logo
Sudan's war is an economic disaster: here's how bad it could get

Sudan's war is an economic disaster: here's how bad it could get

IOL News6 days ago
People walk past destroyed vehicles on the grounds of a hospital in Sudan's capital Khartoum in April 2025.
Image: AFP
In the two years of civil war in Sudan the country has lost more than 50% of it's economy.
Image: AFP
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Ad loading
My research applies economy-wide models to understand how conflict affects national development. In a recent study, my colleagues and I used this approach to answer the question: what will happen to Sudan's economy and poverty levels if the war continues through 2025?
To assess the economic impact of the conflict, we used a Social Accounting Matrix multiplier model. This is a tool that captures how shocks affect different sectors and other agents of the economy, such as firms, government and households.
Based on our modelling, the answer is devastating: the conflict could shrink the size of Sudan's economy by over 40% from 2022 levels, plunging millions more into poverty.
We modelled two scenarios to capture the potential trajectories of Sudan's economy.
The extreme scenario assumes a sharp initial collapse, with a 29.5% contraction in the size of the economy in 2023 and 12.2% in 2024, followed by a 7% decline in 2025, reflecting some stabilisation over time.
The moderate scenario, based on World Bank projections, applies a 20.1% contraction in 2023 and a 15.1% drop in 2024, also followed by a 7% reduction in 2025, indicating a slower but more prolonged deterioration.
We estimated the annual figures and report only the aggregate impacts through 2025 for clarity.
We found that if the conflict endures, the value of Sudan's economy will contract by up to 42% from US$56.3 billion in 2022 (pre-conflict) to US$32.4 billion by the end of 2025. The backbone of livelihoods – agriculture – will be crippled. And the social fabric of the country will continue to fray.
How we did it
Our Social Accounting Matrix multiplier model used data from various national and international sources to show the impact of conflict on the value of the economy, its sectors and household welfare.
We connected this to government and World Bank data to reflect Sudan's current conditions.
This allowed us to simulate how conflict-driven disruptions affect the value of the economy, its sectors and household welfare.
What we found
Under the extreme scenario, we found: Gross domestic product collapse : Gross domestic product (GDP) measures the total value of all goods and services produced in a country within a year. It's a key indicator of economic health. We found that the value of Sudan's economy could contract by up to 42%. This means the country would be producing less than 60% of what it did before the conflict. This would affect incomes, jobs, government revenues and public services. The industrial sector – heavily concentrated in Khartoum – would be hardest hit, with output shrinking by over 50%. The value of services like education, health, transport and trade would fall by 40%, and agriculture by more than 35%.
Job losses : nearly 4.6 million jobs – about half of all employment – could disappear. Urban areas and non-farm sectors would be worst affected, with over 700,000 farming jobs at risk.
Incomes plummet : household incomes would decline across all groups – rich and poor, rural and urban – by up to 42%. Rural and less-educated households suffer the most.
Poverty spikes : up to 7.5 million more people could fall into poverty, adding to the 61.1% poverty level in 2022. In rural areas, the poverty rate could jump by 32.5 percentage points from the already high rural poverty rate pre-conflict (67.6% of the rural population). Women, especially in rural communities, are hit particularly hard. Urban poverty, which was at 48.8% pre-conflict, increases by 11.6 percentage points.
The agrifood system – which includes farming, food processing, trade and food services – would lose a third of its value under the extreme scenario.
Why these findings matter
Sudan was already in a fragile state before the war. It was reeling from decades of underinvestment, international sanctions and institutional breakdown.
The war has reversed hard-won gains in poverty reduction. It is also dismantling key productive sectors – from agriculture to manufacturing – which will be essential for recovery once the conflict ends. Every month of continued fighting adds to the damage and raises the cost of rebuilding.
Our projections already show major economic collapse, yet they don't include the full extent of the damage. This includes losses in the informal economy or the strain on household coping strategies. The real situation could be even worse than what the data suggests.
What needs to be done
First and foremost, peace is essential. Without an end to the fighting, recovery will be impossible.
Second, even as conflict continues, urgent action is needed to stabilise livelihoods. This means: supporting agriculture in areas that remain relatively safe. Food production must be sustained to prevent famine.
restoring critical services where possible – particularly transport, trade and retail – to keep local economies functioning
protecting the most vulnerable, such as women in rural areas and the elderly, through expanded social protection and targeted cash assistance.
Third, prepare for recovery. The international community – donors, development banks and NGOs – must begin laying the groundwork for post-conflict reconstruction now. This includes investment in public infrastructure, rebuilding institutions and re-integrating displaced populations.
The bottom line
Sudan's war is more than a political crisis. It is an economic catastrophe unfolding in real time. One that is deepening poverty, destroying livelihoods and erasing years of progress.
Our research provides hard numbers to describe what Sudanese families are already experiencing every day.
The country's economy is bleeding. Without a shift in the trajectory of the conflict, recovery could take decades – if it happens at all. | The Conversation
Khalid Siddig is Senior Research Fellow and Program Leader for the Sudan Strategy Support Program, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI)
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump's 30% tariffs are a crisis in the making for SA's car industry: Naamsa
Trump's 30% tariffs are a crisis in the making for SA's car industry: Naamsa

