logo
There's too much salt in Westchester County reservoirs. The culprit? Rock salt from roads

There's too much salt in Westchester County reservoirs. The culprit? Rock salt from roads

Yahoo22-03-2025
So much rock salt has seeped into the water supply in the Lower Hudson Valley that a Westchester County reservoir that delivers drinking water to New York City might need to be shut down in 25 years.
'It will be too salty to drink,' Rohit T. Aggarwala, the commissioner of the New York City Department of Environmental Protection said during a press conference Friday in Croton Gorge Park, as water from the New Croton Dam cascaded down.
Aggarwala came to discuss a new DEP study, which found rising levels of salinity in the Croton System reservoirs that provide water to New York City and Westchester County.
Over a 30-year period, salt levels in the main New Croton Reservoir have tripled. At the current rate, the reservoir would reach the state's maximum allowable levels of chloride, salt's main component, by 2108. And the Amawalk Reservoir in Somers — one of the smallest of the Croton System's 12 reservoirs — might need to be shut down by 2050.
Aggarwala likened the task ahead to government eradication efforts following studies linking pesticides and other contaminants to environmental harm.
'We now need to focus on road salt as something that is harming our environment and is going to undermine the infrastructure that our cities and our towns depend on every day,' Aggarwala said.
The study said the reservoirs in Westchester County east of the Hudson River have abnormally high levels of salt, largely because of road salt runoff from the region's major thoroughfares — I-84, I-684 as well as the Taconic and Saw Mill parkways.
Salt in drinking water can lead to hypertension and high blood pressure in humans and can do damage to watershed ecosystems, the study notes.
Salt: Highway heads fear surge in rock salt costs if Gov. Hochul signs 'Buy American' bill
To combat the rising levels, the DEP is encouraging the state and municipalities to reduce or eliminate the use of salt when de-icing roads and to consider alternatives like brine, calcium magnesium acetate and potassium acetate, the study said.
State Sen. Pete Harckham and Assemblywoman MaryJane Shimsky, Democrats representing the Lower Hudson Valley, have introduced legislation to address concerns highlighted by the DEP study.
'We must take the corrective steps needed to protect this resource, and we must do it right away,' Shimsky said. 'If we don't, the damage to our residents, agriculture, and wildlife will be irreversible and the cost of replacing our water infrastructure far more expensive.'
Harckham said wells in the northern Westchester County towns he represents have been shut down in recent years because of rising salt levels.
'You can look at that as the canary in the coal mine,' Harckham said. 'This is not about blame. This is about a teachable moment and a call to change behavior.'
Tolls: Thruway toll evaders owe big bucks. How much?
The legislation would evaluate the use of alternatives that would do less harm to the environment.
The DEP study acknowledged the safety contributions of road salt. One study found that accident rates are eight times higher before salt spreading than they are after it's spread. And road salt use reduced traffic accident costs by 85%.
Thomas C. Zambito covers energy, transportation and economic growth for the USA Today Network's New York State team. He's won dozens of state and national writing awards from the Associated Press, Investigative Reporters and Editors, the Deadline Club and others during a decades-long career that's included stops at the New York Daily News, The Star-Ledger of Newark and The Record of Hackensack. He can be reached at tzambito@lohud.com.
This article originally appeared on Rockland/Westchester Journal News: Westchester, NYC reservoirs have high salt levels from road rock salt
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

As Congress plays hot potato with Obamacare, my health is on the line
As Congress plays hot potato with Obamacare, my health is on the line

