logo
This South Florida suburb swung to Trump. Now many of its residents are facing deportation

This South Florida suburb swung to Trump. Now many of its residents are facing deportation

CNN13-03-2025

South Florida's Venezuelan community has long gathered at the restaurant El Arepazo to mark major milestones.
This is where activists waved Venezuelan flags in celebration when President Joe Biden announced deportation protections for immigrants from the country four years ago, and where supporters of the Venezuelan opposition have gathered to hold rallies and anxiously follow election results back home.
But the lunch crowd has thinned out since President Donald Trump's administration moved last month to revoke the temporary status that had allowed hundreds of thousands of Venezuelan immigrants to stay legally in the US, and announced an agreement with the country's authoritarian government to restart deportation flights.
'You can feel the fear,' said Daniel Oropeza, a Temporary Protected Status holder whose entire family is facing the possibility of deportation, as he sat on the patio outside the restaurant. 'You stop doing things that you normally did before because you don't know for certain if in a couple of weeks you're going to be able to remain in the country.'
Trump's move has sparked a sense of betrayal in this Miami suburb affectionately known as 'Doralzuela' that is home to more Venezuelan immigrants than any other city in the United States. Venezuelan Americans helped deliver Trump a resounding victory in the city, where his margin of victory grew by about 20 percentage points from 2020 to 2024. Voters from the community said they appreciated Trump's tough line on government abuses in their homeland – and didn't expect him to deport their relatives.
Noel Ginestra voted for Trump, but now his sister, who is a TPS holder, is facing possible deportation. While he still backs the president, he said he hoped the TPS revocation is blocked in the courts.
'I supported him, but it disappointed us that he decided to end TPS,' Ginestra said, referring to Venezuelans. 'It bothered us that he put everyone in the same bucket.'
The unease of Venezuelan American voters illustrates the larger political risk Trump is taking by moving to revoke deportation protections for certain immigrant communities, even as Latinos moved rightward in supporting his reelection campaign.
The Trump administration has argued that conditions have improved in Venezuela and that the revocation will improve public safety, with Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem saying on Fox News that the Biden administration's move to extend protections meant immigrants 'were going to be able to stay here and violate our laws for another 18 months – and we stopped that.'
Concern over Trump's TPS decision is particularly acute in Doral, which has seen significant population growth in recent years, thanks in part to the 27,000 Venezuelan immigrants who now make up more than a third of its population. One of its largest employers is Trump's Doral golf resort, which he's visited multiple times as president.
Minutes away from the golf course, Venezuelan Americans come to El Arepazo not just for its arepas, but for a reminder of home. The restaurant's wallpaper is decked out with prints of Venezuelan newspaper front pages chronicling the country's turbulent history. A statue of Venezuelan independence hero Simón Bolívar stands in the parking lot, looking out over SUVs and sedans.
After the administration first announced the TPS retraction, community leaders gathered at El Arepazo to condemn the action.
Adelys Ferro, the head of a Venezuelan advocacy group, declared at a press conference in front of the restaurant that the local community had been 'betrayed' by Republicans. 'They used us,' she said. 'They actually told us that he was not going to touch the documented people.'
Multiple groups of TPS holders have sued the Trump administration in an attempt to overturn the revocation, arguing that it was 'arbitrary and capricious.' Judges have yet to rule on the case, although similar lawsuits delayed Trump's efforts to end TPS protections for other nationalities during his first term.
In Doral, a divide is growing between Venezuelan Americans who are still holding out hope that Trump will course-correct, and others who believe he'll stay steady.
'I want to believe that in the next weeks or in the next month, he will take a decision with (his) team that will help us. I want to think that,' said Johanna Lazarde, a TPS holder who says she still supports the president.
But not all agree. 'I think they're probably going to double down on it,' Oropeza said.
TPS has been used for decades to protect people already in the US from deportation when their homelands have faced armed conflict, natural disasters or unsafe conditions. Both Republican and Democratic administrations have extended protections for immigrants from certain countries, though some Republicans have argued the program, intended to be temporary, has gone on too long.
The Biden administration first granted TPS for Venezuelans in March 2021, citing the increased instability in the country, and expanded it in 2023. Two weeks before Trump took office, the Biden administration renewed protections for an additional 18 months.
But Noem quickly reversed that move. Under Noem's order, protections will end for about 300,000 Venezuelan TPS holders on April 7, after which they could be deported. Another roughly 250,000 Venezuelan immigrants who arrived in the US before 2023 are set to lose their TPS status in September.
In a memo, Noem said there have been 'notable improvements in several areas such as the economy, public health, and crime' in Venezuela – a stance that has angered Venezuelan American activists who have strongly opposed President Nicolás Maduro.
In his first term, Trump took a hard line against Maduro, who has jailed opponents and overseen torture and extrajudicial killings, according to human rights groups and a UN fact-finding mission. Trump recognized an opposition leader as the country's rightful president in 2019 and implemented sanctions against the regime. So far in his second term, Trump has vacillated, with his administration coming to an agreement with Maduro's government to restart deportations to Venezuela in January, but more recently ending a deal that allowed Chevron to export oil from the country.
