
Organ-chips not ready to replace animal studies
EXAM ROOM
One of the cutting-edge technologies the Food and Drug Administration wants to use to replace animal studies might not be ready for a solo performance.
Organ-on-a-chip technology, which uses human cells on microfluidic chips to mimic the structure and function of organs in a laboratory setting, can't yet replace animal tests, according to a new Government Accountability Office report.
Standing in the way: Challenges include cost, availability of materials, a time-intensive process and the need for highly trained staff to operate the technology. OOCs aren't standardized, which makes reproducibility difficult. The National Institute of Standards and Technology told the GAO that standards are needed, particularly for multi-organ chips, but the technology is evolving too rapidly to set them.
The report also highlights a lack of agreed-upon benchmarks for OOCs and validation studies.
However, OOCs could work alongside animal studies, particularly for exploring toxicity, the GAO said. It also found that OOCs could be used in lieu of animal studies for certain standardized tests, for example, to assess skin damage from a compound.
Some recommendations: GAO called for policies that:
— Increase access to diverse, high-quality human cells
— Create standards around the technology
— Encourage more research and validation studies
— Provide regulatory guidance
Notably, it said companies were confused about FDA guidance regarding OOCs. And as of the end of last year, the agency hadn't qualified an OOC for use in regulatory review. However, the FDA's Innovative Science and Technology Approaches for New Drugs pilot program accepted a letter of intent for an OOC that would eventually predict drug-induced liver injury.
What's next: 'Body-on-a-chip' is coming. Instead of chips with single organs, the next generation of OOCs will link multiple organs, including intestines, livers and kidneys— to understand how they interact.
WELCOME TO FUTURE PULSE
This is where we explore the ideas and innovators shaping health care.
Kids advocacy group Fairplay and the Electronic Privacy Information Center are asking the Federal Trade Commission to investigate whether a new kid-focused release of Google's AI chatbot Gemini is violating children privacy laws. Google says the technology is available through parent-supervised accounts and parents are free to disable it.
Share any thoughts, news, tips and feedback with Danny Nguyen at dnguyen@politico.com, Carmen Paun at cpaun@politico.com, Ruth Reader at rreader@politico.com, or Erin Schumaker at eschumaker@politico.com.
Want to share a tip securely? Message us on Signal: Dannyn516.70, CarmenP.82, RuthReader.02 or ErinSchumaker.01.
AROUND THE NATION
States are increasingly interested in making Apple and Google responsible for protecting kids from online harms.
Texas is poised to be the second state to require app stores, like Apple's App Store and Google's Google Play store, to verify their users' ages and — if they're minors — get parental consent to download apps. In March, Utah became the first state to sign an app store age-verification bill into law.
The bill sailed through the Texas House with support from 80 percent of the state Legislature and passed in the Senate by voice vote last week. Now it's awaiting Governor Greg Abbott's signature.
In practice, app stores must verify a user's age. If the user is a minor, the app store must obtain parental consent for each app download. The app stores would then relay this information to the app developer, because some apps provide different experiences based on age. However, certain apps like crisis hotlines and emergency services won't require parental consent.
Pushback: Google isn't happy about the bill's advancement (Apple also opposes this legislation). In particular, the company says there's no commercially reasonable way to verify who a child's parent is. 'Will they need to show a birth certificate or custody document to demonstrate that they have the legal authority to make decisions on behalf of a child?' asked Kareem Ghanem, Google's Senior Director of Government Affairs & Public Policy.
Google prefers a targeted approach: Send 'an age signal' with explicit parental consent only to developers whose apps pose risks to minors.
But such picking and choosing could open this legislation up to legal scrutiny.
Long-time concerns: Doctors, including former Surgeon General Vivek Murthy; parents; and even kids are frustrated with the state of online media. For years, growing evidence has suggested that social media apps wear on kids' mental health.
But social media platforms enjoy protections from a decades-old law that prevents them from being sued their platforms' content.