TimesLIVE

time13 minutes ago

  • TimesLIVE

Trump's 30% tariffs are a crisis in the making for SA's car industry: Naamsa

The 30% tariff imposed on South African exports to the US is a socioeconomic crisis in the making for South Africa's automotive sector, according to motor industry body Naamsa. South Africa failed to reach a trade deal with the US by the August 1 deadline, resulting in President Donald Trump imposing the tariff to take effect from the first week of August. It is expected to potentially cause job losses in South Africa's automotive and agriculture industries. 'The imposition of these tariffs is deeply disappointing and has far-reaching implications. Without an urgent trade remedy, the socioeconomic fallout could be severe,' said Naamsa CEO Mikel Mabasa on Friday. The tariffs — and the broader uncertainty in US-Africa trade relations — strike at the heart of South Africa's industrialisation agenda and threaten future investment in high-value manufacturing, said Naamsa. 'For South Africa's automotive sector — already bearing the brunt of a sharp export contraction to the US market in the first half of 2025 — this latest development is a relative loss of competitiveness as peer countries retain or negotiate lower rates. 'Though some sectors, such as base metals, will remain largely exempt, the automotive industry stands exposed in immediate volumes and long-term market access.'

Ramaphosa urges SA to adapt quickly to US 30% tariff
Ramaphosa urges SA to adapt quickly to US 30% tariff

The Herald

time35 minutes ago

  • The Herald

Ramaphosa urges SA to adapt quickly to US 30% tariff

'South African exports do not compete with US producers and do not pose a threat to US industry. It remains our aspiration that this should continue. Largely, our exports are inputs into US industries and therefore support the US' industrial base. South Africa is also the biggest investor from the African continent into the US, with 22 of our companies investing in a number of sectors including mining, chemicals, pharmaceuticals and the food chain.' He said the government has been engaging the US to improve trade and investment relations that would benefit both countries. 'Our priority is protecting our export industries. We will continue to engage the US in an attempt to preserve market access for our products. We must also accelerate the diversification of our export markets, particularly by deepening intra-African trade.' The government has established an export support desk to assist affected producers. Ramaphosa said the government would soon announce the modalities of support packages for those affected which would also help guide industries looking to expand into markets in Africa, Asia, the Middle East and others. 'Strengthening regional value chains will be key to building resilience for our export markets in the longer-term. Much as strengthening and establishing alternative value chains will take time, this moment presents us with an opportunity to push forward with the implementation and expansion of the African Continental Free Trade Area. 'Reducing over-dependence on certain markets is a strategic imperative to build the resilience of our economy. It will also enable us to expand the frontiers of opportunity for South African businesses, goods and services. In the coming months we will scale up our trade missions into new markets in Africa and beyond, as well as the national exporter development programme whose aim is to grow the pool of export-ready companies.' TimesLIVE

Government says it is working on ways to mitigate job losses from US tariffs
Government says it is working on ways to mitigate job losses from US tariffs

The Herald

time3 hours ago

  • The Herald

Government says it is working on ways to mitigate job losses from US tariffs

The government says it is working on ways to mitigate job losses caused by steep US tariffs and is considering exempting exporters from some competition rules to support them. Africa's biggest economy faces a 30% tariff on its exports to the US starting this week, a move expected to cost tens of thousands of jobs after it failed to secure a trade deal before a deadline set by US President Donald Trump. Trump last Thursday issued an executive order imposing higher import duties on dozens of countries that are set to take effect in seven days as part of his push to reshape global trade in favour of the US 'South Africa poses no trade threat to the US economy or its national security,' the trade and foreign ministers said in a joint statement on Monday. 'The calculation of the US-SA 'trade deficit' ignores the substantial US trade surplus in services, and the complementary nature of the bilateral trade and investment relations between the two countries.' Measures to cushion the impact of job losses could involve the Unemployment Insurance Fund, the government statement said. The statement said a 'block exemption' from competition rules was being developed to enable collaboration and co-ordination by competitors. Reuters

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store