How changes to the welfare bill affects your PIP and Universal Credit payments
Sir Keir Starmer had been hoping to push through welfare reforms that would have seen a crackdown on payments to some benefits claimants.
2
The reforms were aimed at saving billions of pounds on Britain's welfare bill, which is set to balloon in the next five years.
The Government has projected the number of working-age claimants of Personal Independence Payments (PIP) will rise from 2.7million in 2023-24 to 4.3million in 2029-30.
Meanwhile the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) has estimated the overall cost of the working-age benefit system would rise from £48.5billion last year to £75.7billion by 2030.
The reforms would have seen disabled Brits facing stricter tests for claiming PIP payments and a freeze on the health payment element of Universal Credit.
But in a major defeat for the Government this week, 49 Labour MPs rebelled against the welfare reforms.
It forced the prime minister to shelve the controversial reforms so the bill would not have to be scrapped entirely.
The bill will return to the Commons for a third reading on Wednesday before it can be passed.
Here is what the latest changes mean for you…
Personal Independence Payments (PIP)
PIP is the main benefit for people with a disability.
Three key benefits you could be missing out on
It's for people under state pension age who need help with daily activities or getting around because of a long-term illness or disability.
Payments currently start at £1,500 but can rise to £9,600.
The daily living rate comes in at £73.90 for the lower rate and £110.40 for the higher rate.
The mobility rate is worth £29.20 and rises to £77.05 for the higher rate.
Under the Government's plans, PIP claimants would have faced stricter tests to qualify for support.
The assessments involve questions about how difficult a person finds everyday tasks, and they give a score from zero (for no difficulty) to 12 (for most difficulty).
Needing help to wash your hair scores two points but needing help to wash between the shoulders and waist is worth four points.
The Government had proposed that people would need to score four points in one task such as washing and dressing to qualify for support.
Currently they can qualify with eight points across multiple activities.
Ahead of the bill's second reading last week, Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall announced a partial U-turn.
She said the changes would only come into effect in November 2026 and anyone claiming the benefit before that date would not be subject to the new rules.
That meant it would only affect new PIP claimants.
But following the rebellion by Labour MPs, the proposal has been scrapped entirely.
It means no changes are going to be made until after a further review has taken place.
The review is being led by Welfare Minister Sir Stephen Timms, who will work with disabled people and charities.
The review will consider:
The role of the PIP assessment – as the future single gateway to health-related and disability benefits
The assessment criteria – including activities, descriptors and points
Whether any other evidence should be considered alongside the assessment
How the PIP assessment could provide fair access to support across the benefits system
The review will be finished by autumn next year and its findings will be reported to the Work and Pensions Secretary.
That means it's not clear yet what recommendations will be made and what will be placed into law.
Universal Credit
The Government had also planned to make major changes to the health element of Universal Credit.
More than three million Universal Credit recipients don't have to find work due to their poor health.
A single person who is aged 25 or over can receive the basic level of the benefit, which comes in at £400.14 every month.
But those getting an incapacity top-up due to a disability or long-term condition can get an extra £422.37 - more than double the original payment.
The new plans mean that anyone up to the age of 22 will not be able to claim the health element.
Ministers had tried to freeze the payment for the next four years but a commitment has been made for it to go up with inflation.
That means people claiming the health element of Universal Credit and new claimants with the most severe conditions will see their incomes protected in real terms.
Existing claimants will get £97 per week until the end of the decade.
