Deputy PM ‘in awe' of work done at city tech firm
The Act New Zealand leader — who is also acting prime minister this week — was in Dunedin yesterday and visited local businesses including the Otago Childcare Centre, Progressive Plastics and Scott Technology.
Speaking to the media after touring the automation and robotics solutions provider's factory, Mr Seymour said he was "in awe" of what the people at Scott Technology were doing.
"They have robotic knives that can strip a sheep's carcass in six seconds, and to think that is happening here in Dunedin ... what they are doing is absolutely at the forefront of world technology."
Mr Seymour, who has a degree in electrical engineering, said the company's digital signal processing involved some of the hardest mathematics you could do.
The integration of abstract mathematical modelling and robotic programming showed "incredible teamwork".
"To have, at one level, your nerds, if you like, and at another level your tradies working together to create one project ... I think that's very, very cool."
Comments he had heard during his visit included on the speed at which parts had been able to be ordered and delivered before the Covid-19 pandemic.
Global supply chains had been stretched and interrupted by the pandemic as well as global trade uncertainty, and New Zealand needed more capital equipment, capacity and money being laid down, he said.
Anything that allowed businesses to do that more easily was very important, he said.
Both Scott Technology and Progressive Plastics benefited "substantially" from foreign direct investment — something he believed the country needed to welcome more of.
Watching a demonstration of Scott Technology's BladeStop safety bandsaw on the factory floor are (from left) Deputy Prime Minister David Seymour, general manager Andrew Arnold, service technician James Still and chief executive Mike Christman. Photo: Peter McIntosh
The Reserve Bank of New Zealand announced yesterday the official cash rate (OCR) would remain at 3.25%, marking a pause in a series of six consecutive cuts since August last year.
In a statement, the Reserve Bank said annual consumers' price inflation would likely increase towards the top of the 1% to 3% target band over mid-2025.
But due to spare productive capacity in the economy and declining domestic inflation pressures headline inflation was expected to remain within this band and return to around 2% by early next year.
The economic outlook remained "highly uncertain", and further data including on the impacts of tariffs would influence the future path of the OCR, the statement said.
Mr Seymour said concerns about headline inflation were being heard around the world.
"You see the Australians, they cut hard, then they had a rebound, and then they started cutting again.
"In New Zealand, we haven't had to do that.
"Far better to be falling, pausing and hopefully falling again, than having to go back for a second look, as other countries have had to."
When asked about the role uncertainty around United States tariffs may have played in the Reserve Bank's decision, Mr Seymour said he had "no doubt" the bank was looking at international factors.
"I think anyone who's done even five minutes of economics will know that our trade as a trading nation is critical to the prices we see, and they'll be sensitive to that."
tim.scott@odt.co.nz
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
4 hours ago
- RNZ News
Homeowners warned weather-event buyouts may cease in 20 years
Nelson Tasman residents are still cleaning up from last week's flooding. Photo: RNZ / Mark Papalii Politicians are grappling with who should pay for damage to homes from future weather-related events - and just how much responsibility is on the government to front up. Those already affected by severe weather events say they'd be in a tight spot, if it wasn't for government support. On Wednesday, an independent reference group set up by the Ministry for the Environment released a suite of recommendations to help the government shape climate adaptation legislation . After a 20-year transition period, homeowners whose houses are flooded or damaged by weather events should not expect buyouts, the group recommended. The group also recommended that funding for adaptation measures, such as flood schemes, sea walls and blue-green infrastructure, should follow a 'beneficiary pays' approach in most cases. "This would mean those who benefit most from these investments contribute more." Central government should only invest in adaptation, if it would protect Crown assets "or where broader national benefits can be realised". "Central government investment or other financing strategies may be appropriate to help overcome challenges in particularly vulnerable areas, where there is less ability to pay." Acting Prime Minister David Seymour said the government would consider the recommendations, but pointed out the balance between the "very Kiwi instinct" to help people when they have misfortune and "subsidising people to buy in dangerous places". He said it was a mistake to tell people who build "in the most dangerous place imaginable" that other people will pick up the tab. "What's important is that we are grappling with this reality. "There are higher costs being put onto councils and onto central government, thanks to weather events. We saw that two-and-a-half years ago in Hawke's Bay and it won't be the last time." He said the government was approaching the issue with information and fairness, working out the balance to not leave people "high and dry". Greens co-leader Chloe Swarbrick hit out at the government, saying climate adaptation conversations couldn't happen in isolation of its