Disallowing expenditure: Govt likely to increase limit to Rs2.5m
Tax experts told Business Recorder that the amendment to Section 24 of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001, which prohibits the deduction of expenses for cash sales exceeding Rs200,000 has generated considerable concern within the business community.
The new provision introduced through Finance Act 2025 has been implemented from July 1, 2025.
The government has now proposed to implement this law in phase-wise manner to protect the revenue collection, as well as, ensure documentation. This law would be fully implemented in three years period, sources said.
Under the proposed revised law, the law would be fully implemented in three years period in phases. In the first year, the amount of Rs200,000 has been proposed to be increased to Rs 2.5 million for disallowing expenditure per transaction. In the second year, the amount would be decreased from Rs 2.5 million to Rs 1.5 million and subsequently to Rs 0.5 million. The percentage of disallowance would be decreased from 50 percent to 20 percent which would be gradually increased in three years period, the new proposal said.
According to the details, the disallowance introduced via Section 24 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 pertains exclusively to the head 'Income from Business', as defined under Section 18.
This provision disallows 50 per cent of expenditure attributable to cash sales exceeding Rs200,000 per transaction as per Finance Act 2025.
Hence, the restriction applies solely to business income and is not applicable to individuals or entities earning income under any other head under the Finance Act 2025.
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
28 minutes ago
- Express Tribune
Sugar, power and patronage
In the digital age, there's no excuse for opacity as a transparent digital dashboard that tracks sugar from mills to wholesalers to retailers would make it harder for hoarders and profiteers to operate undetected. Photo: file Listen to article Pakistan's recurring sugar crises have become a telling reflection of how entrenched elite interests continue to manipulate the economy under the guise of policy. The latest surge in sugar prices, now hitting between Rs180 and Rs210 per kilogramme despite official claims of intervention, shows just how far removed state actions are from public welfare. What is unfolding isn't simply mismanagement. It's a system that protects the powerful and punishes the public. In July 2024, the federal government announced with much fanfare that it had reached an agreement with sugar mills to sell sugar to wholesalers at Rs165 per kg. This was framed as a breakthrough deal. But within days, the mills began violating the agreed price, resuming supply at Rs175, not Rs165. Even at inflated rates, sugar remains scarce in wholesale markets. The public, meanwhile, continues to pay well over Rs200 per kg in major cities like Karachi and Lahore. This was not just a policy failure. It was the illusion of reform – an orchestrated move to deflect public outrage without touching the roots of the problem. And at the root lies one uncomfortable fact: the sugar sector is not regulated by the government. It is effectively governed by itself. The concentration of political and economic power is stark. The Sharif family, which sits at the core of the current ruling coalition, owns major sugar mills. That the same actors who draft economic policies also control production and pricing of sugar reveals a conflict of interests so blatant that it no longer shocks. This overlap turns policy into patronage, and governance into a tool for private gain. Earlier this year, the government allowed sugar exports even as domestic stocks were under pressure. Predictably, local prices soared. Then came the tax-free import of 500,000 metric tons of sugar; a move that drew criticism from the International Monetary Fund, which questioned both its timing and its lack of transparency. No one has explained who received import licences, under what conditions, or how the decision was justified while government revenues continue to bleed. What the country witnessed was a two-way windfall: profits made on the export side and further gains through duty-free imports. Also there is an issue of price collapse when the shipments arrive in November; around the time sugar mills will be buying from growers, giving them leverage to manipulate buying prices. Throughout all this, regulators have remained silent. The Competition Commission has issued no inquiry into possible cartelisation. The Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) has not released any audits on sugar mill compliance or tax contribution. No action has been taken against mills for openly breaching their agreement with the government. When institutions with legal mandates refuse to act, the market ceases to be a marketplace. It becomes a racket. This isn't new. But it's become more brazen. The previous PTI-led government also faced sugar price hike in 2020. However, its response was markedly different. Then prime minister Imran Khan ordered a wide-ranging inquiry, involving the FIA, SECP, FBR, and other agencies. The investigation looked into hoarding, tax fraud, price manipulation, and the misuse of subsidies. Importantly, it didn't shy away from naming allies or investigating politically connected individuals within PTI itself like Jahangir Tareen. The inquiry report was published in full. While it triggered backlash, it also marked a rare moment where the state asserted its regulatory role over an entrenched industrial elite. The investigation was abandoned and charges dropped when the PTI government was removed. What we are seeing now is the opposite. Instead of confronting the sugar mafia, the current