Miami Herald

time13 hours ago

  • Miami Herald

As Congress plays hot potato with Obamacare, my health is on the line

At the edge I'm 60, self-employed and living with congestive heart failure. That's not a metaphor — I literally have a weak heart and dangerously low ejection fraction (how much blood the heart pumps out with each contraction). The Affordable Care Act is why I can see a doctor, afford my medication and stay alive. Now, Congress is playing political hot potato with my health. If it doesn't extend the ACA's enhanced subsidies by August, my $30 monthly premium could jump to more than $800. Unless I start selling organs on the side (not ideal when your heart's the issue), I won't be able to keep up. I'm too young for Medicare and I don't have employer coverage. I've worked hard, paid taxes and managed my condition responsibly. Millions of Americans are walking this same tightrope, silently panicking. The media must show the country what these policy changes really mean, not as talking points, but as human lives. Kevin Bahn, Tamarac In the undertow We have become numb and indifferent to acts of cruelty and injustice. For many among us, what is happening at Alligator Alcatraz is becoming another daily occurrence, like an accident on the road which we slow down to look at and then drive on. Are all of those being held at the detention facility truly terrible people who have committed serious crimes and deserve to be in cages? Who are they really and why are they there? Cowardly local, state and federal officials are watching this car wreck while determined organizations, outspoken Democrats in the state legislature and Miami-Dade County Mayor Daniella Levine demand action and answers. Outrage in the face of cavalier rhetoric cannot be driven by party affiliation. Those who sit back and do nothing are just as much a part of this sadistic political experiment as those who justify it. Mikki Canton, Coral Gables Never too close Vocal critics of DEI, such as President Trump and Govs. Ron DeSantis and Greg Abbott, claim it undermines merit. Meanwhile, they hand out cabinet positions to donors who are totally unqualified. How often do bosses hire family members or golfing buddies for important job openings? Is merit the top criteria? Of course not! A college or university will give a football player who academically would not qualify for admission a scholarship, yet it is not allowed to try to diversify its learning environment by admitting a minority student whose background may have hindered academic achievement. If the school has the proper environment to let this student excel, the government should have no say in whether that student can be admitted. If DEI is unfair, then so is every boardroom built on bloodlines, every scholarship built on jump shots and every political appointee built on donations instead of competence. When equity lifts someone unlike you, it's called injustice. When it lifts your cousin, it's called networking. Marty Kleinbart, Miami Distorting freedom Re: the July 4 op-ed by Paul Mullen of the Heritage Foundation, 'This Independence Day, you're not as free as you think.' Astonishing how certain segments of our populace judge freedom only within the confines of their own interests and priorities. Taxes are pervasive and government is overwhelming, but Mullen didn't mention the massive add to the national debt recently approved by self-serving politicians. He mentioned zoning restrictions, but ignored the benefits to neighbors and neighborhoods. He vilified vaccine mandates, but ignored that unless the unvaccinated stay home, they can infect others. He completely dismissed the million-plus Americans who died of COVID-19 and the reemergence of measles. He mentioned the Second Amendment, but again ignored how many innocents die or are injured by gun violence. Considering his cry for liberty, he completely disregarded book bans, abortion rights and other issues that should be personal decisions, as they do not impact quality of life or cause physical injury beyond the immediately concerned. The hypocrisy is astounding. Linda S. Conner, Miami Sewage issue Lots of noise, but no one asks the obvious question: where is the sewage from Alligator Alcatraz being processed and discharged? If that answer isn't at hand, then we know no ecological plans or impact studies were made. That's grounds for a court to shut it down. It is that simple. Jared Sherman, Tamarac Gubernatorial choice I've listened to U.S. Rep. Byron Donalds on several important occasions and have come away with great respect for this young politician. He would be the first African American to serve as governor of Florida. He is well-deserved and well-equipped to lead us. Roger Shatanoff, Coral Gables Dade's waste July 16 is another decision day for Miami-Dade County commissioners. Do we stick with past policies of waste management by burning our garbage, or should we use this opportunity to innovate with programs that divert our waste stream to more useful solutions? Commissioners have offered several resolutions for reducing our landfills, such as composting, collection stations, Pay-As-You-Throw, mulching yard debris, recycling construction debris and more. Meanwhile, small businesses are finding ways to reuse or repair. The best news is that we won't need to waste $1.5 billion for a new incinerator. Noel Cleland, Miami Much ado . . . There was great fanfare with the announced meeting of Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and President Trump in the White House recently. So much was at stake: hostages who were to be released on day one of Trump's presidency; war in Gaza with a growing death toll; suffering and starvation of trapped children. What transpired? No joint accomplishments released. No news events. Nada. Well, just one thing: Netanyahu would nominate Trump for the Nobel Peace award. Doug Kostowski, Kendall Pageants and politics Before Fidel Castro ran Cuba, that nation had six provinces. In time, he divided them to create 15. Did anyone notice that the recent Miss Universe Cuba pageant celebrated that geographic nomenclature? Were pageant organizers paying homage to pre- or post-Castro Cuba? Leo Bueno, Coral Gables Carry each other Many weeks ago, I had an image of elephants in the wild forming a circle around their young. They protect the most vulnerable among them in the herd. We, as a caring community, must embrace and help the most vulnerable among us — those hardest hit by the heartless policies of President Trump. Let's give a triumphant lion's roar for all who protested against those policies, from immigration raids to No Kings Day. We are all vulnerable to his Big Blustery Bill. We must help one another and keep up the 'good trouble' with protests and letter writing. Connie Goodman-Milone, Miami Springs legend I was deeply saddened to read in the July 8 Miami Herald the obituary of Miami Springs retired police officer Don Mazzone. He was the archetypal motorman responsible for giving Miami Springs the reputation of being a speed trap, but to Springs residents he was a protector, keeping crime low and the streets safe for our kids to ride their bikes. Every member of my family, myself included, at one time or another was pulled over by Officer Mazzone, sometimes more than once. If a citation was issued, it was well deserved. He had a gruff exterior and a heart of gold and I am thankful for his dedication and service. Felix Jimenez, Miami Show of shows I saw Elvis Presley in 1956 performing at the Olympia Theater for $1.50 while he was still causing hysteria among girls across America. I also saw guitarist B.B. King perform there in the early 1990s. Perfect acoustics. At the Coconut Grove Playhouse, I saw the play 'Equus' and I also saw jazz pianist and composer Oscar Peterson perform live. Because neither venue provides live performances anymore, the only real entertainment in town would be to attend a live Miami City Commission meeting. Mark Osman, Kendall

Inside the Times' sick scaremongering on New Yorkers losing health care
Inside the Times' sick scaremongering on New Yorkers losing health care