policies. "This conversation should not be held in isolation of all the other things this government is doing to throw oil, coal and gas on the climate crisis fire," she said. "You cannot pretend that you are making the bucket more resilient, while you are drilling more holes into it and pouring more water into it." She referenced fast-tracking coalmines and plans to build new roads, which will contribute to greater emissions, making the adaptation challenge harder. When it came to who paid for the weather-related damage in the future, Swarbrick said leaving the future of communities exposed by decades of government inaction up to the market wasn't good enough. "This isn't a market failure. The climate crisis is a consequence of a trickle-down economy. "It's not a bug, it is a feature." The Greens were particularly concerned about the 'beneficiary pays' model. Swarbrick said, in practice, those who could afford to would have the access to move further away from the impact of climate change. Labour leader Chris Hipkins said homeowners couldn't be left alone, and many of the issues raised by the report were due to central and local government decisions. "We do have to accept our share of responsibility for making sure that we're preparing for these sorts of events." When it came to flood protection, he said central government needed to play a role and particularly when it came to making sure homes could still be insured. "That's a tricky balance, because government also doesn't want to end up becoming a default insurer either. We don't want people giving up their insurance, because they think government will just come in and sort that out." He said the correct balance was really important and any adaptation laws needed to have bi-partisan support. Lyall Carter is the chair of West Auckland is Flooding, a group formed after the severe 2023 Auckland Anniversary weekend floods. He was disappointed the reference group seemed to lack input from communities affected by flooding, like Esk Valley, Motueke or Rānui. "There's countless references throughout the last couple of years of communities that have been flooded, and I would have thought that it could have been good to have their voice in in these discussions and decision-making." He also raised the issue of the sense of personal responsibility that came through the recommendations. Carter said people needed good data, open and honest conversations about flood plains, and good governance around allowing developers to build on flood plains, if people were to make informed decisions. "You can have all the personal responsibility in the world, but if you're being let down by poor governance, there's not a heck of a lot you can do about that." Carter explained his property was not on a floodplain, but that changed within seven years of owning it. "When we left the property, when we were brought out, the floodplain had moved to be pretty much all across our property." He said a 20-year timeline was "arbitrary" in a lot of ways, and local and central government needed to have "open and honest" discussions with homeowners. People needed assistance to leave at-risk areas and support to transition, if changes on flood maps occurred. Former Muriwai homeowner Caroline Bell-Booth lost her home during Cyclone Gabrielle and told Morning Report she'd be bankrupt without the council buyout of her property, because of a "multi-faceted" problem. "You've got insurance companies who claim that your home is fully insured, but will find loopholes to climate-change issues. "Those insurances are acquired in order for you to get a mortgage from the bank, both of whom are very happy to take your money, until there's an issue. "Lastly, those are for homes which are being built on land that the council is happy for you to build on." She said "everybody's very happy for you to give them money", but pointed out there was no support, when an unforeseen event took place. "This is why I will forever be grateful to the New Zealand government and to the New Zealand taxpayer, who helped everybody in this perilous situation come through, not unscathed, but not completely financially ruined as a result of a situation in which they were victims." She said, if a government implemented a change with no safety net in 20 years time, it must also look to other parties that theoretically should be there to help. She also questioned whether any government implement these recommendations was also doing everything it could to mitigate against the effects of climate change. Buller District Mayor Jamie Cleine was overseeing a plan to eventually relocate the flood-prone town of Westport . He said he could understand why the government was cautious about setting a precedent around buyouts. "In Buller's case, buyouts for properties right from our 2021 floods were never on the table, but that's a long way short of the government leaving the community on its own." The council adopted a broader approach to how climate change or hazard risk was addressed over time, creating a body of work that included "forward-thinking masterplanning work" around where growth should happen. "Where is it just not the right place to keep building and, if you are going to build in the interim, how do you ensure that you're mitigating that risk by building finished floor heights at appropriate levels and things like that." He said it was most important that the "government walks alongside, particularly smaller communities to help fund those parts of the puzzle" and "buy communities some time to do that adaptation". Hutt City Mayor Campbell Barry was glad to see a level of urgency in the report, but the issue of who paid remained. "We are concerned around