And states like California and Maryland that have tried to put guardrails on social media have been sued for blocking free speech.
Legal challenges: Requiring app stores to verify ages isn't likely run into First Amendment issues. What's more, the policy rests on a fairly well-established legal foundation: contract law. For years, app stores have required minors to sign lengthy contracts — the ones most people don't read — before creating accounts, and legally, it can't do that. Minors can sign contracts but they aren't legally enforceable. App store age-verification laws, however, require sign-off from a legal guardian.
Supporters hope app store accountability laws will provide a first-line defense, funneling more kids into parent-linked app store accounts. It could also render the 1998 Children's Online Privacy Protection Act, which limits the amount of data that apps and websites can collect on children under 13, more enforceable. However, the law doesn't change social media or the risks associated with those platforms.
What's next: As more states take up app-store age verification, federal lawmakers considering similar legislation are likely to feel more pressure to prioritize it.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Google is getting a boost from AI after spending billions
Google parent Alphabet (GOOG, GOOGL) is finally starting to cash in on the billions of dollars it's spending on its rapid AI buildout. The company reported better-than-anticipated earnings after the bell on Wednesday, with CEO Sundar Pichai pointing to AI as a key growth catalyst for its various products. Google cloud revenue climbed 32% and backlog, or purchase commitments from customers not yet realized, rose 38%. Search also performed better than expected during the quarter, with sales increasing 12% year over year. Wall Street previously raised concerns that chatbots and search offerings from AI upstarts like OpenAI ( Perplexity ( and Anthropic ( would steal users from Google's own Search product. But according to Pichai, Search revenue grew by double digits, and its AI Overviews feature, the small box at the top of the traditional search page that summarizes information, now has 2 billion monthly users. But Google also announced it's pouring even more money into its AI development, saying in its earnings release that it will spend an additional $10 billion on the technology this year, bringing its total capital expenditures from $75 billion to $85 billion. Despite that, analysts are riding high on Google's stock. In a note to investors on Wednesday, Jefferies analyst Brent Thill said Google's results back up its increased spending. 'After hiccups in early '23, [Google's] AI efforts picked up urgency and have now delivered benchmark-leading Gemini 2.5 Pro models,' Thill wrote. 'This is starting to show up in [key performance indicators], with Cloud [revenue accelerating] to 32% [year over year] from 28%, tokens processed 2x to 980 [trillion] tokens since April, and search ad [revenue accelerating] to 12% from 10%. This confidence supports '25 [capital expenditures] raise to $85B.' Morgan Stanley's Brian Nowak offered a similar outlook for Google, raising the firm's price target on the tech giant from $205 to $210. Wedbush's Scott Devitt also raised his price target on the company to $225. Malik Ahmed Khan at Morningstar pointed out that while AI Overview searches are monetizing at the same rate as standard Google searches, 'AI Overviews are helping increase search volumes within Google Search, with the feature driving over 10% more queries, leading to additional sales within the Search segment.' But behind all of that are the potentially devastating consequences from a judge's decision that held it liable for antitrust violations in search. Judge Amit Mehta of the US District Court for the District of Columbia is expected to issue a ruling on "remedies" that follows the Justice Department's victory against the company sometime next month. Judge Mehta held that Google violated antitrust law by boxing out rivals in the online search engine and online search text markets. To restore competition, he could order Google to refrain from longstanding exclusivity deals like the one with Apple (AAPL) that set Google Search as the default option on the iPhone. Mehta could also force Google to sell off its Chrome browser, the most popular web browser in the world. That would put a dent in Google's all-important search business, a dangerous proposition for the Daniel Howley at dhowley@ Follow him on X/Twitter at @DanielHowley. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data


