Glossier CEO Kyle Leahy departs
U.S. cult beauty brand Glossier announced on Tuesday its chief executive officer Kyle Leahy will step down from the top spot by year-end.
Leahy took on the CEO role at the New York-based Glossier three years ago, when the executive replaced founder, Emily Weiss, who had helmed her brand since its inception in 2014.
A retail veteran, Leahy first joined Glossier in November of 2021, where she served as chief commercial officer, before her promotion to company CEO in May 0f 2022. Prior to that, she spent nine years at American fashion brand Cole Haan serving in varying roles, after cutting her apparel teeth as an analyst at Nike.
'Over three years ago, Emily [Weiss] and I shared exciting news about Glossier's next chapter, and I was honored to step into my role as CEO of the company she built,' Leahy said in note to Glossier employees on Tuesday, as cited by WWD.
'Today, we have reached a new chapter defined by scale, profitability and brand strength. With that foundation in place, the board and I believe this is the right moment to bring in the next CEO to lead this new phase of growth.'
Leahy will remain on the Glossier board through 2026, and will assist in finding her successor.
Under Leahy, the buzzy cosmetics brand entered Sephora in 2023, across the U.S. and Canada, and promoted Marie Suter to the role of chief creative director the same year. More recently, Leahy was also instrumental in leading the expansion of Glossier's fragrance business.
'I am so grateful for Kyle's leadership and stewardship of Glossier over these past three-plus years,' said Weiss.
"She deeply understands how unique and special this brand is, and was exactly the right person to serve as our CEO as we looked to evolve our business model for sustainability and profitability, and scale our brand. Glossier was always built to be more than just one person — more than me, more than Kyle — and I am excited to partner with her to find our next leader.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sustainability Times
9 hours ago
- Sustainability Times
'$14 Billion Wiped Out': Massive Wave of Hydrogen, Battery, and Solar Projects Cancelled or Delayed Across the U.S. in Energy Collapse
IN A NUTSHELL 💡 Over $14 billion in green energy projects have been canceled or postponed in the U.S. due to political uncertainties. in green energy projects have been canceled or postponed in the U.S. due to political uncertainties. 🔧 The cancellations have resulted in the loss of 10,000 potential jobs in the renewable energy sector. in the renewable energy sector. 🏛️ Proposed tax reforms by Republicans threaten the tax credits established by the Inflation Reduction Act . . 🌍 Republican-led states, despite benefiting from clean energy, are the most affected, jeopardizing both economic growth and environmental goals. The green energy sector in the United States is facing unexpected challenges, with over $14 billion in projects either canceled or postponed this year alone. Political uncertainty, largely influenced by proposed tax reforms, is the primary culprit. Ironically, many of the states most affected are Republican-led, which have historically benefited from advancements in renewable energy. This situation highlights the complex interplay between politics and the burgeoning clean energy industry, creating a ripple effect that impacts employment and economic growth across the nation. Visible Impact on Employment According to recent analyses, the cancellation of green energy projects has resulted in the loss of 10,000 potential jobs in the renewable sector. These jobs were tied to crucial technologies such as solar, wind, battery storage, and hydrogen energy. For instance, the Kore Power battery plant in Arizona and two electric vehicle production sites by BorgWarner in Michigan have been halted. Additionally, Bosch has put a significant investment of $200 million on hold for a hydrogen fuel cell plant in South Carolina. These projects were not just about job creation; they were integral to advancing sustainable technologies. The pause on these initiatives underscores the importance of tax credits provided by the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA). This legislation, passed under the Biden Administration, was designed to support emerging green technologies. However, proposed changes in tax policy threaten to dismantle these incentives, making the future uncertain for many planned and ongoing projects. 'Crazy French Invention Turns Waves Into Power': Breakwaters Now Generate Clean Energy Nonstop With This Shocking Coastal Technology Republican States Face Greater Impact Ironically, Republican-led states and districts are bearing the brunt of these cancellations. More than $12 billion in projects have been affected in these areas, which have seen substantial growth in renewable energy. Over the years, states like Georgia and Tennessee have invested heavily in the battery and electric vehicle supply chains. These investments have not only boosted employment but have also positioned these states as leaders in the clean energy transition. Yet, the proposed fiscal reforms threaten to halt progress, potentially reversing years of growth and investment. The consequences extend beyond economic setbacks; they could undermine efforts to combat climate change, as these states are pivotal in the national strategy to reduce carbon emissions. The risk of job losses and stalled technological advancements looms large, with potential ripple effects across the broader economy. 'From Black Dust to Bright Power': These Abandoned Coal Mines Are Now Massive 300 GW Solar Energy Giants Changing the Game Forever The Role of Political Uncertainty The central issue behind these project cancellations is the proposed tax reform by Republicans in the House of Representatives. This reform aims to dismantle significant portions of the tax credits established by the Inflation Reduction Act. These credits are vital for sustaining investment in clean technologies. Without them, many companies are reconsidering their commitment to the U.S. market, leading to a re-evaluation of planned projects. Political uncertainty not only deters investment but also creates a volatile environment for innovation. Companies are less likely to invest in long-term projects if there is a risk that supportive policies could be revoked. This unpredictability may discourage future investments and collaborations, crucial for advancing the country's renewable energy goals. 