‘We're not sanctuary cities': WMass mayors push back at feds over DHS target list
Springfield, Amherst, Northampton and Holyoke made the new DHS 'sanctuary jurisdiction' list, as well as Hampshire, Franklin and Berkshire counties.
After learning of the new list, local municipal leaders pushed back at the federal administration.
'I've always maintained we are not a sanctuary city. I vetoed a City Council vote to make us a sanctuary, and the council overrode it,' said Springfield Mayor Domenic J. Sarno.
'I'm all for legal immigration. I'm first generation. But there used to be an orderly process,' he said, referring to his parents. 'The federal government walked away from this process and left it to cities and states.'
Springfield, instead, has a 'welcoming city' ordinance that looks a whole lot like a sanctuary city rule — primarily prohibiting city police from cooperating with Immigration and Customs Enforcement operations that have ramped up under President Donald J. Trump. He made a campaign vow to clamp down on undocumented immigrants.
The list was published Wednesday on Homeland Security's website and breaks down its targets by state, county and city.
In Massachusetts, there are a dozen communities on the list:
Amherst
Boston
Cambridge
Chelsea
Concord
Holyoke
Lawrence
Newton
Northampton
Orleans
Somerville
Springfield
'Was I surprised we were on the hit list? No. But I'm hoping President Trump and his team will take another look at Springfield's history and my leadership in particular on this issue,' Sarno said during an interview Friday.
Massachusetts as a whole makes the sanctuary list, probably, because of the Lunn decision, a 2017 court case that bars police from taking people into custody over a civil offense, said Sarang Sekhavat, chief of staff for the Massachusetts Immigrant and Refugee Advocacy Coalition.
Homeland Security's list of a dozen Massachusetts communities doesn't match up with Northeastern University's comprehensive list of sanctuary communities, he noted.
'(It's) wonky,' Sekhavat said. 'People are really wondering where they came up with this list.'
Massachusetts counties don't have governments of their own, for instance.
And in Virginia, one conservative leaning county made the list because it proclaims itself as a gun-friendly '2nd Amendment Sanctuary' on its website, Sekhavat said.
'If the consequences of this weren't so serious, it would be ridiculous and worthy of mockery,' he said.
The list came on the heels of Trump's executive order late last month to produce a list of immigrant-friendly communities. The list released two days ago said it is a matter of public safety.
The list is labeled as Sanctuary Jurisdictions Defying Federal Immigration Law, and posits the following: 'Sanctuary cities protect dangerous criminal aliens from facing consequences and put law enforcement in peril,' read a statement from Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem.
The list also came the same day Amherst town officials confirmed the arrests of two people by ICE on May 28.
'The town of Amherst and the Amherst Police Department did not participate in either of these incidents and have not participated in any federal immigration enforcement actions that have occurred. ICE operated independently from the town with no prior notification. No additional information is available at this time,' a statement from the town manager read.
It's unclear whether the list will have any teeth. It includes no directives other than a pledge to send letters to towns and cities that appear to be immigrant-friendly.
A federal judge in California ruled the Trump administration is not constitutionally allowed to limit federal funding to states and cities that have opposing politics.
'The town of Amherst is a sanctuary community and as such shall not cooperate with ICE,' the statement continued.
In Holyoke, Mayor Joshua A. Garcia said the definition of a sanctuary city is murky.
'There is no universally accepted definition of a 'sanctuary city,' and if one exists, Holyoke should not be considered one. Nowhere in my executive order does the word 'sanctuary' appear. The order simply directs our police officers to follow the law and not act as federal immigration agents. If it is the case where an individual poses a legitimate public safety concern, such as being charged with or convicted of a serious or violent crime, they could be held longer on a detainer,' he said.
Garcia in January sent out strong statements, urging support for immigrants. He worries that undocumented immigrants might fear calling police in emergencies, given the national climate.
'As mayor, my responsibility is to keep everyone in Holyoke safe, residents and visitors alike. We cannot afford to have anyone afraid to call 911 or help police because they fear deportation. Public safety depends on trust, communication and cooperation, and that is exactly what we are working to protect,' Garcia said in the statement.
