State set to devote extra funds to big projects, but where is the money coming from?
budget
and where is the money going to come from?
We should get some clue from the second major document, the Summer Economic Statement (SES), which looks at the outlook for the budget.
Here, the key question is whether extra spending has left less room for day-to-day supports and tax reductions to be factored into the budget.
The SES will give some indication of room for manoeuvre in the budget – in other words, what the package on the day will cost. The budget ministers,
Paschal Donohoe
and
Jack Chambers
, are likely to indicate that less money is available this year.
READ MORE
David McWilliams on how 'big incentives' to build could save Dublin city
Listen |
36:51
They are also likely to repeat the assertion that there is no
cost-of-living
package this year. How both of these commitments survive the run-up to the actual budget remains to be seen.
A key issue to watch for concerns budget overruns and whether the Government is going to take action to stop them happening this year.
The Irish Fiscal Advisory Council, the budget watchdog, has said that the spending allocations for this year were flawed from day one, because they failed to build in overruns in 2024. With the council estimating overruns of €2 billion-plus this year, does the Cabinet plan to rein these in? And what does it mean for 2026?
The goal of keeping spending growth to 5 per cent a year, set in 2021, was quickly consigned to the dustbin. So, what will now replace it? Or is it just a case of spending whatever cash is available every year?
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
12 minutes ago
- Irish Times
The Irish Times view on the choices facing the EU: finding its place in a changing world
European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen and European Council president Antonio Costa will be in Beijing on Thursday for an EU-China summit that is overshadowed by disputes over market access, export controls and Russia's war in Ukraine. Just over a week later, the United States is due to impose a 30 per cent tariff on goods imported from the EU, unless a deal is agreed before then. When Donald Trump announced his tariffs on about 60 countries and trading blocs four months ago, they looked set to push China and the EU closer together. But relations between Brussels and Beijing have deteriorated so sharply in recent weeks that China has scaled back this week's summit, which will now last for just one day instead of two as originally planned. The US, which at one stage imposed a 145 per cent tariff on Chinese goods, is now negotiating with China and Trump is expected to meet Xi Jinping later this year. Washington has lifted its ban on the export of some advanced semiconductors to China and Beijing has restored the supply of rare earth magnets to the US. For much of the 21st century, Europe could rely on Russia for energy, the US for security, and China as an export market. But Vladimir Putin's full-scale invasion of Ukraine three years ago severed the EU's economic relationship with Russia, Trump has brought the US security guarantee into question and China has lost much of its appetite for high-end European products. READ MORE Most EU member-states now see Russia, which has the world's largest nuclear arsenal, as a potentially existential security threat if it prevails in Ukraine and they are ramping up defence spending accordingly. However, Trump's support for Ukraine is contingent at best and could be deployed as a bargaining chip if the EU responds aggressively to tariffs by using its Anti-Coercion Instrument to target US services, intellectual property rights and foreign direct investment. The EU's fear of Russia, its grievances against China and its anxiety about the US's intentions are all based in reality and Europe needs to become more self-reliant in defence while protecting its industrial base from Chinese competition. But its response to a rapidly changing geopolitical environment has too often been piecemeal, defensive and lacking in vision. Mario Draghi's report on competitiveness and Enrico Letta's on the single market last year offered bold blueprints for action to combat Europe's economic weaknesses. The EU needs similarly fresh thinking on its place in the world, the security architecture of the continent, the future of the transatlantic relationship, the rise of China and the growing importance of middle powers such as Brazil and Saudi Arabia in an increasingly multipolar world.