However, new claimants from 2026 will see the health element drop from £97 a week to £50 a week.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
19 minutes ago
- BBC News
EDF will take a 12.5% stake in Sizewell C nuclear power station
Energy company EDF has confirmed it will have a 12.5% stake in the Sizewell C nuclear power month the government committed £14.2bn to build the facility on the Suffolk plans are still waiting for further investment, and the government said more details would be confirmed this groups have criticised the size of French state-owned EDF's stake, saying they believe it had invested "the bare minimum". China General Nuclear Power previously had a 20% stake in Sizewell C but later pulled out, with the government becoming a shareholder alongside recent decision to take a smaller stake in Sizewell C is "consistent with their previously stated position", Downing Street government has said the plant would tackle the climate crisis while generating enough energy to power the equivalent of six million Secretary Ed Miliband said the agreement was a "landmark moment" between the UK and France, as French President Emmanuel Macron began his state visit to the UK. But Together Against Sizewell C chair Jenny Kirtley criticised EDF's stakeholder announcement."In what must be seen as a fantastic result for Macron and an extremely poor outcome for the UK, this has allowed the original Sizewell C promoter, EDF, to invest the bare minimum into the project, with the result [that] UK residents will be subsidising French industry and the French government for the next 75 years, during 15 years of construction and 60 years of operation."Stop Sizewell C, another campaign group, added that "such reliance on France for so lengthy and uncertain project delivery undermines UK energy security".The group added: "With much of the expensive 'kit' for Sizewell C being constructed in France, who does this project really benefit?" Responding to the suggestion the decision was not a show of confidence in the UK, a No 10 spokesman said: "Obviously it's a commercial decision for EDF, but it's fully consistent with their previously stated commitment."Of course, we welcome their involvement. We've always known that EDF was looking to take a minority stake in Sizewell's construction, alongside its other important roles in the project."We're in the closing stages of negotiations with other investors [who] will also bring significant experience to Sizewell C." Follow Suffolk news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
Reuters
20 minutes ago
- Reuters
France's EDF to invest $1.5 billion in Britain's Sizewell C nuclear project
LONDON/PARIS July 8 (Reuters) - French nuclear energy utility EDF will invest around 1.1 billion pounds ($1.5 billion) in the Sizewell C nuclear project in Britain in which it is already a shareholder, the French presidency and British government said on Tuesday. The announcement was made during French President Emmanuel Macron's state visit to Britain, the first by a European leader since Brexit. Britain is seeking to build new nuclear plants to replace its ageing facilities to bolster energy security and its climate target of net zero emissions by 2050. Once operational, the Sizewell C plant is projected to generate enough electricity to power around 6 million homes. "This investment takes us a step closer to the benefits it will bring to the British people," British Prime Minister Keir Starmer said in a statement. State-owned EDF said its investment means it will have a 12.5% stake in the project. EDF's latest annual report showed it held a 16.2% stake in the project at the end of 2024, which was equivalent to 652 million euros already invested. That stake was expected to change as the UK government increased its investment and as other investors join. Britain's government has already committed 17.8 billion pounds to the project but continues to look for additional investors. US-listed investment fund Brookfield has agreed to take a stake of more than 20% in the project in exchange for funds to finance the development of the nuclear plant, according to a source with knowledge of the deal. Brookfield declined to comment. British utility Centrica has previously said it would consider a stake in the project but has yet to announce any decision. A spokesperson for Centrica said the company does not comment on speculation about M&A or investments. The British government said it was in discussions with a range of potential investors which were commercially sensitive. "The UK Government will remain a significant shareholder in the project – ensuring we have oversight of the progress and limiting delays," the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero said in the press release. China General Nuclear Power Group (CGN) was initially set to develop the Sizewell C project alongside EDF but the UK government bought out the Chinese firm's stake in 2022 amid security concerns. Sizewell C would be the second new nuclear plant built in Britain in more than two decades, after EDF's Hinkley Point C, which faced several delays and cost overruns and is now expected to start operations in 2029, at an estimated cost of 31-34 billion pounds in 2015 prices. While the government has not said how much it expects the project to cost, EDF has previously said that Sizewell C would be around 20% cheaper than Hinkley C. ($1 = 0.7363 pounds)