government has aligned itself with it. Instead of enforcing transparency, it has shielded its members from scrutiny. At every step, decisions have served the interests of the few at the expense of many. This has real human costs. Sugar is not just a luxury good. It is a daily essential for households and a critical input for small businesses. Rising sugar prices drive up food inflation, burden already stretched family budgets, and hurt bakeries, tea stalls, and street vendors across the country. When a government facilitates price spiral through weak enforcement and preferential trade decisions, it doesn't just fail the economy. It abandons its moral claim to serve the people. To fix this, Pakistan must first acknowledge that the sugar crisis is not a temporary market blip. It is a symptom of a deeper structural disease: the collusion between political elites and monopolistic interests. The solution begins with cutting these links. Public officeholders, and their immediate families, must be barred from owning or profiting from industries they are in a position to regulate. This principle is basic in any functioning democracy. Without it, policy becomes an instrument of personal enrichment, not public service. Next, regulatory institutions must be depoliticised and empowered. Agencies like the CCP, FBR, and SECP should have independent boards, professional leadership, and the authority to publish findings without seeking ministerial approval. If sugar mills are in violation of tax laws or pricing agreements, the public has a right to know. Trade policy must also be demystified. Export and import decisions, especially for essentials like sugar, should not be made behind closed doors. They must be based on evidence, presented in parliament, and subjected to public scrutiny. Import licences should be granted through open bidding, and their recipients disclosed proactively. In the digital age, there's no excuse for opacity. A transparent digital dashboard that tracks sugar from mills to wholesalers to retailers would make it harder for hoarders and profiteers to operate undetected. It would also empower consumers and watchdog groups with real-time data. Finally, subsidies and tax exemptions must be subjected to rigorous review. No tax waiver or import concession should be granted without a clear, documented public interest rationale. Otherwise, they will continue to be used as vehicles for elite enrichment. The sugar industry has become a symbol of how deeply elite capture runs in Pakistan. But it can also become a turning point. If the state can confront the sugar mafia – not with hollow deals but with real accountability – it can begin to rebuild public trust and economic fairness. If it cannot, the crisis will return. Prices may dip briefly, but the profiteering will continue. This is not just about sugar. It is about who the system is designed to serve and who it leaves behind. The writer is a graduate of the University of British Columbia
Business Recorder
an hour ago
- Business Recorder
Finance Act 2025: BMP demands removal of ‘oppressive' clauses
LAHORE: The Federation of Pakistan Chambers of Commerce and Industry's Businessmen Panel (BMP) has strongly condemned the continuation of controversial fiscal amendments introduced under the Finance Act 2025, asserting that Saturday's successful shutter-down across Punjab and the rest of the country signals a deep rupture in the government's contract with the business community. Addressing the wave of frustration engulfing markets from Lahore to Faisalabad, Gujranwala, Sialkot and beyond, BMP Chairman Mian Anjum Nisar noted that this collective shutdown was not a routine protest—it was a definitive vote of no-confidence in the state's current economic direction. Traders, industrialists, wholesalers and retailers across Pakistan voluntarily ceased operations to register their dismay at the coercive new powers granted to tax officials under the revised law. Mian Anjum Nisar stated that Sections 37A and 37B of the Income Tax Ordinance—empowering tax officers with arrest and prosecution authority—violate the constitutional guarantees of fair treatment and due process. He said these clauses are more reflective of a police state than a participatory economy and have triggered panic throughout formal businesses already struggling with rising costs and limited liquidity. 'These measures were neither debated transparently nor tested through pilot phases. The sudden imposition of unchecked arrest powers, aggressive cash handling limits, and unrealistic digital compliance rules has pushed the entire business landscape into uncertainty,' Nisar warned. 'You cannot reform an economy by intimidating its engine. What the government has misjudged is the deep-rooted unity of Pakistan's trading and industrial community.' He pointed out that even law-abiding businesses with a clear tax history are now rethinking their operations due to the fear of misuse by the enforcement arms of the Federal Board of Revenue. Coupled with hasty implementation of SRO 350 and SRO 709, which mandate complex electronic invoicing and tracking requirements, the situation has left traders vulnerable to penalties without preparation. Anjum Nisar said the nationwide protest was not confined to any single region or sector. 'From mega industrial hubs in Lahore to small-town traders in central Punjab, the shutdown was absolute—and peaceful. This is not political agitation. It is a desperate but constitutional signal from those who have been pushed too far,' he said. BMP stated that instead of expanding the tax base through engagement, the government has opted for punitive actions that are alienating even registered taxpayers. 