Northern Irish LGBTQ+ organisations to celebrate milestone anniversaries at special event
The event will kick off with a champagne reception and a four-course meal, followed by interactive entertainment featuring cabaret performances, live game shows and bingo. Adding to the significance of this occasion, it will also host the prestigious Tolerantia Awards, presented by the European Alliance Against Homophobia.
Ver esta publicación en Instagram
Una publicación compartida de HereNI (@hereni_)
The veteran charity will be Cara-Friend. This LGBTQ+ organisation has spent 50 years supporting the physical, mental, and emotional well-being of the LGBTQ+ community in Northern Ireland.
Alongside this event, Cara-Friend is also hosting an exhibition throughout February in The Linen Hall called Founding Cara-Friend, which tells the story of the establishment of the charity and features a series of moving portraits of founding volunteers of the organisation.
Steve Williamson, Director of Cara-Friend, said, 'Having reached our 50th year of support for LGBTQ+ people in Northern Ireland, we're so proud of the work we've done and continue to do in support of our communities. We hope that our service users, past and present, who have grown up through Cara-Friend's youth service and other services across the sector feel the same pride in being part of our collective story'.
Second in line is The Rainbow Project, celebrating its 30th anniversary. Its dedicated staff, seasonal workers and volunteers located all across their offices in Belfast work devotedly for the cause. They offer services which mitigate the impacts of discrimination, and they also provide training, campaigning and policy work.
Scott Cuthbertson, CEO of the Rainbow Project, stated, 'We've come a long way since Rainbow was founded as a health and wellbeing organisation for gay and bisexual men: we have grown and shifted into a service provider and campaigning organisation for all LGBTQ+ communities, and we look forward to progressing LGBTQ+ equality for the next 30 years.'
Last but not least, HERe NI will complete the total sum of 100 years as it marks 20 years of advocacy for the LGBTQ+ community, especially with lesbians and bisexual women.
Cara McCann, Director of HEReNI, said, '20 years ago, Northern Ireland's first organisation for lesbian and bisexual women was founded in response to a lack of support and space for those women to connect and build community'.
Currently, a remarkable aspect of their work is engaging with LGBTQ+ women on the issues that matter to them, and then raising these issues at government level.
If you are interested in attending the event to celebrate these magnificent collective 100 years of achievements, dedication and advocacy for the Northern Irish LGBTQ+ community, tickets are available at The Rainbow's Project website.
The post Northern Irish LGBTQ+ organisations to celebrate milestone anniversaries at special event appeared first on GCN.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Engadget
2 days ago
- Engadget
VILE: Exhumed is an unjust casualty in Steam's sweeping censorship campaign
Over the past few weeks, thousands of video games have been banned, removed and delisted from Steam and The justifications for doing so have been almost comically vague, and at least one highly anticipated title is now unable to be sold despite containing nothing objectionable. It started in early July, when payment processors including Visa, Mastercard and PayPal established new regulations concerning the types of games they would allow to be sold on the PC gaming platforms they support. The exact details of these regulations have not been made public. What we do know is that, in response on July 16, Steam added a sweepingly vague clause to its ruleset banning ' certain kinds of adult only content .' Hundreds of games were removed from the platform. On July 24, rolled out its own rule change and summarily deindexed every adult and NSFW game it hosted, which amounted to more than 20,000 titles being hidden from search and browse pages. is currently auditing this bunch and preparing to introduce new compliance measures for NSFW games. Among the games swept up in this tidal wave of censorship is VILE: Exhumed, the latest project from solo developer Cara Cadaver of Final Girl Games and publisher DreadXP. To view this content, you'll need to update your privacy settings. Please click here and view the "Content and social-media partners" setting to do so. VILE: Exhumed takes place in the files and preserved BBS chatrooms of an old PC, as players hunt for clues in the disappearance of adult film actress Candy Corpse. It's an unsettling psychological experience that's mainly text-based, and it offers pixelated commentary on misogyny, sexual entitlement and parasocial relationships. VILE: Exhumed has been praised in multiple