Irish Independent
13 minutes ago
- Irish Independent
Michael O'Leary criticised for ‘insulting' comments on Dublin metro
The 18.8km rail line, most of which will be underground, is to run from north of Swords to Charlemont in the south of Dublin city centre. Various metro projects for the capital have been proposed in recent decades but none have proceeded to build stage. On Tuesday, the Government announced that the MetroLink project would get a €2bn boost in funding as part of the national development plan, in what Taoiseach Micheal Martin said was "a very definitive commitment to the metro". While Finance Minister Paschal Donohoe indicated the latest estimated cost for the MetroLink was 11 billion euro, Mr O'Leary claimed it would cost 20 billion euro, "so about a billion a kilometre". "Dublin Airport doesn't need it, Dublin Airport passengers won't use it - they're already well-served by buses," he told RTÉ Radio on Wednesday, while claiming that less than a third of the airport's passengers use buses. He said that while the tube in London runs from Heathrow and through "all of London", the Metro will only serve a section of Dublin city's residents - around 100,000 people, he claimed. "Here's the madness of this. This thing is going to start at Stephen's Green in the morning. If you want to get to our first wave of departures, which leave at about 6.30 in the morning, you need to be at the airport at 5.30am. "Are you seriously going to drive into the centre of Stephen's Green, where there's no car parking, to get this metro to get to Dublin Airport for 5.30 in the morning? No, you're not. "Let me give you the alternative scenario: for €100m, this year we could buy 400 buses, and 400 buses would provide exactly the same capacity as this metro from Dublin Airport, in through Ballymun, in through Drumcondra, on bus lanes that already exist." He claimed the plan had not been properly costed and hit out at the Government's handling of public finances. "This Government wasted €330,000 on a bike shed, imagine what they do with an 18-kilometre underground train from an airport?" He also criticised comments by Mr Martin, who said the Irish capital will not be sustainable without a metro. "Does he not understand that the buses actually will all be electrified by the end of this decade, which will actually be greener than light rail?" Labour TD Duncan Smith said Mr O'Leary's criticisms of public infrastructure were as sure "as night follows day". "Dubliners are stuck in daily gridlock. MetroLink is their best chance at affordable, reliable transport that serves communities, not corporate profits. "As a consistent advocate for MetroLink in Swords, I find it insulting to hear this kind of drive-by commentary from someone who clearly doesn't rely on public transport to get to work. "Dublin deserves better than a transport plan from a billionaire whose only experience with buses is when he is pretending to be one." When asked about his endorsement of Enterprise Minister Peter Burke and junior minister Robert Troy during the general election campaign, Mr O'Leary claimed "they're not in government" and criticised Mr Martin again. "I endorsed Peter Burke, who actually topped the poll despite the criticism. I also endorsed Robert Troy - and they're not the government."
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
The Irish Times view on funding water infrastructure: the €12 billion spanner
The squeaky wheel gets the grease, or perhaps in the case of Uisce Éireann the dripping tap gets the €12 billion spanner. For months, the utility has been decrying its lack of funds at every opportunity in a concerted and coordinated fashion to ensure the Government and the public could be in no doubt that unless pipes went into the ground there would be no more homes. In March the utility's chairman Jerry Grant told a Royal Institute of the Architects of Ireland conference that the State's water and sewerage systems were in 'a desperate state' because of 'extraordinary complacency' and 'passive indifference' to investment in infrastructure. The goal of building 50,000 homes on average each year could not be met unless there was a 'new approach from the Government' in developing water services, Grant said, READ MORE The utility has to be commended for taking this forthright approach. After all, the strategy worked. A hefty chunk has been allocated to Uisce Éireann u nder the National Development Pla n – €2 billion in equity funding, another €2.5 billion for new large-scale projects, and €7.6 billion to improve water services. The establishment of Irish Water was predicated on a model where, like other utility providers such as electricity and gas companies, user charges would provide its core funding. When in 2016 household charges were suspended and subsequently scrapped, the utility was left – so to speak – high and dry, largely reliant on the annual State budget which mitigated against long-term planning. Finally, the Government appears to be realising that certainty is funding is needed for these vital infrastructural investments, rather than State organisations having to wait to see what emerges in each budget. Private sector infrastructure investors in national projects need similar reassurance. Ministers now recognise the need to guarantee a flow of funding over a long period of years. Whether they can deliver on this if the budget numbers get tight is, of course, the big question.