Android Authority
15 minutes ago
- Android Authority
Facer is finally returning to Wear OS 5 smartwatches
Rita El Khoury / Android Authority TL;DR Popular custom watch face distributor Facer is embracing Google's latest Watch Face Format with hundreds of thousands of new compatible watch faces. With this revamp, Facer will regain support on smartwatches running Wear OS 5 and newer versions. Additionally, Facer is bringing new watch faces, a new social feed, and an energy consumption label for watch faces. In 2023, Google set out to improve the state of battery-hungry third-party watch faces on Wear OS. It introduced a new standard called Watch Face Format (or WFF) and started blocking legacy watch faces on Wear OS 5 — stifling third-party watch face marketplaces in the process — to ensure an effective transition. In response to these changes, Facer, the most popular provider of watch faces, is adopting WFF support and reviving compatibility for newer Wear OS devices, including the recently launched Galaxy Watch 8 series and upcoming Pixel Watch 4. WFF creates a lighter environment for the watch face to exist and operate. It essentially enables custom watch face designers to create lightweight XML-based variations without executable code. While designers can configure the visual elements, the Wear OS platform handles the rest. In essence, this saves battery and processing resources on the watch. However, WFF's downside is that it can limit visual effects, such as depth, shadows, and movement, making the watch faces appear very digital. Since Google has left no alternatives for developers, Facer's move was inevitable. With today's update, numerous watch faces in Facer's library have been revised in WFF format, with a primary focus on Wear OS 5 and 6. It says that 'hundreds of thousands' of watch faces are already available in the new store, which is a good sign. Facer Facer is also launching new watch faces to celebrate the transition. Besides watch faces by indie developers, it has official collaborations with big franchises, such as Fallout, Star Trek, and The Smurfs, etc., and is now introducing an official range of SpongeBob SquarePants faces. It will soon add more options from Borderlands 4, Call of Duty: Black Ops 7, and Masters of the Universe. In addition to adopting the newer standard, listings for Facer's watch faces will now display a 'Power Impact' score, similar to energy ratings of appliances, to inform users about a particular watch face's tendency to hog the smartwatch's battery. Along with these changes, Facer is introducing a new section, called 'Looks,' to its Android and iPhone apps. Looks is a social feed where Facer users will be able to upload pictures of their watch faces, which will be automatically linked back to the app's download page. This will roll out based on the region. The section will also link back to Facer's official watch bands for various supported smartwatches. Note that you should ensure checking for compatibility if you have just bought the Galaxy Watch 8, since it uses a redesigned lug mechanism and won't support watch bands from older models. For watch face designers, Facer also brings a simpler Creator hub to help them generate WFF faces. Finally, to entice new users who may have missed using the app on the smartwatches running Wear OS 5 or newer versions, Facer is offering an introductory annual subscription of $14.99 (which is usually $19.99 for the first year and $39.99 thereafter). While there are no promos for existing Facer Premium subscribers, the company is offering 50% off on watch bands. Got a tip? Talk to us! Email our staff at Email our staff at news@ . You can stay anonymous or get credit for the info, it's your choice.