previews , even earning a place in Six One Indie' s Best of PAX East lineup this May. It was slated to hit Steam on July 22. As DreadXP director Hunter Bond and his team continued preparing the game for launch, they noticed it was taking an abnormally long time for Steam to approve its page. They submitted tickets to Steam asking for a status update, but heard nothing concrete back. The day before VILE: Exhumed was supposed to come out, Cara and DreadXP were forced to announce a delay . And On July 28, Cara announced VILE: Exhumed had been removed from Steam and banned from the platform. Steam told Cara that the action was triggered by scenes of 'sexual content with depictions of real people,' a description that she said doesn't apply to her game, since it deals in text and implication. The ban is not eligible for appeal and VILE: Exhumed can not be resubmitted to Steam. This effectively removes it from the mainstream PC gaming conversation entirely, since Steam essentially enjoys a monopoly in the market and there isn't a competing storefront with the same audience reach in town. Losing Steam access is a huge blow for small developers especially. VILE: Exhumed is a deeply personal project for Cara, one that she worked on for years. 'I poured myself into this game — it was an incredibly personal story, made up of bits and pieces of my real-life experiences, my real feelings, and was reflective of that for many other people as well," Cara told Engadget. "Silencing a story about violence, entitlement, and sexual expression (though the sexual content was all implied) shows the age we are living in, and I deeply worry for storytelling and art.' To put it clearly: Steam removed a solo female developer's game about misogynistic violence and banned her from attempting to list it ever again, and the platform's reason for doing so doesn't make sense to anyone who knows what's actually in the game. You can decide that for yourself, too: At least one full playthrough of VILE: Exhumed lives happily on YouTube , a site not known for tolerant views on nudity or adult themes. More confusingly, the original version of Cara's game, VILE , remains available and searchable on storefront, even though it includes much of the same content as Exhumed . This highlights a core issue with Steam and sudden and haphazard censorship plans. Vague rules against 'adult-only content' leave too much room for interpretation and invite overreach — especially in a society that's increasingly hostile to marginalized communities — while simultaneously doing very little to protect the audience from whatever demons the payment processors think they have identified. The rollout of the new regulations has been chaotic and already multiple games, including the horror hit Mouthwashing , have been inaccurately identified as casualties of the situation. Engadget has reached out to Visa, Mastercard and PayPal for information on what their new policies are and why they're being enacted. Only PayPal has responded with a generic statement that it does not comment on individual accounts. Valve has also not returned requests for comment. did not respond to a request for comment in time for publication. This isn't the first time Visa, Mastercard, PayPal and other major payment processors have targeted online communities for censorship. The current PC gaming bans mirror previous efforts to restrict content on PornHub, OnlyFans and Patreon , to name a few targets. This sort of financial censorship, the Electronic Frontier Foundation says , "can heavily influence what kind of speech can exist online.' The International Game Developers Association has lodged its fierce opposition to the censorship campaign, and provides avenues for players to contact Visa and Mastercard directly with their concerns. 'We are alarmed by the vague enforcement of policies delisting and deplatforming legal, consensual, and ethically-developed games, especially from LGBTQ+ and marginalized creators,' the IGDA said. 'Developers deserve clear rules, fair warnings, and the right to appeal.' In the case of VILE: Exhumed , Steam is silencing a game that can help combat gender-based sexual violence, in the name of protecting players from being harmed by these same themes. VILE: Exhumed is uncomfortable, confronting, personal and raw — and that's the beauty of small, independent games. By all accounts, it doesn't belong in the Steam ban, and it's also likely not the only game unfairly swept up in the broad censorship campaigns hitting PC platforms, pushed by payment processors. "Indie development for me has been such a beautiful opportunity to create things and tell stories that mean something to me — and I hate that that freedom of expression is being taken from myself and others," Cara said. She and DreadXP are cooking up a new distribution plan that doesn't include Steam.
