‘Growth Budget' = Growth In Poverty
More children will grow up in cold, damp homes without food on the table because of the decisions this Government has made today. Christopher Luxon has told New Zealand he doesnt care about child poverty with this Budget.
The Government's Budget is failing families in poverty by pulling the rug on young people receiving income support and allowing more children to go without enough food on the table.
'This 'Growth Budget' will result in a growth in poverty, particularly for the vulnerable teenagers who have had support stripped away from them,' says the Green Party's spokesperson for Social Development and Employment, Ricardo Menéndez March.
'The Government has just told teenagers doing it tough that they are on their own. A lot of teenagers having to rely on benefits for support do not have family to lean on – the Government knows this, it just doesn't care.
' Furthermore, documents in the Government's own Budget clearly show it is far off track to meeting the Child Poverty Reduction targets, with over 1 in 8 children living in abject poverty under this Government which is willing to fork out billions for the wealthy, while leaving people in poverty behind.
'More children will grow up in cold, damp homes without food on the table because of the decisions this Government has made today. Christopher Luxon has told New Zealand he doesn't care about child poverty with this Budget.
'We cannot keep doing the same and expect something different. A Green Government will end poverty by ensuring everyone has a liveable income.
'We will end all benefit sanctions and remove barriers to accessing income support, and instead ensure everyone has good lives.
'Our Income Guarantee would mean everyone would have at least $395 a week, and in the case of a sole parent a minimum of $755. Our Green Jobs Guarantee and expanded Jobs for Nature programme will create thousands of jobs to ensure young people have the employment opportunities they deserve. A different Aotearoa is possible and within our reach,' says Ricardo Menéndez March.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
44 minutes ago
- NZ Herald
David Seymour resurrects idea of migrants signing NZ ‘values statement'
'These sorts of things are values that we need to stress. If you don't subscribe to that, don't come here,' he said. Asked about immigration concerns on Newstalk ZB this week, Seymour noted that in 2016 he had made the point that 'we should actually have a New Zealand values statement'. 'That's not the Government's policy. But I suspect it should be,' the Act leader said. He said that 'if you want to be part of New Zealand', people should 'sign up to' ideas such as 'men and women are equal', 'someone's sexuality or religion is a private matter', 'we have certain rights before the law' and 'we have free speech'. The Act Party's constitution makes mention of this idea as an example of a policy that reflects its principles. 'Any person seeking New Zealand citizenship or permanent residency should be required to affirm that they subscribe to the democratic and civil rights enunciated in sections 12-18 of the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990.' These sections of the Bill of Rights Act relate to the likes of freedom of peaceful assembly, expression and association. Act's David Seymour has again raised the idea of a New Zealand values statement. Photo / Michael Craig A spokesman for Immigration Minister Erica Stanford said a values statement is not something the minister has raised with officials or been advised on. 'The minister's work programme has been focused on restoring stability and predictability to the immigration system – getting net migration under control, prioritising higher skilled migrants, reducing migrant exploitation, speeding up visa processing, supporting additional foreign investment for New Zealand, and fit for purpose settings across work, study and visitor visas.' Unlike New Zealand, Australia does have a values statement that most temporary, provisional or permanent visa applicants must sign or accept. This includes confirming they understand 'Australian society values', like 'respect for the freedom and dignity of the individual', 'freedom of religion (including the freedom not to follow a particular religion), freedom of speech, and freedom of association', and 'commitment to the rule of law'. The Australian Home Affairs Department says by accepting the statement, migrants are 'undertaking to conduct yourself in accordance with Australian values and to obey Australian laws during your stay in Australia'. In 2016, Peters, who is now in a coalition Government with Seymour, suggested the Act leader was stealing NZ First's policy. 'Being a secretive admirer of New Zealand First is no excuse for plagiarising that party's leader's statements,' the Herald reported Peters as saying at the time. He also described Seymour as a 'toy MP'. Peters said at the time that migrants should be interviewed at the border to ensure they respect New Zealand 'views'. Two years later, then-NZ First MP Clayton Mitchell proposed the Respecting New Zealand Values Bill, which would have required refugees and migrants to sign up to New Zealand values. These were identified as including respect for gender equality, religious freedom and New Zealand law. NZ First leader Winston Peters also believes migrants should subscribe to New Zealand values. Photo / Mark Mitchell While speaking with Newstalk ZB, Seymour also said there were some people who say, 'immigration is terrible, vote for me [and] I will get rid of it'. 'But they don't actually stop immigration when they get into power,' he said. Seymour said he believed the reason for that was because business owners know 'you can't succeed when you only have 5 million people to pick from when your competitors around the world are operating in labour markets of half a billion'. Peters last week told the Herald he was concerned with the number of migrants entering New Zealand and said it remained NZ First's view that immigration shouldn't be 'an excuse for our failure to train, skill and employ our own people'. His comments about the 'alarming development' overseas of 'careless immigration policies transforming cities' received criticism from Opposition parties. Prime Minister Christopher Luxon on Monday said Peters was entitled to have his own views. 'What I am focused on is making sure I advance New Zealand's national interests, economic and security. Immigration will always be on our terms and in the interest of New Zealand,' Luxon said. 'He is entitled as a political party leader to make comments about his observations of other countries. My job as Prime Minister of New Zealand is to say I am focused on making sure we have the right immigration settings for ourselves in order for us to grow our economy.' Jamie Ensor is a political reporter in the NZ Herald press gallery team based at Parliament. He was previously a TV reporter and digital producer in the Newshub press gallery office. In 2025, he was a finalist for Political Journalist of the Year at the Voyager Media Awards.