CNET
15 minutes ago
- CNET
I've Tried Making My iPad An Almost Mac With iPadOS 26 Beta
I can see the light on the horizon. In the near future I'm carrying just an iPad around, and it's my full everyday computer. The Macbook becomes a distant memory. Apple hasn't made my ultimate fantasy true yet, but with iPadOS 26 it comes closer than ever.. The newest operating system for iPads, expected to officially debut this fall, is now available to try in a public beta. It adds Mac-like features galore including a new multitasking mode, flexible windows, little window-sizing buttons that can snap things into formation, menu bars, even a Preview app. The little mouse icon you get in keyboard-and-trackpad mode is now like a Mac arrow, too. It's a lot to take in and try. I generally like all the changes Apple's made on iPadOS 26, and while I normally recommend people skip public betas and just get the final version in the fall,the changes this time are probably worth trying now if you're at all interested in Mac-ifying your iPad. I'm using the iPad as a Mac replacement to write and even file this article now, and it has its ups and downs. Watch this: iPadOS 26 Almost Turns Your iPad Into a Mac 01:22 Menu Bars (sort of) replicate menus on the Mac Apps now have pull-down menus in iPadOS 26 that can show a whole bunch of actions that were previously hidden, or relegated to icons, gestures and obscure keyboard shortcuts. Apple auto-populates menu bars for existing iPad apps with all the keyboard shortcut actions in that app, plus a general set of actions that are consistent across apps. I love the change.: Menu bars hide until you scroll over them with a mouse cursor with keyboard/trackpad, or pull them down with your finger. They don't get in the way. The nested list of extra functions is easier for me to browse than guessing at whatever user interface magic trick I was supposed to know in that app and forgot. For writing - like this story - it makes using the iPad feel even more laptop-like. But, as I expect in beta software, some apps aren't working perfectly with menu bars yet. Google Docs is currently acting weird, for instance. Also, on iPad, Google tries to force you to launch into its Docs standalone app rather than write in-browser. That's a taste of the strangeness that still lurks in iPadOS 26, and hopefully gets fixed by the fall launch. Much like what Apple promised back at WWDC, it's more possible to stack lots of apps at once. Your limit is mostly screen size. Apple Screenshot Windows are far more flexible Thanks to new sets of colored dots in the upper left of each window, which mirror what's already on Macs, you can minimize/maximize/resize iPad windows a lot more fluidly. Tiling options pop up in the same way they do on Macs, and any window can be dragged around and resized. The window size freedom also seems more flexible. Before, the UI would try to bounce you back to certain size options. There are still minimums to how much you can shrink the width and length of apps, but it feels better. You can also keep stacking and layering windows as much as you'd like within your particular iPad's limits. Apple's been somewhat vague on this aspect, but more powerful iPads can simultaneously layer more apps. On an M1 11-inch iPad Air, I simultaneously had 11 apps open and going without it stopping me. I didn't see any signs of limits ahead. Yes, my small screen started to feel like an impossibly layered clutter, and I had no way of seeing everything at once unless I swiped up with three fingers to see icons of all my open apps, but it was still serious multitasking. The layout and design of certain apps still isn't ideal for all this new screen sizing. I find some apps still have way too much empty space or large mobile-friendly icons, and I wish they'd shrink to more laptop-style layouts to fit the new possibilities. Google's Docs app is a prime example. Safari still isn't quite the same as Mac browser I still find working in-browser on an iPad to be a weird experience. iPads are more about apps, just like the iPhone. Also, web pages aren't always going to load or function the same on an iPad as on a Mac. Sometimes they do, and sometimes they don't. My work CMS, where I produce this and other articles, works mostly fine in iPadOS Safari, but not on Google's Chrome iPadOS browser. Some in-browser tools don't load or work the same. It's still a bit hit and miss, and even though it's gotten better, I feel a lot more comfortable with a Mac's fully functional browsers. Other apps may vary, too That's the biggest ongoing challenge with living your life on an iPad vs a Mac: the app libraries are literally different. Apple's been improving the crossflow feel between both, and the Files browser on iPad now shows folders and stackable views in ways that feel more Mac-like. But dragging and dropping files can still feel weird depending on how an app is prepped to handle it. Dragging photos into browsers doesn't feel the same as on a Mac, for instance. It's close, but a little different. Pro apps on iPads still need to evolve. Apple has a subscription-based version of its Final Cut and Logic Pro apps on iPad while you can fully buy the versions on Mac. Some art tools on iPad exceed what Macs can do, but other graphics or coding tools are likely to still feel better on Macs. I don't live in those realms much. For my life, I'm more of a writer and editor living in CMS and with a bunch of work apps. I can get things done on the iPad now better than before, but there are some uncanny moments. That's why I'm still using a Mac for work. But I'm ready to bridge, and I hope iPadOS 26 is part of that bridge. Try it out, but as good as the improvements are, it's not all there yet.