into law by Trump on July 4, will cause the federal EV tax credit to end in September — a $7,500 incentive that Slate had counted on to help its all-electric pickup clear that mark. When Slate came out of stealth mode in April, the startup heavily promoted that its all-electric pickup would start at 'under $20,000' with the $7,500 federal EV tax credit. That language was still on Slate's website as recently as yesterday according to the Web Archive. The change is a potential blow to the young company's attempt to make a radically affordable electric vehicle. Slate didn't provide a precise price for the EV at its launch event; and it has yet to say what the actual starting price of its vehicle will be, sans-credit. A Slate spokesperson declined to comment on the change. The company won't start building the truck until the end of 2026 at the earliest. Slate's business is also built around making this vehicle highly customizable, which means it's possible that few people will buy the base model to begin with. The sub-$20,000 price had been a big attraction point for the brand new company's product, and it was a major focus following its April launch event. The auto industry has 'driven prices to a place that most Americans simply can't afford,' chief commercial officer Jeremy Snyder said during the event. 'But we're here to change that.' 'We are building the affordable vehicle that has long been promised but never been delivered,' CEO Chris Barman added at the time. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Trump's ‘Big Beautiful Bill' Cements GOP Dominance
Trump's ‘Big Beautiful Bill' Cements GOP Dominance

Yahoo

time22 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump's ‘Big Beautiful Bill' Cements GOP Dominance

Speaker of the House Mike Johnson (R-LA) and President Donald Trump, speak to members of the media as they depart a House Republican meeting at the U.S. Capitol on May 20, 2025 in Washington, DC. Credit - Andrew Harnik—Getty Images The passage of the 'Big Beautiful Bill' on Thursday was a moment when President Donald Trump's hold on the Republican Party was tested — and he won. GOP holdouts objected to the trillions of dollars the bill is projected to add to the debt and the cuts to Medicaid and other safety net programs. But in the end, Trump was able to browbeat Republicans into supporting his costly plans to fund long-term tax cuts for the wealthy, more deportations of immigrants and boosting defense spending. Trump's victory further strengthens his power in Washington and clears the way for him to take even more aggressive actions on immigration, trade policy and depart from American tradition to hammer the chair of the Federal Reserve Jerome Powell into lowering interest rates, a move that could give the U.S. economy a sugar high of cheap cash. Read more: The Budget Bill's Big Consequences Trump's control over the GOP 'is as close to total as any President has ever had over his own political party,' says Whit Ayres, a long-time Republican pollster. 'It gives him the support of his own legislative caucus for almost anything he wants to do.' Trump plans to sign the bill into law on Friday at 5 p.m. as B-2 bombers jet over the White House during a Fourth of July celebration for military families. 'We'll be signing with those beautiful planes flying right over our heads,' Trump told reporters traveling with him on Air Force One on Thursday evening. In order to get the bill passed, some Republicans broke their promises not to cut Medicaid, other Republicans reneged on pledges to keep down the national debt. In the House, only two Republicans—Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky and Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania—ended up voting against Trump's bill. The bill narrowly passed the House 218-214 with all Democrats voting against it. Massie wrote on X that he voted 'no' because 'it will significantly increase U.S. budget deficits in the near term, negatively impacting all Americans through sustained inflation and high interest rates.' The bill barely made it out of the Senate earlier in the week. Republican Senators Susan Collins of Maine, Rand Paul of Kentucky and Thom Tillis of North Carolina voted against Trump's bill forcing Vice President J.D. Vance to cast a tie-breaking vote. Tillis said the Medicaid cuts would be devastating to his state, and, after bucking Trump, said he wouldn't run for reelection. Republican Senator Josh Hawley of Missouri had argued against the cuts to Medicaid but ended up voting 'yes,' and Senator Ron Johnson of Wisconsin, a Republican, had criticized the bill for not cutting enough to offset adding trillions to the debt, but ended up voting for the bill. Read more: The GOP Budget Will Balloon the National Debt. Here's What Trump Could do to Fix it Now Trump is faced with the daunting task of selling the unpopular bill to the public. Only 29% of voters said they support the bill, according to a Quinnipiac University poll published on June 26, while 55% percent of voters said that they oppose the bill and 16% were unsure. The cuts to social safety net programs and the increase in the deficit could lead to political blowback that helps Democrats take back control of the House in the 2026 mid-term elections. The bill could be a political risk for Trump, says Ayres, if 'a whole lot of Trump supporters lose their health care and get angry about it.' Contact us at letters@

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store