the costs that will fall on to local government, without having the funding and financing tools to be able to cater for that. "We're the first to say that councils do need to be at the table in these conversations and how we actually implement climate adaptation, but we will be set up to fail, if we have the same funding and financing framework that we currently operate with." He believed "foundational issues" must be addressed. Barry acknowledged a "line in the sand" must be drawn in the future, when it came to whether the government or private landowners paid for such events. "There probably will need to be a point in time where we say the government won't be stepping in or local councils won't be stepping in." He said most important right now was ensuring buyers and property owners were aware of the current risks, so they could make an informed decision with "where they choose to often make their biggest investment that they'll make in their lives". "That isn't always the case." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Otago Daily Times
6 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Latest poll good news for Peters and party
NZ First leader Winston Peters. Photo: ODT files Coalition parties are reasserting their lead, driven by a surge in support for NZ First - now the third most popular party, the latest political poll shows. The latest Taxpayers' Union-Curia Poll, published today, shows NZ First leapfrogging the Greens and ACT for the first time since the poll began in 2021. NZ First registered 9.8%, up 3.2 points compared to the last poll in June. Just behind, the Greens received 9.4%, up 1.2 points, while ACT came in at 9.1%, unchanged. The poll also puts National back in the top spot, up 0.4 points to 33.9%, with Labour faltering on 31.6%, down 3.2 points. Te Pāti Māori had a 0.2-point increase to 3.5%. On those numbers, the coalition parties would secure 65 seats - up three from last month - compared to 57 seats for the opposition. The surge in popularity for NZ First comes after leader Winston Peters handed over the deputy prime ministership to ACT's David Seymour at the end of May. Voters' enthusiasm for both prime ministerial contenders remained muted with just 19.7% naming National's Christopher Luxon as their preference and 19.6% naming Labour's Chris Hipkins. In third spot was Peters, on 9.3%, then Green Party co-leader Chlöe Swarbrick on 7%. Seymour was in fifth on 5.7%. Asked for their top issues, respondents overall gave the cost-of-living top billing at 21.6%. The economy registered at 19.1%, with health in third place on 13.3%. The poll was conducted by Curia Market Research for the New Zealand Taxpayers' Union and has a maximum margin of error of +/- 3.1%. It surveyed 1000 adult New Zealanders - 780 by phone and 220 by online panel - from Wednesday, July 2 through to Sunday, July 6. The results are weighted to reflect the overall voting adult population in terms of gender, age and area. Some 7.9% were undecided on the party vote question. Curia is a long-running and established pollster in New Zealand, which has resigned its membership from the Research Association New Zealand (RANZ) industry body.
Scoop
7 hours ago
- Scoop
Former Prime Minister Dame Jacinda Ardern To Give Evidence To Covid Response Inquiry
Former Prime Minister Dame Jacinda Ardern will provide evidence to the Royal Commission investigating New Zealand's Covid-19 pandemic response. The inquiry is looking into the government's response to the pandemic and its effects. This week's hearings have concentrated on the impact of the extended lockdown in Auckland and Northland in 2021 and on vaccine mandates and safety. RNZ previously reported that the commission had requested Ardern to give evidence at a public hearing in August. But the commission said no decisions had been made about who would appear. "The witness list is still under consideration, and it is not appropriate to make further comment about it at this stage," they said in a written statement. "The Inquiry will share the witness list and more information about the planned August public hearing in due course." A spokesperson for Ardern said she will provide evidence to assist the commission meet its terms of reference and are in discussions about the best way for that to happen. She provided testimony to the first phase of the Inquiry, the spokesperson said. "She is also happy for the commission to access her previous testimony," the spokesperson said. The first phase was conducted behind closed doors with conclusions and recommendations made public afterwards. The impact of the extended lockdown in Auckland and Northland in 2021 has been the main topic of discussion at this week's hearings. On Tuesday, Dr Antje Deckert told the Inquiry that 63,000 lockdown breaches were reported to police by citizens during levels 4, 3 and 2. Police road stops were also counterproductive because officers were often unclear on how to enforce lockdown rules, she said. Deckert said people found it difficult balancing government messaging of being kind while also enforcing lockdown rules. Representatives from the disabled community have revealed they were often a target of abuse during lockdowns. A Pasifika health expert said the Pacific population was over-represented in all aspects of the pandemic. Auckland Council disability advisory group co-chair Barry De Geest said because disabled people were often mask or vaccine exempt, it led to cases of discrimination. "The number of people we had crying because they'd been uptown or done something and they were being abused by people saying you know 'put your mask on', you know 'think of us', you know so there was so much of that."