North Wales Chronicle
20 minutes ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Investors stripping cash from water firms ‘criminal' says ex-Wessex Water chief
Colin Skellett, who helmed the south-west England utility from 1988 to 2024, argued against nationalising water companies because of the industry requiring 'continuous levels of investment'. He spoke as campaigners and experts urged the Government to explore public ownership during the UK River Summit in south London on Tuesday. Ministers have promised a 'fundamental reset' following years of companies paying out large dividend that diverted money away from infrastructure investment and maintenance, leading to sewage pollution and rising bills. However, they have ruled out nationalisation and instead are focusing efforts on tightening rules, increasing investment and strengthening penalties within the current system of regulated private firms. Minister Emma Hardy talking about tackling sewage with @RiverActionUK but the government is ignoring the reality: 7 European countries with highest average of 90%+ bathing sites achieving 'excellent' status – all are 90%+ publicly owned 🇨🇾🇦🇹🇬🇷🇲🇹🇭🇷🇩🇪🇩🇰 — Cat Hobbs (@CatHobbs) July 8, 2025 Speaking at the summit, Mr Skellett said he has seen the industry change since he joined it in 1974, saying it is one that 'requires continuous levels of investment'. 'The problem with public ownership is the Government always has other things it wants to spend its money on,' the former Wessex boss said. He argued that privatisation helped to get debt off the Government's balance sheet and boost investment but this changed when the 'wrong sort of investors' began stripping cash out of companies through high dividends. 'It was bloody criminal what happened – the amount of money that was stripped out of not just Thames (Water), but a number of companies,' he said. 'So we need that to change (in) the system. It's not so much about ownership, it's more about how you regulate it, how you control it, and how you make sure the investment continues.' It came as the Environment Department (Defra) announced an increase in funding for the Environment Agency from £114 million in 2022/23 to £189 million this current financial year, a sum which is understood to have been welcomed by the regulator. 🚨REVEALED: Over half of adults in England don't trust the Government to end the UK's sewage crisis. And who can blame them? 💩 158,000+ sewage spills already this year. 📣 We're in London today, demanding the radical change we need. Are you with us?✊➡️ Email your MP today and… — Surfers Against Sewage (@sascampaigns) July 2, 2025 Ministers are also currently awaiting the publication of the independent water commission's final report and recommendations, led by Sir Jon Cunliffe, which is expected in two weeks. The review is not exploring nationalisation as an option, with campaigners at the summit indicating they will continue to campaign on the issue following its publication. Ewan McGaughey, professor of law at King's College London, argued that the Government should take away licences from failing water companies and transition them into a long-term sustainable model of public ownership, calling privatisation in England a 'broken model'. Mr McGaughey said 90% of countries and cities around the world have water in public ownership and cited examples such as Berlin and Paris, which brought their sectors back into public ownership in 2013 and 2009 respectively after the privatised model failed. 'Bills go down. Water quality goes up. It's actually not really that controversial. You just have to look at the evidence, and you can see that public ownership works better,' he said. Cat Hobbs, founder and We Own It, which campaigns for public ownership of public services, said the Government's decision to not allow the independent review to explore nationalisation is a 'scandal'. 'That has to change. They still have time to change it,' she said, And Ashley Smith, founder of Windrush Against Sewage Pollution (WASP), called privatisation a 'ludicrous scam', arguing that there has never been a single year since the firms were privatised when shareholders put in more money than they took out of the firms. Later, water minister Emma Hardy defended the Government's approach to reforming the sector. 'There's been a lack of sustained investment in the industry for an incredibly long time,' she told the summit. 'We have taken immediate action, but there are some things that, of course, are going to take longer to fix. 'We want to listen to you and we can have difference of opinion – that is absolutely fine but I want to make sure that we try and bring as many people with us as possible because fundamentally we're all trying to get to the same place and that place is an effective water system with reduced pollution which is better for customers and better for the environment.' Ms Hardy called the Cunliffe report a 'once-in-a-generation opportunity to modernise (the sector)' and said the Government will give a top-level reaction to the review before looking at any potential further legislation.