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
13 Sharp Responses For When Someone's Trying To Out-Smart You Publicly
When someone tries to show you up in public, it can be annoying and downright embarrassing. Maybe it's a colleague who wants to look smart in front of the boss or a friend who feels the need to one-up your every word. Whatever the reason, it can throw you off your game. Instead of letting it get to you, having a few sharp responses up your sleeve can make all the difference. Here are 13 clever comebacks for those moments when someone's trying to out-smart you in public. 1. "Interesting Perspective. Let's Dive Deeper." Sometimes, acknowledging someone's point without directly engaging can deflate their attempt to out-smart you. By inviting them to explore the topic further, you shift the focus from a monologue to a dialogue. It shows confidence in your knowledge and willingness to engage, rather than retreat. According to communications expert Deborah Tannen, showing interest in further discussion can diffuse tension and foster constructive conversation. This approach leaves them with the choice to either backtrack or genuinely engage, giving you the upper hand by remaining composed and open-minded. This response works well in group settings because it shows you're not easily fazed. You're inviting others to join in the discussion, which can balance the power dynamic. It subtly implies that you're well-equipped to handle the topic at hand. This can be a great way to remind everyone that the conversation is a shared space, not a personal podium for one. Plus, it often leads to more productive discussions, steering away from pointless point-scoring. 2. "I See You're Passionate, But Here's Another Angle." When someone's coming at you with all they've got, acknowledging their enthusiasm can be a quick way to level the playing field. Adding your twist or perspective shows that you're not just passively listening, but actively engaging. This response can subtly remind them that there are more ways to look at a situation. You don't have to dismiss their point; instead, you're adding to it. This can often turn a competitive atmosphere into a collaborative one. By offering another angle, you're subtly asserting that your insight is equally valuable. It serves as a gentle reminder that discussions are richer with diverse viewpoints. You're not conceding defeat or acknowledging their superiority; you're broadening the conversation. It's a clever way of saying, "I respect your opinion, but I have something valuable to add.' This way, you maintain your dignity and keep the conversation constructive. 3. "What Makes You Say That?" Asking someone why they hold a particular opinion can stop them in their tracks. It encourages them to unpack their thinking, which might reveal weaknesses in their argument. Communication coach Celeste Headlee emphasizes the power of asking questions to encourage deeper discussion and critical thinking. This simple phrase can prompt them to rethink their approach, shifting focus from winning to understanding. It's a way to regain control without being confrontational or defensive. This response invites them to reconsider the basis of their argument. Often, people trying to out-smart others rely on surface-level information. By asking for their reasoning, you're prompting them to go beyond a first impression. It may become evident that they are not as informed as they initially seemed. Plus, it buys you some time to gather your thoughts, putting you back in the conversation with renewed confidence. 4. "I Appreciate Your Insight; Let's See What Others Think." When someone's running circles around you in conversation, bringing others into the fold can dilute the intensity. By acknowledging their input and then inviting others to chime in, you shift the spotlight. It's a polite way of saying, "Let's not make this just about us." You're encouraging a broader discussion that includes everyone, not just the two of you. This way, the person attempting to out-smart you isn't the focus anymore. This tactic can be particularly effective in group settings where opinions are valued. Instead of letting one person's voice dominate, you're advocating for a more democratic approach. This can subtly remind them that while their thoughts are valuable, they aren't the only ones worth listening to. Plus, it gives you a chance to collect your thoughts while others weigh in. It's a win-win for everyone involved and keeps the conversation balanced and inclusive. 5. "That's One Way To Look At It. Ever Considered...?" Offering an alternative perspective can gently challenge someone who is overly confident in their stance. It suggests that while their viewpoint is valid, it's not the only one, encouraging more inclusive thinking. As noted by psychologist Adam Grant, presenting alternative perspectives fosters open-mindedness and can lead to more innovative solutions. This approach puts you in the driver's seat without making the other person feel belittled. It sets the stage for a richer conversation without escalating tensions. You're effectively saying, "I hear you, but there's more to this story." This subtle nudge can remind them that knowledge is multifaceted. It allows you to take back some conversational control without appearing combative. They're more likely to be receptive to your input if it's framed as an exploration rather than a correction. This response can turn a one-sided lecture into a balanced exchange, elevating the quality of the conversation. 