Committee explores nuclear solutions to AI demand
The Energy Subcommittee hearing — to be led by Chair Randy Weber (R-Texas) — continues Republicans' early focus and significant concern regarding supply and demand in the 119th Congress. They believe baseload energy sources, such as nuclear and fossil fuels, need to be built at a rapid pace to offset a surge in intermittent, renewable energy generation that could put grid reliability at risk.
Indeed, transmission providers are forecasting an 8.2 percent growth in electricity load over the next five years primarily due to AI data center proliferation. That's equivalent to hooking up nearly 50 million homes to the grid by 2029.
Advertisement
But whether nuclear energy can actually meet that demand remains a point of debate among energy and policy experts.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
15 minutes ago
Which Republican senators voted against Trump's agenda bill and why
President Donald Trump's tax cut and spending bill came down to the wire as Senate Republican leaders scrambled to get all GOP members on board before the final vote Tuesday. In the end, three long-serving GOP members, Susan Collins of Maine, Rand Paul of Kentucky and Thom Tillis of North Carolina voted against, forcing Vice President JD Vance to break a 50-50 tie. Each of the three has explained their reasons for bucking the president. Susan Collins One of the mostly closely watched as the vote neared was Collins, who had been on the fence due to the bill's proposed Medicaid cuts. "Approximately 400,000 Mainers – nearly a third of the state's population – depend on this program," she said in a statement after voting no. "A dramatic reduction in future Medicaid funding, an estimated $5.9 billion in Maine over the next 10 years, could threaten not only Mainers' access to health care, but also the very existence of several of our state's rural hospitals." Collins added that the bill had "additional problems." "The tax credits that energy entrepreneurs have relied on should have been gradually phased out so as not to waste the work that has already been put into these innovative new projects and prevent them from being completed," she said. Thom Tillis Tillis has been extremely vocal in his opposition sine the weekend, drawing attention for a passionate floor speech citing Medicaid provisions he claimed would hurt his North Carolina constituents. During a closed-door GOP conference meeting two weeks ago, Tillis is reported to have made the point that Medicaid coverage for more than 600,000 North Carolinians would be at risk under the Senate's proposal and asked his colleagues to consider how the policy would affect their own states -- even providing state-specific data on a handout. "I just encouraged other members to go to their states and just measure how ... take a look at the proposed cuts and tell me whether or not you can absorb it in the normal course of business, and in many cases, you're gonna find that you can't," Tillis told reporters at the Capitol last week. Trump lashed out against Tillis on his social media platform and to the press and threatened to field primary challengers. Tillis announced on Saturday that he would not seek reelection. Rand Paul Paul, a staunch advocate for keeping spending and the debt ceiling in check, posted on X that he wanted the bill to include a 90% reduction in the ceiling. "No earmarks. No handouts. Just real fiscal reform. I wasn't looking for favors. I wasn't horse-trading. I was fighting for the American people and against our out-of-control debt," he said. "Bottom line: I offered my vote for fiscal sanity. Congress chose to sell out taxpayers instead. Only once the bill is released, we will know what the true price was," Paul added.
Bloomberg
15 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Senators Came to Their Senses on AI Regulation Ban
Some sense has prevailed in the Senate — a 99-1 vote against a provision in its huge tax and spending bill that would have banned state-level artificial-intelligence laws for the next 10 years. It's been just 944 dizzying days since ChatGPT was launched into the world — imagine what might have happened over the next 3,653. A last-gasp effort to amend the bill, which included reducing 10 years to five, also failed. The new wording would have been more onerous than the original, decimating existing state laws on facial recognition and data privacy. New laws will need to tackle AI-triggered issues on discrimination, recruitment and mental health. The matter is simply too urgent to be left only in Washington's hands. Senators rightly saw through the moratorium as doing the bidding of big tech companies that want free rein to do as they please in the insatiable race to build and sell AI.
CBS News
16 minutes ago
- CBS News
Michigan lawmakers, officials react to passage of federal spending bill
The U.S. Senate narrowly passed President Trump's massive tax and spending bill Tuesday, with a tie ultimately broken by Vice President JD Vance. The bill that was referred to by Republicans as the "Big, Beautiful Bill" now goes back to the House for a final vote and then to the president's desk, possibly by the end of this week. All Senate Democrats voted against the bill, including Michigan Senators Gary Peters and Elissa Slotkin. Here are some of the reactions and statements issued by Michigan officials and organizations as the vote was announced. U.S. Senator Gary Peters, D-Michigan "Democrats did everything in our power to stop this legislation, but President Trump and Republicans in Congress are dead set on selling out hardworking Michiganders so they can pay for a massive tax cut for billionaires. This bill is reckless, irresponsible, and an unconscionable betrayal of American families. I voted no," Sen. Gary Peters said. U.S. Senator Elissa Slotkin, D-Michigan "After more than 25 hours on the Senate floor, I voted no on the so-called 'One Big Beautiful Bill.' No matter which way you slice it – health care, energy, housing – the President just rammed through a bill that will make Michiganders pay in every part of their lives. All so the wealthiest among us can get a tax break," Sen. Elissa Slotkin said. Curtis Hertel, chair of the Michigan Democratic Party "Millions of Michiganders will see their costs go up thanks to Republicans in DC choosing to help billionaires over working families. Republicans are trying to gut Medicaid and SNAP programs and put thousands of jobs, and even more lives, at risk as hospitals are forced to close and families lose coverage," Michigan Democratic Party chair Curtis Hertel said. "This budget is not just cruel, it's stupid and a financial disaster for our state and the whole country." Charlesetta Wilson, director of nursing homes at SEIU Healthcare Michigan "This legislation is a direct attack on the health and dignity of Michigan's working families. It would rip more than a trillion dollars from Medicaid and other essential programs our communities rely on just to fund more tax breaks for billionaires. ... We're calling on Michigan's U.S. House delegation to vote no," Charlesetta Wilson, director of nursing homes at SEIU Healthcare Michigan, said. Michigan League for Public Policy "The shock of this bill is hard to overstate. Republican leaders just voted to spend trillions of dollars to increase poverty and hunger, to strip away health coverage, and to create the biggest redistribution of wealth from poor to rich in U.S. history. Much of the bill — including billions of dollars to be spent on a 'mass deportation plan' that could upend our nation's immigration system — lacks specificity and gives full discretion to the Trump administration, not Congress. And this shortsighted, harmful bill also adds $2.4 trillion to the nation's deficit. It's just staggering," read a statement from the Michigan League for Public Policy.