Already, the Trump administration has started detaining Venezuelan immigrants at Guantanamo Bay Naval Base in Cuba. Officials said that people kept there include the 'worst of the worst' members of Tren de Aragua, a transnational gang – although some of those sent to Guantanamo were deemed by federal authorities as low-to-medium threats, according to court documents. They were deported to Venezuela last month.
TPS holders in Doral say they're living in fear that their families will be next – and some argue that if they are sent back, there's a chance they will be killed or jailed.
While living in Maracaibo, Venezuela, Carol Durán Pérez had faced harassment for years from a pro-Maduro militia and the country's intelligence agency due to her opposition to the government, she said. She arrived in Florida in 2021 with her son for what she thought would be a family vacation lasting a few weeks.
But while she was in the US, the threats against her family increased, and Durán Pérez said she felt she had no choice but to stay 'because my life was in danger, and my son's too.' Receiving TPS status gave them a chance to build a future in the US, she said.
When Trump won in November, Durán Pérez said she was happy because she thought he was a stronger leader than Biden – and didn't expect him to undo the TPS extension approved under the previous administration.
'I totally agree that they should pursue Tren de Aragua and that they should leave this country,' she said. 'The surprise was that the measure was against all Venezuelans,' including 'hard-working people, professional people who contribute a lot to this country.'
Now, some of the things Durán Pérez loved about living in Doral – like a school in walking distance for her 13-year-old son – consume her with fear. She's stopped letting him play at a nearby park on weekends.
'That they'll pick him up – I think that is the worst fear I have, that it might happen when I am not with him or he is not with me,' she said, her voice breaking.
Like many TPS holders, Durán Pérez has applied for political asylum. But asylum cases typically drag on for years, with some people waiting a decade or more in uncertainty about the outcome.
Immigration lawyers in Doral say they're struggling to handle a wave of cases from people who are desperately looking for a pathway to stay in the US after April.
'Our phone has been on fire,' said Ros-Ana Guillen, an immigration attorney who is representing hundreds of Venezuelans, including some with TPS. 'There're actually people sobbing on the other line, crying and scared for their family members. I have around a thousand WhatsApp messages, around a thousand texts that I haven't been able to respond.'
Officials in Doral – a community where seemingly everyone has a friend, family member or neighbor with TPS – are ringing the alarm about the disastrous impact that mass deportations would have on the city.
Maureen Porras, the Doral vice-mayor who recently left the Democratic Party to become a Republican, said that the city's economy would grind to a halt if local TPS holders are deported. Because TPS comes with employment authorization, many businesses in Doral are dependent on Venezuelan employees who are set to lose their legal status in weeks or months. Other TPS holders have started their own businesses and stores.
'The Venezuelan community is the community that built this city,' Porras said. 'And without that community, I think Doral will cease to be what it is.'
She said that the TPS decision could also hurt the Trump Organization's plans to build four luxury condo towers overlooking the president's Doral golf course. 'I think that it could potentially impact them in looking for service workers or people that are going to perhaps buy their condos and also work within that project,' Porras said.
Already, some businesses in the city, including El Arepazo, say they're seeing fewer customers in recent weeks, which they attribute in part to Venezuelans without permanent immigration status staying home out of fear.
City councilman Rafael Pineyro, the only Venezuelan member of the council, voted for Trump in November. While he opposes Trump's TPS move and initial steps toward rapprochement with the Maduro regime, he said he believed the president needed to make drastic moves in response to Biden's less restrictive immigration policy.
'I don't think that we have to enter in some type of confrontation with the administration at this point, or making demands,' Pineyro said. 'I think it's more about working together.'
Pineyro authored a resolution that the city council passed last month calling on Trump to find a solution allowing law-abiding TPS holders to stay in the US, and said he hoped the president would make a move to do so before the April deadline. If he didn't, Pineyro said, there could be electoral consequences for Republicans in Florida's congressional elections next year, because the Venezuelan American community is 'going to be diligent and pay attention' to how the GOP responds to the TPS revocation.
A bipartisan group of Florida congressmembers has introduced a bill to grant some Venezuelan immigrants permanent legal status, although it's unclear whether it has any chance of passing.
Back at El Arepazo, Oropeza, the TPS holder, said he was trying to take the uncertainty he was facing about his future day by day. Asked about what he thought of his community's support for Trump, said he didn't have a problem with the president trying to deport criminals.
'But I don't feel like he should punish the vast majority of us who are hard-working people who have dreams and hopes and just want to provide for their families,' he said. 'I don't think this is the right decision if he wants to bring stability back into the country – or if he wants to continue to have the support of our people.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump Urges Israel-Gaza Ceasefire: 'Make the Deal'
Trump Urges Israel-Gaza Ceasefire: 'Make the Deal'

