Manchester Arena bomber's brother 'has full prison privileges restored' just months after 'attacking guards with boiling oil and makeshift blades'
Manchester Arena terrorist Hashem Abedi has had full prison privileges restored for 'good behaviour' - despite an alleged brutal attack on guards in April.
That reportedly means that he will be able to use the gym again and spend more time outside of his cell, The Sun reported.
Other perks as a result of his regime being upgraded from 'basic' to 'standard' are believed to include additional canteen credit and more cash to spend on phone calls - and even a better TV package.
A source told the newspaper: 'They do that when someone behaves and it makes a huge difference to how comfortable the inmate's life is.
'He'll get Freeview TV with about 25 channels, can afford better food and won't be in his cell as much.
'Naturally he is cock-a-hoop about it but many of the officers who look after him are less than happy — especially considering what he did to their colleagues.'
Abedi was ordered to serve a record 55-year minimum term for helping his brother Salman Abedi carry out a bombing at the Manchester Arena in 2017.
The blast killed 22 people, many of them children, with more than 1,000 left injured.
Manchester Arena bomber Hashem Abedi, 28, is accused of attacking three prison officers with cooking oil and makeshift weapons at HMP Frankland, County Durham in April
HMP Frankland in Durham, where Abedi is accused of brutally attacking prison guards in April this year
Abedi is seen with a smile on his face moments before the horrific alleged attack unfolded
The terrorist also reportedly attacked three warders with burning cooking oil and a makeshift blade at HMP Frankland, County Durham on April 12, leaving them with what were described as 'life-threatening' injuries.
Despite the severity of his original offence, Abedi was given privileges including being allowed to cook for himself in a prison kitchen.
He was reportedly able to fashion two 20cm blades from a baking tray.
Abedi is said to have dashed out of the kitchen just before lunchtime clutching the weapons and a pan of boiling oil which he flung at the nearest three prison officers he encountered on a landing.
One male officer was then stabbed in the neck, with the blade coming close to severing an artery, reportedly leaving the victim 'just millimetres' from death.
Another male officer was stabbed at least five times in the back, puncturing a lung.
One of their female colleagues was also injured. The boiling oil is said to have left victims with third-degree burns.
As a result of the alleged attack, Abedi was moved to HMP Belmarsh, where he has been barred from having any contact with lags under 18 due to fears he will attempt to radicalise them.
Salman Abedi, Hashem's brother, at Victoria Station making his way to the Manchester Arena, on May 22, 2017 where he detonated a homemade bomb
A composite showing the 22 people killed in the Manchester Arena bombing in May 2017 which Abedi helped to plan
An undated handout photo issued by the Manchester Arena Inquiry of Hashem Abedi, one of those responsible for the terror attack at the Ariana Grande concert at the Manchester Arena in May 2017
A file photo issued by Greater Manchester Police of Salman Abedi on the night he carried out the Manchester Arena terror attack
Belmarsh, in south-east London, is a top security prison that houses many of Britain's most dangerous killers, sex offenders and terrorists
Prison authorities are concerned that could encourage other prisoners to carry out attacks of their own, a source told The Sun.
That raises the question of why Abedi's regime has been relaxed if officials still believe he is an active threat.
Following the alleged attack, justice secretary Shabana Mahmood announced the use of tasers will be trialled by guards in UK prisons.
She also previously said the Prison Service will investigate whether front line staff should be given protective body armour.
It comes after union bosses called for officers to be given stab vests and protective equipment, arguing the incident shows 'how dangerous our job is'.
The move is response to a dramatic rise in assaults on prison staff, which hit 10,605 in the year to December - a rise of 13 per cent.