New York Post

timea day ago

  • New York Post

Inside the Times' sick scaremongering on New Yorkers losing health care

The New York Times' lead headline Thursday was outright, deceptive fearmongering: 'Why 1.5 Million New Yorkers Could Lose Health Insurance Under Trump Bill.' Yet the story was little more than a rewrite of Democratic campaign releases. For starters, many of its figures come from health-care bosses and state officials ever eager to maximize their take in federal dollars — and with a keen interest in overestimating the damage. Advertisement These sources, and the Times itself, won't talk much about the obscene amounts (tens of billions) that New York spends on government-subsidized health care — or how much of that bill Washington winds up footing. Let alone note that many who lose coverage under this law can — and surely will — find other plans to cover their health care, whether public or private. Advertisement Nor are they eager to admit how the state completely games the system to suck up federal bucks. Or how individuals themselves game — or outright defraud — Medicaid. Last year, the Empire Center's Bill Hammond found that 'as many as 3 million New Yorkers appear to be receiving state-sponsored health coverage from Medicaid or the Essential Plan despite having incomes above the eligibility limits' — but the state doesn't bother checking. Advertisement That's millions who likely should lose their coverage because they don't qualify: Where's the injustice in the GOP's new law forcing the issue? It's true that the One Big Beautiful Bill Act aims to (slightly) restrain the growth of federal Medicaid outlays, with an eye on keeping the program solvent for those who truly need it. It does this by targeting much of the waste and fraud: One key provision, for example, requires young, able-bodied Medicaid recipients to work at least 80 hours a month. The Times somehow doesn't explain what's wrong with that. Another cuts off federal aid for noncitizens: That includes hundreds of thousands in the Essential Plan, which is almost entirely funded by the feds, and reimburses providers at more than twice the Medicaid rate. Advertisement And still, the plan has raked in so much federal dough that it's built huge surpluses — amounting to nearly an estimated $12 billion through the 2024-25 fiscal year. Yet people who qualify for the Essential Plan are not the poorest of the poor; indeed, they make too much to qualify for Medicaid (which in itself cover about a third of New York's population, going far above the poverty line). Voters across the nation don't want to cover noncitizens (particularly illegal migrants); if New York politicians insist on it, they can find the cash elsewhere in the bloated state budget. Look: Medicaid outlays have soared this last decade, as Democrats juke the rules as a stealthy route to nationalized health insurance; this is a huge reason why Uncle Sam's deficits now reach $2 trillion a year. And the GOP law only begins to dent future increases. Liberals and Democrats are desperate to paint this modest restraint as dealing a harsh blow to the needy: Telling the truth won't help them win any voters back. How pathetic that they see their best interests served by leaving Medicaid, and the nation, on track to go bankrupt.

Pew: Most adults say health insurers overly influence health policy
Pew: Most adults say health insurers overly influence health policy

UPI

timea day ago

  • UPI

Pew: Most adults say health insurers overly influence health policy

Most adults surveyed agree that health insurers have too much influence over health policy in the United States, the Pew Research Center reported on Thursday. File Photo by Thomas Maresca/UPI | License Photo July 10 (UPI) -- Whether identifying as Republicans or Democrats, about 70% of adults surveyed say health insurers exert too much influence over health policy, according to the Pew Research Center. Among all adults, 69%, including 69% of Democrats and 71% of Republicans, cited too much influence on health policy by insurers, Pew reported. Relatively small percentages of respondents said health insurers have either not enough influence, 9%, or about the right amount, also 9%. Among adults who identify as Republicans, 7% said health insurers don't have enough influence, and 11% said their level of influence is about the right amount. That compares to 10% and 8%, respectively, among adults who are Democrats. Centers for Disease Control's influence on health policy Opinions on the level of health policy influence by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention differ more among survey respondents. Among all adults surveyed, 33% said the CDC does not have enough influence, versus 27% saying it has about the right amount, and 25% saying it has too much. When broken down among political parties, 15% of Republicans and 53% of Democrats said the CDC does not have enough influence on health policy. Another 26% of Republicans said the CDC has about the right amount and 45% too much influence over health policy. Democrats, 27%, were nearly equal in saying the CDC has about the right amount of influence, while 8% said it has too much. Opinions differ on health scientists' influence on health policy When it comes to the influence of health scientists on health policy, 51% of adults surveyed said such scientists don't have enough influence, while 19% said they have about the right amount. Another 14% said health scientists have too much influence. Significant differences exist between adults who identify as Republicans and those who identify as Democrats. A third of Republicans surveyed said health scientists don't have enough influence, versus 70% of Democrats saying health scientists have insufficient influence. Among Republicans, 28% said health scientists have about the right amount of influence, and another 22% said they have too much. That compares to 11% and 7%, respectively, among Democrats. Greater agreement on health problems Larger majorities of 79% or more of those surveyed, regardless of political affiliation, agreed that cancer, obesity, heart disease and opioid addiction are major problems in the United States. Narrower majorities said Alzheimer's disease and loneliness are major health problems, with 64% and 55%, respectively, indicating so. When it comes to bird flu and measles, nearly equal majorities of 55% and 57%, respectively, said they are minor problems. The Pew Research Center conducted the survey in April and May.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store