6. "I've Never Thought Of It That Way Before." Sometimes, the simplest response can be the most unexpected. When someone is trying to out-smart you, admitting that you haven't considered their point before can throw them off. It shows humility and a willingness to learn, which are powerful traits. This response can make them reconsider their approach, as they might expect you to challenge them. Instead, you catch them off-guard with a candid admission, which can be disarming. This phrase can also serve to redirect the conversation. When you say, "I've never thought of it that way before," you're implying that the conversation is opening new territories for you. It can subtly encourage them to elaborate, shifting the dynamic from adversarial to collaborative. You're demonstrating the ability to take ideas on board without losing your cool. It's a strategic way to keep the conversation open-ended and more about exploring ideas than proving points. 7. "Let's Agree To Explore More On This." When discussions get heated, proposing to explore the subject further can be a neutral ground. It acknowledges the validity of the other person's point while giving you both the chance to delve deeper. Conflict resolution expert Dr. John Gottman has found that suggesting future exploration can defuse tension and open up more productive avenues for dialogue. This approach allows you to step back from a confrontation without backing down. It signals that while you respect their opinion, the conversation isn't over. Using this tactic, you're effectively buying time and creating space for more thoughtful dialogue. It shows that you're not just reacting in the moment but are committed to understanding the subject fully. This can often lead to more respectful exchanges in the future, as both parties know there's more to be uncovered. It reframes the interaction from a battle of wits to a shared journey of discovery. Plus, it sets the stage for future discussions, keeping the conversation alive and ongoing. 8. "Can You Explain That Further For Everyone?" This response turns the tables by inviting the other person to dig deeper into their point. It subtly shifts the pressure back onto them to make sure they're clearly understood. Often, people who try to out-smart others haven't thought through their points as thoroughly as they think. By asking them to explain, you're giving them a chance to reveal any gaps in their knowledge. This tactic can reinforce that you're not intimidated and are willing to engage further. By asking for clarification, you're also encouraging them to include everyone in the discussion. It can shift the tone from competitive to cooperative, as they have to consider how to effectively communicate their ideas. This puts you back in a position of strength, as you remain calm and in control. You're not just passively listening; you're actively participating in the discussion. This can turn the conversation into a more enriching experience for everyone involved. 9. "I Can See Why You'd Think That, But Here's My Viewpoint." Acknowledging someone's logic while still presenting your own perspective can be a powerful way to assert your stance. It shows that you're not dismissing their points outright, but you have your own insights to offer. This kind of mutual recognition can transform a potentially contentious conversation into a more balanced exchange. By validating their thought process, you reduce the likelihood of defensive reactions. It sets the stage for a more constructive dialogue, rather than a debate. This response implies that you're confident enough in your own opinion to share it openly. You're not just passively accepting their argument; you're actively contributing to the discussion. It's a way of saying, "Your opinion matters, but so does mine." By emphasizing your viewpoint, you remind them that you're an informed participant, not just a passive listener. This can elevate the conversation, turning it into a space where different ideas coexist and enrich each other. 10. "That's A Valid Point. What About...?" Affirming someone's point while introducing another consideration can keep the dialogue balanced and open. This shows that you respect their input but also have something worthwhile to add. It's a diplomatic way of saying, "I'm not dismissing you, but let's broaden the conversation." By acknowledging their contribution, you demonstrate emotional intelligence and the ability to engage without clashing. This can encourage them to reciprocate, making the discussion more inclusive and well-rounded. This approach fosters an environment where different perspectives are welcomed and valued. It highlights your ability to incorporate various angles into the conversation. By saying, "What about...?" you're inviting further exploration rather than shutting down their point. This can lead to richer, more nuanced discussions that benefit everyone involved. It's a subtle yet effective way to steer the conversation towards a more collaborative outcome. 