ICE sweeps have been scattered in Western Massachusetts, and the federal agency has been largely cloak-and-dagger about its operations, rejecting media inquiries.
In Northampton, Mayor Gina-Louise Sciarra revived a statement she released in November.
'The enforcement of federal immigration laws is outside the authority of local law enforcement, and Northampton has a long-standing policy of non-cooperation with such actions to the extent permissible by law,' she said.
A chief of staff said Sciarra had no further comment.
Staff writer Jim Kinney contributed to this report.
Read the original article on MassLive.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

USA Today
9 minutes ago
- USA Today
'Doing its best to dismantle the Constitution': Biden slams Trump administration
Former President Joe Biden on Thursday accused President Donald Trump and his administration of trying to "dismantle the constitution." At the National Bar Association's 100th Annual Awards Gala, Biden said the Trump White House "is doing its best" to go after the nation's core principles and that "they've been doing it all too often with the help of a Congress that's just sitting on the sidelines and enabled by the highest court in the nation." The speech echoed the "Soul of the Nation" theme in Biden's 2020 and 2024 presidential campaigns. "In the life of our nation there are moments so stark that they divide all that came before from everything that follows. Moments that force us to confront hard truths about ourselves, our institutions and democracy itself," Biden said in his July 31 speech. "We are, in my view, at such a moment in American history." The former president also swiped at law firms that have made deals with the Trump administration, saying they were "bending to bullies." Biden, who accepted the association's C. Francis Stradford Award, called on lawyers in the room to defend the rule of law. "It means take the client that can't write the big check but needs protecting of basic fundamental rights. It means sign on to that brief that may draw the ire of people in power, but you know its the right thing to do," Biden said. Biden, Obama contrast on Trump responses Biden's remarks came just over a week after former President Barack Obama issued a statement in response to Trump's accusations of treason and the posting of an AI generated video of the 44th President being arrested. The statement, attributed to a spokesperson, called Trump's comments a "ridiculous and a weak attempt at distraction" from the ongoing controversy surrounding the Trump administration's handling of sex offender Jeffrey Epstein's criminal files. Trump has had his own share of criticism for Biden, both recent and in the past. In April, Trump blamed his predecessor for a poor economy, saying "This is Biden's Stock Market, not Trump's," adding that "we have to get rid of the Biden 'Overhang.'' He's also ordered an investigation of Biden's alleged "cognitive decline." At a 2022 rally in Arizona, Trump said "Biden has utterly humiliated our nation." In the rare post-presidency public appearance Thursday evening, Biden said that "the hard truth" of the Trump administration was that it aimed "to erase fairness, equality, to erase justice itself." Biden's remarks echoed his first post-presidency speech in April, when he accused Trump of "taking a hatchet" to the Social Security Administration.


Boston Globe
9 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Trump sharpens sanctions threat on Russia, while admitting it may not work
Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Administration officials gave no reasons to believe the latest engagement with Russia would be any more useful. And Trump himself, usually a true believer in the power of economic sanctions to alter the decisions of foreign leaders, admitted for the second time this week that Putin appears to be immune. Advertisement 'I don't know that sanctions bother him,' he said Thursday. Nonetheless, Trump has now executed a 180-degree turn on Russia, at least in tone, in roughly 180 days. He came to office questioning whether Russia was truly the invader of Ukraine, and hinting that the Ukrainians were responsible for their own troubles. His famous blowup with President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in the Oval Office in February led him to briefly cut off aid to the Ukrainian military. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth declared that Ukraine would never join NATO -- a reversal of stated American policy -- and Vice President JD Vance spoke out against arming the Ukrainians. Russia was exempted from most tariffs. Advertisement That has been followed by a series of apparent reversals, with no public acknowledgment from Trump that he is changing strategy. He no longer relies on what he has framed as a deep past relationship with Putin in an effort to win him over. In fact, he has been quite open about his frustration that conversations about ceasefires are usually followed by Russian escalation, often in the pace of drone and missile attacks. 