'This is not how you build trust. If every law-abiding businessperson starts to feel like a criminal, the tax system collapses under its own contradictions,' Nisar remarked. He expressed serious concern that the government's narrative continues to suggest that only a few sectors oppose the reforms. 'This strike disproved that myth. The unity seen across commercial centers in Punjab should be a wake-up call. We are talking about a total industry halt—a shutdown of production, supply chains, and sales from top to bottom,' he said. While acknowledging the establishment of a grievance redressal committee by FPCCI and the Ministry of Finance, BMP criticized the lack of urgency in addressing the issues. 'At this stage, verbal commitments are not enough. The government must issue written notifications immediately reversing or suspending the most dangerous aspects of these laws,' Nisar insisted. The Businessmen Panel emphasized that the business community has always been in favor of responsible reforms and progressive digitization. However, it cannot support a system that is imposed overnight, without education, infrastructure, or practical rollout plans. 'Pakistan's economy does not run on apps and directives. It runs on trust, predictability, and dialogue,' he added. He said BMP had repeatedly presented constructive suggestions, including timelines for documentation, gradual onboarding of digital systems, and protections against harassment. 'Unfortunately, the state continues to legislate from a distance, without consulting the very people who will bear the brunt of these policies,' Anjum Nisar lamented. He warned that if the Finance Act is not amended in the coming days, the economic consequences could extend beyond business closures to investment flight, job losses, and reduced exports. 'Pakistan's productive class cannot afford to operate in fear. We will not be spectators to our own collapse,' Nisar said. BMP reiterated its complete support for the constitutional right to protest and expressed pride in how peacefully and effectively the strike was observed across the country. 'The discipline and unity shown on July 20 have restored our belief that business owners can still come together for the nation's economic future. But that unity must now be respected—not ignored,' the chairman said. The Businessmen Panel demanded that the government issue official notifications to immediately withdraw Sections 37A and 37B, revise SRO 350 and SRO 709 with stakeholder input, and suspend punitive cash transaction rules until a proper mechanism is agreed upon. 'We are not seeking confrontation. We are demanding correction,' Mian Anjum Nisar said. 'If the government fails to act now, the business community will be forced to reconsider how—and whether—it continues to operate under such conditions.' Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
an hour ago
- Business Recorder
UAE golden visa issue: FTO irked by FBR's ‘inefficiency'
ISLAMABAD: Federal Tax Ombudsman (FTO) has taken notice of the issue of Federal Board of Revenue's (FBR) inefficiency to timely seek data from the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) about the golden visas issued by the United Arab Emirates (UAE) to the resident Pakistanis, making huge investments aboard. After the elapse of more than five years of enabling legislation, the FBR was unable to obtain data from the FIA about the golden visa issued by the UAE to the resident Pakistanis on investment of at least 2.0 million dirhams, equivalent to more than Rs 150 million at the present exchange rate and FTO has taken notice of this inefficiency and has called report from the FBR Member Tax Policy and Director General (DG) International taxes. In this regard, the FTO has issued instructions to the FBR to file comments by July 29, 2025 to the FTO office. Crackdown underway: Pakistan's FIA identifies investors with AED 2m real estate holdings in UAE As per tax experts, section 175A was inserted in the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 through Finance Act 2020 and it required that arrangements shall be made to provide real-time access of information and database to the Board by the FIA as per section 175A(1)(a)/(b) regarding international travel and exit of immigration visa holders. Whereas under sub-section (2), the Board shall make arrangements for that. Moreover, under sub-section (3), until real-time access to information and database is made available, such information and data shall be provided periodically in such form and such manner as may be prescribed. However, after the elapse of more than five years, the Board has failed to do both the statutory duties of real-time data access and periodic statements from FIA. This delay and inaction constitute maladministration, and an informed citizen, Tarik Ahmed, has brought the issue to the attention of FTO, and notices have been issued to file comments by July 29, 2025. When contacted for comments, Basharat Qureshi, a Karachi-based tax expert, explained that the issue has two dimensions: the first is ownership of foreign immovable property and its declaration in the wealth statement and sources thereof. The second issue is whether the foreign exchange was remitted from Pakistan through permissible legal means, and checking of this aspect is the domain of the FIA. Therefore, coordination of FBR and FIA would be required, and thousands of cases can be easily detected where neither the foreign property is declared in the tax declaration, nor the foreign exchange was remitted legally. Basharat was of the opinion that in the tax return, further mandatory attributes can be added, asking for do you hold any foreign passport or resident visa, and basis of the same as naturalization or investment, as thousands of Pakistanis hold a second passport or resident visa on the basis of investment. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