Newsweek

timean hour ago

  • Newsweek

Trump Urges Israel-Gaza Ceasefire: 'Make the Deal'

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump has pressed for Israel and Hamas to clinch a ceasefire and secure the release of the remaining captives held in Gaza. Trump fired off an all-caps demand fire in a Truth Social post at 1:19 a.m. ET Sunday: "MAKE THE DEAL IN GAZA. GET THE HOSTAGES BACK!!! DJT" It follows comments the president made on Friday in the Oval Office, when he told reporters that he believed a ceasefire could come "within the next week." "I think it's close. I just spoke with some of the people involved. It's a terrible situation," Trump said. This is a breaking news situation and will be updated

Trump threatens to support a primary challenger against GOP senator for opposing 'big, beautiful bill'
Trump threatens to support a primary challenger against GOP senator for opposing 'big, beautiful bill'

Fox News

timean hour ago

  • Fox News

Trump threatens to support a primary challenger against GOP senator for opposing 'big, beautiful bill'

President Donald Trump on Saturday said he is looking for a GOP candidate to mount a primary challenge against Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., after the lawmaker announced he would not support the president's "big, beautiful bill." "Numerous people have come forward wanting to run in the Primary against 'Senator Thom' Tillis," Trump wrote on Truth Social. "I will be meeting with them over the coming weeks, looking for someone who will properly represent the Great People of North Carolina and, so importantly, the United States of America," he continued. "Thank you for your attention to this matter!" Tillis, who is up for re-election in 2026, came out against Trump's spending bill earlier on Saturday over concerns about deep cuts to Medicaid. The senator vowed not to support the measure through a procedural hurdle needed to kick off a marathon of debate and amendment voting that would eventually lead to a vote on the measure's final passage. As he was leaving the Senate GOP's closed-door lunch on Saturday, the North Carolina lawmaker said he has a "great relationship" with his colleagues, but that he could not support the colossal bill. "We just have a disagreement," he said. "And, you know, my colleagues have done the analysis, and they're comfortable with the impact on their states. I respect their choice. It's not a good impact in my state, so I'm not going to vote on the motion to proceed." The Senate cleared the hurdle late Saturday to start debate on the bill by a 51-49 vote. Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., was another Republican who joined Tillis in voting no. "Did Rand Paul Vote 'NO' again tonight? What's wrong with this guy???" Trump wrote on Truth Social. Senate Republicans hold a slim 53-47 majority and can only afford to lose three votes. Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, said earlier that she would help advance the bill through the first step, but was leaning against voting to pass the bill's final passage unless the legislation was "further changed." Collins and other initial GOP holdouts, Sens. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., and Ron Johnson, R-Wis., voted to at least advance the legislation through the first key procedural hurdle. The latest version of the bill pushed back the provider rate crackdown by one year and also added another $25 billion for a rural hospital stabilization fund over the next five years. During a closed-door lunch earlier this week, Tillis reportedly warned that North Carolina could lose as much as $40 billion in Medicaid funding if the changes were codified. He is also planning to unveil further analysis on the impact of Medicaid cuts on his state that he said no one in the "administration or in this building" has been able to refute. "The president and I have talked, and I just told him that, 'Look, if this works for the country, that's great. And if my other colleagues have done extensive research and concluded it's different in their states, I respect that,'" he said. "We just have a disagreement based on the implementation in our respective states."