'I think what bothers the president the most is he has these great phone calls where everyone sort of claims yeah, we'd like to see this end, if we could find a way forward,' Rubio said in his Fox interview, 'and then he turns on the news and another city has been bombed, including those far from the front lines.' 'So at some point,' Rubio told his interviewer, Brian Kilmeade of Fox News Radio, 'he's got to make a decision here about what -- how much to continue to engage in an effort to do ceasefires if one of the two sides is not interested.' On Monday, Trump said he would give Russia about 10 to 12 days to end the war before imposing 'sanctions and maybe tariffs, secondary tariffs,' a reference to sanctions on countries that trade with Russia. But there is reason to question how far Trump will push for full secondary sanctions, which would involve threatening the three countries buying much of Russia's oil and gas: China, India and Turkey. All are key to other American interests, and Trump is likely to need future favors and cooperation from them. And it is hard to imagine that China's president, Xi Jinping, would abandon Putin, his most critical partner in challenging American power. Advertisement Rubio took up the hard choices in his conversation with Kilmeade, arguing that 'the president has a lot of options.' He noted that if the United States could get at Russia's oil sales, it 'is a huge part of their revenue.' For their part, Russian officials who have long been presumed to speak with Putin's blessing have dismissed Trump's threats, portraying him in Russian media as erratic and unpredictable. 'Fifty days, it used to be 24 hours, it used to be 100 days,' Sergey Lavrov, Russia's foreign minister, said a few weeks ago, as Trump kept moving the deadlines. 'We've been through all this.' Democrats say Trump has other options: He could provide direct military aid to Ukraine, as Congress did during the Biden administration. Instead, he has an elaborate plan to sell arms and related technologies to Europe, which will then donate them to Ukraine. Trump once suggested he could end the war in 24 hours simply by negotiating with Putin, man to man. But now, as Trump's frustration over the conflict grows, his threats have raised questions about how much leverage the United States has with Russia -- and whether Trump is willing to use it. This article originally appeared in Advertisement


Hamilton Spectator
9 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Trump pushed tariffs on Canada to 35 per cent, but a CUSMA carveout creates a shield
WASHINGTON - U.S. President Donald Trump has increased tariffs on Canada to a staggering 35 per cent but a critical carveout is likely to shield most goods from the devastating duties. The White House has said the tariffs won't be applied to goods that are compliant with the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement on trade, also known as CUSMA. Here's what that means for Canadian companies: What is CUSMA compliance? CUSMA was negotiated during the first Trump administration to replace the North American Free Trade Agreement. Companies can claim preferential treatment under CUSMA if they meet its rules of origin. While it is different depending on the product, generally it requires a specific amount of the goods be made of products or with labour originating from Canada, Mexico or the United States. About 80 to 90 per cent of Canadian goods might be able to comply with CUSMA's rules of origin, said Michael Dobner, the national leader of economics and policy practice at PricewaterhouseCoopers Canada. Not all exporters have filed the necessary paperwork to avoid the duties. There's been an increase in businesses claiming preferential treatment under CUSMA but it's not clear exactly how much of Canadian exports are currently compliant. Are any industries more at risk? Dobner said there's no specific industry that he expects to be hit the hardest. Certain companies may not be able to source input materials from North America to make their product. That means they would not be able to apply for preferential treatment under CUSMA and will face the 35 per cent tariff. But Dobner said 'it's the minority of the exports of Canada to the U.S.' What's the impact on small and medium-sized businesses? Small and medium-sized businesses may have not applied for CUSMA preferential status before Trump's tariffs because the process can be burdensome for enterprises of that size. Some small and medium-sized businesses might not meet CUSMA rules of origin requirements and don't have the financial flexibility to change their inputs to North American products. Dan Kelly, president and CEO of the Canadian Federation of Independent Business, said many of these businesses were absorbing some or all of the costs associated with Trump's tariffs under the assumption that there would a resolution coming. Kelly said some small and medium-sized businesses facing the 35 per cent tariff may have to stop selling into the United States. This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 1, 2025.