11. "That's One Take, But Here's Another Thought." Presenting an alternative thought can quickly shift a conversation from a contest to a collaboration. This shows you're not just going to accept what's being handed to you without question. You're confident enough in your own knowledge to offer another angle. It's a gentle reminder that while their point is valid, it's not the only one. By introducing your own thoughts, you keep the dialogue balanced and engaging. This response encourages a more layered conversation where multiple ideas can be considered. You're not attacking their viewpoint; you're simply adding to it, which can enrich the discussion. It's a way to assert your knowledge without being confrontational. By offering another thought, you demonstrate that you're engaged and ready to contribute meaningfully. This can transform the conversation from a competition to a cooperative exchange. 12. "I Didn't Know That. Thanks For Sharing." Thanking someone for their input can be a surprisingly effective way to manage attempts to out-smart you. This approach can catch them off guard, as they might expect defensiveness or rebuttal. By expressing gratitude, you show that you're open to learning, which can be disarming. It's a simple way to maintain your composure while acknowledging that there's always more to learn. This can diffuse tension and make the conversation more pleasant for everyone involved. This tactic can shift the focus from out-smarting to sharing knowledge. You're effectively saying, "I'm here to learn, not to compete," which can elevate the quality of the dialogue. By showing appreciation, you can subtly remind them that the exchange of ideas is a two-way street. It's a way of maintaining your integrity while also keeping the conversation respectful. This can lead to more meaningful interactions, where both parties feel valued and heard. 13. "Great Insight. How Do You See That Playing Out?" Sometimes, asking someone to apply their theory to real-life scenarios can be quite revealing. It challenges them to think beyond abstract ideas and consider practical implications. This can be a polite way to expose any gaps in their logic or understanding. You're not dismissing their point; you're asking them to take it further, which can be quite challenging. This response subtly shifts the responsibility back to them to substantiate their claims. This approach can turn a theoretical exercise into a practical one, encouraging deeper thinking. It shows that you're not easily swayed by surface-level arguments and want to explore their real-world relevance. By asking how they see it playing out, you're inviting them to think critically, which can enrich the conversation. It's a strategic way to engage without being confrontational. This tactic can make the discussion more dynamic and insightful for everyone involved. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
'So You Think You Can Dance' Host Cat Deeley Splits from Husband Patrick Kielty After 12 Years of Marriage
The couple tied the knot in 2012 and share two children together, sons Milo and James PatrickNEED TO KNOW So You Think You Can Dance host Cat Deeley and comedian Patrick Kielty announced their split after 12 years of marriage They shared a joint statement with PEOPLE, explaining they "have taken the decision to end our marriage and are now separated" The former couple also noted they "will continue to be united as loving parents" to their two children, sons Milo and James PatrickCat Deeley and Patrick Kielty are calling it quits after more than a decade of marriage. The longtime So You Think You Can Dance host, 48, and the Northern Irish comedian, 54, announced their split on Tuesday, July 29, in a joint statement. "We have taken the decision to end our marriage and are now separated," the pair said, per BBC. "There is no other party involved," they continued. "We will continue to be united as loving parents to our children and would therefore kindly ask for our family privacy to be respected." The former couple concluded by noting that there will be "no further comment" on the matter. PEOPLE has reached out to representatives of Deeley and Kielty for comment. Deeley and Kielty have a long history and first worked together a decade before they got married. The two co-presented the British talent competition series Fame Academy, which aired for two seasons between 2002 and 2003. Fast-forward to September 2012, the couple tied the knot in Rome. In a 2015 interview on Loose Women, Kielty revealed how his and Deeley's friendship turned romantic thanks to a big gesture he made while Deeley was in Beverly Hills and he was in Northern Ireland at "a little Irish pub" around closing time. When he texted her for her birthday, Kielty remembered, "She said, 'It's just a shame you're not in L.A. because I'm having a lunch tomorrow.' So I said I'll be there." He then flew around the world and, when he walked into the Beverly Hills Hotel and said hi, Deeley "fell off the chair and we've been together ever since." The former couple share two children together. They welcomed their first son, Milo, in January 2016. In June 2018, they welcomed their second son, James Patrick. Between welcoming her two children with Kielty, Deeley opened up about motherhood. "I've got so much respect for all moms out there that do it. You have to juggle like crazy and have a team around you," she told PEOPLE at the time. "And whether that's your family, Mom and Dad, nanny … whoever it is, you have this team. It takes a tribe — I can totally understand that now." Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. While this is Kielty's first marriage, Deeley had previously been married. Read the original article on People