Senate bill's Medicaid cuts draw some GOP angst
Senate bill's Medicaid cuts draw some GOP angst

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Senate bill's Medicaid cuts draw some GOP angst

The Senate's deep cuts to Medicaid in the tax and spending megabill are setting off alarm bells among some Republicans, complicating leadership's effort to get the legislation passed by July 4. It seeks to clamp down on two tactics states use to boost Medicaid funding to hospitals: state-directed payments and Medicaid provider taxes. The restrictions are a major concern for rural hospitals, a key constituency for senators. Republicans have set an ambitious July 4 deadline to pass the bill and send it to President Trump to be signed into law. Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.), who has been warning his colleagues about making cuts to Medicaid for weeks, said the changes took him by surprise. 'I had no idea that they were going to completely scrap the House framework with this. I mean, this totally caught me by surprise. And I've talked to other senators, and that's what I've heard consistently from everybody I've talked to, that no one was expecting this entirely new framework,' Hawley told reporters Tuesday. States impose taxes on providers to boost their federal Medicaid contributions, which they then direct back to hospitals in the form of higher reimbursements. Critics argue it's a scheme for states to get more federal funding without spending any of their own money. But provider taxes have become ingrained into states' Medicaid financing systems. States and provider groups say the taxes provide a steady source of financing for hospitals that operate on thin margins and would otherwise face closure. 'The draconian Medicaid cuts contained in the Senate bill would devastate health care access for millions of Americans and hollow out the vital role essential hospitals play in their communities,' said Bruce Siegel, president and CEO of America's Essential Hospitals, an organization that represents hospitals that serve low-income patients. The legislation would effectively cap provider taxes at 3.5 percent by 2031, down from the current 6 percent, but only for the states that expanded Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act. The cap would be phased in by lowering it 0.5 percent annually, starting in 2027. Nonexpansion states would be prohibited from imposing new taxes, but as was true in the House-passed version, their rates would be frozen at current levels. The lower cap would not apply to nursing homes or intermediate care facilities. All states except for Alaska finance part of their share of Medicaid funding through health care provider taxes, and 38 states have at least one provider tax that exceeds 5.5 percent. When asked if his concerns were enough to make him vote against the bill if it were brought to the floor as written, Hawley hedged. 'It needs a lot of work, so I would say maybe we could, I guess, try to fix it on the floor, but it'd be better to do it beforehand,' he told reporters. Republicans can afford to lose only three votes in the Senate and still pass their bill if Democrats remain united in opposition. Sen. Jim Justice ( said he was also surprised by the Senate's change. If provider tax changes are on the table, he said he wants leadership to keep the House version. Justice wouldn't say how he would vote if the provision was left unchanged but expressed some unease about the July 4 deadline. 'I promise you, I won't rubber-stamp anything,' Justice said. 'I want this thing to come out and come out quickly, but when it really boils right down to it, you may have to hold your nose on some things that you just absolutely don't like because we can't like everything.' Similarly, Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.) indicated he would also prefer the House-passed freeze on provider taxes but was still analyzing the impact on his state. Louisiana expanded Medicaid in 2016. Senate Republican leaders huddled with members Tuesday during a closed-door caucus lunch to talk through the details of the bill. Speaking to reporters afterward, Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) said leadership was listening to members' concerns, especially about provider taxes. 'We think [the changes] rebalance the program in a way that provides the right incentives to cover the people who are supposed to be covered,' Thune said. 'We continue to hear from members specifically on components or pieces of the bill they want to see modified or changed, and we are working through that.' Members were also briefed by Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Administrator Mehmet Oz, who downplayed the impact of a lower provider tax cap. 'We do not believe that addressing the provider tax effort is going to influence the ability of hospitals to stay viable,' Oz told reporters. Without weighing in on the exact details, Oz said some changes to provider taxes and state-directed payments should be included. 'The framework of addressing the legalized money laundering with state-directed payments and provider taxes must be in this bill, it should be in this bill,' Oz said. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store