The Ministry of Justice declined to comment. The prisons minister has been approached for comment.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
28 minutes ago
- The Independent
Nigel Farage should do his bit to keep the peace
There is no situation where an intervention by Nigel Farage won't make things worse. He has, after all, made a career out of detecting, exploiting and exacerbating people's grievances and fears, a grim cycle that has delivered electoral success. The man is gifted in his insidious trade, if nothing else. Nowhere is this strategy more dangerously deployed than in issues of migration, race and crime, so often shamelessly conflated by the Reform UK leader with a studied and long-experienced hand. It is done almost instinctively. Once, he even blamed being late for a 'meet-the-Ukip leader' event in Wales on traffic jams on the M4 caused by immigration, rather than, say, the infamous bottleneck at Newport. Rather more grievously, his actions in the aftermath of the horrific Southport murders a year ago did nothing to calm tempers and stop the wild social media speculation that the person responsible was a Muslim asylum seeker who'd more or less just arrived in Britain, via a small boat. He plainly has no regrets and is approaching the disclosure of details concerning the rape of a 12-year-old girl in Nuneaton in the same reckless manner. He and his Reform UK colleagues on Warwickshire County Council are demanding, as Mr Farage did last year, that the immigration status of those involved be released by the police. The justification, once again, is that there is a 'cover-up' – a serious allegation made without foundation – and people are being denied the truth, presumably through some sense of misguided political correctness. Mr Farage implies, as he did last year, that this 'cover-up' – which he presumably sees as a deliberate attempt to deceive the public – only serves to create confusion and inflame feelings. In fact, of course, it is he who is creating additional tension, adding to a sense of injustice and the fear that the police are more interested in defending perpetrators than defending victims, despite the obvious truth that those accused have been caught and taken into custody by those same police, doing their duty. It is difficult to see why the migration status of everyone arrested on a serious offence should be automatically released, as Mr Farage suggests, even when it is immediately known for sure. If the person involved is a refugee, for example, accepted for indefinite leave to remain, then that does not make them 'more guilty' or their offence 'more serious' simply by the fact that they may have escaped from torture or some war zone. There is a strong probability that migration status will be equated to race, which is even less relevant. The only possible valid use of immigration status in the criminal justice system is if the person is convicted. At that point, the question of deportation does arise. The fact is that someone's immigration status can affect the feelings of many perfectly law-abiding and worried people demonstrating outside 'migrant hotels' (real or imagined) up and down the country on legitimate grounds. They are not all fascists or racists, still less pathologically violent. They are angry and fearful at what they learn from the news and the speculation on social media, and they deserve to be told the facts. But there is just the suspicion that immigration status can, in some grotesque, emotionally-charged way, lead to violence and mob rule. It is, quite simply, wrong and criminally so, to attempt arson on a hotel with human beings inside, whatever the circumstances. It doesn't help anyone or solve anything. If a rapist comes from a family that can trace its English origins to Anglo-Saxon times, that should make people no more or less angry than if the criminal has only lived here for a matter of weeks and is from some country in Africa or the Middle East. Race should play no part in justice, even mob justice. It would be refreshing, statesmanlike and a genuinely great public service if Mr Farage and those like him used their public platform to call for calm and peaceful protest, and not display so much apparent tacit support for angry, violent reactions in tense demonstrations. His warnings sound too much like self-fulfilling prophecies, as when he declared a few weeks ago: 'I don't think anybody in London understands just how close we are to civil disobedience on a vast scale in this country.' Given what happened last July and early August, the opposite is surely true: ministers and police chiefs are all too well aware of such a possibility. The difference is that, unlike Mr Farage, they don't seem to be talking it up. It would make a useful change if Mr Farage didn't make everything into a 'cover-up' and accept that, in many cases, details are withheld for sound legal reasons concerning a fair trial and the provisions of the Contempt of Court Act 1981. The police should not have to break the law and risk upsetting a trial and letting the guilty go free simply because of the threat of a riot if they don't, or accusations of 'two-tier policing'. What's more, Mr Farage shouldn't call for the resignation of chief constables, or any other officers, who are trying to keep the oaths they took to uphold the laws set down by parliament and the King's peace. Standing up for the police, defending the independent judiciary, condemning violence and respecting human rights are, in fact, the patriotic British things to do at times such as these. If he cares about the cohesion of communities and the rule of law as deeply as he claims, Mr Farage should do his bit to keep the peace as well.
The Sun
28 minutes ago
- The Sun
Girl, 4, tragically dies at popular waterpark's swimming pool as company left ‘in shock' & cops launch probe
Breaking WATERPARK TRAGEDY Waterworld staff and colleagues from the West Midlands Ambulance Service treated the child at the scene before paramedics took her to hospital for further treatment A FOUR-YEAR-OLD girl has tragically died at a popular waterpark's swimming pool, with the company left "in shock" as cops launch a probe. Police were called to Waterworld in Hanley, Staffordshire, today at around 4:20pm to reports of a four-year-old girl in critical condition. 2 2 Waterworld staff and colleagues from the West Midlands Ambulance Service treated the child at the scene before paramedics took her to hospital for further treatment. Despite the desperate efforts of hospital staff, the four-year-old tragically died a short while later. The child's family have been informed of the tragedy and are being supported by specially-trained officers, cops said. Detective Chief Inspector Lucy Maskew from Staffordshire Police said: 'Our thoughts are with the family at this terribly sad time. We are now making enquiries and looking to establish the circumstances of the incident. "We would ask that members of the public avoid speculating in these early stages of the investigation and allow the family to grieve." A Waterworld spokesperson said: 'It is with great sadness that we learned of this little girl's passing this evening. "All our thoughts are with her family and loved ones during these extremely difficult times. "Waterworld is in shock and has decided to remain closed tomorrow out of respect for the family. Waterworld is working closely with the authorities at this sad time."
Times
28 minutes ago
- Times
Police chief ‘pressured over statement linking riots to migration'
A police chief says she was pressured by a government minister to retract a statement she made suggesting that 'mass uncontrolled immigration' was one of the reasons behind rioting last summer. Donna Jones, the police and crime commissioner for Hampshire and the Isle of Wight, said the minister phoned her after she made the controversial comments in the wake of the disorder following the Southport attacks. Jones said the newly appointed minister, whom she declined to name, told her 'you and I both know this has nothing to do with immigration', and asked her to take down the statement. Jones believes the episode shows that the government is 'out of touch' and fears that anti-migrant hotel protests will escalate and 'parts of the country risk falling into a state of lawlessness'.