'America's First Nuclear Reactor in 50 Years': This Ultra-Compact Power Source Will Deliver Electricity Where No Grid Can Reach The Future of Clean Energy Initiatives The current situation raises critical questions about the future of clean energy in the United States. While the potential of renewable energy remains vast, the political climate poses significant challenges. The need for bipartisan support in fostering a stable and conducive environment for green investments is more urgent than ever. As we move forward, it is crucial to consider how policy decisions impact not only the economy but also the environment and society at large. The stakes are high, and the decisions made today will shape the country's energy landscape for years to come. Will the U.S. manage to overcome these political hurdles and continue its path toward a sustainable future? Our author used artificial intelligence to enhance this article. Did you like it? 4.4/5 (26)
LeMonde
12 hours ago
- LeMonde
Trump forces the rest of the world to exempt US companies from global tax on multinationals
Once again, the threat worked. By brandishing in recent weeks the prospect of a new tax on foreign companies – dubbed the "revenge tax" – the United States secured a major concession from other G7 countries on a tax issue that has irked Donald Trump since his return to the White House: the taxation of multinationals, and more specifically, the 15% global minimum corporate tax adopted in 2021 by 140 countries under the aegis of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). Already implemented in 2024 across the European Union as well as in the United Kingdom, Canada and Japan, this tax was seen as a first step in combating unfair tax competition among states. Eager to share this American victory, US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent announced it on Thursday, June 26, on the social network X. "After months of productive dialogue with other countries on the OECD Global Tax Deal, we will announce a joint understanding among G7 countries that defends American interests," he wrote. "(…) OECD Pillar 2 taxes [that is, the 15% global minimum tax] will not apply to US companies." Le Monde was able to confirm this information on Friday, 27 June, via both France's Ministry of Finance and the OECD, as the G7 finalized a communiqué seen by the newspaper.
Fashion Network
a day ago
- Fashion Network
Nike's turnaround strategy faces stiff headwinds from tariffs and rivals
Nike is making progress in clearing out stocks of out-of-fashion sneakers, particularly the Air Force 1. The company believes it will have worked through the backlog by the end of the first half of this fiscal year. Not having to discount so heavily should boost profitability. Nike expects its gross margin — the difference between the price at which it buys and sells goods — to be down by 3.5 to 4.25 percentage points, including a 1 percentage point hit from tariffs, in the first quarter, compared with a 4.4 percentage point decline in the final three months. The company also looks to be ending its new product drought. The Vomero 18 shoe has generated more than $100 million in sales since its launch at the end of February. Meanwhile, the frenzy around the new hybrid loafer and sneaker, the Air Max Phenomena, has driven resale prices beyond $500 — even before its official release. That looks like a blast from Nike's past, when new models had sneakerheads salivating. Also evoking the kind of innovation that has been so sorely lacking is the Cryoshot, which reinterprets classic football boots for everyday dressing. It builds on the #bootsonlysummer TikTok trend of wearing soccer cleats in the street. For the past two and a half years, such foresight has largely belonged to Gulden. It's a welcome shift to see Nike finally riding a trend — rather than missing it, as it did with retro low-rise shoes. But Hill is far from the finish line. The delay in launching NikeSkims — the collaboration between the sportswear giant and Kim Kardashian 's shapewear company — looks like an own goal, especially given the hype around the tie-up. Of course, Hill wants to make such an important debut, right? However, the long gap between the February announcement and the product release seems unfortunate. It gives rivals like Lululemon Athletica Inc. time to spruce up their collections. The CEO also faces the challenge of Donald Trump 's tariffs. While no company is immune from the levies, they are especially unhelpful to retailers amid revival plans, such as Nike, Target Corp. and Gap Inc. Nike said it faced a cost — before any measures to mitigate the impact of tariffs — of about $1 billion. However, it aims to work with its suppliers and retail partners to offset some of the expense and will implement 'surgical' price increases beginning this fall. The last time sneaker makers encountered such a significant external challenge was four years ago, when Covid-19 lockdowns in Vietnam disrupted supply chains. At the time, Nike didn't struggle with demand — consumers were still clamoring for its sneakers. Today, however, it faces fierce competition not only from a resurgent Adidas but also from rising challengers like On Holding AG and Deckers Outdoor Corp.'s Hoka, which gained ground while Donahoe pursued his ill-fated strategy of selling directly through Nike's own stores and websites. As in the luxury sector, brands that remain highly desirable to consumers will be the ones able to raise prices. Through to Thursday's close, Nike shares are down about 34% over the past year, and about 23% since Hill's appointment in September. They trade at about 2 times the next 12 months' sales, compared with Adidas's 1.5 times. That premium will look too lofty until Hill can turn trying into victory. The views expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the publication or its affiliates. Andrea Felsted is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering consumer goods and the retail industry. Previously, she was a reporter for the Financial Times. with Reuters