NZ Herald
an hour ago
- NZ Herald
Government must step up to save vital regional air routes
This follows its withdrawal of its Wellington to Taupō and Wellington to Westport routes last year. Loss of regional air routes rips out lifelines for our communities – literally, in the case of Blenheim to Christchurch. This is a critical healthcare link for Marlborough people needing specialist treatment such as chemotherapy, radiotherapy and day surgery in Christchurch. As of September 28, that's gone and they face an about four-hour drive, one way. Regional air services are the backbone of connectivity for New Zealand, not just healthcare and holidaymakers but business, education, freight and emergency response capability. The Kaikōura earthquake and Cyclone Gabrielle showed us just how vital these regional air routes and carriers are in times of crisis, delivering vital supplies and medical care to cut-off communities. With extreme weather events now part of life, they are becoming even more important. Yet our regional carriers that serve smaller centres, supplementing Air New Zealand's domestic network, are struggling. They face a growing burden of compliance costs across a range of government agencies that intersect with the industry. This also includes other government charges such as ACC levies and airport landing fees. Alongside the CAA's hikes, government air traffic control agency Airways New Zealand this week set a 6% average annual price increase. These hikes amount to hundreds of thousands of dollars per year for regional carriers, on top of fee increases from airports and growing operational and maintenance costs. The assumption is that operators can pass the cost on to the passenger, but there comes a point where that's not feasible. This leads to route cuts, aircraft sales and staff losses and once gone, these are very difficult to bring back. The Government says it wants to partner with the industry to 'build an aviation sector that continues to be a pillar of New Zealand's economy and a lifeline for our communities'. Its goal is to transition the CAA into a 100% industry-funded regulatory body (it is already 90% industry-funded) and rely on market forces to lift the sector and support regional communities. This is wrong. As with Crown funding for critical infrastructure such as rail and roading, the Government plays a role in supporting access to safe and secure air services domestically and internationally. This is in the wider public interest and good for New Zealand. There are at least 30 countries around the world that support regional airlines in different ways. In Australia, the Government has made a strong commitment to support access to safe and secure regional air services with a package of measures. This includes access to concessional loans, something that has been floated here and is part of a possible solution. Aviation services are essential to our regional communities and New Zealanders deserve access to them now and into the future. If the Government really wants to support regional connectivity and deliver its economic growth plan, it urgently needs to lend a helping hand to our regional carriers so they can keep these routes in the air.
RNZ News
5 hours ago
- RNZ News
New Zealand 'lagging behind' rest of world by failing to recognise Palestinian statehood, former PM Helen Clark says
Former Prime Minister Helen Clark said New Zealand needed to act now. (File photo) Photo: RNZ / Samuel Rillstone New Zealand is lagging behind the rest of the world through its failure to recognise Palestinian statehood, Former Prime Minister Helen Clark says. Canada on Thursday became the latest country to announce it would formally recognise the state of Palestine when world leaders met at the United Nations General Assembly in September. It follows recent similar commitments from the United Kingdom and France. On Wednesday, Prime Minister Christopher Luxon suggested the discussion was a distraction and said the immediate focus should be on getting humanitarian aid into Gaza. But, speaking to Midday Report , Clark said New Zealand needed to come on board. "We are watching a catastrophe unfold in Gaza. We're watching starvation. We're watching famine conditions for many. Many are using the word genocide," she said. "If New Zealand can't act in these circumstances, when can it act?" The Elders, a group of world leaders of which Clark is a part, last month issued a call for countries to recognise the state of Palestine, calling it the "beginning, not the end of a political pathway towards lasting peace". Clark said the government seemed to be trying avoid the ire of the United States by waiting until the peace process was well underway or nearing its end. "That is no longer tenable," she said. "New Zealand really is lagging behind." Even before the recent commitments from France, Canada and the UK, 147 of the UN's 193 member states had recognised the Palestinian state. Clark said the hope was that the series of recoginitions from major Western states would first shift the US position and then Israel's. "When the US moves, Israel eventually jumps because it owes so much to the United States for the support, financial, military and otherwise," she said. "At some point, Israel has to smell the coffee." Clark said she was "a little surprised" that Foreign Minister Winstion Peters had not been more forward-leaning given he historically had strongly advocated New Zealand's even-handed position. On Wednesday, New Zealand signed a joint statement with 14 other countries expressing a willingness to recognise the State of Palestine as a necessary step towards a two-State solution. However, later speaking in Parliament, Peters said that was conditional on first seeing progress from Palestine, including representative governance, commitment to non-violence, and security guarantees for Israel. "If we are to recognise the state of Palestine, New Zealand wants to know that what we are recognising is a legitimate, representative, viable, political entity," Peters told MPs. Peters also agreed with a contribution from ACT's Simon Court that recognising the state of Palestine could be viewed as "a reward [to Hamas] for acts of terrorism" if it was done before Hamas had returned hostages or laid down arms. Luxon earlier told RNZ New Zealand had long supported the eventual recognition of Palestinian statehood, but that the immediate focus should be on getting aid into Gaza rather than "fragmenting and talking about all sorts of other things that are distractions". "We need to put the pressure on Israel to get humanitarian assistance unfettered, at scale, at volume, into Gaza," he told RNZ. "You can talk about a whole bunch of other things, but for right now, the world needs to focus." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
